ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Abdi   A. (1)
Bagherizadeh ‎   I. (1)
Shajare pour   L. (1)
Ideh‎   B. (1)
Hadi pour ‎   Z. (1)
Hadi pour   F. (1)
Shafaghti‎   Y. (2)
Behjati   F. (*)






(*) ‎“Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” ‎, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(1) ‎Medical Genetic Department, ‎Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC), Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(2) ‎“Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” ‎, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence


Article History

Received:   February  20, 2016
Accepted:   May 19, 2017
ePublished:   June 15, 2018

ABSTRACT

Aims Recurrent abortions comprise almost 15% of diagnosed pregnancies. ‎Chromosomal inversions, as a type of chromosomal rearrangements can result in ‎abortion or the birth of abnormal neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate ‎the prevalence of chromosome inversions (pericentric and paracentric) in ‎patients with recurrent abortions.‎
Materials & Methods This descriptive study was conducted on 2299 couples with recurrent abortions ‎referred to Sarem women’s hospital (Tehran, Iran) during 2006 to 2014. The ‎structure of autosomal and sex chromosomes were studied using high resolution ‎GTG banding and C banding techniques.‎
Findings In total, 49 (2.1%) patients showed chromosomal inversions. Pericentric ‎inversion around centromere of chromosome 9 (p11.2q13) was observed in 29 ‎patients (1.26%). Chromosomal inversions were found in heterochromatin region ‎of chromosome 1 in one patient and chromosome Y in one other patient. ‎Pericentric inversion of chromosome 2 was also found in one patient. ‎Chromosomal inversion involving other autosomal chromosomes included ‎pericentric inversion of chromosomes 1, 5, 8, 11 and 12, and paracentric ‎inversion of chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 8, and 12 (0.44%).‎
Conclusion The prevalence of pericentric and paracentric chromosomal inversions in patients ‎with abortion history is 2.1%. The rate of pericentric inversions of chromosome 9 ‎in p11.2q13regions is 1.26% that is similar to the normal populations and it has ‎no clinical significance.‎


CITATION LINKS

[1]Boue A, Boue J, Gropp A. Cytogenetics of Pregnancy Wastage. In: Harris H, Hirschhorn K, editors. Advances in Human Genetics 14; 1985. pp. 1-57.
[2]Daniel A, Hook EB, Wulf G. Risks of unbalanced progeny at amniocentesis to carriers of chromosome rearrangements: Data from United States and Canadian laboratories. Am J Med Genet. 1989;33(1):14-53.
[3]McKinlay Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 648.
[4]Sılan F, Yalcıntepe S, Uysal D, Urfalı M, Uludag A, Cosar E, et al. High frequency of chromosomal anomalies and a novel chromosomal insertion associated with infertility and recurrent miscarriages (Reproductive failure) in West Turkey. Gene Ther Mol Biol. 2014;16:139-48.
[5]Sohrabi M. Genetics and molecular Biology. Tehran: Pooran Pazhoohesh; 2012. p. 552. [Persian] 6- Celep F, Karagüzel A. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 (p11q13) in two cases. East J Med. 2008;13(1):35-7.
[6]Celep F, Karagüzel A. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 (p11q13) in two cases. East J Med. 2008;13(1):35-7.
[7]Drabova J, Trkova M, Hancarova M, Novotna D, Hejtmankova M, Havlovicova M, et al. A 15 mb large paracentric chromosome 21 inversion identified in Czech population through a pair of flanking duplications. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7:51.
[8]Behjati F. Laboratory manuals in human cytogenetics. Tehran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation SeiencesPublication; 1386. [Persian]
[9]Pellegrini SAP, Ribeiro MCM, Kahn E, De Barros GL, Rodrigues MA, De Paula Coutinho M, et al. Familial study of paracentric inversion in chromosome 3p. Br J Med Med Res. 2013;3(3):760-70.
[10]Farcas S, Belengeanu V, Stoian M, Stoicanescu D, Popa C, Andreescu N. Considerations regarding the implication of polymorphic variants and chromosomal inversions in recurrent miscarriage. Off J Romanian Soci Pediatr Surg. 2007;X(39-40):7-11. [Romanian]
[11]Karaman A, Paşa U. Cytogenetic analysis of couples with recurrent miscarriages: A series of 316 cases. New J Med. 2013;30(1):30-2.
[12]Ternpenny PD. Emery’s element of medical genetics. 14th edition. Akbari MT, translator. Tehran: Andisheh Rafi; 2012. [Persian]