ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Sobhani   N. (*)
Beyranvandzadeh   M. (1)
Radmanesh   M. (2)
Oshnavai   A. (3)






(*) Geography & Urban Planning Department, Human Sciences Faculty, Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Geography & Urban Planning Department, Earth Sciences Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
(2) Geography & Urban Planning Department, Human Geography Sciences Faculty, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
(3) Geography & Urban Planning Department, Human Geography Sciences Faculty, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Human Sciences Faculty, Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, End of Sattari Highway, Tehran, Iran
Phone: -
Fax: -
n.sobhani65@gmail.com

Article History

Received:  August  31, 2016
Accepted:  November 30, 2016
ePublished:  February 24, 2017

BRIEF TEXT


… [1-15]. As a social and biological phenomenon, disability is a reality faced by all societies, including industrial and nonindustrial countries, regardless of their level of advancement. According to a research by Sanderson 16] in Canada, planning tools are appropriate solutions for improving the accessibility of urban spaces for disabled individuals in order to actively participate in the society.

Miller et al. [17] marked that disabled people with mild disability, with whom they were able to communicate more, had significantly more satisfaction. On the other hand, those who were less communicated had physical disorders, depression, and mental illnesses. Other studies in this area include research by Kondson [18], Yates [19], Romanyuta [20], Wenter et al. [21], Rogers [22], and Yang et al. [23]. Evaluating the quality and quantity of space of Laleh Park in Tehran, Iran, Bahmanpour and Salajegheh [24] concluded that this park had a favorable condition in terms of use of disabled individuals with a medium condition. However, despite the passing of the law for modification of the condition of buildings by ministers in 2000, many of buildings have been modified to be used by disabled individuals on wheelchair [25].

This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of urban public spaces for veterans and disabled individuals in Lorestan province.

This was a descriptive and analytical research.

This study was carried out in Lorestan Province, Iran (Khoramabad, Borujerd, and Kouhdasht), in 2014.

In total, 384 veterans and disabled individuals of Lorestan province were selected through convenience sampling.

Data collection tools was a researcher-made questionnaire, containing 50 items in five areas of problems in access and use of spaces (10 items), lack of feeling of safety and comfort in public spaces (10 items), lack of participation and involving veterans and disabled individuals in various urban activities (10 items), lack of implementation of regulations related to modification of public spaces for veterans and disabled individuals (10 items), and access to and appropriateness of public facilities (10 items). Face validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed by experts of the field and at Cronbach’s alpha of 0.76, respectively. In addition, Vikor technique was applied to evaluate the components to make urban public spaces appropriate for veterans and disabled individuals [6]. In this regard, the greater the proximity of Viktor indicator to zero, the better the condition of the place. Statistical Analysis: Data analysis was performed in SPSS 21 software using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

In terms of fitting indicators, welfare organization of Lorestan was ranked first and parks of Shahideh Shirin Peyman and Kiu in Khoramabad were mutually ranked last. In Borujerd, the welfare organization was ranked first and Mosafer park was ranked last. In Kouhdasht, education ministry and Friday Imam’s office were ranked first and last, respectively (Table 1). A positive and significant correlation was observed between the appropriateness of urban public spaces according to Vikor index and from the perspective of veterans and disabled individuals regarding problems in access to and use of spaces (r=0.483; p=0.001), lack of feeling of safety and comfort in public spaces (r=–0.346; p=0.006), lack of participation and involving veterans and disabled individuals in various urban activities (r=0.215; p=0.005), implementation of regulations related to the design of urban public spaces for veterans and disabled individuals (r=0.344; p=0.001), and access to and appropriateness of facilities of spaces (r=0.472; p=0.001).

Today, approaches must lean toward “human-oriented cities” to achieve a dynamic city. In general, the movement priority in a city must be walking, cycling, and using public transportation and not personal cars. Following up of this issue is carried out through programs such as “city without barriers” in the world. In this program and similar plans, a public agreement is made to solve the problems, and regulations are proposed after determining the required prerequisites in this area. Meanwhile, the only emphasis in Iran is on presenting regulations. Management structure of urban development of the evaluated spaces has not led to the formation of a unified local management. Defects in strategic planning and implementing levels has led to localized planning in urban spaces more in a sectional and short-term form. Therefore, urban planning and executive affairs, such as planning and fitting urban spaces for disabled individuals, cannot be easily achieved, and urban management in the evaluated cities had no mid-term and short-term and unified executive plan and an efficient monitoring mechanism to evaluate the performance of the city in this regard.

In order to improve the management structure for fitting of urban spaces for veterans and disabled individuals, the following items are suggested: modification of management-executive structures, adequate funding, education of citizens and culture building, appropriate legislation, elimination of obstacles to architecture and urbanism, and provision of infrastructures of e-city.

None declared by the authors.

Urban public spaces of Lorestan province have a medium condition in terms of accessibility for veterans and disabled individuals. Therefore, accurate implementation of regulations related to this area is significantly felt.

None declared by the authors.

None declared by the authors.

None declared by the authors.

None declared by the authors.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Falahat MS, Kalami M. The impact of urban open spaces on the quality of spending leisure time of citizens. J Urban Manag. 2008;6(22):85-98. [Persian]
[2]Rafiyain M, Taghvayi AA, Khademi M, Alipour R. Urban public spaces, review and quality assessment. Iran Soc Archit Urban Plann. 2012;2(2):35-43. [Persian]
[3]Kashanijou Kh. Recognition of theoretical approaches to urban public spaces. Hoviya-e-Shahr. 2010;4(6):95-106. [Persian]
[4]Safdarzadeh Z. The urban streets compliance with the requirements of the disabled and veterans (case study city Shirvan). Geogr J Chashmandaz-E-Zagros. 2013;5(15):35-64. [Persian]
[5]Taghvaei M, Moradi Gh, Safarabadi A. Review and assess the situation based on existing standard of city parks for the disabled and veterans access. Geogr Environ Plan. 2010;21(2):47-64. [Persian]
[6]Sarvar R, Mohammadi Hamidi S, Valikhani A. Analyzing urban public spaces for the disabled and low motor capacity case study: Second field Square (Tehran). Geography. 2014;12(41):83-105. [Persian]
[7]World Health Organization. World report on disability [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Published 2016, 16 August; Cited 2016, 22 December]. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/.
[8]World Health Organization. Assistive devices and technologies [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Published 2016, 20 May; Cited 2016, 2 September]. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/en/.
[9]Bajlan S. Check the status of people with disabilities access to facilities and public spaces of Universities in Tehran. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2008. [Persian]
[10]Ferneeuw S. Guidelines for planning a barrier-free environment: A practical manual to improve physical accessibility in Afghanistan [Internet]. Ney York: International online resource centre on disability and inclusion. [Published 2005, 21 July; Cited 2016, 28 February]. Available from: http://www.asksource.info/es/node/66326.
[11]Majidi FS, Teymori S. A study of Chaharbagh avenue as a case study to improve access for war-invalids and physical disabled people. Iran J War Public Health. 2011;3(3):36-44. [Persian]
[12]United Nations [Internet]. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [Cited 2006, 13 December]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
[13]Ali Akbari E, Modaber SJ. Challenges to implementing appropriate urban spaces (case study: Pedestrian path Vali-e Asr Ave). Urban Manag Stud. 2011;3(7):15-28. [Persian]
[14]Kamanrodi Kajori M, Structural pathology of Tehran urban management with an emphasis on good urban spaces for the disabled. Urban Manag. 2009;8(25):99-114. [Persian]
[15]Bazi Kh, Kiyani A, Afrasiyabi Rad MS. Evaluating urban traffic and the needs of veterans, using TOPSIS Decision Making Model (case study: Shiraz). Res Urban Plan. 2010;1(3):103-30. [Persian]
[16]Sanderson M. An examination of planning for persons with disabilities in mid-size Canadian municipalities [Dissertation]. Canada: University of Waterloo; 2007.
[17] Miller E, Chen R, Noreen M, Karnes, P. Willing to engaged in personal relationships with persons with disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2009;52(4):251-68.
[18]Knudson P. Creating a more accessible and equitable environment [Internet]. Australia: Southern Hills Therapy Services. [Published 1999, 21 August; Cited 2016, 10 May].
[19]Yeates M. Integrating urban design: Meeting the needs of people [Conference Paper]. Presented at the International VeloCity '99 Conference. Graz, Austria & Maribor, Slovenia; April 1999.
[20]Romanyuta SO. Barrier-Free Access for the Disabled in Ukraine: Public Policy Analysis. Available from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/NISPAcee/UNPAN004658.pdf.
[21]Venter CJ, Bogopane HI, Camba J, Venkatesh A, Rickert TE, Mulikita N, et al. Improving accessibility for people with disabilities in urban areas [Conference Paper]. Presented at 10th International CODATU Conference; 2002. pp. 21-5.
[22]Harnik P. The excellent city park system: What makes it great and how to get there. San Francisco: The Trust for Public Land; 2003.
[23]Yang Y, George LK. Functional disability, disability transitions, and depressive symptoms in late life. J Aging Health. 2005;17(3):263-92.
[24]Bahmanpour H, Salajeghe B. Qualitative and quantitative study of urban spaces in Tehran from a user perspective for persons with disabilities (case study: Laleh Park). Urban Manag. 2008;6(21):7-18. [Persian]
[25]Golestanibakht M, Rabiyi Kh, Mojtahedzade M, Kosariyan M. Access to urban services for people using a wheelchair in sari. J Soc Welfare. 2011;11(43):257-70. [Persian]