@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2538-4384 Geographical Researches 2020;35(1):55-62
ISSN: 2538-4384 Geographical Researches 2020;35(1):55-62
Providing a Conceptual Model of the Underground Space as an Urban Development Catalyst Using the Grounded Theory
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Houshmand M. (1)Saeede Zarabadi ZS. (*2)
Majedi H. (2)
Nouri SA. (3)
(*2) Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Art, Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
(3) Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah , Iran
Correspondence
Address: Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hesarak Martyrs Boulevard, University Square, End of Shahid Sattari Highway, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 3973188981.Phone: +98 (21) 44865179
Fax: +98 (21) 44865166
z.zarabadi@srbiau.ac.ir
Article History
Received: August 11, 2019Accepted: December 20, 2019
ePublished: March 10, 2020
ABSTRACT
Aims & Backgrounds
Over time, cities are confronted with a number of natural and artificial problems such as lack of green and open spaces, high density and lack of recreational spaces, which in some cases can be reasonably efficient use of underground spaces. The Aim of current study was to present a conceptual model that include factors which construct underground spaces as a development catalyst.
Methodology This qualitative research was carried out based on grounded theory in 2019. In order to analyze documentary studies, cross-sectional and content analysis were used and to gather the required data, in-depth and open ended interviews were conducted. Thirty-five experts and faculty members of university in urbanism field were selected as a sample based on snowball sampling technique.
Findings After studying documents and interviewing experts and analyzing qualitative data, with respect to the number of citations (237 citations), 29 initial codes of the underground spaces constructor were extracted as urban development catalyst. These initial codes were categorized in five axial codes including perceptual, visual, morphological, service and functional codes and also three components including activity, physical and imaginations that construct underground spaces as an urban development catalyst
Conclusion Component of subsurface activity and citizens’ perceptions of these spaces lead to services such as security and safety. The component of citizen perceptions and image leads to the identification of items such as fit, human scale, comfort, and so on in urban underground spaces. The interaction between activity and physical components comprises two important factors of land use and transport, and factors such as land use mixing and access hierarchy, leading to the enhancement of the performance of underground space as urban development catalyst.
Methodology This qualitative research was carried out based on grounded theory in 2019. In order to analyze documentary studies, cross-sectional and content analysis were used and to gather the required data, in-depth and open ended interviews were conducted. Thirty-five experts and faculty members of university in urbanism field were selected as a sample based on snowball sampling technique.
Findings After studying documents and interviewing experts and analyzing qualitative data, with respect to the number of citations (237 citations), 29 initial codes of the underground spaces constructor were extracted as urban development catalyst. These initial codes were categorized in five axial codes including perceptual, visual, morphological, service and functional codes and also three components including activity, physical and imaginations that construct underground spaces as an urban development catalyst
Conclusion Component of subsurface activity and citizens’ perceptions of these spaces lead to services such as security and safety. The component of citizen perceptions and image leads to the identification of items such as fit, human scale, comfort, and so on in urban underground spaces. The interaction between activity and physical components comprises two important factors of land use and transport, and factors such as land use mixing and access hierarchy, leading to the enhancement of the performance of underground space as urban development catalyst.
CITATION LINKS
[1]Admiraal H, Cornaro A (2019) Future cities, resilient cities – The role of underground space in achieving urban resilience. Underground Space. in press.
[2]Broere W (2016). Urban underground space: solving the problems of today’s cities. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 55:245-248.
[3]Cui J, Allan A, Taylor MA, Lin D (2013). Underground pedestrian systems development in cities: Influencing factors and implications. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 35:152-160.
[4]Carmody RJ (1993). Underground space design. 1st ed. New York: Wiley.
[5]Doucet B (2007). Flagship regeneration: Panacea or urban problem. Paper presented at the EURA Conference the Vital City. 2007, 12-14 September: Glasgow, Scotland.
[6]Hunt D V L, Makana LO, Jefferson I, Rogers CDF (2016). Liveable cities and urban underground space. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 55:8-20.
[7]Kongsombat P (2012). Study on urban catalyst for sustainable urban development, case study of IMS/Solaria Plaza and Hotel II Palazzo [dissertation]. Japan: Kyushu University.
[8]Molyneaux N, Riccardo S, Bierlaire M (2018). Two management strategies for improving passenger transfer experience in train stations. 18th Swiss Transport Research Conference. 2018, 16-18 May: Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland.
[9]Molaei A (2013) Explain the relationship between underground transportation and sustainable urban development. Third International Conference on Environmental Planning and Management. 2013, December: Tehran.
[10]Molaei A (2015). Urban subsurface spaces development: Studying the basics. Iranian and World records of Urban Subsurface Spaces in urban design approach. Tehran: Armahnshahr Publication.
[11]Molaei A (2019). Urban underground space, new strategy in urban development. Urban Structure and Function Studies. 6(18):57-86.
[12]Pourjafar A, Ranjbar E, Khorrami A (2017). Explaining the new model of urban design qualities of underground urban spaces. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 7(3):79-97
[13]Penga J, Penga F, Yabukib N, Fukudab T (2019). Factors in the development of urban underground space surrounding metro stations: A case study of Osaka, Japan. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 91.
[14]Robert P, Sykes H (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. California: SAGE Publications.
[15]Tarafdar Z (2014). Recognizing the role of urban development stimulus projects in urban reconstruction of historically valuable textures case study: Shiraz Region 2 [dissertation]. Shiraz: Shiraz University.
[2]Broere W (2016). Urban underground space: solving the problems of today’s cities. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 55:245-248.
[3]Cui J, Allan A, Taylor MA, Lin D (2013). Underground pedestrian systems development in cities: Influencing factors and implications. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 35:152-160.
[4]Carmody RJ (1993). Underground space design. 1st ed. New York: Wiley.
[5]Doucet B (2007). Flagship regeneration: Panacea or urban problem. Paper presented at the EURA Conference the Vital City. 2007, 12-14 September: Glasgow, Scotland.
[6]Hunt D V L, Makana LO, Jefferson I, Rogers CDF (2016). Liveable cities and urban underground space. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 55:8-20.
[7]Kongsombat P (2012). Study on urban catalyst for sustainable urban development, case study of IMS/Solaria Plaza and Hotel II Palazzo [dissertation]. Japan: Kyushu University.
[8]Molyneaux N, Riccardo S, Bierlaire M (2018). Two management strategies for improving passenger transfer experience in train stations. 18th Swiss Transport Research Conference. 2018, 16-18 May: Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland.
[9]Molaei A (2013) Explain the relationship between underground transportation and sustainable urban development. Third International Conference on Environmental Planning and Management. 2013, December: Tehran.
[10]Molaei A (2015). Urban subsurface spaces development: Studying the basics. Iranian and World records of Urban Subsurface Spaces in urban design approach. Tehran: Armahnshahr Publication.
[11]Molaei A (2019). Urban underground space, new strategy in urban development. Urban Structure and Function Studies. 6(18):57-86.
[12]Pourjafar A, Ranjbar E, Khorrami A (2017). Explaining the new model of urban design qualities of underground urban spaces. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 7(3):79-97
[13]Penga J, Penga F, Yabukib N, Fukudab T (2019). Factors in the development of urban underground space surrounding metro stations: A case study of Osaka, Japan. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 91.
[14]Robert P, Sykes H (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. California: SAGE Publications.
[15]Tarafdar Z (2014). Recognizing the role of urban development stimulus projects in urban reconstruction of historically valuable textures case study: Shiraz Region 2 [dissertation]. Shiraz: Shiraz University.