ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Babaei   V. (1)
Garmaroodi   Gh. (1)
Batebi   A. (1)
Alipour   D. (1)
Shahbaz   M. (2)
Babazadeh   T. (3*)






(1) Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(2) 2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(3*) Department of Health Promotion and Education, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health and Nutrition, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Correspondence


Article History

Received:  January  24, 2015
Accepted:  March 14, 2015
ePublished:  March 19, 2015

BRIEF TEXT


... [1-9]. The outbreak of brucellosis in human can be influenced by the prevalence of this disease in animals. By providing the necessary instructions and sensitizing people exposed to danger, the disease can be prevented from spreading to people [3, 8, 10].

In recent studies, there has been an emphasis over the importance of instruction in preventing risky behaviors and reducing brucellosis [11-13].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of educational intervention based on Health Belief Model to empower stockbreeders against risky behaviors of brucellosis.

This study is quasi-experimental.

The stockbreeders of Charoymaq city (a city in East Azerbaijan province, Iran) were studied in 2014.

According to the same study [13] and based on the formula,the sample size was 100 for each of the intervention and control groups. Sampling was randomly stratified; that is out of five rural health centers, four villages were randomly selected from each center (among a total number of 20 villages). Then, among four selected villages, two villages were categorized as the control group and two as the intervention group (10 villages as the control group and 10 villages as the intervention group). The qualified subjects were randomly selected based on the documents of the households. The criteria for being included in the study were being a stockbreeder, age requirements of 20-50, being present in the village during the study, completing a written letter of satisfaction to participate in the study, and no records of any disease for the subjects and their family. Furthermore, the criteria for being excluded were migrating from the village during the study, the death of the subjects, and absence of more than one session during the training course and not willing to continue the study.

The data collection instrument was research-made questionnaire. These questionnaires comprised two sections: (a) demographic characteristics (age, education, gender) and (b) research-made questionnaire based on the constructs of Health Belief Model. In order to assess the appropriateness and clarity of the questionnaire, opinions of health education and health promotion professors were taken. To examine the reliability, the questionnaire was assessed using test-retest method. Twice 20 stockbreeders, who were not included in the study sample within 2 weeks, completed the questionnaire and the Cronbach's alpha was calculated for each of the constructs. To assess the knowledge, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy and behavior ,15 questions (α=0.77), 5 items (α=0.80), 7 items (α=0.82), 9 items (α=0.85), 7 items (α=0.75), (α=0.83), 7qustions (α=0.84) and 10 questions (α=0.87) were designed, respectively. The maximum score of knowledge questions was 15 and the minimum was zero; 1 point was regarded for the correct answer and zero score for no idea and wrong response. The maximum and minimum scores of perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers were 25 and 5, 35 and 7, 54 and 9 and 35 and 7, respectively, all based on 5-point Likert scale. The maximum and minimum scores of self-efficacy were 35 and 7 (5-point Likert scale), respectively and for the behavior a minimum score of 10 and a maximum score of zero were calculated (yes = 1 point, no = zero point). After collecting the intervention and control groups` data, an educational program was designed and implemented for the intervention group. Interventions were presented by trained health workers in this study, such that three training and briefing sessions were held for health workers of the intervention`s villages about the goals of the research. The purpose of using trained health workers was their possibility of communicating effectively with the cases. After training health workers of the intervention villages, training sessions took place by health workers according to the constructs of Health Belief Model for the intervention group. Training sessions were in the form of lectures and panel discussions which were held by health workers of each village`s health centers for the intervention group within 45 days and in three 45-minute sessions. The educational material included the importance of an introduction to brucellosis, ways of transmission and prevention, economic losses and the effects of brucellosis in humans. Moreover, in order to increase the effectiveness on target groups in this study, one of the family members of the subjects were trained about brucellosis in schools and mosques. Finally, the data was collected, compared and analyzed after 3 months of educational intervention. The stockbreeders of the control group received the educational pamphlets. Statistical analysis: To analyze the data, the version of SPSS 21 statistical software was employed and according to the non-normal distribution of the data, descriptive statistical tests (mean standard deviation and frequency), Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the two groups before and after the intervention. Besides, in this study, the level of significance was regarded less than 0.05 in all tests.

In this study, 200 stockbreeders in Charoymaq city were studied within control and intervention groups. The two groups were similar in terms of demographic data including age, sex and education. Most of the people were illiterate in both groups (Table 1). Table 2 illustrates the subjects` intragroup and intergroup relationships before and after the educational intervention. According to the findings no significant difference was observed in the mean scores of both intervention and control groups before the educational intervention (p<0.05), whereas this difference was statistically significant after the educational intervention (p<0.001). Moreover, in this study, a significant difference was found between the mean scores of the constructs of Health Belief Model in the intervention group before and after the intervention (p<0.001). Before training, the mean scores of knowledge , perceived susceptibility, perceived intensity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived self-efficacy and the behavior were 8.86, 17.99, 14.50, 23.75, 19.71, 14.97 and 6.98, respectively, in the intervention group to which had changed 11.12, 27.59, 21.20, 40.08, 26.95, 25.56 and 9.03, respectively after intervention. Such increase was statistically significant in mean scores after the educational intervention.

... [14]. The success of disease-prevention projects requires the knowledge of the reasons behind the disease, identification the ways of transmission, recognition of risk factors and groups exposed to danger, and early detection of the diseases[15]. ... [16]. Besides, in a study by Motamedi et al. who had used the Health Belief Model for increasing preventive behaviors against cutaneous leishmaniasis, the sensitivity of the intervention group had been increased[17].... [18-22]. The findings of this study are in harmony with the results of studies by Niazi et al. [23] and Orooji et al [24].

What is essentially important here is planning a systematic educational intervention using the model of health interventions with an emphasis on effective individuals.

Individuals’ self-reporting and conducting the study in only one vocational group are some of the limitations of this study.

The designed educational intervention based on Health Belied Model has a considerable influence on improving behaviors to prevent brucellosis in the stockbreeders.

The authors of this study are thankful to the authorities of Health Network Management of Charoymaq city as well as the colleagues in the network for their immense assistance during conducting the study.

Non-declared

The present study is approved by the Research Council and Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. At the beginning of the study, letters of consent were obtained from participants in the intervention and control groups and all of them were willing to enter the study.

This article is taken from the master degree`s thesis in the field of health education in Tehran University of Medical Sciences

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Andriopoulos P, Tsironi M, Deftereos S, Aessopos S, Assimakopoulos S. Acute brucellosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of 144 cases. Int J Infect Dis.2007; 11(1):52-7.
[2]Dobrean V, Opris A, Daraban S. An epidemiological and surveillance overview of brucellosis in Romania. Vet Microbiol.2002; 90(1&4):157-63.
[3]Roushan MR, Baiani M, Asnafi N, Saedi F. Outcomes of 19 pregnant women with brucellosis in Babol, northern Iran. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg.2011; 105(9):540-2.
[4]Taleski V, Zerva L, Kantardijev T, Cvetnic Z, Erski-Biljic M, Nikoloskvi B, et al. An overview of the epidemiology and epizootology of brucellosis in selected countries of Central and Southeast Europe. Vet Microbiol.2002; 90(1&4):147-55.
[5]Al-Majali AM, Shorman M. Childhood brucellosis in Jordan: prevalence and analysis of risk factors. Int J Infect Dis.2009; 13(2):196-200.
[6]Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis.2006; 6(2):91-9.
[7]Rajabzadeh R, Shoraka HR, Arzamani K, Alavinia SM, Hosseini SH, Rihani H. [Epidemiological aspects of Brucellosis in North Khorasan province, during 2006-2011]. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences.2013; 5(4):753-60. (Persian)
[8]Kaspper DL, Braunwald E, Favci A, Hauser SL, longoD, Jameson Jl. Harrison’s of internal medical. 16ed. New York: Mc Grawhill compan; 2005:914-7.
[9]Almasi-Hashiani A, Khodayari M, Eshrati B, Shamsi M. [Factors affecting the interval between the onset and diagnosis of brucellosis in Markazi Province, Iran (2010-11)]. Arak Medical University Journal.2012; 14(7):21-30. (Persian)
[10]Soltani R. [The survey of knowledge and practice on women toward Brucellosis]. National Congress of Brucellosis in Iran, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences: Iran, 2009:26. (Persian)
[11]Javaheri J, Noree A. [Assessment of the Health Education to Brucellosis control and prevention in Khomein city]. National Congress of Brucellosis in Iran, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences: Iran, 2009:62. (Persian)
[12]Hosseinzadeh K, Rahmati R. [Assessment of knowledge in rural families toward Brucellosis in Qazvin province]. National Congress of Brucellosis in Iran, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences: Iran, 2009:24. (Persian)
[13]Aminshokravi F, Khanian HR, Hashemian AH. [Effect of training on preventive behavior of brucellosis]. Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion.2013; 1(3):15-22. (Persian)
[14]Allahverdipoor H, Bashirian S. [Brucellosis Prevention Program: Applying “Child to Family Health Education” Method]. Scientific Journal of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.2010; 17(1):46-51. (Persian)
[15]Moradi Gh, Kanani Sh, Sofimajidpur M, Ghaderi E. [Epidemiologic Survey of 3880 patients with brucellosis Kurdistan]. Iran Infectious and Tropical Diseases Journal.2006; 11(33):28-32. (Persian)
[16]Karimy M, Montazeri A, Araban M. [The effect of an educational program based on health belief model on the empowerment of rural women in prevention of brucellosis]. Arak Medical University Journal.2012; 14(7):85-97. (Persian)
[17]Motamedi N, Hejazi SH, Hazavei SMM, Zamani AR, Saberi S, Rahimi E. [Effect of education based on Health Belief Model on promoting preventive behavior of coetaneous Leishmaniasis]. Journal of Military Medicine.2010; 11(4):231-6. (Persian)
[18]Shamsi M, Heidarnia AR, Niknami Sh, Rafiei M, Karimi M. [The Effects of Educational Programs Based on Health Belief Model on Oral Health Behavior of Pregnant Women in Arak city]. Scientific Journal of Hamadan Nursing & Midwifery Faculty.2013; 20(2):12-21. (Persian)
[19]Ghofranipour F. The application of health belief model on prevention brucellosis in the Shahrekord [PhD thesis]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 1998. (Persian)
[20]Park S, Chang S, Chung C. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening. Public Health Nurs.2005; 22(4):289-98.
[21]Sharifi-rad Gh, Hazavei SMM, Hasan-zadeh A, Danesh-amouz A. [The effect of health education based on health belief model on preventive actions of smoking in grade one, middle school students]. Arak Medical University Journal.2007; 10(1):79-86. (Persian)
[22]Koch J. The role of exercise in the African-American woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus: application of the health belief model. J Am Acad Nurse Pract.2002; 14(3):126-9.
[23]Niazi S, Ghafari M, Noori A, Khodadoost M. [Impacts of a health belief model-based education program‘about osteoporosis prevention on junior high school students physical activity]. Hakim Jorjani Journal.2014; 1(1):1-8. (Persian)
[24]Oruoji MA, Hashemi SJ, Hazavehei SMM, Charkazi A, Jvaheri J, Moazeni M. [The positive impact of educational intervention program based on precede model on preventive behaviors to reduce brucellosis in the rural people of Khomein]. Journal of Research Development in Nursing & Midwifery.2012; 9(1):51-60. (Persian)