ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Nazmi   S. (1)
Pejhan   A. (1)
Azhdari-Zarmehri   H. (2)
Mojadadi   M.S. (*)






(*) Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
(1) “Cellular and Molecular Research Center” and “Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine”, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
(2) Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Building Number 2 of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Kilometer 5 of Tehran Road, Sabzevar, Iran
Phone: +985144446070
Fax: +985144264462
mojadadim@medsab.ac.ir

Article History

Received:  May  30, 2015
Accepted:  January 2, 2016
ePublished:  March 5, 2016

BRIEF TEXT


… [1-11] Several studies have confirmed the role of sound pollution and vibration as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases [12, 13].

Sound pollution can cause confusion, increase in heart rate, increase in blood pressure, damages of myocardia and heart valves, and risk factors which increase cardiovascular diseases such as viscosity, lipid and blood sugar [14-17]. … [18-25]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of short-term and long-term exposure to the sound pollution on some cardiac electrophysiological and biochemical parameters in the Wistar rats.

This is an experimental study.

Wistar male rats (200 to 250 gr) were studied.

60 rats were studied.

After one week that rats became accustomed to the new situation, they randomly divided into the experimental groups in one of which the rats had short-term exposure (one day exposure) to sound pollution and in the other one the rats had long-term exposure to the sound pollution (abbreviated as short-term group and long-term group). Short-term groups included four different groups i.e. a control group and three experimental group of 4, 8 and 12 hours of exposure to sound (each group consisted of 5 mice). And for investigating the short-term exposure to sound pollution the rats in these groups once entered the sound room and were exposed to 100 dB sound intensity. Control group animals were kept in the animal room and were not exposed to the sound. The rats in control group entered the sound room (without exposure to the sound) every day for 8 hours to experience the condition of sound room. Long-term groups were, also, included four different groups namely a control group and three experimental groups of 4, 8 and 12 hours exposure to sound (each group included 10 rats). These animals were transferred to the sound room every day for 4, 8 and 12 hours and were exposed to 100 dB sound intensity. Animals in the control group were in the animal room during a 30-day trial, and were not exposed to the sound. The sound pollution in form of white noise with the intensity of 100 dB and the frequency of 250-350 Hz was created by a Dictaphone stereo (Sony; Japan). To control the intensity and frequency of sound, an audiometer machine (PCE instruments; England) was used. The start and end time of exposure was controlled by a timer. Heart`s electrical activity was recorded using electrocardiography (Nexus Lifecare; India) and subcutaneous electrodes which were designed to record ECG in rats. Time parameters included RR interval, PQ interval, QT interval, QTC corrected interval (using Bazett`s formula: QT Interval/√ (RR interval)), PR segment, QRS complex; and voltage parameters including P wave height, QRS complex height, and the T wave height. Finally, the number of heart beats per minute was calculated from the RR interval on ECG. In long-term group, after recording the electrocardiogram, the mice were dissected and a drop of blood from their dorsal aorta was used for measuring creatine phosphokinase (isoenzyme MB) and troponin. The level of creatine phosphokinase and cardiac troponin 1 enzymes was determined qualitatively by rapid one-step immunochromatographic kits (ALUXBIO Co., LTD; China). The collected data were analyzed by SPSS 21 software (IBM; Chicago; USA) applying statistical methods including one-way ANOVA and Tukey`s post-hoc test considering the significance level of 0.05 for investigating between-group differences.

Short-term exposure to sound pollution had only significant effect on the time interval between two R waves (RR-interval) (p<0.05). That is to say, the RR interval had a significant decrease in a group which was exposed to sound pollution four hours compared to control group (p=0.021). However, there was no significant difference between groups exposed to 8 and 12 hours of sound pollution on one hand and control group on the other hand (Table 1). Short-term exposure to sound pollution had no significant effect on ECG voltage parameters (results have not been shown). Long-term exposure to sound pollution had significant effect on RR, QT and QTc intervals (p<0.05) i.e. the QT, RR and QTc intervals in the group which exposed to 12 hours of pollution (p=0.023, p=0.045 and p=0.041, respectively) and the group which exposed to eight hours of sound pollution (p=0.032, p= 0.046 and p=0.044, respectively) were significantly less than control group. However, in the group exposed to 4 hours of sound pollution, the parameters did not have any significant difference with control group. Long-term exposure to sound pollution did not have any significant effect in different groups in PR interval, QRS and PR segment (p>0.05; Table 1). Long-term exposure to the sound pollution had only significant effect on the QRS complex voltage (p<0.05) and QRS complex voltage in two experimental groups exposed to 12 hours (p= 0.02) and 8 hours (p=0.031) of sound pollution increased significantly compared to control group. However, no significant difference was observed in the group exposed to four hours of sound pollution compared to control group. Long-term exposure to sound pollution did not have any significant effect on P and T wave voltages in the different groups (p>0.05; Table 2). Short-term exposure to sound pollution had significant effect on the heart rate (p<0.05) and heart rate in the group which is exposed to four hours of exposure to sound pollution was significantly increased compared to control group (p = 0.028) while no significant difference was observed between the groups exposed to 8 and 12 hours of sound pollution and control group (Diagram 1). Long-term exposure to sound pollution, also, had significant effect on the heart rate (p<0.05) and the heart rate in the groups exposed to eight (p = 0.031) and 12 hours (p = 0.013) of sound pollution was significantly increased compared to control group while in the group which was exposed to sound pollution four hours no significant difference was observed compared to control group (p>0.05; Diagram 1). The results of the test for determining the effect of long-term exposure to sound pollution on the level of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and cardiac troponin I (Tn I) were negative in all groups.

Short and long term exposures to sound pollution with the intensity of 100 dB changed some of the time parameters of ECG in male Wistar rats. And short-term four-hour exposure to the sound pollution reduced the interval of RR wave. However, long-term exposure to pollution (8 and 12 hours) significantly reduced QT and QTc waves, as well as a significant decrease in RR intervals. Long-term exposure to sound pollution, also, significantly increased QRS complex voltage. And this change was not seen in short-term exposure. Moreover, short and long term exposures to sound pollution significantly increased heart rate in the rats, while in the short-term exposure only four-hour exposure caused an increase in heart rate and in the daily long-term exposure, 8 and 12 hours exposure to sound pollution increased the heart rate. Sound pollution as an environmental stressor to activate the hormonal axis of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal cortex and the nervous axis of hypothalamus- sympathetic nervous system-the center of adrenal gland increases the level of cortisol, vasopressin and catecholamine including epinephrine and norepinephrine in the blood and creates a series of hemodynamic, structural and functional changes in the cardiovascular system [7, 14, 26, 27]. An increase in QRS complex voltage which was observed in this study, mechanically could mean more severe contraction of the ventricles or an increase in the cardinal muscle mass called hypertrophy [28]. … [29] The result of immunochromotographic tests for creatine phosphokinase and troponin I was negative in all groups indicating lack of severe damage in cardiac muscle. Many studies have shown that the sounds over 130 dB can cause serious damages to myocardial cells and even cause the heart attack [30, 31].

In a human study, the effect of different sound pollution which people are faced with at their work or life on the function of cardiovascular system should be examined.

Of the limitations of this study, the difficulty in determining the specific and standard definition of sound pollution can be mentioned.

Short-term exposure to 100dB sound pollution can reduce RR wave interval in the Wistar rats. However, long-term exposure to the sound pollution, in addition to a reduction in RR wave interval, significantly reduces QT and QTc waves and significantly increases QRS complex voltage. In addition, short-term and long-term exposures to sound pollution can significantly increase the heart rate in rats. In general, continuous exposure to sound pollution can increase heart rate and cardiac function through changing the hemodynamic condition.

Deputy of Research and Technology of Sabzevar Univeristy of Medical Sciences is appreciated.

Non-declared

All tests were in accordance with the instruction in the care and use of laboratory animals (National Institute of Health, Publication No. 23-80, revised 1996). In addition, all the methods were approved by Ethics Committee of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.

This project has been sponsored by Deputy of Research and Technology of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-32.
[2]Saremi M, Rezapour R. Non-auditory Effects Caused by Environmental Noise Pollution. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2013;20(3):312-25. [Persian]
[3]van Kempen E, Babisch W. The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012;30(6):1075-86.
[4]Stansfeld SA, Matheson MP. Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. Br Med Bull. 2003;68:243-57.
[5]Brouček J. Effect of noise on performance, stress, and behaviour of animals. Stovak J Anim Sci. 2014;47(2):111-23.
[6]Ising H, Braun C. Acute and chronic endocrine effects of noise: review of the research conducted at the Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene. Noise Health. 2000;2(7):7-24.
[7]Babisch W. Stress hormones in the research on cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise Health. 2003;5(18):1-11.
[8]Nazemi S, Pejhan A, Azhdari-Zarmehri H, Mojadadi MS. The effects of sound pollution on the serum levels of corticosterone and other hematological parameters in male rats. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2015;17(8):41-7. [Persian]
[9]de Souza TC, Périssé AR, Moura M. Noise exposure and hypertension: Investigation of a silent relationship. Bio Med Central. 2015;15:328.
[10]Gesi M, Riva A, Soldani P, Fornai F, Natale G, Lenzi P, et al. Central and peripheral benzodiazepine ligands prevent mitochondrial damage induced by noise exposure in the rat myocardium: an ultrastructural study. Anat Rec. 1999;255(3):334-41.
[11]Rahma MS, Win NN, Rafidah HM, Kamal T, Ailin R. The effects of noise on cardiovascular parameters using isolated rats hearts. Sci Ser Data Rep. 2012;4(12):39-50.
[12]Babisch W, Beule B, Schust M, Kersten N, Ising H. Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiol. 2005;16(1):33-40.
[13]Selander J, Nilsson ME, Bluhm G, Rosenlund M, Lindqvist M, Nise G, et al. Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and myocardial infarction. Epidemiol. 2009;20(2):272-9.
[14]Babisch W. Cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):201-4.
[15]McClintock PV, Stefanovska A. Noise and determinism in cardiovascular dynamics. Phys Stat Mech Appl. 2002;314(1-4):69-76.
[16]Takeuchi H, Enzo A, Minamitani H. Circadian rhythm changes in heart rate variability during chronic sound stress. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2001;39(1):113-7.
[17]Ismaila SO, Odusote A. Noise exposure as a factor in the increase of blood pressure of workers in a sack manufacturing industry. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2014;3(2):116-21.
[18]Evrard AS, Bouaoun L, Champelovier P, Lambert J, Laumon B. Does exposure to aircraft noise increase the mortality from cardiovascular disease in the population living in the vicinity of airports? Results of an ecological study in France. Noise Health. 2015;17(78):328-36.
[19]Stansfeld S, Crombie R. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: Research in the United Kingdom. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):229-33.
[20]Lercher P, Botteldooren D, Widmann U, Uhrner U, Kammeringer E. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: research in Austria. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):234-50.
[21]Kempen E. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: research in The Netherlands. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):221-8.
[22]Belojevic G, Paunovic K, Jakovljevic B, Stojanov V, Ilic J, Slepcevic V, et al. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: research in Serbia. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):217-20.
[23]Bluhm G, Eriksson C. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: Research in Sweden. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):212-6.
[24]Maschke C. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: research in Germany. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):205-11.
[25]Ahnve S. Correction of the QT interval for heart rate: Review of different formulas and the use of Bazett's formula in myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1985;109(3 Pt 1):568-74.
[26]Babisch W, Fromme H, Beyer A, Ising H. Increased catecholamine levels in urine in subjects exposed to road traffic noise: the role of stress hormones in noise research. Environ Int. 2001;26(7-8):475-81.
[27]Spreng M. Central nervous system activation by noise. Noise Health. 2000;2(7):49-58.
[28]Bacharova L, Kyselovic J, Klimas J. QRS voltage-duration product in the identification of left ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2002;79(2):143-8.
[29]Paparelli A, Soldani P, Breschi M, Martinotti E, Scatizzi R, Berrettini S, et al. Effects of subacute exposure to noise on the noradrenergic innervation of the cardiovascular system in young and aged rats: a morphofunctional study. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1992;88(2):105-13.
[30]Sorensen M, Andersen ZJ, Nordsborg RB, Jensen SS, Lillelund KG, Beelen R, et al. Road traffic noise and incident myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39283.
[31]Munzel T, Gori T, Babisch W, Basner M. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(13):829-36.