ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Yoshany   N. (1)
Seyedkhameshi   S.S. (1)
Rezaei   M. (2)
Baghian-Zarchi   N. (3)
Karimiankakolaki   Z. (*4)






(*4) Health Department, Medical Sciences Faculty, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord , Iran
(1) “Social Determinants of Health Research Center” and “Department Health Education & Promotion, Public Health Faculty”, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
(2) Management Department, Management Faculty, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
(3) Health Services Management Department, Public Health Faculty, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rahmatiyeh, Shahrekord, Chaharmahal Bakhtiari, Iran. Posal Code: 8813733395
Phone: +98 (38) 333361000
Fax: +98 (35) 38209119
zohrehkarimian68@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  March  22, 2019
Accepted:  August 18, 2019
ePublished:  December 21, 2019

BRIEF TEXT


Aging is an important period of life, and attention to the issues and needs of this period is socially important because they can eclipse the quality of life of the elderly.

... [1-3]. Today, with an increase in the life expectancy index, a more important issue is how to live a life or "quality of life", which has been addressed by scholars and researchers in studies on elderly [4]. Quality of life is an essential indicator which should be considered due to covering many aspects, such as physiological, functional and existential aspects [5]. The quality of life has expressed as the perception of each person of his health status and satisfaction with it [6]. … [7-12].

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between quality of life and the use of smart cell phones in the elderly.

This research was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study.

This research was conducted on 408 elderly people who were covered by the retirement center of Yazd in 2019.

According to the sample size formula, standard deviation of 18 and error of 1.5, the required sample size was determined 554 people and finally the data obtained from 408 subjects were recorded [13].

Data gathering tools included demographic and contextual questionnaire, cell phones status and if the samples had a mobile phone, they were asked about the length and reason of using. Also, the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire was used to measure quality of life. Data were analyzed by SPSS 18 software. Normal distribution of data was first evaluated by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and data had no normal distribution, therefore, Spearman correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between variables and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the components of quality of life according to demographic variables.

Of 554 distributed questionnaires among the elderly, 408 questionnaires (73.6%) were fully completed and collected. The mean age of the elderly was 67.82 ± 6.49 years with a minimum age of 60 and a maximum of 95 years. 368 participants (90.2%) used mobile phones. Based on the obtained mean scores in different dimensions of quality of life, the highest score was related to overall general health dimension and the lowest score was found in environmental health (Table 1). There was a significant inverse correlation between age and all components of quality of life, except for social health. There was also a direct and significant correlation between the components of quality of life, so that by an increase in the scores of each component of quality of life, scores of other components also increased (Table 2).There was a significant relationship between all components of quality of life, except for gender and social health. All components of quality of life, except for mental health and environmental health were significantly associated with having mobile. Regarding the type of home, only the overall quality of life showed a significant relationship, and no significant relationship was found with other components. In all cases, the mean score of quality of life was higher in men, people with mobile phones, and those with owning a home (Table 3).There were also significant differences in all components of quality of life according to marital status, level of education, income, and people living with. The components of physical, mental and general health in terms of the reason for using mobile phone and the components of physical, mental, social and general health in terms of duration of mobile phone use were significantly different (Table 4).The mean score of physical, social and environmental health in divorced persons was higher than other groups and the mean score of mental health and general health was higher in married people. The mean score of mental health, social, environmental and general health was higher in PhD students than others and the mean score of physical health in undergraduates and masters was higher than others. The average score of all components of quality of life was higher in people with an income of over two million and those who had used mobile for more than 3 years. The average score of physical, social and general health was higher in those who used mobile phone to raise awareness and the average score of mental and the environment health was higher in people who used mobile phone to raise awareness and for entertainment and communication. The mean score of physical and environmental health was higher in those who lived with single children after the death of their spouse and the average mental health and general health score of those living with their spouse and married child at home were higher than others. Also, the average social health score of those living with spouse and single child was higher than others. In general, the mean score of all components of quality of life in people living alone or without a spouse was lower than others.

... [13-19]. In the present study, a significant statistical relationship was found between marital status and all dimensions of quality of life, which is in line with the results of Tavassoli et al. [20] and Jadidi et al. [24], whereas it is not consistent with the results of Taheri et al. [24]. … [24-42]. Also, in the present study, physical, social, and environmental health of divorced people, and mental health and overall quality of life of married people were higher than others. In the study by Panaghi et al. [43], being a widow had a negative relationship with physical health, which is in contrast to the present study and married women had a higher quality of life. A study by Ahangari et al. showed that single elderly who never married had a higher score in physical health [30]. … [44-46].

It is recommended to use a smart phone for training the elderly.

One of the limitations of the present study was the lack of relevant scientific studies in Iran, which reduced the possibility of more comprehensive comparisons.

There was a direct relationship between the quality of life and using cell phone, duration and context of its use that this interaction can be through the use of cell phones to raise awareness, communicate or entertain, or build more social relationships with family, relatives and peers.

The authors are grateful to Dr. Ihrampoosh, the head of the Faculty of Health of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Dr. Morovvati, the head of the Health Research Center for Elderly, the head of the Yazd Retirement Center, and also all elderly participated in the study.

None.

This study (research ID: 4382)was extracted from a research approved by the Elderly Health Research Center and the Ethics Committee of School of Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd (IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1396.123).

This study was funded by the Elderly Health Research Center of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Momeni K, Karimi H. Comparison of mental health between elderly admitted in sanitarium with elderly in sited in personal home. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2011;14(4): e79446. [Persian]
[2]Wilmot JM, Ferraro KF, editors. Gerontology: perspectives and issues. 4th Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2013.
[3]Zahran HS, Kobau R, Moriarty DG, Zack MM, Holt J, Donehoo R, et al. Health-related quality of life surveillance--United States, 1993-2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54(4):1-35.
[4]Rejeski WJ, Mihalko SL. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(Suppl 2):23-35.
[5]Conger S, Moore K. Chronic illness and quality of life: the social workers role. Singapore: TSAO foundation; 2002. p. 1.
[6]King AC, Pruitt LA, Phillips W, Oka R, Rodenburg A, Haskell WL. Comparative effects of two physical activity programs on measured and perceived physical functioning and other health-related quality of life outcomes in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(2):M74-83.
[7]Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M. Validation of the United States' version of the world health organization quality of life (WHOQOL) instrument. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(1):1-12.
[8]Osada H, Shibata H, Haga H, Yasumura S. Relationship of physical condition and functional capacity to depressive status in person aged 75 years. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1995;42(10):897-909. [Japanese]
[9]Salar A, Ahmadi F, Faghihzadeh S. Study of effectiveness of continuous care consultation on the quality of life of elderly clients. Zahedan J Res Med Sci (Tabib-e-Shargh). 2004;5(4):261-7. [Persian]
[10]Kazemi N, Sajjadi H, Bahrami G. Quality of Life in Iranian Elderly. Iran J Ageing, 2019;13(5):518-33. [Persian]
[11]Shahbazi MR, Mirkhani M, Hatamizadeh N, Rahgozar M. Disability assessments in Tehranian elderly, 2007. Iran J Ageing. 2008;3(3 and 4):84-92. [Persian]
[12]Najafi B, Arzaghi M, Fakhrzadeh H, Sharifi F, Shoaei S, Alizadeh M, et al . Mental health status and related factors in aged population: Urban health equity assessment and response tool (Urban- HEART) study in Tehran. Iran J Diabetes Metab. 2013;13(1):62-73. [Persian]
[13]Ahmadi F, Salar A, Faghihzadeh S. Quality of life in Zahedan elderly population. Hayat. 2004;10(3):61-7. [Persian]
[14]Mazloomi Mahmoodabad SS, Ghazinezhad N, Dehghani Tafti A. Consider quality of life nulliparous women of Noshar 2015. J Toloo-e Behdasht. 2017;16(1):23-32. [Persian]
[15]Berlim MT, Pavanello DP, Caldieraro MA, Fleck MP. Reliability and validity of the WHOQOL BREF in a sample of Brazilian outpatients with major depression. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):561-4.
[16]Izutsu T, Tsutsumi A, Islam A, Matsuo Y, Yamada HS, Kurita H, Wakai S. Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(7):1783-9.
[17]Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299-310.
[18]Abdollahpour I, Salimi Y, Nedjat S, Jorjoran Shushtari Z. Quality of life and effective factors on it among governmental staff in Boukan city. J Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2011;22(1):40-7. [Persian]
[19]Basakha M, Mohaqeqi Kamal SH, Pashazadeh H. Acceptance of information and communication technology by the elderly people living in Tehran. Iran J Ageing. 2019;13(5):550-63. [Persian]
[20]Tavasoli Zanjani Z, Mohammadi F, Motalebi SA, Alipour Heydari M. Quality of life among elderly with visual impairment referring to Booali Sina Hospital, Qazvin. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2017;15(5):376-85. [Persian]
[21]Naseh L, Shaikhi R, Rafiei F. Quality of life and its related factors among elderlies living in nursing homes. Iran J Nurs. 2014;27(87):67-78. [Persian]
[22]Jadidi A, Farahaninia M, Janmohammadi S, Haghani H. Quality of life for elderly residents in nursing home. J Geriatr Nurs. 2015:2(1):9-18. [Persian]
[23]Zahmatkeshan N, Bagherzadeh R, Akaberian S, Yazdankhah MR, Mirzaei K, Yazdanpanah S, et al . Assessing quality of life and related factors in Bushehr’s elders - 2008-2009. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2012;2(1):53-8. [Persian]
[24]Taheri N, Fereydouni Moghaddam M, Cheraghian B, Hekmatipour N, Hojjati H. Factors affecting quality of life among elderly living in nursing homes. J Geriatr Nurs. 2015;2(1):50-61. [Persian]
[25]García EL, Banegas JR, Pérez-Regadera AG, Cabrera RH, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Social network and health-related quality of life in older adults: a population-based study in Spain. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):511-20.
[26]Netuveli G, Blane D. Quality of life in older ages. Br Med Bull. 2008;85:113-26.
[27]Nejati V, Ashayeri H. Health related quality of life in the elderly in Kashan. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2008;14(1):56-61. [Persian]
[28]Vahdaninia MS, Goshtasebi A, Montazeri A, Maftoon F. Health-related quality of life in an elderly population in Iran: a population-based study. Payesh. 2005;4(2):113-20. [Persian]
[29]Alipour F, Sajadi H, Forozan A, Biglarian A. The role of social support in elderly quality of life. Soc Welfare. 2009;9(33):147-65. [Persian]
[30]Ahangari M, Kamali M, Arjmand Hesabi M. Quality of elderly's life in Tehran senile culture house clubs. Iran J Ageing. 2007;2(1):182-9. [Persian]
[31]Orfila F, Ferrer M, Lamarca R, Tebe C, Domingo-Salvany A, Alonso J. Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: the role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(9):2367-80.
[32]Rafati N, Yavari P, mehrabi Y, Montazeri A. Quality of life among Kahrizak charity institutionalized elderly people. J Sch Public Health Inst Public Health Res. 2005;3(2):67-75. [Persian]
[33]Abdi N, Solhi M. Quality of life in postmenopausal women in Tehran. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2014;2(2):87-96. [Persian]
[34]Safdari R, Shamsabadi AR, Pahlevaninejad S. Improve health of the elderly people with m-health and technology. Iran J Ageing. 2018;13(3):288-99. [Persian]
[35]Hosseini A, Mjdi A, Hassani G. Investigating the role of social support on the quality of life of the elderly in Mashhad in 2014. J Gerontol. 2016;1(2):10-8. [Persian]
[36]Gallegos-Carrillo K, Mudgal J, Sánchez-García S, Wagner FA, Gallo JJ, Salmerón J, et al. Social networks and health-related quality of life: a population based study among older adults. Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51(1):6-13.
[37]Salarvand S, Abedi HA. Causes and motivations of elderly home residency from residents' point of view. Feyz. 2008;12 (2):55-61. [Persian]
[38]Virtuoso Júnior JS, Guerra RO. Factors associated to functional limitations in elderly of low income. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2008;54(5):430-5.
[39]Woo J, Lynn H, Leung J, Wong SY. Self-perceived social status and health in older Hong Kong Chinese women compared with men. Women Health. 2008;48(2):209-34.
[40]Emami Naeini M, Bakhtiari M, Hatami H, Khodakarim S, Sahaf R. Depression and perceived social support in the elderly. Iran J Ageing. 2017;12(2):192-207. [Persian]
[41]Heidari M, Shahbazi S. Effect of self-care training program on quality of life of elders. Iran J Nurs. 2012;25(75):1-8. [Persian]
[42]Helgeson VS. Social support and quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(Suppl 1):25-31.
[43]Panaghi L, Abarashi Z, Mansoori N, Dehghani M. Quality of life and its related demographic characteristics in the elderly in Tehran. Iran J Ageing. 2010;4(12):77-87. [Persian]
[44]Song L, Li S, Zhang W, Feldman MW. Intergenerational support and self-rated health of the elderly in rural China: an investigation in Chaohu, Anhui province. In: Yi Z, Poston DL, Vlosky DA, Gu D, editors. Healthy Longevity in China. London: Springer; 2008. pp.235-49.
[45]Sudha S, Suchindran C, Mutran EJ, Rajan SI, Sarma PS. Marital status, family ties, and self-rated health among elders in South India. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2006;21(3-4):103-20.
[46]Drageset J, Eide GE, Ranhoff AH. Anxiety and depression among nursing home residents without cognitive impairment. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27(4):872-81.