ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Davarzani   A. (1)
Mehri   A. (1)
Barati   H. (2)
Joveini   H. (1)
Shahrabadi   R. (1)
Hashemian   M. (*1)






(1) Health Education & health promotion Department, Public Health Faculty, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar , Iran
(2) Epidemiology Department, Health Faculty, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar , Iran

Correspondence

Address: Campus Building, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Towhid Shahr Boulevard, Sabzevar, Iran. Postal Code: 9613873136
Phone: -
Fax: +98 (51) 44238013
hashemianm@medsab.ac.ir

Article History

Received:  June  17, 2019
Accepted:  September 23, 2019
ePublished:  December 21, 2019

BRIEF TEXT


Unsafe behaviors of motorcyclists are one of the main causes of their mortality. Measuring the unsafe behaviors of motorcyclists and planning for control them in the first step, requires a tool that matches the cultural, social and religious characteristics of the society.

... [1-14]. Insecure behavior of motorcyclists is one of the causes of accidents [15]. Educational interventions are one of the best ways to reduce unsafe behaviors. The effectiveness of educational interventions and health education programs require the proper and appropriate use of health education theories and models [16]. One of these models is information, motivation and behavioral skills model for assessing and measuring behaviors [17]. In this model three main factors of information, motivation and behavioral skills determine health behaviors. Information refers to the people's knowledge. Motivation involves two factors: personal motivation, as a positive attitude to safe behaviors and the belief that these behaviors are useful and social motivation that includes perceived social support and social norms for engaging in safe behaviors. Finally, behavioral skills indicate the ability and self-efficacy to perform safe behaviors [18]. … [19].

The purpose of this study was to design and psychometric of measurement tool of unsafe behaviors in motorcycle driving based on information, motivation and behavioral skills model.

This research was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study.

This study was carried out on 210 student motorcyclists in Sabzevar in 2018.

The study population consisted of Sabzevar University students who were selected through two-stage cluster sampling. First, out of 7 universities in Sabzevar, two universities were randomly selected (Islamic Azad University and Imam Khomeini Technical University) and the sample size was determined based on the population of eligible students. Inclusion criteria were students with motorcycle using it at least one year and also the informed and voluntary consent to participate in the study.

The draft of the questionnaire was developed based on information model, motivation and behavioral skills constructs by searching in databases and studying Iranian and international studies, assessing questionnaires and relevant studies basic needs assessments of students' beliefs about motorcycle safety-preventive driving behaviors. Needs assessment was done by open-ended questions based on model constructs. Comments were recorded until saturation. Then, based on the obtained results and the results of other studies, and also observing the principles to design a research tool, the draft of the information, motivation and behavioral skills model questionnaire was designed with 32 questions, including 8 questions for information, 12 questions for motivation, 11 questions for behavioral skills constructs on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5.

The mean age of students was 25.82 ±2.42 years, 11.0% were married and 89.0% were single and most (79.0%) had a motorbike license. Face validity: In the qualitative face validity, some changes were made to the literature of some items of the original questionnaire. Two items were similar that were merged. In quantitative face validity, after calculating the item effect size, 4 items were removed for obtaining an effect size of less than 1.5 and the number of items decreased from 32 to 27 questions. Content validity: In the qualitative content validity, based on the panel of experts, the items were reviewed and the necessary corrections were made to the items. In content validity, the content validity ratio and index were calculated. In terms of content validity ratio, according to the number of experts (n = 11), the accepted minimum CVR was 0.59. According to the scores given by the experts, 3 items were removed due to a score of less than 0.59 and eventually 24 items remained. In the content validity index (CVI), due to the CVI of higher than 0.79, 3 items were omitted. Finally, a 21-item questionnaire was included in the next step to determine construct validity. CVI was obtained from 0.97 to 0.97 with a mean of 0.88. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the effect of hidden variables on the information, motivation and behavioral skills model, and the effect of apparent and hidden variables was significant in most of the constructs (p <0.05). Also, the chi-square/degrees of freedom ratio of the model was less than 2 and the RMSEA was 0.071 (p <0.001; Table 1). Internal consistency and stability: Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the constructs was 0.7 to 0.87 and 0.836 for the whole questionnaire. The ICC index for the whole questionnaire was 0.992, which was calculated separately for each construct (Table 2).

Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine construct validity. One of the best fit indices of structural equation models in confirmatory factor analysis is the fit index by calculating the root mean square error of approximation. It is defined as the magnitude of the difference for each degree of freedom, which should be less than 0.05 for models with good fit. Values above 0.08 indicate a reasonable approximation error [20]. The LISREL output in the present study was 0.071. The lower this index, the model has a better fit, therefore, it can be claimed that it has a good fit. … [21-27]. In this study, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.836, which is consistent with the results of Sang et al. [28] and Klassen et al. [29]. Given the high Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire (0.836), it can be concluded that the questionnaire had a high internal consistency and also indicated that the questionnaire is suitable for using in investigations and interventional studies, as well. The results obtained from the two tests with a two-week interval showed the stability of the questionnaire for model constructs between 0.896 to 0.963 and 0.992 for the whole tool. The results were acceptable and were in agreement with the results of Sang et al., where the ICC index value was 0.81 [30]. This finding also showed that the reliability coefficient of this tool was excellent, as De Croon et al. have introduced the intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.75-75 as excellent [31].

Since the validity of the tool was approved, it is recommended that it be used as a standard tool in various studies on unsafe behaviors.

Of the limitations of the present study were the difficulty of designing the items related to measuring the motivation construct based on the information, motivation, behavioral skills model and also self-report questionnaires.

Designed questionnaire to assess the unsafe behaviors of motorcyclists based on the information, motivation and behavioral skills model has appropriate validity and reliability and is approved.

We appreciate all the respected members of the Research Council, Ethics Committee, as well as students of Sabzevar Universities who assisted us in this study.

None.

This study was extracted from a MSc thesis in Health Education approved by the Research Council Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee (IR.MEDSAB.REC.1397.057) that registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20181113041637N1).

This research was funded by Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Gonzalez MPS, Escribano Sotos F, Tejada Ponce A. Impact of provincial characteristics on the number of traffic accident victims on interurban roads in Spain. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;118:178-89.
[2]Mohamed HA. Estimation of socio-economic cost of road accidents in Saudi Arabia: Willingness-To-Pay Approach (WTP). Adv Manag Appl Econ. 2015. 5(3):43-61.
[3]Parkinson F, Kent SJ, Aldous C, Oosthuizen G, Clarke D. The hospital cost of road traffic accidents at a South African regional trauma centre: a micro-costing study. Injury, 2014;45(1):342-5.
[4]Chisholm D. Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat road traffic injuries in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2012;344:e612.
[5]Babajanpour M, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Sadeghi Bazargani H. Predictive ability of underlying factors of motorcycle rider behavior: an application of logistic quantile regression for bounded outcomes. Health Promot Perspect. 2017;7(4):230-7.
[6]Mahdian M, Sehat M, Fazel MR, Moraveji A, Mohammadzadeh M. Epidemiology of urban traffic accident victims hospitalized more than 24 hours in a level III trauma center, Kashan county, Iran, during 2012-2013. Arch Trauma Res. 2015;4(2):e28465.
[7]Ghadirzadeh M, Fadaye Vatan R, Akbari Kamrani A, Davatgaran K, Hashemi Nazari S, Mirtorabi S. Road accident mortality rate of the Iranian elderly from 2006 to 2008. Iran J Ageing. 2012;7(1):49-56. [Persian]
[8]Saadat S, H. Soori. Epidemiology of traffic injuries and motor vehicles utilization in the capital of Iran: a population based study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):488.
[9]Mohtasham-Amiri Z, Dastgiri S, Davoudi-Kiakalyeh A, Imani A, Mollarahimi K. An epidemiological study of road traffic accidents in Guilan Province, Northern Iran in 2012. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2016;4(4):230-5.
[10]Mansouri M, Sharifi F, Varmaghani M, Yaghubi H, Moghadas Tabrizi Y, et al. Iranian university students lifestyle and health status survey: study profile. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017;16:48.
[11]Akbari ME, Naghavi M, Soori H. Epidemiology of deaths from injuries in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12(3-4):382-90.
[12]Shafaeizadeh A, Sedaghat M, Kheitash A, Nedjat N. Designing university students’ health surveillance system in Iran from stakeholders’ opinion. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(5):522-8.
[13]Moghisi A, Mohammadi R, Svanstrom L. Motorcyclists' safety in Iran: implication of haddon matrix in safe community setting. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014;28(1):37.
[14]Spoerri A, Egger M, von Elm E. Mortality from road traffic accidents in Switzerland: longitudinal and spatial analyses. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43(1):40-8.
[15]Razmara A, Aghamolaei T, Madani A, Hosseini Z, Zare S. Prediction of safe driving Behaviours based on health belief model: the case of taxi drivers in Bandar Abbas, Iran. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):380. [Persian]
[16]Jackson C. Behavioral science theory and principles for practice in health education. Health Educ Res. 1997;12(1):143-50.
[17]Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):462-73.
[18]Meunier S, Coulombe S, Beaulieu MD, Côté J, Lespérance F, Chiasson JL, et al. Longitudinal testing of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model of self-care among adults with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(11):1830-6.
[19]Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Bryan AD, Misovich SJ. Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner-city high school youth. Health Psychol. 2002;21(2):177-86.
[20]Juniper EF, Guyott GH, Streiner DL, King DR. Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50(3):233-8.
[21]Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75.
[22]Bertsimas D, O’Hair A, Relyea S, Silberholz J. An analytics approach to designing combination chemotherapy regimens for cancer. Manag Sci. 2016;62(5):1-21.
[23]Lee HB, Comrey AL. Distortions in a commonly used factor analytic procedure. Multivariate Behav Res. 1979;14(3):301-21.
[24]Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. 5th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
[25]Dodson EA, Baker EA, Brownson RC. Use of evidence-based interventions in state health departments: a qualitative assessment of barriers and solutions. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010;16(6):E9-15.
[26]Sangoseni O, Hellman M, Hill C. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviors, attitudes, and clinical practices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidenced-based clinical practice. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2013;11(2):1-7.
[27]Sadeghi M, Mazaheri MA, Mootabi F. Iranian couples interaction coding system. J Fam Res. 2010;6(3):353-72. [Persian]
[28]Song CS, Choi YI, Hong SY. Validity and reliability of the safe driving behavior measure in community-dwelling self-drivers with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(5):1640-3.
[29]Classen S, Wen PS, Velozo CA, Bedard M, Winter SM, Brumback BA, Lanford DN. Rater reliability and rater effects of the safe driving behavior measure. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(1):69-77.
[30]Song CS, Chun BY, Chung HS. Test-retest reliability of the driving habits questionnaire in older self-driving adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(11):3597-9.
[31]De Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Frings Dresen MH. Psychometric properties of the Need for Recovery after work scale: test-retest reliability and sensitivity to detect change. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(3):202-6.