@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2018;2(2):45-50
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2018;2(2):45-50
Prevalence of Chromosome Inversions (Pericentric and Paracentric) in Patients with Recurrent Abortions
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Abdi A. (1)Bagherizadeh I. (1)
Shajare pour L. (1)
Ideh B. (1)
Hadi pour Z. (1)
Hadi pour F. (1)
Shafaghti Y. (2)
Behjati F. (*)
(*) “Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” , Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(1) Medical Genetic Department, Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC), Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(2) “Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” , Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Article History
Received: February 20, 2016Accepted: May 19, 2017
ePublished: June 15, 2018
BRIEF TEXT
At least 15% of diagnosed pregnancies leads to spontaneous abortion and recurrent abortions occur in about 1% of all pregnancies. Unusual chromosomal structures are the only common symptom for the loss of pregnancy that is due to the end of a pregnancy before the 20th gestational week.
The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy is more than 50%. In cases where there are at least two abortions, the probability that one of the couples have a moderate chromosomal abnormality is 7% [1] and the probability of abortion is 25-50% in these cases [2, 3]. The extent of moderate chromosomal abnormalities in the standard examination of this group of patients should include the karyotype of both parents for chromosomal abnormalities [4]. The risks of the resulting cases depend on the chromosomal rearrangement of the type of novelty and whether the male or female parent is carrier. Visible chromosomal reversals which are observable under the optical microscope are a common group of balanced structural rearrangements. In reversals, a piece of a chromosome turns off 180 degrees after being disconnected from the chromosome and then restored. For reversal, the chromosome must be broken at two points. If the broken part contains the centromere, the type of revision is pericentric. The second reversal mode occurs when the broken part does not contain a centromere and only contains one arm of the chromosome, that in this case the reversal type is paracentric. Increase and decrease of the genetic material is an unbalanced abnormality structure. However, in the reversion, the genetic material is not increased or decreased and it is considered to be a structural malformation, and only the order of the genes changes. Reversals often have no phenotypic effects, however, failure may occur within a gene, and part of it goes to another location and the entire gene action is degraded. Another phenotypic effect is that the location and position of the gene through reversal may have an effect on the expression and effect of the gene and has a spatial effect [5]. ... [5-7].
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of pericentric and paracentric chromosomal reversal in patients with abortion history.
This is a descriptive study.
In this study, couples who had referred to the cytogenetic lab of Sarem Hospital in Tehran from 2006 to 2014 due to a history of one abortion or more were studied.
2299 couples were examined. The incidence of abortion in these women was between the ages of 16 and 57.
The structure of all 44 autosomal chromosomes and 2 sexual chromosomes was investigated. Chromosomal study was performed using T lymphocytes and standard cytogenetic methods. The specimens were studied using GTG banding method with high distinction power. In this method, the cell cycle stops in step S using thymidine and the chromosomes are collected for a short time in the pro-metaphase or early metaphase stage using calcimid. As a result, longer chromosomes with high resolution spanning stains (bph 850-500) can be obtained and chromosomal abnormalities can be detected with high precision. At first, 5 ml of patient's blood sample was prepared using a syringe with 100 μL antidiabetic heparin sodium hydrate with a concentration of 5000 IU / cc and without any preservative. The amount of 0.4 cc of blood was poured into 4 cc of complete RPMI-1640 medium at pH = 7, and one cc of FBS and 125 micro liter of phytohaemagglutinin and 1% of penicillin or streptomycin were added. The contents of the culture tube were shaken for a few times and then placed in a 37 ° C incubator at 30 degrees. After 48 hours, 100 μl of thymidine was added to the culture medium and placed in a 37 ° C incubator for 16 to 17 hours. Then, the tubes were centrifuged for 8 minutes and the supernatant was discarded, and after mixing the precipitate, 5 cc of complete culture medium without PHA was added. Subsequently, the contents of the tubes were mixed and placed in a 37 ° C incubator for 4 hours and 45 minutes. Then, 100 μl of calcimid was added to the tubes and placed in an incubator for 15 minutes. Finally, the cultured samples were harvested, placed on the slides, strained and analyzed using GTG standard bonding method [8]. In this method, the slides are placed in an incubator at 37 ° C for a week or at 70 ° C for one day. Then, the slides were placed in 0.05% trypsin at room temperature for 10 to 60 seconds, and they were washed into the physiologic serum containing 1% FBS serum and then stained with Giemsa. For each patient, at least 15 samples were examined in the metaphase step and 5 metaphases were used to determine the structural abnormalities according to the International Cytogenetic Naming System (ISCN 2013) [8]. C banding method was used to investigate more on pericentric percentile reversals of heterochromatin region of chromosome 9. The method of this method is to detect long chromosome homochromatic regions of Y, 1, 9 and 16 chromosomes and to detect the heterochromatin nature of some chromosomal markers. In the c-banding method, the slides were first placed in a HCl solution at a concentration of 0.2 M at room temperature for 15 to 20 minutes, then they washed with distilled water. Following that the slides were then placed in Ba (OH) 2 saturated solution at room temperature for 10 to 15 minutes and washed with distilled water. Then they were placed in a XSSC2 solution at 60 ° C for 2 to 3 hours. Slides were then stained for 10-15 minutes with 5% Giemsa solution and were placed on the slides using anthelion or DPX adhesive (8). The study of metaphases in C-banding was performed by recognizing the areas of centromere and heterochromatin regions in Y, 1, and 9 chromosomes.
In total, 49 (2.1%) patients had chromosomal reversal (Table 1). A reversal was observed around the chromosome 9 centromere in 37 (1.6%) patients.There were 29 cases of pericentric reversal of chromosome 9 in the region (p11.2q13) including 15 women and 14 males, which contained 26.1% of total cases (Figures 1 and 2).Reversal was observed around centromere in chromosome 9 in two patients with chromosomal displacement in form of 46, XY, t (11.18) (p15.1; q23), inv (9) (p11.2q13), as well as 46, XY, t (12 ; 14) (p11.21q21), inv (9) (p11.2q13), and in another patient with Robertsonin displacement of chromosomes 13 and 14, whose karyotype was 45, XY, der (13; 14) (q10q10) , inv (9) (p11.2q13). In a patient, the reversal of chromosome 9 was in the region (p11.2q13) with a paracentric reversal of chromosome 3, whose karyotype was 46, XY, inv (3) (p23p26), inv (9) (p11.2q13). Pericentric reversal of chromosome 9 was also observed in the region (p11q21.1) in 3 patients. There was a reversal in the heterochromatin region of chromosome 1 and in Y chromosome, each of which was observed in one patient. The reversal of chromosome 2 was obtained between the points 2 / p11 and q13 in one patient. Chromosomal reversals that was observed in other chromosomes as well as in non-heterochromatin regions were pericenteric in chromosomes 1, 5, 8, 11 and 12 (Figures.1 and 3) and in paracentric in chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 8, and 12 (Figure 4).
In this study, the total rate of pericentric reversal in chromosome 9 was 1.6%. The precentric reversal of chromosome 9 or inv (9) usually accounts for 1 to 2% of the population [9]. Previous research findings have reported the reversal of chromosome 9 at points (p11.2q13) / (p11q21) in 27.2% of patients with a history of recurrent abortions [1]. Knowing that the observed reversal is belonged to which categories of reversal is very important [10]. Reversible carriers may have the risk of removing or rearrangement of chromosomes during meiosis. The results of paracentric reversals are detrimental [11]. Pericentric reversal carriers also have high risk of abortion. Crossing over results in a pericentric reversal loop may be the removal or duplication of a chromosomal fragment. The size of the genetic material obtained or lost depends on the length of the broken part [4]. ... The results of several studies have shown that if a person is a carrier of balanced pericentric reversal, and that this reversal has previously led to the birth of an abnormal child, the risk of having an unbalanced baby is approximately 5-10% for that person. If the reversal is proven by repeated abortion, this risk would be close to 1% [12].
Chromosomal reversal in the patient can lead to abortion or childbirth with abnormalities. Therefore, performing karyotype as a gold diagnostic test is necessary for patients with a history of abortion or abnormal child birth.
The prevalence of pericentric and paracentric chromosomal reversals in patients with abortion history is 2.1%. Also, the pericentric reversal rate of chromosome 9 in the regions of p11.2q13 is 1.26%, which is similar to the prevalence in the natural population and therefore cannot be the cause of abortion.
The efforts of our dear Dr. Saremi, the deputy chairman of the Sarem Specialized Hospital, all the doctors who participated in the referral of patients and all patients and their families, as well as the assistance of the staff of the hospital's cytogenetic laboratory, especially Shahnaz Ghalabeygi, Fatemeh Moghaddasi and Roghieh Vahedi, are appreciated.
TABLES and CHARTS
Show attach fileCITIATION LINKS
[1]Boue A, Boue J, Gropp A. Cytogenetics of Pregnancy Wastage. In: Harris H, Hirschhorn K, editors. Advances in Human Genetics 14; 1985. pp. 1-57.
[2]Daniel A, Hook EB, Wulf G. Risks of unbalanced progeny at amniocentesis to carriers of chromosome rearrangements: Data from United States and Canadian laboratories. Am J Med Genet. 1989;33(1):14-53.
[3]McKinlay Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 648.
[4]Sılan F, Yalcıntepe S, Uysal D, Urfalı M, Uludag A, Cosar E, et al. High frequency of chromosomal anomalies and a novel chromosomal insertion associated with infertility and recurrent miscarriages (Reproductive failure) in West Turkey. Gene Ther Mol Biol. 2014;16:139-48.
[5]Sohrabi M. Genetics and molecular Biology. Tehran: Pooran Pazhoohesh; 2012. p. 552. [Persian] 6- Celep F, Karagüzel A. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 (p11q13) in two cases. East J Med. 2008;13(1):35-7.
[6]Celep F, Karagüzel A. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 (p11q13) in two cases. East J Med. 2008;13(1):35-7.
[7]Drabova J, Trkova M, Hancarova M, Novotna D, Hejtmankova M, Havlovicova M, et al. A 15 mb large paracentric chromosome 21 inversion identified in Czech population through a pair of flanking duplications. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7:51.
[8]Behjati F. Laboratory manuals in human cytogenetics. Tehran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation SeiencesPublication; 1386. [Persian]
[9]Pellegrini SAP, Ribeiro MCM, Kahn E, De Barros GL, Rodrigues MA, De Paula Coutinho M, et al. Familial study of paracentric inversion in chromosome 3p. Br J Med Med Res. 2013;3(3):760-70.
[10]Farcas S, Belengeanu V, Stoian M, Stoicanescu D, Popa C, Andreescu N. Considerations regarding the implication of polymorphic variants and chromosomal inversions in recurrent miscarriage. Off J Romanian Soci Pediatr Surg. 2007;X(39-40):7-11. [Romanian]
[11]Karaman A, Paşa U. Cytogenetic analysis of couples with recurrent miscarriages: A series of 316 cases. New J Med. 2013;30(1):30-2.
[12]Ternpenny PD. Emery’s element of medical genetics. 14th edition. Akbari MT, translator. Tehran: Andisheh Rafi; 2012. [Persian]
[2]Daniel A, Hook EB, Wulf G. Risks of unbalanced progeny at amniocentesis to carriers of chromosome rearrangements: Data from United States and Canadian laboratories. Am J Med Genet. 1989;33(1):14-53.
[3]McKinlay Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 648.
[4]Sılan F, Yalcıntepe S, Uysal D, Urfalı M, Uludag A, Cosar E, et al. High frequency of chromosomal anomalies and a novel chromosomal insertion associated with infertility and recurrent miscarriages (Reproductive failure) in West Turkey. Gene Ther Mol Biol. 2014;16:139-48.
[5]Sohrabi M. Genetics and molecular Biology. Tehran: Pooran Pazhoohesh; 2012. p. 552. [Persian] 6- Celep F, Karagüzel A. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 (p11q13) in two cases. East J Med. 2008;13(1):35-7.
[6]Celep F, Karagüzel A. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 (p11q13) in two cases. East J Med. 2008;13(1):35-7.
[7]Drabova J, Trkova M, Hancarova M, Novotna D, Hejtmankova M, Havlovicova M, et al. A 15 mb large paracentric chromosome 21 inversion identified in Czech population through a pair of flanking duplications. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7:51.
[8]Behjati F. Laboratory manuals in human cytogenetics. Tehran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation SeiencesPublication; 1386. [Persian]
[9]Pellegrini SAP, Ribeiro MCM, Kahn E, De Barros GL, Rodrigues MA, De Paula Coutinho M, et al. Familial study of paracentric inversion in chromosome 3p. Br J Med Med Res. 2013;3(3):760-70.
[10]Farcas S, Belengeanu V, Stoian M, Stoicanescu D, Popa C, Andreescu N. Considerations regarding the implication of polymorphic variants and chromosomal inversions in recurrent miscarriage. Off J Romanian Soci Pediatr Surg. 2007;X(39-40):7-11. [Romanian]
[11]Karaman A, Paşa U. Cytogenetic analysis of couples with recurrent miscarriages: A series of 316 cases. New J Med. 2013;30(1):30-2.
[12]Ternpenny PD. Emery’s element of medical genetics. 14th edition. Akbari MT, translator. Tehran: Andisheh Rafi; 2012. [Persian]