ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Taghavi-Fard   M.T. (1)
Hanafizadeh   P. (1)
Bamdad Soofi   J. (1)
Yoosefvand   A. (*1)






(*1) Industrial Management Department, Management Economy & Account Faculty, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Industrial Management Department, Management & Accounting Faculty, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Industrial Management Department, Management Economy & Account Faculty, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Industrial Management Department, Management Economy & Account Faculty, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence

Address: 3th Floor, Financial Departement, Building of Ministry of Health & Medical Education,Ivanak Boulevard, Sannat Square, Shahrake Qods, Tehran, Iran.
Phone: +98 (21) 81452180
Fax: +98 (21) 88363747
ayoosefvand@gmail.com

Article History

Received:  July  10, 2019
Accepted:  November 9, 2019
ePublished:  March 18, 2020

BRIEF TEXT


... .[1, 2]. An e-service is any service provided by the Internet or information technology and mostly done by the client [2].

... [3-16]. It shown that introducing technologies to users is difficult; therefore, using these technologies is limited [17]. For this purpose, e-service has been widely considered for the acceptance of e-health services by the patient [18]. Predicting the adoption and use of technology has long been one of the key concepts for many researchers [19]. The present study reviewed the literature on the acceptance and use of technology in 2018. … [20-26]. A few numbers of studies have been done on the adoption of information technology from the people’s views [27, 28]. Accordingly, due to the need to develop a more comprehensive model for the acceptance of health e-service by patients and health e-service users, the proposed model of the present study was presented (Figure 1).The Hanafizadeh's and Yarmohammadi's 3C model was used to design of the conceptual model of this study [29].

The purpose of the present study was to present a model of acceptance of e-health services.

The research was a descriptive-correlational study.

This study was carried out in public hospitals in Tehran in 2018-19.

Using convenience sampling, patients referring to the studied hospitals were selected. The inclusion criteria were at least diploma degree and being familiar with e-service. Using Morgan table, a sample size of 384 cases was estimated [30].

Data were collected by a questionnaire including four sections. The first part assessed demographic information, such as gender, age and level of education. Content validity was assessed using the tutors’ views and two faculty members of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education and finally approved. The face validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by 14 experts, including 3 tutors, 3 physicians, 3 specialist physician, and 5 people with masters’ degree. The construct validity of the questionnaire was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. Descriptive analysis of data was performed by SPSS 22 software and the partial least squares regression and Smart PLS 3.2.8 software, were used to test the conceptual model.

In total, the data obtained from 357 individuals were analyzed. The majority of cases were men in the age group of 31-40 years with a bachelor's degree (Table 2).In the construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis, the average variance index (AVE) extracted for each dimension was greater than 0.5, while composite reliability was greater than 0.70. In addition, all coefficients of path coefficients of variables were more than 0.60. Therefore, the convergent validity of the model was confirmed (Table 3).There was a positive and significant correlation between all variables (p <0.05, Table 4).The effect of factors associated with the recipient of health services or clients, factors associated with the health services or intellectual processing, as well as the factors associated with provider and receiver of the healthcare on the acceptance of e-health services was significant (p <0.05; Table 5).Therefore, all connections between model variables were confirmed. Accordingly, considering the investigated components, the final model of the research was approved (Figure 2).

The findings of the present study are consistent with those of Goldsmith et al. In another study conducted by Razaghi and Nasiripour, satisfaction with outcomes, waiting for effort, need for training and knowledge, coordination of experiences, and need for expertise have been identified as influencing factors in acceptance of health services, which were also assessed and approved in our research. Reliability of the service provider is also an important issue that has not been considered in most studies and needs to be addressed [33]. Length of doing a work/waiting time, attention to the patient needs, health care consultation, initial diagnosis, access to the patient’s information by specialists and physicians, referral services, ensuring the accuracy of information, service updates and delivery, complete information, and rapid responsiveness are indicators that have not been frequently addressed in studies in Iran.

Investigating the views of both the patients as recipients and staff of hospitals and health care providers and those working in this area can provide better and more accurate results that should be considered in future research.

This study was conducted on patients in public hospitals of Tehran city with a significant number of patients from other cities, which was one of the limitations of this study.

The presented model of acceptance of e-health services was approved, and based on this model, effective factors in determining acceptance of e-health services can be predicted.

We would like to thank all the staff of Tehran public hospitals for their co-operation with the researchers of this study.

None.

None.

This research was extracted from a PhD thesis in Information Technology Management in Allameh Tabatabai University.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1] Domenichiello M. State of the art in adoption of e-health services in Italy in the context of European Union E-government strategies. Procedia Econ Finance. 2015;23:1110-8.
[2] Rust RT, Kannan PK. E-service: a new paradigm for business in the electronic environment. Commun ACM. 2003;46(6):36-42.
[3]Mou J, Shin DH, Cohen JF. Trust and risk in consumer acceptance of e-services. Electron Commerce Res. 2017;17(2):255-88.
[4]Esmaeilzadeh P, Sambasivan M, Kumar N, Nezakhati H. Adoption of technology applications in healthcare: the influence of attitude toward knowledge sharing on technology acceptance in a hospital. In: Kim TH, Adeli H, Ma J, Fang W, Kang BH, Park B, et al., editors. International Conference on U-and E-Service, Science and Technology, U- and E-Service, Science and Technology; 2011 Dec 8-10; Jeju Island, Korea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.
[5]Featherman MS, Pavlou PA. Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2003;59(4):451-74.
[6] Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren AJ, Kralovec P, Worzala C, Searcy T, Patel V. Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(6):1142-8.
[7] Aarts J, Gorman P. IT in health care: sociotechnical approaches "to err is system". Int J Med Inform. 2007;76 (Suppl 1):S1-3.
[8]Giuse DA, Kuhn KA. Health information systems challenges: the Heidelberg conference and the future. Int J Med Inform. 2003;69(2-3):105-14.
[9] Heeks R. Development 2.0: the IT enabled transformation of international development. Commun ACM. 2010;53(4):22-4.
[10]Sezgin E, Özkan-Yıldırım S. A cross-sectional investigation of acceptance of health information technology: a nationwide survey of community pharmacists in Turkey. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016;12(6):949-65.
[11] Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2(3):192-222.
[12]Ward R. The application of technology acceptance and diffusion of innovation models in healthcare informatics. Health Policy Technol. 2013;2(4):222-8.
[13]Lakbala P, Dindarloo K. Physicians’ perception and attitude toward electronic medical record. Springerplus. 2014;3(1):63.
[14] Tao D, Xie L, Wang T, Wang T. A meta-analysis of the use of electronic reminders for patient adherence to medication in chronic disease care. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(1):3-13.
[15]Or CKL, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):550-60.
[16]Montague E, Perchonok J. Health and wellness technology use by historically underserved health consumers: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e78.
[17]Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, Hersh W. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;(175):1-1422.
[18] Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA, Bardon CG, Spurr CD, Carchidi PJ, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003;114(5):397-403.
[19]Burton-Jones A, Hubona GS. Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. ACM Sigmis Database. 2005;36(2):58-77.
[20]Sandhu K. Theoretical perspectives for e-Services acceptance model. In: Sobh T, editor. Advances in computer and information sciences and engineering. Bridgeport: Springer; 2008. p. 218-23.
[21]Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Poon EG, et al. Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):110-7.
[22]Panagiotopoulos P, Al-Debei MM, Fitzgerald G, Elliman T. A business model perspective for ICTs in public engagement. Govern Inf Q. 2012;29(2):192-202.
[23] Ghazisaeidi M, Ahmadi M, Sadoughi F, Safdari R. A roadmap to pre-implementation of electronic health record: the key step to success. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(2):133-8.
[24] LeRouge C, Van Slyke C, Seale D, Wright K. Baby boomers' adoption of consumer health technologies: survey on readiness and barriers. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e200.
[25] Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159-72.
[26] Bagozzi RP. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Information Syst. 2007;8(4):244-54.
[27]Al-Hujran O, Al-Debei MM, Chatfield A, Migdadi M. The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;53:189-203.
[28] Beldad A, de Jong M, Steehouder M. I trust not therefore it must be risky: Determinants of the perceived risks of disclosing personal data for e-government transactions. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(6):2233-42.
[29] Hanafizadeh P, Yarmohammadi M. An integrated conceptualization of content in an information society. Inf Dev. 2016;32(4):880-9.
[30] Naderi E, Seif Naraghi M. Research methods‭ and its evaluation in human sciences. 6th Edition. Tehran: Arasbaran; 2010. p. 336. [Persian]‬‬
[31]Zargar SM, Alizadeh Otaghvar H, Danaei A, Babaei M. Factors affecting of telemedicine technology acceptance among technology specialists in Iranian hospitals. Razi J Med Sci. 2017;24(161):88-98. [Persian]
[32]Razzaghi R, Nasiripur A. Factors affecting the adoption of electronic health record (HER) based on TTF and UTAUT Models. In: Proceedings of the First Regional Information Technology Conference; 2013 Dec 5; Tabarestan Institute of Higher Education, Chalus, Mazandaran, Iran. Civilica; 2013. [Persian]
[33]Barooti N. Conceptual model of information technology acceptance for banking system staff (case study: Saderat bank staff in Tehran) [Dissertation]. Tehran: Alzahra University; 2006. [Persian]
[34]Dwivedi YK, Shareef MA, Simintiras AC, Lal B, Weerakkody V. A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Govern Inf Q. 2016;33(1):174-87.
[35]Wongkaew T, Thammakoranonta N. Factors effecting consumers’ attitudes toward using of e-Healthcare. International DSI/Asia and Pacific DSI. 2007.
[36] Khoja SRA. Developing and validating'e-health readiness assessment tools' for public and private healthcare institutions in Pakistan [Dissertation]. Pakistan: UMI; 2007.
[37]Silber D. The Case for e-Health. In: Proceedings of European Commission’s First High-Level Conference on e-Health; 2003 May 22-23; European Institute for Public Administration (EIPA), Brussels, Belgium.
[38]Azizi AA, Hasibian MR, Tara SM. systematic review of the factors influencing the implementation and acceptance of electronic health records. J Med Counc Iran. 2014;31(4):289-97. [Persian]
[39]Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Gohari M, Noruzi A. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians' attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records. J Biomed Inform. 2015 Feb;53:174-9.
[40] Pai FY, Huang KI. Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(4):650-60.
[41] DeLuca JM, Enmark R. E-health: the changing model of healthcare. Front Health Serv Manage. 2000;17(1):3-15.
[42]Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2003;12(1):752-80.
[43]Cheng TC, Li AX. Maltreatment and families' receipt of services: associations with reunification, kinship care, and adoption. Fam Soc J Contemp Soc Serv. 2012;93(3):189-95.
[44]Kamal MM, Themistocleous M. A conceptual model for EAI adoption in an e-government environment. In: Proceedings of European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS); 2006 July 6-7; Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain.
[45]Natagh F, Rezaei Rad M. Electronic health role to provide health care services. Educ Sci J Sch Health. 2011;11(42):23-33. [Persian]