ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Qualitative Study

Authors

Gholipour   S. (*)






(*) Sociology Department, Social Science Faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Sociology Department, Social Science Faculty, Razi University, Tagh-Bostan, Daneshgah Street, Kermanshah, Iran
Phone: +98 (83) 34277605
Fax: -
gholipoor.sia@gmail.com

Article History

Received:   December  25, 2016
Accepted:   April 25, 2017
ePublished:   May 30, 2017

ABSTRACT

Aims Veterans, like ordinary people, do not have a 100% ability of solving everyday problems. Therefore, they need special services and attention so they can enjoy a good quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how to service veterans according to the type of injury and to provide solutions for improving their quality of life.
Instrument & Methods This study was conducted using a combination (quantitative and qualitative) method in 2014 among 368 veterans over 25% of Kermanshah province. Sampling in the quantitative part was a combination of classification and systematic, and in the qualitative section, was deliberate. The data gathering tool in the quantitative method was questionnaire and in the qualitative method was interviewing, observing, living experience and document review. Data analysis in quantitative method was based on SPSS 20 software by chi-square test, V Kramer, univariate analysis of variance and Shafa test And was performed in a qualitative way through open and closed coding and data organization.
Findings Satisfaction with the educational, welfare, sporting, cultural and cooperative services was not related to the type of injuries (p>0.05). The method of health services in the components of complementary therapeutic insurance and dental services, and in urban space in the components of pavement, street, bus and urban fleet, parks and shopping centers and passages were related to the type of injuries. Type of injury was also effective on how to spend leisure time and quality of life (p<0.05).
Conclusion The type of injury does not affect the satisfaction of the educational, welfare, sporting, cultural and cooperative services, but it affects the satisfaction of health services, urban space services, leisure time and quality of life.


CITATION LINKS

[1]Toffler A, Toffler H. War and Anti-war. Besharat M, translator. New York: Warner Books, Inc;1993.
[2]Rabbani Khurasgani A, Kianpour M. An introduction to theoretical approaches and practical definitions of quality of life. J Soc Work. 2006;5(4):42-57.
[3]Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The world health organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial; A report from the WHOQOL group. Q life Res. 2004;13(2):299-310.
[4]Jenkinson C. Quality of life and health: Concepts, methods and applications. Qual Health Care. 1996;5(4):260.
[5]Ghaffari GH, Omidi R. Quality of life index of social development. Tehran: Shirazeh Press; 2011. [Persian]
[6]Ferrans CE. Conceptualization of quality of life in cardiovascular research. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1992;7(1):2-6.
[7]Agha Molaei T. Principles and generalities of health services. Tehran: Andishe Rafi’e Press; 2005. [Persian]
[8]Latifi Gh, Farrokh Vandi A. Factors affecting quality of life in veterans of Dezful. Soc Dev Welfare Plan. 2011;3(9)81-122. [Persian]
[9]Web EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L. Unobtrusive measure (sage classics) revised edition. Chicago: SAGE Publications; 1999.
[10]Douglos JD. Review: Investigative social research: Individual and team field research. American J Sociol. 1977;83(3):809-11.
[11]Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?. J Qual Res. 2006;6(1):97-113.
[12]Jick TD. Mixing qualititative and quantitative Methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(4):602-11.