ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Dehghani   R. (1 )
Fathi   B. (* )
Sedaghat   M.M. (2 )






(* ) Pharmacology Department, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
(1 ) “Social Determinants of Health Research Center” and “Environment Health Department, Health Faculty”, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
(2 ) Medical Entomology Department, Health Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Pharmacology Department, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Azadi Square, Mashhad, Iran. Postal Box: 91775-1793
Phone: +985118813907
Fax: +985118703700
behrooz840@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:   July  23, 2014
Accepted:   October 29, 2014
ePublished:   January 10, 2015

ABSTRACT

Aims Venomous snake bites are public health problems in different parts of the world. The most specific mainstay in the treatment of envenomation is anti-venom. To treat the envenomation, it is very important to identify the offending species. This study was designed to determine the penetrating pattern of fangs and teeth of some viper snakes.
Materials & Methods This descriptive study was performed on live venomous and nonvenomous snakes from 2010 till 2011. All 47 sample snakes were collected from different regions of Isfahan province such as Kashan City, Ghamsar, Niasar, Mashhad Ardehal, Taher- Abad and Khozagh. Their mouths were inspected every two weeks and development of their fangs and teeth were recorded by taking clear digital photos. Fangs and teeth patterns of samples were drawn and the results were compared.
Findings One or two wounds appeared as typical fang marks at the bite site of venomous snakes while non-venomous snakes had two carved rows of small teeth. Three different teeth and fang patterns were recognized in venomous snakes which were completely different.
Conclusion The fang marks of venomous snakes do not always have a common and classic pattern and there are at least 3 different patterns in Isfahan province, Iran.


CITATION LINKS

[1]Jackson K. How tubular venom-conducting fangs are formed. J Morphol. 2002;252(3):291-7.
[2]Jackson K. The evolution of venom-delivery systems in snakes. Zool J Linn Soc. 2003;137:337-54.
[3]Avicenna H. The Canon; Snakes and Scorpions. Tehran: Souroosh Publications; 2010. [Persian]
[4]Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, et al. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modeling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008;5(11):e218.
[5]Rita P, Animesh DK, Aninda M, Benoy GhK, Sandip H. Snake bite, snake venom, anti-venom and herbal antidote. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2011;2(4):1060-7.
[6]Warrel DA. Guidelines for clinical management of snake bites in the South-East Asia Region. World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, New Delhi; 2010.
[7]Bawaskar HS. Snake venoms and antivenoms: Critical supply issues. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:11-3.
[8]White J. Bites and stings from venomous animals: A global overview. Ther Drug Monit. 2000;22(1):65-8.
[9]Kumar V, Maheshwari R, Verma HK. Toxicity and symptomatic identification of species involved in snakebite in the Indian subcontinent. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2006;12(1):3-18.
[10]Dhanya SP, Bindu LR, Hema CG, Dhanya TH. Antisnake venom use: A retrospective analysis in tertiary care center. Cal Med J. 2009;7(3):1-7.
[11]Theakston RD, Warrell DA. Crisis in snake antivenom supply for Africa. Lancet. 2000;356(9247):2104.
[12]Alirol E, Sharma SK, Bawaskar HS, Kuch U, Chappuis F. Snake bite in south Asia: A review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(1):e603.
[13]Besharat M, Abassi F. Snake bite in Iran; Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment. J Med Couns IRI. 2009;27(1):63-76. [Persian]
[14]Gold BS, Wingert WA. Snake venom poisoning in the Unites States: A review of therapeutic practice. South Med J. 1994;87(6):579-89.
[15]Gold BS, Barish RA, Dart RC. North American snake envenomation: Diagnosis, treatment, and management. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004;22(2):423-43
[16]Porter KR. Herpetology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1972.
[17]Van den Enden E. Bites by Venomous snakes, Acta Clinica Belgica. 2003;58(6):350-5.
[18]Ananda KJ, Mohan K, Kamran A, Sharada R. Snake bite in dogs and its successful treatment. Vet World. 2009;2(2):66-7.
[19]Butt KZ, Anwar F, Rizwan M. Snake bite; experience in a field hospital professional. Professional Med J. 2010;17(2):263-8.
[20]Spiessens M, Van der Velden B, Willems G. Analysis of bite marks. Rev Belge Med Dent. 2005;60(3):203-19. [French]
[21]Gold BS, Dart RC, Barish RA. Bites of venomous snakes. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(5):347-56.
[22]Blaylock RS. The identification and syndromic management of snakebite in South Africa. SA Fam Pract. 2005;47(9):48-53.
[23]Kumar KB, Nanda SS, Venkateshwarlu P, Kumar YK, Jadhav RT. Antisnake venom serum (ASVS). Int J Pharm Biomed Res. 2010;1(3):76-89.
[24]Anz AW, Schweppe M, Halvorson J, Bushnell B, Sternberg M, Andrew Koman L. Management of venomous snakebite injury to the extremities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(12):749-59.
[25]Nishioka Sde A, Silveira PV, Bauab FA. Bite marks are useful for the differential diagnosis of snakebite in Brazil. Wilderness Environ Med. 1995;6(2):183-8.
[26]Isbister GK. Antivenom efficacy or effectiveness: the Australian experience. Toxicology. 2010;263(3):148-154.
[27]Sutherland KS. Snakebite in tropical Australia, Papua New Guinea and Irian Jaya. Emerge Med. 2000;12(4):285-94.
[28]Kardong KV. The evolution of the venom apparatus in snakes from colubrids to viperids and elapids. Mem Inst Butantan. 1982;46:105-18.
[29]Juckett G, Hancox JG. Venomous snakebites in the United States: Management review and update. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65(7):1367-74.