@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2008-2630 Iranian Journal of War & Public Health 2020;12(4):235-240
ISSN: 2008-2630 Iranian Journal of War & Public Health 2020;12(4):235-240
Validity and Reliability of the Obsession with the COVID-19 Scale
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Descriptive & Survey StudyAuthors
Yaghoobi A. (1)Saeighi Mameghani Sh. (2)
Palancı M. (3)
Karimi K. (*1)
(1) Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
(2) Department of Psychology, Faculty of Basic Sciences and Literature, Avrasya University, Trabzon, Turkey
(3) Department of Counseling Psychology, Department of Counseling Psychology, Trabzon University, Trabzon , Turkey
Correspondence
Address: Bu-Ali Sina University, Shahid Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan Street, Hamedan. Postal Code: 6516738695Phone: +98 (83) 43752217
Fax: +98 (83) 43752297
kambiz.karimi90@gmail.com
Article History
Received: October 16, 2020Accepted: December 7, 2020
ePublished: March 3, 2021
ABSTRACT
Aims
The spread of Covid-19 worldwide has challenged public health and has had various psychological consequences. The present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Obsession with the COVID-19 scale.
Instrument & Methods As a descriptive-correlational study and to validate the Obsession with the COVID-19 scale, 392 people over 18 participated online, using the available sampling method from May to August 2020. A demographic questionnaire, Obsession with the COVID-19 Scale and Fear of Covid-19 Scale, was used to collect data. To evaluate the instrument's reliability, Cronbach's alpha internal consistency method and halving in the form of SPSS 25 statistical software and to evaluate the construct validity, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis with the orthogonal rotation of Varimax type in Lisrel 8.8 software were used.
Findings Exploratory factor analysis identified all four items as one factor. Also, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construction. The convergent validity of the scale with fear of Covid-19 showed a correlation value of 0.25 (p<0.01). In the scale's validity, Cronbach's alpha value was estimated to be 0.797, and the split-half reliability coefficient was estimated to be 0.771.
Conclusion Obsession with the COVID-19 Scale can be used as a suitable measurement tool in research.
Instrument & Methods As a descriptive-correlational study and to validate the Obsession with the COVID-19 scale, 392 people over 18 participated online, using the available sampling method from May to August 2020. A demographic questionnaire, Obsession with the COVID-19 Scale and Fear of Covid-19 Scale, was used to collect data. To evaluate the instrument's reliability, Cronbach's alpha internal consistency method and halving in the form of SPSS 25 statistical software and to evaluate the construct validity, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis with the orthogonal rotation of Varimax type in Lisrel 8.8 software were used.
Findings Exploratory factor analysis identified all four items as one factor. Also, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construction. The convergent validity of the scale with fear of Covid-19 showed a correlation value of 0.25 (p<0.01). In the scale's validity, Cronbach's alpha value was estimated to be 0.797, and the split-half reliability coefficient was estimated to be 0.771.
Conclusion Obsession with the COVID-19 Scale can be used as a suitable measurement tool in research.
CITATION LINKS
[1]Kim SW, Su KP. Using psycho neuro immunity against COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:4-5.
[2]Taylor S. The Psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2019.
[3]Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2381.
[4]Li Z, Ge J, Yang M, Feng J, Qiao M, Jiang R, et al. Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:916-9.
[5]Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatry. 2020;33(2): e100213.
[6]Haider II, Tiwana F, Tahir SM. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult mental health. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S90-4.
[7]Mazza C, Ricci E, Biondi S, Colasanti M, Ferracuti S, Napoli C, et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Italian people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Immediate psychological responses and associated factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3165.
[8]Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.
[9]Skalski S, Uram P, Dobrakowski P, Kwiatkowska A. Thinking Too much about the novel coronavirus, the link between persistent thinking about COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 anxiety and trauma effects. Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2020;8(3):169-74.
[10]Langlois F, Freeston MH, Ladouceur R. Differences and similarities between obsessive intrusive thoughts and worry in a non-clinical population: Study 2. Beh Res Ther. 2000;38(2):175-89.
[11]Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77-100.
[12]Lee SA. How much “thinking” about COVID-19 is clinically dysfunctional?. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:97-8.
[13]Ashraf F, Lee SA, Crunk A E. Factorial validity of the Urdu version of the obsession with COVID-19 scale: Preliminary investigation using a university sample in Pakistan. Death Stud. 2020;1-6.
[14]Evren C, Evren B, Dalbudak E, Topcu M, Kutlu N. Measuring anxiety related to COVID-19: A Turkish validation study of the coronavirus anxiety scale. Death Stud. 2020;1-7.
[15]Stegmann RB. Review of A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.), by Randall E. Schumacker & Richard G. Lomax. Struct Equ Model Multidisciplinary J. 2017;24(3):475-7.
[16]Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic validation manual for health outcome assessments. Lyon: Mapi Institute; 2012.
[17]Aravindan JS, Vivekanandan K. An empirical approach for validation of inter-rater reliability of identified candidate aspects. Int J Comput Sci Eng. 2017;5(5):94-100.
[18]Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020;1-9.
[19]Khodayari Fard M, Ghobari Bonab B, Akbari Zardkhaneh S, Zamonpour EA, Derakhshan M, Musavi SA. Iranian positive thinking scale (IPTS): Development and standardization. J Appl Psychol Res. 2015;5(4):103-30. [Persian]
[2]Taylor S. The Psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2019.
[3]Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2381.
[4]Li Z, Ge J, Yang M, Feng J, Qiao M, Jiang R, et al. Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:916-9.
[5]Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatry. 2020;33(2): e100213.
[6]Haider II, Tiwana F, Tahir SM. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult mental health. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S90-4.
[7]Mazza C, Ricci E, Biondi S, Colasanti M, Ferracuti S, Napoli C, et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Italian people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Immediate psychological responses and associated factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3165.
[8]Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.
[9]Skalski S, Uram P, Dobrakowski P, Kwiatkowska A. Thinking Too much about the novel coronavirus, the link between persistent thinking about COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 anxiety and trauma effects. Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2020;8(3):169-74.
[10]Langlois F, Freeston MH, Ladouceur R. Differences and similarities between obsessive intrusive thoughts and worry in a non-clinical population: Study 2. Beh Res Ther. 2000;38(2):175-89.
[11]Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77-100.
[12]Lee SA. How much “thinking” about COVID-19 is clinically dysfunctional?. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:97-8.
[13]Ashraf F, Lee SA, Crunk A E. Factorial validity of the Urdu version of the obsession with COVID-19 scale: Preliminary investigation using a university sample in Pakistan. Death Stud. 2020;1-6.
[14]Evren C, Evren B, Dalbudak E, Topcu M, Kutlu N. Measuring anxiety related to COVID-19: A Turkish validation study of the coronavirus anxiety scale. Death Stud. 2020;1-7.
[15]Stegmann RB. Review of A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.), by Randall E. Schumacker & Richard G. Lomax. Struct Equ Model Multidisciplinary J. 2017;24(3):475-7.
[16]Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic validation manual for health outcome assessments. Lyon: Mapi Institute; 2012.
[17]Aravindan JS, Vivekanandan K. An empirical approach for validation of inter-rater reliability of identified candidate aspects. Int J Comput Sci Eng. 2017;5(5):94-100.
[18]Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020;1-9.
[19]Khodayari Fard M, Ghobari Bonab B, Akbari Zardkhaneh S, Zamonpour EA, Derakhshan M, Musavi SA. Iranian positive thinking scale (IPTS): Development and standardization. J Appl Psychol Res. 2015;5(4):103-30. [Persian]