ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Shakeri   A. (*)
Sokhangoei   Y. (1 )
Hoseini   Y. (2)






(*) Physical Education Department, Physical Education & Sports Sciences Faculty, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
(1 ) Physiotherapy Department, Physiotherapy Faculty, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(2) Physical Education Department, Physical Education & Sports Sciences Faculty, Scientific-Applied University of Physical Education, Hamedan, Iran

Correspondence

Address: No. 49, Shahid Mofateh Street, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 15719-14911
Phone: +98 (21) 77299848
Fax: +98 (21) 77292669
alishakeri310@gmail.com

Article History

Received:  November  20, 2015
Accepted:  July 19, 2016
ePublished:  January 19, 2017

BRIEF TEXT


The annual incidence of back pain in 50% of adults is in career age [1, 2].

… [3-24]. Evidence of stabilization exercise in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain is plentiful but disputed because it is still no general agreement over their superiority over other treatments in the short and long term effects. It should be noted that most studies have been accompanied with other interventions (such as manual treatments especially massage). This suggests that combined therapy is more effective than treatment with stabilization exercise alone [25].

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term effects of massage therapy, core stability exercise and combined method on limits of stability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

This study is semi-experimental with pretest and posttest design.

This study was conducted in 2013 on 30 male patients with chronic non-specific low back pain referred to physiotherapy clinics of 1 and 3 districts of Tehran City.

30 male patients with chronic non-specific low back pain were selected randomly. Inclusion criteria included male gender, age range 20 to 50 years, suffering from chronic low back pain and enjoyment of general health. Also, numbness, decreased muscle strength or possibility of urinary incontinence that imply cauda equina syndrome, history of surgery of the spine and herniated disc, pain in the spine with fever and chills, morning stiffness, etc. that indicate infectious spondylopyosis, or inflammatory diseases, compression fracture due to osteoporosis, stenosis or spondylolisthesis, a fracture in the spine, pelvis and lower extremities which indicate the presence of osteoporosis or other diseases, a history of neuromuscular diseases and disorders of the vestibular system, a history of dizziness and the consumption of drugs with known effects on balance, spine and lower extremity malfunctions, malignancies, arthritis, and other infectious, systematic and metabolic diseases [24], and lack of physical activities were considered as exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups of massage therapy, core stability exercises, and combinational method.

In order to assess the optimal spatial and temporal dynamic postural control of each of the subjects, Limits-of-Stability Test on the force place device version 6.11. (Nerocom; United States) was used. In this test, the variables: 1) Reaction Time (RT): The time between the first command to move and the first movement of the patient in seconds, 2) Movement Velocity (MV): Average speed of movement of the center of gravity in degrees per second, 3) The Maximum Flow (MF): The maximum distance achieved during the test, and 4) Endpoint of Excursion (EPE): The distance of the first move toward the determined target that is considered as a percentage of the maximum distance, were evaluated in eight directions of anterior (1), right anterior (2), right lateral (3), right posterior (4), posterior (5), left posterior (6), left lateral (7), and left anterior (8)by the device. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups of massage therapy, core stability exercises, and combined method. Massage therapy group received 12 15-minute sessions (4 weeks in form of every other day) of surface stroking, deep stroking, kneading and friction (each for 3 minutes) under the supervision of the researcher and a therapist [28]. All the techniques applied in the therapy group were in the lumbar region. Core stability exercise group received 12 sessions (4 weeks every other day) of the selective core exercises under the supervision of the therapist. The exercises have been designed into two parts (including warm-up and the main exercises). Before the main exercises, patients were doing warm-up exercises in order to prepare muscles for working out the other exercises. The total duration of training sessions were from 20 to 73 minutes. The total duration of training sessions was obtained from adding the duration of preservation of shrinkage or stretching to resting time. Combinational method group received 15-minute 12 sessions (4 weeks every other day) of massage therapy and core stability training protocols. The warm up exercises and the main exercises for both core stability exercises group and combinational method group were the same. During the study, the patients were asked to refrain from using drugs and other therapeutic interventions. Data were analyzed by SPSS 16 software. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the normality distribution of the data. In order to evaluate the results before and after the test, and to compare the between groups comparison among the three groups, ANCOVA test was used.

Subject had the mean age 33.44±9.02 years, mean weight 84.33±11.70 kg, mean height 177.00±4.40 cm, and mean body mass index of 26.58±2.75 kg per square meter. After applying any of the intervention, significant difference was observed between the groups in RT variable in the directions 3 (right lateral), and 8 (left anterior) (p<0.05; Figure 1). Also, after intervention, significant difference was obtained in amount of MV in direction 2 (right anterior) between only the two groups of core stability and combinational method exercises (p<0.05) i.e. the combined method had more improvement in MV compared with the core stability method (Figure 2). After intervention, only in Direction ME7 and between the two core stability exercises group and combined method group, there was a significant difference (p<0.05; Figure 3) that is core exercises caused more improvement in ME variable compared to the combined exercises. However, with respect to EPE variable in different directions, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (p<0.05; Figure 3).

The results of this study are in line with the results of systematic review of May and Johnson. They stated that in most studies, stabilization exercises were accompanied with other interventions such as manual intervention with or without recommendation, and only 4 studies used the stability exercises as the only therapy. Two of the studies clearly support core stability exercises and a study reported a significant difference between the two groups [25]. … [26-31].

It is suggested that a research be conducted in line with this study using other treatment methods in patients with acute and sub-acute back pain in different age of groups. On the other hand, since the assessment of balance parameters are considered as a criterion for the whole body operation, it is recommended that assessing the balance parameters of these patients be considered.

lack of study on the effects of mental-psychological, economic and other factors on the variables of the study, and lack of control on the environmental factors such as nutrition pattern, rest and activity level of patient’s job were the limitations of this study.

Running each of the methods of massage therapy, core stability exercises and combined exercises in short-term (4 weeks) improve postural balance and improve the time and percentage of performance for the limit of stability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain that the effect of combined therapy in improving the limit of stability in these patients is more than the other two methods.

All the participants of the study are appreciated.

Non-declared

The authors observed all ethical issues related to research on the human subjects.

The study has been conducted without taking financial assistance from any organization and institutions.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Robin DI. Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(2):353-71.
[2]Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults. health provider utilization and care seeking. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27(5):327-35.
[3]Stankovic A, Lazovic M, Kocic M, Zlatanovic¬d. Spinal segmental stabilization exercises combined with traditional strengthening exercise program in patients with chronic low back pain. Acta Fac Med Naiss. 2008;25(3):165-70.
[4]Furlan AD, Imamura M, Dryden T, Irvin E. Massage for low back pain: An updated systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(16):1669-84.
[5]Clare H, Adams R, Maher C. A systematic review of efficacy of McKenzie therapy for spinal pain. Aust J Physiother. 2004;50(4):209-16.
[6]Karimi N, Ebrahimi E, Torkaman G, Kahrizi S, Maghsoudi Pour M, Ezzati K. The effects of stability training on postural indices and limit of stability in male patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Phys Treat J. 2012;2(1):31-8. [Persian]
[7]Kapandji IA. Physiology of the joint. 2nd edition. Edinburgh London: Churchill Livingston; 1982. pp. 68-102.
[8]Kisner C. Therapeutic exercise: Foundations and techniques. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1990. pp. 222-54.
[9]Karimi N, Ebrahimi I, Kahrizi S, Torkaman G. Evaluation of postural balance using the biodex balance system in subjects with and without low back pain. Pak J Med Sci. 2008;24(3):1-6.
[10]Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscle testing and function. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1993. pp. 321-65.
[11]Langevin HM, Sherman KJ. Pathophysiological model for chronic low back pain integrating connective tissue and nervous system mechanisms. Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(1):74-80.
[12]Norris CM. Spinal stabilisation: 4. Muscle imbalance and the low back. Physiotherapy. 1995;81(3):127-38.‏
[13]Akuthota V, Ferreiro A, Moore T, Fredericson M. Core stability exercise principles. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2008;7(1):39-44.‏
[14]Richardson C, Jull G, Toppenberg R, Comerford M. Techniques for active lumbar stabilisation for spinal protection: a pilot study. Aust J Physiother. 1992;38(2):105-12.‏
[15]O’Sullivan, P. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Man Ther. 2005;10(4):242-55.
[16]Janda V. Muscle strength in relation to muscle length, pain and muscle imbalance. In: Harms-Ringdahl K, editor. Muscle strength (International Perspectives in Physical Therapy). Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh: W.B. Saunders Company; 1993. pp. 112-325.
[17]Janda V. Muscles, central nervous motor regulation and back problems. In: Korr IM, editor. The neurologic mechanisms in manipulative therapy. New York: Plenum; 1978. pp. 27-41.
[18]Byrne K, Doody C, Hurly DA. Exercise therapy for low back pain: Asmall-scale exploratory survey of current physiotherapy practice in the Republic of Irland acute hospital setting. Man Ther. 2006;11(4):272-8.
[19]Ebenbichler GR, Oddson LI, Kollmitzer J, Erim Z. Sensory-motor control of the lower back: Implications for rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(11):1889-98.
[20]Kofotolis N, Kellis E. Effects of two 4-week proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation programs on muscle endurance, flexibility, and functional performance in women with chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(7):1001-12.
[21]Hubley-Kozey CL, Vezina MJ. Muscle activation during exercises to improve trunk stability in men with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(8):1100-8.
[22]Tsao H, Hodges PW. Persistence of improvements in postural strategies following motor control training in people with recurrent low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(4):559-67
[23]Tsao H, Druitt TR, Schollum TM, Hodges PW. Motor training of the lumbar paraspinal muscles induces immediate changes in motor coordination in patients with recurrent low back pain. J Pain. 2010;11(11):1120-8.
[24]Karimi N, Ebrahimi I, Ezzati K, Kahrizi S, Torkaman G, Arab AM. The effects of consecutive supervised stability training on postural balance in patients with chronic low back pain. Pak J Med Sci. 2009;25(2):¬177-81.
[25]May S, Johnson R. Stabilisation exercises for low back pain: A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2008;94(3):179-89.
[26]Clark S, Rose DJ. Evaluation of dynamic balance among community-dwelling older adult fallers: A generalizability study of the Limits of Stability Test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):468-74.
[27]Clark S, Rose DJ, Fujimoto K. Generalizability of the limits of stability test in the evaluation of dynamic balance among older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(10):1078-84.‏
[28]Panahi F, Kamali Sarvestani F. Compared massage and modalities in the treatment of patients with non-specific low back pain subacute and chronic. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2011;15(5):327-32. [Persian]
[29]Mohan G, Pal PK, Sendhil KR, Thennarasu K, Usha BR. Quantitative evaluation of balance in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 1: A case control study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009;15(6):435-9.
[30]Karimi N, Ebrahimi I, Ezzati K, Kahrizi S, Torkaman G, Arab AM. The effects of stability exercise on index stability and limits of stability in patients with mechanical chronic low back pain. Iran Rehabil J. 2012;12(2):21.
[31]Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK, Greene HS. Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain. Spine. 2001;26(7):724-30.