ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Zaboli   R. (* )
Seyedin   S. H. (1 )
Khosravi   S. (2 )
Tofighi   Sh. (3 )






(* ) Department of Health Care Services Management, School of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(1 ) Department of Health Care Services Management, Faculty of Medical Management & Informing, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(2 ) Department of Health Care Services Management, School of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(3 ) Health Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence

Address:
Phone:
Fax:
rouhollah.zaboli@gmail.com

Article History

Received:   April  4, 2010
Accepted:   August 23, 2010
ePublished:  

ABSTRACT

Aims One of the most important changes in the method of payment to the employees of health institutions is to pay for performance. Pay for performance improves employees’ performance in the organization through the promotion of financial incentives. The aim of this study was assessing the impact of per-case payment on performance indicators and satisfaction in a selected military hospital.
Methods This observational cross-sectional study was conducted during 2003-2008 in a military hospital of Tehran that had participated in per-case payment plan. Subjects were selected by census sampling method. Data was collected by a researcher-made questionnaire using 5-scale Likert system and checklists. Data was analyzed by the SPSS 16 software using independent t-test, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results The average of bed occupancy rate increased after implementation of per-case payment method in all wards. The evaluation of employees’ satisfaction showed that 21.3% had high satisfaction, 6.7% were satisfied, 31.5% had moderate satisfaction, 24.7% had low satisfaction and 15.7% were not satisfied at all. As a whole, the employees’ satisfaction rate with this plan was “good” with the average of 3.06±1.34.
Conclusion Wards’ performance has improved in almost all the studied wards and this improvement has occurred through increasing of bed occupancy rate in some wards and reduction of patients’ length of stay and increasing of bed turnaround in some other wards. The level of general satisfaction with the plan is evaluated as “good”.


CITATION LINKS