ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Abdolmaleki   A. (1 )
Behnam-Rassouli   M. (*)
Moghimi   A. (1)
Mahdavi-Shahri   N. (1)






(*) Biology Department, Science Faculty, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
(1 ) Biology Department, Science Faculty, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Biology Department, Science Faculty, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Azadi Square, Mashhad, Iran
Phone: +98 (51) 32527204
Fax: +98 (51) 32527204
behnam@um.ac.ir

Article History

Received:  February  4, 2014
Accepted:  April 4, 2017
ePublished:  July 22, 2017

BRIEF TEXT


Peripheral nerves are always subject to a wide range of factors [1].

… [2-14]. There is no definitive drug for spinal cord injury and peripheral nerve system and the effect of the only existing drug (methylprednisolone) is unanimous although it is used in all emergency and acute cases [15].

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of methylprednisolone on improvement of motor function and tissue changes following sciatic nerve disruption and repair by degrading scaffolding transplantation in rats.

This is an experimental study.

This study was conducted from September 2015 to September 2016 at the Neurosurgery Research Laboratory of the Faculty of Basic Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Experiments were performed on 50 adult male Wistar rats weighing 250-300 grams and approximately 3 months old.

Experiments were performed on 50 adult male Wistar rats weighing 250-300 grams and approximately 3 months old.

The animals were randomly divided into 5 groups of 10 as follows: 1) Negative control group (discontinuation of sciatic nerve) 2) Sham group (surgery without a nerve cut-off accompanied with a solvent) 3) Experimental group 1 (Sciatic nerve cut-off and scaffold transplantation with a dose of 1 mg/kg) 4) Experimental group 2 (sciatic nerve cut-off and scaffold transplant with 30 mg/kg dose) 5) Experimental group 3 (sciatic nerve cut-off and scaffold transplantation with drug solvent) Animals in experimental groups 1 and 2 received methylprednisolone (Alborz Pharmaceutical Company, Iran) with 1 and 30 mg/kg doses respectively for one week respectively [14, 16]. The negative control group did not receive the drug, and in the sham group, only surgery was performed without damage to the nerve and with solvent medication [17]. … [18-19]. The walking test was performed at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 after surgery, and in each test, three footprints were measured and the mean was recorded [20]. In order to assess the extent of 12 weeks postoperative recovery, the proportion of gastrocnemius muscle mass fracture to healthy gastrocnemius muscle was evaluated. Then, for each rats, gastrocnemius muscle mass was calculated by the following formula according to the weight ratio of the foot muscle which had been under operation to the healthy foot muscle was calculated using the following formula [21]: Weight of muscle of healthy foot/surgical foot muscle weight=muscle mass ratio At week 12 after operation, the Combined Muscle Activity Potential (CMAP) from gastrocnemius muscle was recorded with PicoScope software. Record was repeated three times, and amplitude and delay of combined muscle action potential (CMAP) were recorded for each rat. Also, the potential of combined muscle action (CMAP) was recorded from a healthy non-surgical healthy foot. All the data were entered into the computer to calculate the electrophysiological parameters. The distal part was removed from the affected sciatic nerve (left leg) in the treated and controlled groups and then the nerves were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After the dewatering steps with ascending ethanol, the samples were molded and serial sections of the sample were prepared with ultramicrotomy. Then, the samples were stained with 1% toluidiblone color, followed by counting the axons, fiber diameter, and thickness of the myelin layer using Image J software. The sciatic nerve of the right foot was considered as the control sample. Statistical analysis: The statistical design of the study was completely randomized design. Data were expressed as mean. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data and to compare the mean of variables in the experimental groups, Tukey's post hoc test was used. All the statistical analysis and drawing of the charts were done using SPSS 16 software.

Functional evaluation of the sciatic nerve in pathway walking test: before surgery, SFI levels were close to zero in all experimental groups. In the first week after nerve disruption due to complete loss of function of sciatic nerve, the SFI level in all groups was significantly lower than the sham group that is at the lowest level near -100. Four weeks after operation in methylprednisolone treated group with doses of one and 30 mg/kg increased to -62.92±3.5 and -56.07±2.7 respectively and in the experimental group, the scaffold with the drug solvent increased to -64.34±4.2 which was significant in comparison with the sham group. There was no change in sham group and control group in this week. In the eighth week after surgery, SFI level were -58.08±3.4, -51.87±3.1, and -61.85±2.8 respectively for methylprednisolone-treated groups with single does and 30 mg/kg and the experimental group received scaffold transplant with solvent medication that this difference was significant in comparison with the sham group. However, sham and negative control groups did not change. After 12 weeks, the levels of SFI in the treatment groups with methylprednisolone at dosages of 1 and 30 mg/kg were -52.06±3.3 and -46.18±4.1respectively, and in the experimental group, scaffold transplantation with receiving the solvent of the drug was increased to -54.63± 3.5, which was significant in comparison with the sham group. However, no changes were observed in sham and negative control groups. In comparison with methylprednisolone at doses of 1 and 30 mg/kg, the SFI value increased significantly in the methylprednisolone at dose of 30 mg/kg after the fourth week (Fig. 1). Gastrocnemius muscle mass: the mean weight ratio of muscle between the surgical foot and the healthy foot in the sham group after 12 weeks was about 0.95. However, in the negative control group, the weight ratio of the muscle showed a significant decrease and reached about 0.3. In groups treated with doses of one and 30 mg/kg methylprednisolone and in the experimental group, the scaffold transplant with the reception of the drug solvent showed significant increase compared to the control group. Also, with the increase of methylprednisolone, the weight loss of gastrocnemius muscle significantly decreased (Fig. 2). Electrophysiological evaluation: in all groups treated with methylprednisolone, as well as the experimental group of scaffold transplant, with the drug solvent, the amplitude of compounding operation was increased gradually. Also, the potential start delay was decreased. At the week 12 after lesion, the amplitude of combined muscle action potential and the delay in the negative control group, the experimental group of scaffold transplant with the solvent and the treatment groups with doses of 1 and 30 mg/kg methylprednisolone had a significant difference with the sham group. Also, in comparison with the treated groups with methylprednisolone, dose of 30 mg/kg compared to the dose of one mg/kg showed significantly higher potential amplitude and less delay (figures 3 and 4). Histomorphometry (stereology) Evaluation: Morphometric parameters such as mean number and diameter of fibers, mean number of axons and myelin sheath thickness in distal region in the treated groups with doses of 1 and 30 mg/kg methylprednisolone compared to the experimental scaffold bonding group with drug solvent was significantly higher, but it was lower than sham group (p<0.05, Table 1, and figure 1).

Many studies that examined the effects of anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant agent on peripheral nerve system repair have shown positive effects in the reducing the amount of free radicals and other malignant factors. These agents also accelerate the improvement of peripheral nerve damage [16, 26]. … [27-32].

It is suggested that in future studies, the rate of motor activity recovery be evaluated up to week 16 or 20.

Of the limitations of this study was the lack of study period.

Administration of methylprednisolone following the sciatic nerve cut and scaffold transplantation in rats increases the rate of motor function and tissue repair. Also, recovery of motor and tissue function at a high dose of methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) is better than low dose (one mg/kg).

The Deputy of Research at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad is appreciated.

Non-declared

All experiments were carried out at the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Peripheral Nerves Repair Department according to the ethical guidelines for working with laboratory animals.

The cost of this research has been provided by Mashhad Ferdowsi University.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Arkhipova SS, Raginov IS, Mukhitov AR, Chelyshev IuA. Satellite cells of the sensory neurons after different types of sciatic nerve trauma in rat. Morfologiia 2008;135(3):29-34. [Russian]
[2]Kim TH, Yoon SJ, Lee WC, Kim JK, Shin J, Lee S, et al. Protective effect of GCSB-5, an herbal preparation, against peripheral nerve injury in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;136(2):297-304.
[3]Tator CH, Fehlings MG. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(1):15-26.
[4]Umebayashi D, Natsume A, Takeuchi H, Hara M, Nishimura Y, Fukuyama R, et al. Blockade of gap junction hemichannel protects secondary spinal cord injury from activated microglia-mediated glutamate exitoneurotoxicity. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(24):1967-74.
[5]Takeuchi H. Neurotoxicity by microglia: Mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategy. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2010;1(1):12-21.
[6]Benveniste H, Jørgensen MB, Sandberg M, Christensen T, Hagberg H, Diemer NH. Ischemic damage in hippocampal CA1 is dependent on glutamate release and intact innervation from CA3. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1989;9(5):629-39.
[7]Bozkurt A, Deumens R, Beckmann C, Damink LO, Schügner F, Heschel I, et al. In vitro cell alignment obtained with a Schwann cell enriched microstructured nerve guide with longitudinal guidance channels. Biomaterials. 2009;30(2):169-79.
[8]Meek MF, Coert JH. Clinical use of nerve conduits in peripheral-nerve repair: Review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18(2):97-110.
[9]Tang JB, Shi D, Zhou H. Vein conduits for repair of nerves with a prolonged gap or in unfavorable conditions: an analysis of three failed cases. Microsurgery. 1995;16(3):133-7.
[10]Noorafshan A, Omidi A, Karbalay-Doust S, Aliabadi E, Dehghani F. Effects of curcumin on the dorsal root ganglion structure and functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush in rat. Micron. 2011;42(5):449-55.
[11]Mohammadi R, Azad-Tirgan M, Amini K. Dexamethasone topically accelerates peripheral nerve repair and target organ reinnervation: a transected sciatic nerve model in rat. Injury. 2013;44(4):565-9.
[12]Feng X, Yuan W. Dexamethasone enhanced functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats. Bio Med Res Int. 2015;2015:1-9.
[13]Bracken MB, Collins WF, Freeman DF, Shepard MJ, Wagner FW, Silten RM, et al. Efficacy of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. JAMA. 1984;6(1):45-52.
[14]Hall ED. Lipid antioxidants in acute central nervous system injury. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22(6):1022-7.
[15]Rasouli MR, Nouri M, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Spinal cord injuries from road traffic crashes in southeastern Iran. Chin J Traumatol. 2007;10(6):323-6.
[16]Yüce S, Gökçe EC, Iskdemir A, Koç ER, Cemil DB, Gökçe A, et al. An experimental comparison of the effects of propolis, curcumin, and methylprednisolone on crush injuries of the sciatic nerve. Ann Plastic Surg. 2015;74(6):684-92.
[17]Ghayour MB, Abdolmaleki A, Behnam-Rassouli M. The effect of Riluzole on functional recovery of locomotion in the rat sciatic nerve crush model. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;12:1-9.
[18]Johnson PC, Duhamel RC, Meezan E, Brendel K. Preparation of cell free extracellular matrix from human peripheral nerve. Muscle Nerve 1982;5(4):335-44.
[19]Sondell M, Lundborg G, Kanje M. Regeneration of the rat sciatic nerve into allografts made acellular through chemical extraction. Brain Res. 1998;795(1-2):44-54.
[20]Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA. Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(1):129-36.
[21]Solandt DY, Magladery JW. The relation of atrophy to fibrillation in denervated muscle. Brain. 1940;63(3):255-63.
[22]Noorafshan A, Omidi A, Karbalay-Doust S. Curcumin protects the dorsal root ganglion and sciatic nerve after crush in rat. Pathol Res Pract. 2011;207(9):577-82.
[23]Secer HI, Daneyemez M, Tehli O, Gonul E, Izci Y. The clinical, electrophysiologic, and surgical characteristics of peripheral nerve injuries caused by gunshot wounds in adults: A 40-year experience. Surg Neurol 2008;69(2):143-52.
[24]Terenghi G, Hart A, Wiberg M. The nerve injury and the dying neurons: Diagnosis and prevention. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011;36(9):730-4.
[25]Yilmaz Z. Neuroprotective effects of mannitol and vitamin c on crush injury of sciatic nerve: an experimental rat study. J Neurol Sci. 2012;28(4):538-51.
[26]Galloway EB, Jensen RL, Dailey AT, Gregory Thompson B, Shelton C. Role of topical steroids in reducing dysfunction after nerve injury. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(11):1907-10.
[27]Young W, DeCrescito V, Flamm ES, Blight A, Gruner JA. Pharmacological therapy of acute spinal cord injury: Studies of high dose methylprednisolone and naloxone. Clin Neurosurg. 1987;34:675-97.
[28]Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, Holford TR, Young W, Baskin DS, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury: Results of the second national acute spinal cord injury study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(20):1405-11.
[29]Iizuka H, Iwasaki Y, Yamamoto T, Kadoya S. Morphometric assessment of drug effects in experimental spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg. 1986;65(1):92-8.
[30]Holtz A, Nyström B, Gerdin B. Effect of methylprednisolone on motor function and spinal cord blood flow after spinal cord compression in rats. ‎Acta Neurol Scand. 1990;82(1):68-73.
[31]Lee MY, Yoon TG, Sung JJ, Kim HJ, Yum KW. Pre-emptive effect of methylprednisolone on the mechanical allodynia development after peripheral nerve injuries in rats. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2004;46(6):S17-21.
[32]Yanilmaz M, Akduman D, Sagun ÖF, Haksever M, Yazicilar O, Orhan I, et al. The effects of aminoguanidine, methylprednisolone, and melatonin on nerve recovery in peripheral facial nerve neurorrhaphy. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(3):667-72.