@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2013;6(3):147-151
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2013;6(3):147-151
Effect of Nonaka & Takeuchi Knowledge Management Model Implementation on Teaching/Learning Process in Psychology Course
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Nasirzade S. (*)(*) Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology & Educational Sciences Faculty, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Address: Mr. MirRezaei, Hospital Manamgment, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Sepiddasht, Khoramabad, Iran. Postal Code: 6886123413Phone: +986635220430
Fax: +986634724142
nasirzadesomaye@yahoo.com
Article History
Received: November 11, 2012Accepted: May 12, 2013
ePublished: August 2, 2013
ABSTRACT
Aims
Nowadays, the widespread use of new technologies and the need for more education and expense, force the educational and economical centers to use the new educational approaches. One of these approaches is e-learning. Knowledge management seeks to increase the information processing capacity through innovation and creative power of human beings. This paper aimed to investigate the effect of Nonaka & Takeuchi knowledge management model implementation on teaching/learning process in psychology course.
Materials & Methods This quasi-experimental study was done in the first semester 0f 2011-2012 in students of Allameh Tabatabai University, College of Psychology and 36 students were selected by random sampling method. Data were collected by the researcher-made achievement test and a questionnaire to assess the students’ motivation for academic success. Independent T-test and SPSS 18 software were used to analyze the data.
Findings The two groups showed no significant difference in pretest scores but the posttest score of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group. Academic success motivation score of experimental (195.77±20.89) and control (182.33±19.78) groups showed a significant difference (p=0.04).
Conclusion E-learning based on Nonaka & Takeuchi knowledge management model is effective on university students’ achievement.
Materials & Methods This quasi-experimental study was done in the first semester 0f 2011-2012 in students of Allameh Tabatabai University, College of Psychology and 36 students were selected by random sampling method. Data were collected by the researcher-made achievement test and a questionnaire to assess the students’ motivation for academic success. Independent T-test and SPSS 18 software were used to analyze the data.
Findings The two groups showed no significant difference in pretest scores but the posttest score of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group. Academic success motivation score of experimental (195.77±20.89) and control (182.33±19.78) groups showed a significant difference (p=0.04).
Conclusion E-learning based on Nonaka & Takeuchi knowledge management model is effective on university students’ achievement.
CITATION LINKS
[1] Brudilovsky P, Conlan O. From learning objects to adaptive content servicws for e-learning, in architecture solution for e-learning systems. Pahl C, editor. Canada: Idea Group Inc; 2007.
[2] Zareizvark E, Movahed Safai S. Learning the 21st century. Tehran: Institute of Science; 2009. [Persian]
[3] Afraze A. Administration of Tehran. Tehran: Amirkabir University Press; 2008. [Persian]
[4] Hamdi MS. 2007. A multi-agent approach to information customizayion for the purpose of academic advising of students. Appl Comput. 2007;7:746-71.
[5] Andy I. Success factors for development of knowledge management. Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development; 2002.
[6] Friesen K, Hans S. Manaying the development of an elearning product: Applying software engineening techniquesin an ecademic environment. Germany: University of Mannheim; 2002.
[7] Mcfall R. Electronic textbooks transform how textbooks are used. Electron Libr. 2005;23(1):72-81.
[8] Birchall DW. Third generation distance learning: A new method for learning. J Euar Indast Train. 2003;14(7):25-33.
[9] Seok S, Meyen E. Three dimensions of the online course evaluation instrument in post secondary education. Peru; Proceedings of the Ninth Lasted International Conference Compaters and Advanced Technology in Education, 2006.
[10] Limniou M, Roberts D, Papadopoulos N. Full immersive virtual environment in chemistry education. Comput Educ. 2005;51(2):584-93.
[11] Willis D. Measuring access to learning opportunities. Washington: National Research Council of the National Academies; 2005.
[12] Yazdani F, Ebrahimzadeh IS, Zandi B, Alypvr AH, Zare H. Article identifies factors underlying the effectiveness of e-learning. J Sci Technol Iran. 2012;27(2):385-411. [Persian]
[13] Davoudimamaghani M. Components and the possibility of implementation of virtual education at the faculty of education and psychology [dissertation]. Tehran: Tehran University; 2006. [Persian]
[14] Attaran M. Electronic learning: Principles, design, implementation and evaluation. Tehran: Boali Sina University; 2006. [Persian]
[15] Hassanzadeh M, Fatemi I. Knowledge management and communication sciences. Tehran: Librarian Publication; 2008. [Persian]
[16] Jafar Moghadam S. Knowledge management system, school-based management. J Manag Educ. 2003;2(1):5-9. [Persian]
[17] Carl F. Knowledge management. Ahmadi S, translator. Tehran: Mailman Publication; 2008. [Persian]
[18] Nonaka I, Konno N. The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif Manag Rev. 1998;40(3):40-54.
[19] Marwick AD. Knowledge management technology. IBM Syst J. 2002;4(4):12-3.
[20] Erickson T, Kellogg W. Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. Comput Human Int. 2000;7(1):59-83.
[21] Nunamaker JF, Deta F. Electronic meeting systems to support group Woak. ACM. 1991;34(7):40-61.
[22] Marwick A. Knowledge management technolog. IBM Syst J. 2002;4(4):814-29.
[23] Yang Y, Liu X. A re-examination of text categorization method proceedings of SIGIR. USA; Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1999.
[24] Grey D. The internet in school. London: Cassells Education; 2001.
[25] Smith MO. Open and distans e-learning in the twenty first century: Opportunity to bridge the divide. In: Venuyopal Manjulik R, editor. London: Open Distance Learning; 2002.
[26] Grayson DR, Andersen T. E-learning in the 21st century. Ataran M, translator. Tehran: Smart School Publisher; 2003.
[27] Mckimm J, Jolli C, Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching. Washington: Web Based Learning; 2006.
[28] Saeif AA. Sensing products learning: Methods old and new. Tehran: Doran Publication; 2005. [Persian]
[29] Hurst DC, Thomas J. 2003. Developing team skills and a complishing team projects online. Athabasca: Theory and Practice of Online Learning; 2003.
[2] Zareizvark E, Movahed Safai S. Learning the 21st century. Tehran: Institute of Science; 2009. [Persian]
[3] Afraze A. Administration of Tehran. Tehran: Amirkabir University Press; 2008. [Persian]
[4] Hamdi MS. 2007. A multi-agent approach to information customizayion for the purpose of academic advising of students. Appl Comput. 2007;7:746-71.
[5] Andy I. Success factors for development of knowledge management. Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development; 2002.
[6] Friesen K, Hans S. Manaying the development of an elearning product: Applying software engineening techniquesin an ecademic environment. Germany: University of Mannheim; 2002.
[7] Mcfall R. Electronic textbooks transform how textbooks are used. Electron Libr. 2005;23(1):72-81.
[8] Birchall DW. Third generation distance learning: A new method for learning. J Euar Indast Train. 2003;14(7):25-33.
[9] Seok S, Meyen E. Three dimensions of the online course evaluation instrument in post secondary education. Peru; Proceedings of the Ninth Lasted International Conference Compaters and Advanced Technology in Education, 2006.
[10] Limniou M, Roberts D, Papadopoulos N. Full immersive virtual environment in chemistry education. Comput Educ. 2005;51(2):584-93.
[11] Willis D. Measuring access to learning opportunities. Washington: National Research Council of the National Academies; 2005.
[12] Yazdani F, Ebrahimzadeh IS, Zandi B, Alypvr AH, Zare H. Article identifies factors underlying the effectiveness of e-learning. J Sci Technol Iran. 2012;27(2):385-411. [Persian]
[13] Davoudimamaghani M. Components and the possibility of implementation of virtual education at the faculty of education and psychology [dissertation]. Tehran: Tehran University; 2006. [Persian]
[14] Attaran M. Electronic learning: Principles, design, implementation and evaluation. Tehran: Boali Sina University; 2006. [Persian]
[15] Hassanzadeh M, Fatemi I. Knowledge management and communication sciences. Tehran: Librarian Publication; 2008. [Persian]
[16] Jafar Moghadam S. Knowledge management system, school-based management. J Manag Educ. 2003;2(1):5-9. [Persian]
[17] Carl F. Knowledge management. Ahmadi S, translator. Tehran: Mailman Publication; 2008. [Persian]
[18] Nonaka I, Konno N. The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif Manag Rev. 1998;40(3):40-54.
[19] Marwick AD. Knowledge management technology. IBM Syst J. 2002;4(4):12-3.
[20] Erickson T, Kellogg W. Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. Comput Human Int. 2000;7(1):59-83.
[21] Nunamaker JF, Deta F. Electronic meeting systems to support group Woak. ACM. 1991;34(7):40-61.
[22] Marwick A. Knowledge management technolog. IBM Syst J. 2002;4(4):814-29.
[23] Yang Y, Liu X. A re-examination of text categorization method proceedings of SIGIR. USA; Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1999.
[24] Grey D. The internet in school. London: Cassells Education; 2001.
[25] Smith MO. Open and distans e-learning in the twenty first century: Opportunity to bridge the divide. In: Venuyopal Manjulik R, editor. London: Open Distance Learning; 2002.
[26] Grayson DR, Andersen T. E-learning in the 21st century. Ataran M, translator. Tehran: Smart School Publisher; 2003.
[27] Mckimm J, Jolli C, Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching. Washington: Web Based Learning; 2006.
[28] Saeif AA. Sensing products learning: Methods old and new. Tehran: Doran Publication; 2005. [Persian]
[29] Hurst DC, Thomas J. 2003. Developing team skills and a complishing team projects online. Athabasca: Theory and Practice of Online Learning; 2003.