ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Keshavarz   M. (*)
Farajollahi   M. (1)
Zandi   B. (2)
Sarmadi   M.R. (1)






(*) Educational Sciences Department, Educational Sciences & Psychology Faculty, Tehran Branch, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Educational Sciences Department, Educational Sciences & Psychology Faculty, Tehran Branch, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Educational Sciences Department, Educational Sciences & Psychology Faculty, Tehran Branch, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran
(2) Linguistics Department, Literature & Human Sciences Faculty, Tehran Branch, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence


Article History

Received:  November  8, 2015
Accepted:  September 9, 2015
ePublished:  October 25, 2015

BRIEF TEXT


… [1-11] In the process of e-learning, the responsibility of schedule of learning is on the behalf of the learner, and learners control the time and place of their own learning [12, 13]. Distance learning courses require a high level of classmates` participation and working groups [14, 15]. … [16, 17]

Many studies have been conducted to study students 'information literacy [7-9], but there has been little attention to information literacy in distance learning environment.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the information literacy level of distance education postgraduate students of Entrepreneurship Faculty of Tehran University.

This is a descriptive-survey study.

Students enrolled in the second semester of the academic year 2014-2015 in distance learning at Entrepreneurship Faculty of Tehran University were studied.

Minimum number of samples based on Cochran formula was estimated 181 and sampling was carried out using Symmetric Stratified Sampling. 450 participants (all students) were studied.

The research instrument was information literacy questionnaire based on five dimensions standard of Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) [18]. This questionnaire contains 49 items based on five standards, including 8 questions for the first standard, 12 questions for the second standard, 8 questions for the third standard, 11 questions for the fourth standard and 10 questions for the fifth standard. For grading scale, each correct answer to the questions having one correct answer receives one score, and correct answer to the questions with multiple correct answers receives 3 scores. Total score for a student with information literacy 70 and in the point 50% was obtained 35. Using Cronbach`s Alpha, the reliability coefficient was calculated 0.78. The validity of this questionnaire was confirmed, using face validity based on the experts’ viewpoints. To describe the samples, descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, standard deviation and percentage) and inferential statistics (Single-group Student T test) were used and data analysis was carried out through SPSS 18 software.

101 patients (56%) were male and 80 (44%) were female. All the samples were MA distance education system entrepreneurship students. Among the components of information literacy, determining the nature of information and understanding the legal and economic information were in the undesirable level. Effective access to information and critically information evaluation were in the relatively desirable level, and purposeful use of data-information was in the desirable level. Also, the mean difference of information literacy skills in distance education system students of Entrepreneurship Faculty of Tehran University was evaluated relatively desirable (Table 1).

Information literacy skills according to obtained scores and above information are relatively favorable. Students in fourth standard (purposeful use of data information) and the second standard (effective access to information) are more skillful. This result is similar to other studies [18, 19]. The earned grades in terms of information literacy skills by graduate students at Ferdowsi, Tehran, Shiraz and Chamaran Universities are desirable and there is a significant difference in this regard between students of humanities and other disciplines [20]. The findings of this research in terms of low scores of the ability to understand legal and economic items of the information (fifth standard), has been confirmed by other studies [18, 20]. The status of students in identifying their needed information, identifying resources and setting research is not appropriate. Most of the students do not have a high capacity to determine the extent and nature of their required data. Their ability in organizing and retrieving of information literacy is not desirable [21]. Freshmen students do not have a clear understanding of useful information and access to it [22]. Although students have good computer literacy, certainly, they are not completely information literate [23]. The results of this research are in line with the findings of other studies which have evaluated the status of students` information literacy acceptable (average) and higher. … [24-27] Undergraduate students at the last year of Iran University of Science and Technology are at the level lower than average in recognition of the need for information. However, in terms of access, evaluation and use of information as well as familiarity with legal issues, they are in a higher level than average [28]. There is a significant difference between students in different disciplines of Alzahra University in terms of information literacy level [25]. Allameh Tabatabai University economic graduate college students' information literacy is above average [26]. The results of other studies [27, 29, 30] are consistent with the results of the current study.

Presentation of information literacy course as one of the basic prerequisites for research should be considered for all medical and non-medical fields.

Of the limitations of this study, were presentation of courses based on distance education system by Entrepreneurship Faculty of Tehran University and lack of full access to all students to collect data.

The information literacy skills of distance education students of Entrepreneurship Faculty of Tehran University are evaluated relatively favorable.

E-learning Center of Tehran University is appreciated.

Non-declared

The participants were assured on the confidentiality of the information.

Funding has been provided by the corresponding author.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Andretta S. From prescribed reading to the excitement or the burden of choice: Information literacy: Foundation of e-learning. Aslib J Inf Manag. 2007;57(2):181-90.
[2]Bangert-Drowns R. The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Rev Educ Res. 1993;63(1):69-93.
[3]Bawden D. Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. J Doc. 2006;57(2):218-59.
[4]Corrall S. Information literacy strategy development in higher education: An exploratory study. Int J Inf Manag. 2008;28(1):26-37.
[5]Gonzalez-Rodriguez D, Kostakis V. Information literacy and peer-to-peer infrastructures: An autopoietic perspective. Telemat Inform. 2015;32(4):586-93.
[6]Navsaria D, Sanders LM. Early literacy promotion in the digital age. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2015;62(5):1273-95.
[7]Raeis AR, Bahrami S, Yousefi M. Relationship between information literacy and creativity: A study of students at the Isfahan university of medical sciences. Mater Soc Med. 2013;25(1):28-31.
[8]Sharif Moghaddam H, Malekian Fard E. Information literacy in distance education universities in Iran: A case study of ‎ payame noor university. Int J Inf Sci Manag. 2014;12(1):65-76.
[9]Buchanan L, Luck D, Jones T. Integrating information literacy into the virtual university: A course model. Libr Trends. 2002;51(2):144-66.
[10]Sun P. Information literacy in higher education in China. Libr Trends. 2002;51(2):210-7.
[11]Alinejad M, Sarmadi MR, Zandi B ,Shobeiri M. Level of information literacy and its role in e-learning of university students. Res Inf Sci Public Libr. 2011;17(2):371-37. [Persian]
[12]Maughan PD. Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: A discussion of the literature and the university of California-Berkeley assessment experience. Coll Res Libr. 2001;62(1):71-85.
[13]Ozgen E, Baron R. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. J Bus Ventur. 2007;22(2):174-92.
[14]Puzziferro M. Online Technologies self-regulated and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. Am J Distance Educ. 2008;22:72-89.
[15]Powell C, Prior J, Case-Smith J. Information literacy skills of occupational therapy graduates: A survey of learning outcomes. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003;91(4):468-77.
[16]Van de Vord R. Distance students and online research: Promoting information literacy through media literacy. Internet High Educ. 2010;13(3):170-75.
[17]Julien H, Barker S. How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2009;31(1):12-7.
[18]Abdollahi M, Jowkar A. Study of the state of public librarian’s information literacy in Fars province. Res Inf Sci Public Libr. 2015;20(4):771-87. [Persian]
[19]Soleymani MR. Investigating the relationship between information literacy and academic performance among students. J Educ Health Promot. 2014;3:95.
[20]Qasemi AH, Dayani MH, Davarpanah MR, Shabani Varaki B. Normalizing the "information literacy competency standards for higher education" (ACRL) for academic community in Iran. Stud Educ Psychol. 2007;8(3):75-98. [Persian]
[21]Feast V. Integration of information literacy skills into business courses. Ref Serv Rev. 2007;31(1):87-95.
[22]Catalano A. The effect of a situated learning environment in a distance education information literacy course. J Acad Libr. 2015;41(5):653–9.
[23]Flaspohler M. Information literacy program assessment: One small collage takes the big plung. Ref Serv Rev. 2003;31(2):129-40.
[24]Pandpazir M, Cheshmeh-Sohrabi M. A survey on information literacy of higher education students in Kermanshah university of medical sciences. Res Inf Sci Pub Libr. 2010;16(2):115-37. [Persian]
[25]Azami Z, Salehiniya H. A survey of information literacy among students of faculty of management and information science in Tehran university of medical sciences in 2014. Iran J Med Educ. 2014;14(7):633-40. [Persian]
[26]Ashrafi-rizi H, Ramezani A, Koupaei HA, Kazempour Z. The amount of media and information literacy among Isfahan university of medical sciences’ students using Iranian media and information literacy questionnaire (IMILQ). Acta Inf Med. 2014;22(6):393-7.
[27]Ghasemi AH. Model of developing information literacy for Iranian ministry of higher education (MSRT). Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2012;27(2):345-68. [Persian]
[28]Mahdian MJ, Shahbazi SH. Barriers and challenges, taking advantage of new technologies in the field of information literacy from the perspective of faculty member. Proced Soc Behav Sci. 2012;69:2092-5.
[29]Mirzasafi A, Rajaeipour S, Jamshidiyan A. The Relationship between Information Literacy and Entrepreneurship Capabilities among Isfahan University Graduate Students. Libr Inf Sci. 2011;53(1):58-72. [Persian]
[30]Hazrati H, Zarea Gavgani V, Ghorbanian N, Rahmatvand N, Vahedi L. Determining information literacy competency of faculty members in using medical information resources. Res Dev Med Educ. 2014;3(1):49-52.