ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Nasiri   R. (1)
Ranjkesh   F. (1)
Olfati   F. (1)
Mafi   M. (1)






(1) Midwifery Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
(1) Midwifery Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
(1) Midwifery Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
(1) Midwifery Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Midwifery Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Phone: +98 (28) 33338034
Fax: +98 (28) 33237268
papoy6olfati@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  June  6, 2019
Accepted:  March 9, 2019
ePublished:  June 20, 2019

BRIEF TEXT


Due to the high sensitivity of pregnancy and the vulnerability of mothers during this period, their participation in clinical decisions is very important.

... [4-12]. Active collaboration between physician and patient has recently been considered by shared decision making (SDM) studies. ... [13-32]. According to the Ethics and Reproductive Health committee the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM), the pregnant women have the right to be informed about benefits and disadvantages of different treatments and to participate in the decision-making process of treatment and care. Another right for pregnant women is that the treatment team provide them with all the information necessary to make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, including the benefits and complications of the selected treatment [33]. Educational intervention in pregnant mothers has reduced hospital stay, increased natural childbirth, decreased prenatal problems and increased satisfaction in pregnant mothers [34]. Patient participation is described as a continuum from the customer-oriented approach to demographic-oriented approach and four types are outlined to make patient able for making healthcare decisions: 1) giving information to the patient, 2) consulting, 3) engaging the patient in decision-making, and 4) make patient able in decision-making [35]. Training and counseling are two of the key roles of the health team; however, it is less addressed [36]. … [37].

This study aimed to investigate the effect of individual counseling on the participation of pregnant mothers in decision making on the treatment process.

This research is a randomized clinical trial with control group.

This study was carried out on pregnant women who referred to Kosar medical-education center in Qazvin in 2018.

Pregnant mothers who met the inclusion criteria were selected through purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria included 10 to 36 weeks gestation, willingness to participate in research, and no history of neuropsychiatric disorders (self-report) and the exclusion criteria included pregnant mothers requiring immediate referral, pregnant mothers complaining of labor pain, and pregnant mothers without needed consciousness. Sample size was estimated 86 patients for each group according to the Hillary Becker (2004) [38] and with respect to the mean obtained in control and test groups (3.94 ± 0.36 and 3.77 ± 0.43) and α = 0.05 and β = 0.2 and the final sample size was estimated to be 172 subjects and due to the 10% sample loss 190 subjects were considered. 95 patients were included in the study for each group.

The data collection tool was a checklist consisting of two sections: demographic information and pregnancy information. The SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was also used to assess the patients' participation in decision making [39-41]. The intervention was done in a personal consultation with the clinic coordinator in a room of the clinic prepared for consultation. Counseling for the test group was done in a session of up to 60 minutes after examination by an expert. At the consultation session, the researcher identified the topic at the beginning of the session and after providing understandable information on the topic, by asking questions, the patient entered the discussion and thereby identified his or her needs and problems. Then, with the active cooperation and involvement of the patient, they explained about the performance and the right method for problem solving and also the necessary corrections, so that the patient could make the right decision. The decision-making areas for mothers were fetal health tests and pregnancy screening and ultrasound. Prior to the intervention, both control and test groups completed the participation in decision making questionnaire. The control group received a routine counseling session and counseling on prenatal nutrition (placebo). The experimental group, in addition to receiving routine care and prenatal nutrition counseling, participated in a counseling session after examination by a specialist. Immediately after the intervention, the decision-making questionnaire was completed by both groups to evaluate the results. The data were analyzed by SPSS 23 software using descriptive statistics methods for providing general information, independent t-test for comparison between the experimental and control groups before intervention, paired T-test for comparison between the experimental and control groups after the intervention and Chi-square test to compare the qualitative variables.

The mean age of pregnant women in the experimental group was 28.6± 5.9 and in the control group was 27.5 ± 5.3 years and the mean gestational age in the experimental and control groups was 23.6 ± 0.8 and 22.5±7.3 weeks, which there was no significant difference between the groups (p> 0.05). In terms of demographic characteristics, both groups were similar and did not have significant differences (p> 0.05; Table 1).There was a significant difference between the mean scores of mothers 'participation before and after the intervention in the experimental group, but in the control group there was no significant difference between the mean scores of mothers' participation before and after the intervention. In addition, before intervention, the mean level of participation between the experimental and control groups was not statistically significant, but after the intervention, this difference was statistically significant (Table 2).Mothers' participation in the experimental and control groups was almost the same before the intervention and did not show a statistically significant difference, but after the intervention this difference was significant (Table 3).

Becker et al. conducted a study using decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making in the UK and concluded that counseling with a decision analysis approach could give women more knowledge about prenatal diagnosis decisions. Professionals will need training to use this effective technique. In addition, receiving a decision-making aid package in women with positive screening results made them less anxious than those in the routine group. Those in the decision-making analysis group were less conflicted in their decision making, but in the routine counseling group there was a great deal of concern about these decisions [38]. Ghiasvandiani et al. conducted a study aimed at investigating the impact of decision-making aid package on treatment selected by patients with breast cancer and its consequences. The results showed that intervention in decision making, by involving patients in their own therapeutic decision making improves patients' awareness, and results in confidence in initiating treatment and choosing treatment options in accordance with their values and priorities [42]. These two studies are in line with the present study. [43]. ... [44, 45].

Further studies on the effect of different counseling models on pregnant mothers' attitudes towards participation in decision making are suggested.

One of the limitations of this study was the limited number of Iranian and International studies, so we tried to use similar studies.

Individual counseling is an effective and appropriate intervention to increase the participation rate of pregnant mothers in decision making in the treatment process.

The staff of the Kosar medical-education center, Qazvin who assisted us in this study are appreciated.

None declared.

This study was conducted after obtaining permission from the Ethics Committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR.QUMS.REC.1397.042) and registered at the Iranian Registry for Clinical Trial (IRCT20180508039583N1).

This study is extracted from a Master's thesis in Midwifery Counseling.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Joolaee S, Nikbakht-Nasrabadi A, Parsa-Yekta Z, Tschudin V, Mansouri I. An Iranian perspective on patients' rights. Nurs Ethics. 2006;13(5):488-502.
[2]Larijani B. Physician and ethical considerations. Tehran: Baraye Farda; 2005. [Persian]
[3]Parsapour AR, Bagheri AR, Larijani B. Review of revolution of patient’s right charter. Med Ethics Hist Med. 2010;3(1 and 2):39-47. [Persian]
[4]Manouchehri H, Zagheri Tafreshi M, Nasiri M, Ashrafi H. Patients’ participation in health care decision makings in hospitals affiliated with Saveh school of medical sciences, 2016. J Health Care. 2018;19(4):251-61.
[5]Michie S, Miles J, Weinman J. Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(3):197-206.
[6]Edwards A, Elwyn G. Evidence-based patient choice: inevitable or impossible? Oxford: Oxford University Press ; 2001.
[7]Mazur DJ. Shared decision making in the patient- physician relationship: challenges facing patients, physicians, and medical institutions. 1st Edition. Washington DC: Amer College of Physician; 2001.
[8]O’Connor A, Stacey D. Should patient decision aids (PtDAs) be introduced in the health care system [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005 [cited 2018 Aug 26]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2WTnLA2.
[9]Farrell C. Patient and public involvement in health: the evidence for policy implementation: a summary of the results of the Health in Partnership research programme [Internet]. London: Department of Health; 2004 [cited 2018 Aug 26]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2WVFUZa
[10]Meterko M, Wright S, Lin H, Lowy E, Cleary PD. Mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the influences of patient‐centered care and evidence‐based medicine. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(5p1):1188-204.
[11]Boulding W, Glickman SW, Manary MP, Schulman KA, Staelin R. Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(1):41-8.
[12]Edgcumbe DP. Patients' perceptions of hospital cleanliness are correlated with rates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. J Hosp Infect. 2009;71(1):99-101.
[13]Ministry of Health and Medical Services. Ministry strategic plan 2016-2019 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 [cited 2018 May 24]. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/nutrition/gina/en/node/23647.
[14]Ertesvåg M, Tselishcheva EG. Elektronisk «Legemidler i bruk»-et blikk inn i fremtiden Evaluering av pilotprosjektet «Legemidler i bruk» i «Reseptformidleren», inkludert elektronisk multidose i e-resept: Universitetet i Agder; Univ Agder. 2015. [Norwegian
[15]Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301-12.
[16]Simon D, Schorr G, Wirtz M, Vodermaier A, Caspari C, Neuner B, et al. Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):319-27.
[17]Hooshmand A, Joolaee S, Mehrdad N, Bahrani N. Nurses’ information and their view points about patient’s rights and practical facilitators in clinics. J Hayat. 2007;;12(4):57-66. [Persian]
[18]O'Neill O. Some limits of informed consent. J Med Ethics. 2003;29(1):4-7.
[19] Dadashi M, Andarz Habibi R, Habibi Moghaddam A, Jeylani M. Patients’ satisfaction of observing patients' right charter in private clinics. Med Ethics Hist Med. 2010;3(5 and 1):61-8. [Persian]
[20]Hendrix M, Van Horck M, Moreta D, Nieman F, Nieuwenhuijze M, Severens J, et al. Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in the Netherlands. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(4):537-42.
[21]
[22] Gamble J, Creedy DK, Teakle B. Women's expectations of maternity services: a community-based survey. Women Birth. 2007;20(3):115-20.
[23]Seefat-van Teeffelen A, Nieuwenhuijze M, Korstjens I. Women want proactive psychosocial support from midwives during transition to motherhood: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2011;27(1):e122-7.
[24]Elmir R, Schmied V, Wilkes L, Jackson D. Women’s perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta‐ethnography. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(10):2142-53.
[25]Politi MC, Lewis CL, Frosch DL. Supporting shared decisions when clinical evidence is low. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(1 Suppl):113S-28S.
[26]Hibbard JH, Peters E. Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Ann Rev Public Health. 2003;24(1):413-33.
[27]en Zorg Rvd V. De participerende patient [The participating patient]. RVZ: Den Haag; 2013. [Dutch]
[28]Härter M, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G. Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: an international perspective. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):229-33.
[29] Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146
[30]Baker A. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. BMJ. 2001;323(7322):1192.
[31]Patel N, Rajasingam D. User engagement in the delivery and design of maternity services. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(4):597-608.
[32]Gee RE, Corry MP. Patient engagement and shared decision making in maternity care. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):995-7.
[33]James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonik B, Crowther CA, Robson SC. High risk pregnancy: management options. 4th Edition. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunderd; 2010.
[34]ACOG Committee on Ethics. ACOG Committee Opinion #321: maternal decision making, ethics, and the law. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 Pt 1):1127-37.
[35]Rajabi Naeeni M, Simbar M. Effect of child birth preparation classes on empowering Iranian pregnant women: a systematic review. J Educ Community Health. 2018;5(1):60-71. [Persian]
[36]Asadi Janati N, Vahdat S, Yazdanpanah A. Studying patient participation in controlling postoperative infection in orthognathic surgery in BouAli Hospital, Tehran in 2012-2013. Med Sci J. 2014;24(3):189-93. [Persian]
[37]Taylor CR, Lillis C, LeMone P, Lynn P. Fundamental of nursing: the art and science of nursing care. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
[38]Seyed Ahmadinejad FS, Golmakani N, Asgharipour N, Shakeri MT. Effect of progressive muscle relaxation on depression, anxiety, and stress of primigravid women. Evid Based Care J. 2015;5(1):67-76. [Persian]
[39]Bekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG. Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(4):265-75.
[40]Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):94-9.
[41]Khamrnia M, Eskandari M, Alinezhad Ranjbar A, Ansari Moghadam A, Peyvand M. Participation rate of cancer patients in treatment decisions: a cross sectional study. J Health Literacy. 2017;2(3):156-63. [Persian]
[42]World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 [cited 2018 May 24]. Available from: http://www who int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
[43] Ghiyasvandian S, Mousavizadeh SN, Dehghan Nayeri N, Haghani H. The effect of decision aid's pakage in selected treatment by patients with early stage breast cancer and decision making outcomes. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2013;3(3):271-79. [Persian]
[44]Vlemmix F, Warendorf JK, Rosman AN, Kok M, Mol BWJ, Morris JM, et al. Decision aids to improve informed decision‐making in pregnancy care: a systematic review. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(3):257-66.
[45]Raynes-Greenow CH, Nassar N, Torvaldsen S, Trevena L, Roberts CL. Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):15.
[46]Olfati F, Asefzadeh S, Changizi N, Keramat A, Yunesian M. Patient involvement in safe delivery: a qualitative study. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8(6):33-40.