ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Mohseni   R. (1)
Sandoughdar   N. (*)
Bradaran   H.R. (2)
Kouhpayezadeh   J. (3)






(*) Speech Therapy Unit, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(1) Speech Therapy Unit, Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(2) Medical Education Department, Public Health School, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(3) Social Medicine Department, Medicine Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Speech Therapy Clinic, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Araabi Street, Yaman Street, Park Way, Chamran Highway, Tehran, Iran
Phone: +982123031619
Fax: +982122432570
n.sandoughdar@sbmu.ac.ir

Article History

Received:   October  4, 2015
Accepted:   December 30, 2015
ePublished:   March 28, 2016

ABSTRACT

Aims Clinical trial plays an important role in the enhancement of practical skills of the medical students. Then, to be sure about the effectiveness of clinical trial on learning, it is required to assess the environment. The aim of this study was to assess the educational environment based on DREEM model from the viewpoints of speech therapy interns in neurology and ENT wards of Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital of Iran University of Medical Sciences.
Instrument & Methods In the cross-sectional descriptive study, 59 BS speech therapy interns (final semesters) were studied in neurology and ENT wards of Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital in the first and second semesters of academic year 2013-14. The subjects were selected via census method. Data was collected using 44-question standard DREEM questionnaire. Data was analyzed by SPSS 18 software using independent T test.
Findings Mean scores of five educational domains were 125.7 of 176, showing favorable educational quality (71.44%). Intern’s comprehension of the teacher’s learning capability was assessed very favorable, while other four domains were assessed favorable. There was no significant difference between the viewpoints about the educational environment based on gender (males and females), marital status (single and married), and semesters (seven and eight; p>0.05).
Conclusion Based on the DREEM model, the educational environment of neurology and ENT wards of Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital of Iran University of Medical Sciences is assessed favorable by speech therapy interns.


CITATION LINKS

[1]Kebriaei A, Roudbari M. Quality gap in educational services at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences: Students viewpoints about current and optimal condition. Iran J Med Educ. 2005;5(1):53-61.
[2]Jenifer Warner. The clinical setting and the student’s clinical responsibilities. Warner J, Beyers Brown B, Mc Cartney E, editors. Speech therapy: A clinical companion. 1st edition. New York: Manchester University Press; 1984.
[3]Biddle WB, Riesenberg LA. Medical students’ perception of desirable characteristics of primary care teaching sites. Fam Med. 1996;28(9):629-33.
[4]Palan J, Roberts V, Bloch B, Kulkarni A, Bhowal B, Dias J. The use of a virtual learning environment in promoting virtual journal clubs and case-based discussions in trauma and orthopaedic postgraduate medical education: the Leicester experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(9):1170-5.
[5]Jamaiah I. Review of research in learning environment. J Health Trans Med. 2008;11(1):7-11.
[6]Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23: Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001;23(4):337-44.
[7]Hutchinson L. Educational environment. BMJ. 2003;326(7393):810-2.
[8]Al-Hazimi A, Al-Hyiani A, Roff S. Perceptions of the educational environment of the medical school in King Abdul Aziz University, Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2004;26(6):570-3.
[9]Avalos G, Freeman C, Dunne F. Determining the quality of the medical educational environment at an Irish medical school using the DREEM inventory. Ir Med J. 2007;100(7):522-5.
[10]Moore-West M, Harrington DL, Mennin SP, Kaufmand A, Skipperd BJ. Distress and attitudes toward the learning environment: Effects of a curriculum innovation. Teach Learn Med. 1989;1(3):151-7.
[11]Varma R, Tiyagi E, Gupta JK. Determining the quality of educational climate across multiple undergraduate teaching sites using the DREEM inventory. Bio Med Central. 2005;5(1):8.
[12]de Oliveira Filho GR, Sturm EJ, Sartorato AE. Compliance with common program requirements in Brazil: its effects on resident's perceptions about quality of life and the educational environment. Acad Med. 2005;80(1):98-102.
[13]Kanashiro J, McAleer S, Roff S. Assessing the educational environment in the operating room-a measure of resident perception at one Canadian institution. Surgery. 2006;139(2):150-8.
[14]Brown T, Williams B, Lynch M. The Australian DREEM: Evaluating student perceptions of academic learning environments within eight health science courses. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:94-101.
[15]Edgren G, Haffling AC, Jakobsson U, McAleer S, Danielsen N. Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curriculum reform. Med Teach. 2010;32(6):e233-8.
[16]Miles S, Leinster SJ. Medical students' perceptions of their educational environment: Expected versus actual perceptions. Med Educ. 2007;41(3):265-72.
[17]Marshall RE. Measuring the medical school learning environment. J Med Educ. 1978;53(2):98-104.
[18]Bassaw B, Roff S, McAleer S, Roopnarinesingh S, De Lisle J, Teelucksingh S, et al. Students' perspectives on the educational environment, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Trinidad. Med Teach. 2003;25(5):522-6.
[19]Abraham R, Ramnarayan K, Vinod P, Torke S. Students' perceptions of learning environment in an Indian medical school. J Am Sci. 2012;8(4):69-75.
[20]DS Lokuhetty M, P Warnakulasuriya S, IR Perera R, TR De Silva H, D Wijesinghe H. Students’ perception of the educational environment in a Medical Faculty with an innovative curriculum in Sri Lanka. South‐East Asian J Med Educ. 2010;4(1):9-16.
[21]Zawawi AH, Elzubeir M. Using DREEM to compaire graduating students’ perceptions of learning environments at medical school adoping contrasting educational strategies. Med Teach. 2012;34(Suppl 1):S25-31.
[22]Pinnock R, Shulruf B, Hawken SJ, Henning MA, Jones R. Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the clinical learning environment in years 4 and 5 at the University of Auckland. N Z Med J. 2011;124(1334):63-70.
[23]Riesenberg LA, Biddle WB, Erney SL. Medical student and faculty perceptions of desirable primary care teaching site characteristics. Med Educ. 200l;35(7):660-5.
[24]Montgomery A, Rossi R. Education reforms and students at risk: A review of current state of art. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement; 1993.
[25]Palmgren PJ, Chandratilake M. Perception of educational environment among under graduate students in a chiropractic training institution. J Chiropr Educ. 2011;25(2):151-63.
[26]Farrell GA, Coombes L. Students nurse appraisal on placement (SNAP): An attempt to provide objective measures of the learning environment based on qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Nurs Educ Today. 1994;14(4):331-6.