@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2015;8(1):7-14
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2015;8(1):7-14
Physiotherapy Students’ Attitudes to Basic Medical Sciences Courses
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Descriptive & Survey StudyAuthors
Vasaghi Gharamaleki B. (1 )Nikmaram M.R. (* )
Rouhi Azizi M. (2 )
(* ) Department of Basic Sciences in Rehabilitation, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(1 ) “Rehabilitation Research Center” and "Department of Basic Sciences in Rehabilitation, School of Rehabilitation Sciences”, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(2 ) Department of Basic Sciences in Rehabilitation, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Article History
Received: October 30, 2014Accepted: December 31, 2014
ePublished: March 15, 2015
BRIEF TEXT
… [1-11] Based on the learning theory, the attitude is a state of mental and neurological readiness achieved through experience and with a direct and dynamic effect on the individual's response to all the issues and opportunities related to attitude [12]. Based on the cognitive view, the attitude is a sustainable organization of motivational, emotional, and cognitive perception in relation to some aspects of the world [13]. West et al. designed a questionnaire to assess attitudes towards basic science courses, and emphasized the importance of this subject [4].
Medical students who are trained according to traditional methods (i.e. the way in which basic science courses are taught without paying attention to application) do not pay attention to the basic science courses, while students who are trained according to the new method (the way in which the basic courses are taught emphasizing the importance of clinical applications) had more emphasis on the need for more and accurate attention on the basic science [14]. Residents and anesthesiologists emphasize the need for proper training of basic science courses before entering the training course; however, anesthesiologists highly emphasize this domain which indicates the impact of experience on their attitudes [15]. Medical students do not have a positive attitude to the importance of the basic courses, but their tendency is toward integrative teaching method of the basic sciences [16].
The aim of this study was to determine the attitude of undergraduate and graduate students of physiotherapy to the basic sciences courses.
This is a descriptive cross-sectional study designed through easy access.
Undergraduate and graduate students of physiotherapy in Rehabilitation Departments of Iran and Tehran Medical Schools were studied in October and November 2012.
151 subjects participated in the study. There were 99 undergraduate physiotherapy students of first, third, fifth and seventh semesters. There were 47 MA physiotherapy students of first and third semesters. 5 students had not specified their gender, so 146 students were enrolled. The fall semester was selected, because undergraduate freshmen were registered in the semester without any previous exposure to the basic science courses.
To assess students' attitudes toward basic science courses, written questionnaire of West et. al. was used [4]. The validity and reliability of a Persian version of this questionnaire has been determined [16]. In the questionnaire of attitude to basic science courses, according to a Likert scale, there were 5 options, “totally agree” (5 marks), “agree” (four marks), “no opinion” (three marks), “disagree” (2 marks) and “totally disagree" (one mark). Therefore, the total score of subjects is between 9 and 45, and the higher the total score, the higher the positive attitude of subjects to the basic science courses is. In the questionnaire, there are two subscales of importance (consisting of 5 first items) and the effectiveness (of 4 last items). Overall rating of two parts reflects the attitude of individuals. Data was investigated through SPSS 17 software using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, in compliance of frequency distribution of quantitative variables with the natural theoretical distribution. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the attitudes and subscales in different semesters. Independent T test was used to evaluate the effect of gender or educational level on students 'responses to each item or the rate of attitude, and Logistic Regression was used to evaluate the correlation between the students' attitudes and their responses to the asked questions about their willingness to continue their education.
In the undergraduate level of physiotherapy, in the first, third, fifth and seventh semesters, there were 73 female students (mean age 19.76 ± 2.73years) and 26 male students (mean age 20.79 ± 1.51years); and in the MA level in the first and third semesters, there were 30 female students (mean age 25.00± 1.95 years) and 17 male students (mean age 26.88 ± 4.32 years). There was no significant difference between mean score of the female BA and MA students' responses to the questionnaire items (except the item 7) and the mean response of the male undergraduate and graduate level students (except the item 4). In examining the students' opinion based on gender, except the items 1, 4, 7 and 8, there was no significant difference between males and females (Table 1). No statistical significance difference was observed between the mean scores of undergraduate and graduate students in different academic semesters. There was a significant correlation between the mean of total scores and the subscale of importance totally and regardless of the semester of the study in both genders and undergraduate and graduate levels. In the first and third semesters in the undergraduate level, the mean of attitude scores and the subscales of the importance and effectiveness did not have any significant difference, while in the fifth and seventh semesters, the mean scores of females were significantly higher than the males. In the MA level, the attitude and the subscale of importance of females were significantly more positive than men in the first semester (Table 2). In response to the question about the study in the fields of basic science course, there was no significant difference in the response of the subjects who were not willing to continue their education at a personal cost in one of the basic science courses and those who wish, and the attitude did not have any significant effect on the outcome of decision-making.
Physiotherapy students had a positive attitude toward the basic science courses. Female students had more positive attitudes than male students. Women, unlike men, paid more attention to know the details of the biological treatment. In view of males, satisfactory result was more important than the detailed method of treatment and by raising the level of education, attitude of women came near that of men. Female undergraduate students put more emphasis on the importance and effectiveness of the basic sciences courses. Despite the positive attitude to the basic science courses, female and male students have asigned equal importance and effectiveness to the basic sciences courses. Other studies have had similar results [4, 14, 15]. Female students are more likely to know the details of physiological processes [17]. Medical students who use the integrated program acknowledge that their working future depends on learning of the basic sciences (item 8); however, students who use the traditional methods do not have such an opinion [16]. In response to item 8, there is a significant difference between the medical students at the beginning and end of the training course with the new method and students at the end of the training course highly emphasize this point [18]. Psychological factors (such as a mental history of treatment, good and bad memories of the subjects from the result of treatment, etc.) as much as physical factors are important in the process of treatment (item 3) [14, 18]. Medical students, who have trained on basis of early exposure to patient and clinical application of basic science principles, have more positive attitude to the role of the basic sciences in treatment of patients compared to the students who have been traditionally trained in the basic sciences continuously during the first two years of education [4, 19]. Comparison between traditional teaching methods and integration methods of the basic sciences shows lack of applicability of theoretical basic science courses of traditional methods in the clinical practice [16]. … [20-23] According to medical students, early exposure to clinical settings leads to their better studying and more pleasure in learning medicine [5, 24, 25]. … [26]
Attitudes of the students in higher semesters of MA and PhD levels should, also, be examined. Opinions of the lecturers of the rehabilitation departments about the basic science courses should be examined.
The small sample size in the 7th semester of BA, lack of access to students in the higher MA semesters and the small number of male students in the classroom were the limitations of this study.
Bachelor and master students’ positive attitudes toward the basic science are affected by their gender; and women pay more attention to learn the details of the physiological process of treatment, while men are more likely to emphasize on the results of the treatment without emphasis on learning the details of the physiological process of treatment. Increasing the number of women in the master levels, their attitude get closer to men. All students agree on the impact of psychological factors on the treatment process as much as physical factors.
Participating students are appreciated.
Non-declared
This study was approved by Iran and Tehran Universities of Medical Sciences.
The study has been funded using research budget approved by Iran University of Medical Sciences.
TABLES and CHARTS
Show attach fileCITIATION LINKS
[1]Campbell EJM. Basic science, science, and medical education. Lancet. 1976;307(7951):134-6.
[2]Chapman CB. Should there be a commission on medical education?. Science. 1979;205(4406):559-62.
[3]Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Basic sciences in problem-based learning and conventional curricula: student’s attitudes. Med Educ. 1997;31(3):177-80.
[4]West M, Mennin SP, Kaufman A, Galey W. Medical students’ attitudes toward basic sciences: influence of a primary care curriculum. Med Educ. 1982;16(4):188-91.
[5]Gupta S, Gupta AK, Verma M, Kaur H, Kaur A, Singh K. The attitudes and perceptions of medical students towards basic science subjects during their clinical years: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014;4(1):16-9.
[6]Mazouchian H, Roshangar L, Salek Ranjbarzadeh F, Piri R, Karimi Shoar M, Rasi Marzabadi L. Medical Students’ View about the Effects of Practical Courses on Learning the General Theoretical Concepts of Basic Medical Sciences. Res Dev Med Educ. 2014;3(1):21-3.
[7]Vahidshahi K, Mahmoudi M, Ranjbar M, Shahbaznezhad L, Ehteshami S, shafiei S. The effect of early clinical experience on attitude of medical students toward basic sciences courses. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2011;8(1):94-100. [Persian]
[8]Javadi M, Hassanzadeh G, Salehzadeh Y. The opinion of Qazvin medical students on their future career. J Qazvin Univer Med Sci. 2006;10(3):91-5. [Persian]
[9]Alipour Haydari M, Hasanzadeh G, HajiSeied Javadi Z. Attitude of dentistry students at clinical sections of Qazvin Medical University towards the application of basic sciences courses. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2002;6(2):38-42. [Persian]
[10]Shuler CF. Comparisons in basic science learning outcomes between students in PBL and traditional dental curricula at the same dental schppl. In: Bridges S. (Editor). Problem-Based Learning in Clinical Education. Netherlands: Springer; 2012. pp. 35-46.
[11]Nouns Z, Schauber S, Witt C, Kingreen H, Schuttpelz-Brauns K. Development of knowledge in basic sciences: a comparison of two medical curricula. Med Educ. 2012;46(12):1206-14.
[12]Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(1):4-27.
[13]Krech D, Crutchfield RS. Theory and problems of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1948.
[14]Custers EJFM, Cate OTJT. Medical students’ attitudes towards and perception of the basic sciences: a comparison between students in the old and the new curriculum at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. Med Educ. 2003;36(12):1142-50.
[15]Filho GR, Schonhorst L. Attitudes of residents and anesthesiologists toward basic sciences. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(1):137-43.
[16]Kuhpayehzadeh J, Daryazadeh S, Soltani Arabshahi K. Medical students’ attitudes to traditional and integrated basic sciences curriculums. Q Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2013;6(1):37-42. [Persian]
[17]Elkhair EB, Alharbi WDM. How do female preclinical medical students at Umm Al-Qura university study physiology?. Int J Sci Commerce Human. 2014:2(7);40-6.
[18]Custers EJ, Ten Cate OT. Medical clerks’ attitudes towards the basic sciences: a longitudinal and a cross-sectional comparison between students in a conventional and an innovative curriculum. Med Teach. 2007;29(8):772-7.
[19]Spencer AL, Brosenitsch T, Levine AS, Kanter SL. Back to the basic sciences: an innovative approach to teaching senior medical students how best to integrate basic science and clinical medicine. Acad Med. 2008;83(7):662-9.
[20]Alam A. How do medical students in their clinical years perceive basic sciences courses at King Saud University?. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(1):58-61.
[21]D'Eon MF. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:5.
[22]Valle R, Alaminos I, Contreras E, Salas LE, Tomasini P, Varela M. Student questionnaire to evaluate basic medical science teaching (METEQ-B). Rev Med IMSS. 2004;42(5):405-11.
[23]Lazić E, Dujmović J, Hren D. Retention of basic sciences knowledge at clinical years of medical curriculum. Croat Med J. 2006;47(6):882-7.
[24]Farahani M, Ahmadi F. Doctoral nursing students’ viewpoint about the nursing PhD curriculum. Iran J Med Educ. 2006;6(1):83-92. [Persian]
[25]Sathishkumar S, Thomas N, Tharion E, Neelakantan N, Vyas R. Attitude of medical students towards Early Clinical Exposure in learning endocrine physiology. BMC Med Edu.c 2007;7:30.
[26]Biabangardy Z, Soltani Arabshahi SK, Amini A, Shekarabi R, Yadavar Nikravesh M. Role of basic science courses on promoting the medical graduate’s competencies in medical schools of Iran. Iran J Med Educ. 2005;5(1):13-23. [Persian]
[2]Chapman CB. Should there be a commission on medical education?. Science. 1979;205(4406):559-62.
[3]Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Basic sciences in problem-based learning and conventional curricula: student’s attitudes. Med Educ. 1997;31(3):177-80.
[4]West M, Mennin SP, Kaufman A, Galey W. Medical students’ attitudes toward basic sciences: influence of a primary care curriculum. Med Educ. 1982;16(4):188-91.
[5]Gupta S, Gupta AK, Verma M, Kaur H, Kaur A, Singh K. The attitudes and perceptions of medical students towards basic science subjects during their clinical years: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014;4(1):16-9.
[6]Mazouchian H, Roshangar L, Salek Ranjbarzadeh F, Piri R, Karimi Shoar M, Rasi Marzabadi L. Medical Students’ View about the Effects of Practical Courses on Learning the General Theoretical Concepts of Basic Medical Sciences. Res Dev Med Educ. 2014;3(1):21-3.
[7]Vahidshahi K, Mahmoudi M, Ranjbar M, Shahbaznezhad L, Ehteshami S, shafiei S. The effect of early clinical experience on attitude of medical students toward basic sciences courses. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2011;8(1):94-100. [Persian]
[8]Javadi M, Hassanzadeh G, Salehzadeh Y. The opinion of Qazvin medical students on their future career. J Qazvin Univer Med Sci. 2006;10(3):91-5. [Persian]
[9]Alipour Haydari M, Hasanzadeh G, HajiSeied Javadi Z. Attitude of dentistry students at clinical sections of Qazvin Medical University towards the application of basic sciences courses. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2002;6(2):38-42. [Persian]
[10]Shuler CF. Comparisons in basic science learning outcomes between students in PBL and traditional dental curricula at the same dental schppl. In: Bridges S. (Editor). Problem-Based Learning in Clinical Education. Netherlands: Springer; 2012. pp. 35-46.
[11]Nouns Z, Schauber S, Witt C, Kingreen H, Schuttpelz-Brauns K. Development of knowledge in basic sciences: a comparison of two medical curricula. Med Educ. 2012;46(12):1206-14.
[12]Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(1):4-27.
[13]Krech D, Crutchfield RS. Theory and problems of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1948.
[14]Custers EJFM, Cate OTJT. Medical students’ attitudes towards and perception of the basic sciences: a comparison between students in the old and the new curriculum at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. Med Educ. 2003;36(12):1142-50.
[15]Filho GR, Schonhorst L. Attitudes of residents and anesthesiologists toward basic sciences. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(1):137-43.
[16]Kuhpayehzadeh J, Daryazadeh S, Soltani Arabshahi K. Medical students’ attitudes to traditional and integrated basic sciences curriculums. Q Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2013;6(1):37-42. [Persian]
[17]Elkhair EB, Alharbi WDM. How do female preclinical medical students at Umm Al-Qura university study physiology?. Int J Sci Commerce Human. 2014:2(7);40-6.
[18]Custers EJ, Ten Cate OT. Medical clerks’ attitudes towards the basic sciences: a longitudinal and a cross-sectional comparison between students in a conventional and an innovative curriculum. Med Teach. 2007;29(8):772-7.
[19]Spencer AL, Brosenitsch T, Levine AS, Kanter SL. Back to the basic sciences: an innovative approach to teaching senior medical students how best to integrate basic science and clinical medicine. Acad Med. 2008;83(7):662-9.
[20]Alam A. How do medical students in their clinical years perceive basic sciences courses at King Saud University?. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(1):58-61.
[21]D'Eon MF. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:5.
[22]Valle R, Alaminos I, Contreras E, Salas LE, Tomasini P, Varela M. Student questionnaire to evaluate basic medical science teaching (METEQ-B). Rev Med IMSS. 2004;42(5):405-11.
[23]Lazić E, Dujmović J, Hren D. Retention of basic sciences knowledge at clinical years of medical curriculum. Croat Med J. 2006;47(6):882-7.
[24]Farahani M, Ahmadi F. Doctoral nursing students’ viewpoint about the nursing PhD curriculum. Iran J Med Educ. 2006;6(1):83-92. [Persian]
[25]Sathishkumar S, Thomas N, Tharion E, Neelakantan N, Vyas R. Attitude of medical students towards Early Clinical Exposure in learning endocrine physiology. BMC Med Edu.c 2007;7:30.
[26]Biabangardy Z, Soltani Arabshahi SK, Amini A, Shekarabi R, Yadavar Nikravesh M. Role of basic science courses on promoting the medical graduate’s competencies in medical schools of Iran. Iran J Med Educ. 2005;5(1):13-23. [Persian]