ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Sadeghi   M. (1)
Taghva   A. (*)
Goudarzi   N. (2)
Rah Nejat   A.M. (2)






(*) Psychiatry Department, Medicine Faculty, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(1) Evaluation & Measurement Department, Psychology & Educational Faculty, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
(2) Psychiatry Department, Medicine Faculty, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Aja University of Medical Sciences, Next to the 501 Hospital, West Fatemi Street, Tehran, Iran
Phone: +98 (21) 88661875
Fax: +98 (21) 22194140
ataghva@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  June  23, 2016
Accepted:  October 15, 2016
ePublished:  November 21, 2016

BRIEF TEXT


One of psychological disorders is Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) that is classified as an anxiety disorder. Sudden and unexpected environmental disorders can cause severe psychological and physical symptoms. These severe symptoms, often referred to as PTSD, are defined as a severe response in face of severe stressors that appear in form of high anxiety, avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma and numbness in emotional responses [1, 2].

… [3, 17]. Iran-Iraq war has caused various physical and mental effects in many victims. It has been reported that among these problems, post-traumatic stress disorder has been the most common with 41% [18]. … [19-22].

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) with the help of modern psychometric methods among the veterans.

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) with the help of modern psychometric methods among the veterans.

The period of the study was from November 2015 to April 2016. The population consisted of all male veterans with chronic Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Tehran.

400 of these veterans were selected as samples. Due to lack of access and possibility of random sampling, purposive and available sampling was used. Inclusion criteria included confirmed disorder by psychologists in military hospitals, minimum education level of primary school, and the lack of psychotic disorders and features according to the psychiatrists

The research tool was a Checklist of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PCL) which was a self-report scale for screening these patients from normal people and other patients. The advantage of this checklist is its conciseness and brevity, and its administration takes 10 minutes. PCL Checklist has been prepared based on DSM-5 diagnosis criteria for The United States National Center of PTSD. It includes 20 items that 5, 2, 7, and 6 items of it are related to signs and symptoms of re-experiencing the traumatic event, avoidance of stimuli associated with traumatic event, negative changes in cognition and mood associated with the event, and arousal and reactivity associated with traumatic event respectively [23]. Total score ranges from zero to 80 that is obtained by summing the scores in each of 20 items based on the Likert Scale (at all=zero, very low=one, moderate=2, severe=3, very severe=4).The cut off score for the diagnosis is 50. PCL-5 psychometric properties were studied in a large group with 912 members of the army seeking for PTSD treatment. The internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity and factor structure of PCL-5 indicated high internal consistency and accepted validity of PCL-5 checklist [24]. In order to assess the validity of the checklist and confirmation of the four-factor structure in its Persian version, first and second order exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used. For confirmatory factor analysis, with regard to the fact that serial and batch items were existed in the model, Diagonal Weighted Least Square (DWLS) and theta parameters were used during the first and second order confirmatory factor analysis. In order to study the convergent evidence for PCL-5 Scale, CAPS list was used and the correlation coefficient between the two measures was reported in the 30 persons of the sample group. Also, to investigate the reliability of PCL-5 Scale, Cronbach’s alpha was used. In order to assess test-rest reliability, also, 30 persons in the sample group were tested again after three weeks.

In total, the structures based on the four subscales to explain and fit, were in good condition and it can be told that the researcher`s assumption that the PCL-5 checklist has four factors, is approved (Figure 1, Table 1). There was a significant correlation between PCL-5 and CAPS scales. Therefore, PCL-5 Checklist had satisfactory convergent evidence (p=0.001; r=0.68). Cranbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability coefficients in the whole scale and its dimensions were higher than 0.07 and they were satisfactory (Table 2).

In line with the findings of this study, validity and reliability of PCL-5 have been confirmed in a study of parents of children with burn [25]. Also, the internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of PCL-5 in the members of army who seek treatment, indicated high consistency and acceptable validity of PCL-5 checklist [24].

It is recommended that this tool be used in Iran for screening.

Since the presented results in this study is related to the veterans, caution should be observed in the generalization of the result to other PTSD groups.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PCL-5) has good reliability and validity, and it can be effective in screening evaluations of veterans.

The authorities of military hospitals that provided the context for this study are appreciated.

Non-declared

Assurance of confidentiality of information, and psychological and mental preparation of the samples for participating in this study were the moral points observed in this study.

The funds for this research was provided by the author

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Boulos D, Zamorski M. Deployment-related mental disorders among Canadian forces personnel deployed in support of mission in afghanistan, 2001-2008. J Canadian Med Assoc. 2013;185(11):545-52.
[2]Ikin JF, Creamer MC, Sim MR, McKenzie DP. Co-morbidity of PTSD and depression in Korean War veterans: Prevalence, predictors, and impairment. J Affect Disord. 2010;125(1-3):279-86.
[3]Rauch S, Favorite T, Giardino N, Porcari C, Defever E, Liberzon I. Relationship between anxiety, depression, and health satisfaction among veterans with PTSD. J Affect Disord. 2010;121(1-2):165-8.
[4]Franciskovic T, Stevanovic A, Jelusic I, Roganovic B, Klaric M , Grkovic J. Secondary Traumatization of wives of war veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Croat Med J. 2007;48(2):177-84.
[5]Fernandez M A, Short M. Wounded warriors with PTSD: A compilation of best practices and technology in treatment. Prof Couns. 2014;4(2):114-21.
[6]Xue C, Ge Y, Tang B, Liu Y, Kang P, Wang, M, et al. A meta-analysis of risk factors for combat-related PTSD among Military personnel and veterans. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120270.
[7]Badour CL, Blonigen DM, Boden MT, Feldner MT, Bonn-Miller MO. A longitudinal test of the bi-directional relations between avoidance coping and PTSD severity during and after PTSD treatment. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(10):610-6.
[8]Firuzabadi A, Farid AA, Mirzaee J, Shareh H. Normalization of clinician administered PTSD scale-version 1 (CAPS-1) for psychological effects due to war. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2010;15(4):334-42. [Persian]
[9]Norris FH, Perilla JL. The revised Civilian Mississippi Scale for PTSD: reliability, validity, and cross-language stability. J Trauma Stress. 1996;9(2):285-98.
[10]Goudarzi MA. The validity and reliability of the scale of post-traumatic stress Mississippi (Mississippi scale). J Psychol. 2003;7(2):153-78. [Persian]
[11]Rossi A, Carmassi C, Daneluzzo E. Community assessment of psychic experiences (CAPE) and trauma and loss spectrum (TALS) 12 months after an earthquake in Italy. J Psychopathol. 2013;19:68-72.
[12]American Psychiatric Association. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
[13]Eifert GH, Forsyth JP, Arch J, Espejo E, Keller M, Langer D. Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders: Tree case studies exemplifying a unified treatment protocol. Cogn Behav Pract. 2009;16(4):368-85.
[14]Orsillo SM, Batten SV. Acceptance and commitment therapy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Modif. 2005;29(1):95-129.
[15]Thompson RW, Arnkoff DB, Glass CR. Conceptualizing mindfulness and acceptance as components of psychological resilience to trauma. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011;12(4):220-35.
[16]Marx BP, Sloan DM. Peritraumatic dissociation and experiential avoidance as predictors of posttraumatic stress symptomatology. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43(5):569-83.
[17]Morina N. The role of experiential avoidance in psychological functioning after war-related stress in Kosovar civilians. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007;195(8):697-700.
[18]Nemati SH, Saeedi Moghadam M, Pirzadi H. Psychological consequences of the Iraqi war against Iran. J Sacred Defense. 2012;1(2):81-95. [Persian]
[19]Ghazanfari T, Faghihzadeh S, Aragizadeh H, Soroush MR, Yaraee R, Mohammad Hassani Z, et al. Sardasht-Iran cohort study of chemical warfare victims: Design and methods. Arch Iran Med. 2009;12(1):5-14.
[20]Shalev AY, Peri T, Canetti H, Schreiber S. Predictors of PTSD in injured trauma survivors: A prospective study. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153(2):219-25.
[21]Kessler RC. Posttraumatic stress disorder: The burden to the indicidual and society. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(Suppl 5):4-12.
[22]Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 3rd edition. New York: HapperCollins; 1996.
[23]Weathers FW, Litz BT, Keane TM, Palmieri PA, Marx BP, Schnurr PP. PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Honolulu: National Center for PTSD; 2013.
[24]Wortmann JH, Jordan AH, Weathers FW, Resick PA, Dondanville KA, Hall-Clark B, et al. Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(11):1392-1403.
[25]Sveen J, Bondjers K, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: A pilot study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2016;7:10.