ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Kalantari   N (1)
Ghaffari   S (*)
Ghaffari   S (*)






(*) Parasitology & Mycology Department, Medicine Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
(*) Parasitology & Mycology Department, Medicine Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
(1) 1“Molecular & Cellular Biology Research Center” and “Laboratory Sciences Department, Para-Medicine Faculty”, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Parasitology & Mycology Department, Medicine Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Ganjafrooz Street, Babol, Iran
Phone: +981112291291
Fax: +981132236367
s3ghaffari@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:   July  9, 2013
Accepted:   January 11, 2014
ePublished:   October 7, 2014

ABSTRACT

Aims Parasitology is one of the important lessons in medical and paramedical students’ education. Selection of appropriate teaching method helps students to learn better. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of student participation in Parasitology teaching on their learning and satisfaction to find a better training method.
Materials & Methods This semi-experimental study was performed in 2012-13 on 58 laboratory sciences students at second and third year (2011 and 2010) in the Department of Paramedical of Babol University of Medical Sciences and parasitology (1 and 2) presentation were compared using lecture and with the participation of students in training. A 21-item researcher-made questionnaire used to assess students’ attitudes regarding the effectiveness of the method in the learning progress. Data were analyzed by SPSS 18 using descriptive statistics and Student-T test.
Findings 35 persons (60.4%) introduced this teaching method better than the lecture method. 32 persons (55.2%) were satisfied with the method, 33 persons (56.9%) suggested the method in for future semesters. The mean scores of Parasitology (1 and 2), showed a significant difference with and without participation of students (p<0.04). The obtained scores higher than 16 and 17 increased with participation compared to non-participation method.
Conclusion Participation of students in parasitology teaching, will improve teaching quality of this course. Also, using this method leads to motivation to learn, attending classes, more effort and better communication between teacher and student.

Keywords: Parasitology, Learning, Lectures, Methods,

CITATION LINKS

[1]Liaghatdar M, Abedi MR, Jafari E, Bahrami F. Effectiveness of lecturing teaching method and group-discussion teaching method on educational achievements and communicative skills: A comparative study. Q J Res Plan High Educ. 2004;10(3):29-55. [Persian]
[2]Golafrooz Shahri H, Khaghanizade M. Introduction to oral presentation teaching method. Sci J Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2010;2(4):161-6. [Persian]
[3]Fattahi Bafghi A, Karimi H, Anvari MH, Barzegar K. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Teaching Methods of Group Discussion and Lecturing in Learning Rate of Laboratory Medicine Students. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2007;4(1):51-6. [Persian]
[4]Norozi HM, Mohsenizadeh SM, Jafary Suny H, Ebrahimzadeh S. The effect of teaching uning a blend of collaborative and mastery of learning models, on learning of vital signs: An experiment on nursing and operation room students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(5):544-53. [Persian]
[5]Krueger PM, Neutens J, Bienstock J, Cox S, Erickson S, Goepfert A, et al. To the point: Reviews in medical education teaching techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(2):408-11.
[6]Rossiter Jr CM. The effects of various methods of teaching about freedom of speech on attitudes about free speech issues. Free Speech Yearbook. 1997;9(1):44-51.
[7]Hill RJ. A comparative study of lecture and discussion methods (Studies in adult group learning in the liberal arts). Bangalore: The Fund for Adult Education; 1960.
[8]Johnson JP, Mighten A. Comparison of teaching strategies: Lecture notes combined with structured group discussion versus lecture only. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44(7):319-22.
[9]Momeni Danaei SH, Zarshenas L, Oshagh M, Omid Khoda SM. Which method of teaching would be better; cooperative or lecture?. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(1):24-31. [Persian]
[10]Farhadi A, Fallahi E, Ghazi Sh. Effect of modified team effect of design (m-TED) and lecture teaching methods on students' satisfaction and thier learning in Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. Biannual J Med Educ Dev Center Babol Univ Med Sci. 2013;1(1):7-12. [Persian]
[11]Ghasemian-Safaei H, Farajzadegan Z. Active participation of students in teaching. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;11(9):1129-30. [Persian]
[12]Safari M, Yazdanpanah B, Ghafarian HR, Yazdanpanah Sh. Comparing the effect of lecture and discussion methods on students` learning and satisfaction. Iran J Med Educ. 2006;6(1):59-64. [Persian]
[13]Khalili H, Baba Mohammady H, Hadji Aghajani S, Qods AA . The effects of two educational methods, classic and critical thinking strategies (CTS), on the stable learning of nursing students. J Med Educ. 2003;3(2):71-6. [Persian]
[14]Masoumy M, Ebadi A, Raisifar A, Hosseini R, Javanbakhtian R. Comparison of two teaching methods on nursing students’ learning and retention: Concept mapping or lecture?. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;12(7):498-507. [Persian]
[15]Heravi M, Jadid Milani M, Rejeh N. The effect of lecture and focus group teaching methods on nursing students learning in community health course. Iran J Med Educ. 2004;4(1):55-60. [Persian]
[16]Jafari M. Comparison of lecture and blended teaching methods on learning and satisfaction of medical students in biochemistry course. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;12(7):488-97. [Persian]
[17]Mortazavi H, Nemat R, Soheil Arshadi S, Armat MR. The effectiveness of various teaching methods application and learning in education process. Iran J Med Educ. 2005;5(14). [Persian]