@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2017;1(1):9-13
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2017;1(1):9-13
Osteoblastic Differentiation of Amniotic Pluripotent Stem Cell
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Mahmoodinia Maymand M. (1)Noruzinia M. (*)
(*) Medical Genetics Department, Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC), Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Article History
Received: September 27, 2015Accepted: January 12, 2016
ePublished: February 15, 2017
BRIEF TEXT
Amniotic Fluid stem cells (AFSC), are multi-potent stem cells that have high reproduction and self-healing powers [1]. It also has the potential for differentiation to various cell types, including osteoblast cells [2], fat cells [3], and myositis cells [4].
The power of differentiation of these cells has been observed in vivo and in vitro conditions as well as Ex vivo cultures [5]. … [6].This ability has led to the use of this cell in the treatment of diseases that are mainly associated with the removal of cells (such as degenerative diseases). Meanwhile, stem cells derived from amniotic fluid have special place because they have less immunologic effect, and after injection to mice, they did not show tumorigenecity effect like embryonic stem cells [7]. For this reason, many studies have emphasized their impact on cell therapy because they are not applied in medical problems, and usually, amniocentesis does not pose a risk to the fetus and mother [8, 9]. … [10].Recently, osteoblast cells derived from stem cell differentiation have been proposed as a cell source for the treatment of degenerative bone diseases [11, 12]. In the process of osteoblast differentiation, the primary division of mesenchymal stem cells is asymmetric and produce two types of cells, one stem cells that retains the stem cell (self-renewal feature), and the other is a committed progenitor cells that has ability to become osteoblast (Potency). There are two important steps in differentiating osteoblasts from MSCs. The first step is the passage of the mesenchymal stem cell into the progenitor cells committed to osteoblast or the Transition stage, and the second step is the end differentiation and the end of the cell cycle. Osteoblasts are distinct cells expressing osteocalcin, osteopontin, and bone sialoprotein. These cells have limited proliferative power, and after the introduction of osteoblast cells into end-stage of differentiation, the cell cycle is stopped and post mitotic osteocytes are obtained. Osteocalcin is a marker of end stage of differentiation of osteoblast cells. The role of the transit amplifying in bone formation is very important, as increased proliferation at this stage lead to an increase in bone mass [13]. One of the characteristics of osteoblast differentiation is the formation of calcium as well as porous areas even in vitro, which in some cases leads to the removal of the cells from the flask floor. In this study, a method was developed to advance differentiation and to prevent cell separation, so that half of the supernatant medium of the cells was slowly expelled in each medium change and the severe shakes of the flask were avoided. Thus, the amount of calcification of cells was very significant.
The purpose of this study was to isolate stem cells from amniotic fluid and to differentiate them into osteoblast cells.
About 10 ml of amniotic acid from a healthy donor prepared from Sarem Hospital, after receiving the consent of the individual, was transferred to a cell culture lab in a sterile tube. Cell culture: After centrifugation, the cell plate was suspended with DMEM-low glucose culture medium (Gibco) containing 20% FBS (Gibco) and penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). Cell counting and determination of viability percentage was carried out by using trypan with Neobar slide. For differentiation, mesenchymal stem cells were treated for 21 days with an osteoblast differentiation medium including DMEM high glucose medium enriched with 10% serum and 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 units of penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma) and 50 μg / ml Ascorbate-2-phosphate and 5 mM beta-glycerol phosphate and 10 nM dexamethasone. During the period of differentiation, the cells` medium was changed twice a week. Alizarin Red staining: After 21 days, differentiated cells and mesanchylmal stem cell were used as control of differentiation for Alizarin Red staining. The slides were washed twice with PBS and then fixed with 40% formaldehyde. The staining with 1% solvent was performed for 30 minutes at room temperature and after washing under a microscope, the staining of osteoblast cells was compared with MSC RT-PCR for markers of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin: The Rima Zol kit (Teyf Ara Farayand) was used to extract RNA. According to the kit protocol, lysis of cells was performed. After cell lysis, extraction is performed using chloroform and isopropanol to obtain RNA deposition. Finally, after washing with ethanol 75%, the obtained RNA is dissolved in water. To prepare the cDNA, according to the protocol of Sinagen Co. (Tehran, Iran), 10 μl of RNA solution was incubated at 65 ° C for 5-10 minutes and then a mixture of 3 μl buffer (10X PCR), random primer 6, dNTP(10 mM 0.2), 6 μl MgCl 2 (25 Mm ) And 0.5 μl Reverse Transcriptase enzyme were added. The resulting solution was incubated for 10 min at 25 ° C and then incubated for an hour at 42 ° C, and then, for the stopping of the reaction, the sample was placed at 70 ° C for 10 minutes. The resulting cDNA was used for PCR. The cDNA sample can be freeze at minus 70 ° C. Alkaline phosphatase is a primary indicator off osteoblast cells. In this experiment, cDNA prepared from RNA extracted from osteoblast cells, and cDNA prepared from RNA extracted from mesenchymal stem cells were tested as test sample and control sample respectively. PCR test was used for each primer (100ng) of Taq DNA Polymerase for each reaction with a final volume of 25 μL using a mixture of MgCl2, PCR, l0X, dNTP (200μM) and primer (1mm) buffer. After the initial denaturation step, for 3 minutes at 94 ° C, the replication of components performed In 35 cycles at 94 ° C for 30 seconds, 58 ° C for 20 seconds and 72 ° C for 30 seconds. The final extension was performed at 72 ° C for 7 minutes. The PCR product was electrophoresed on agarose gel 1.5%, and after staining with ethidium bromide, its photo was taken using UV rays (Table 1).
The percentage of viability of the cells was about 80%. The observation of cells with inverted microscopy showed that the morphology of these cells was similar to that of fibroblast cells (Fig. 1). Also, the results of flow cytometry indicate the expression of mesenchymal stem cell markers in isolated bone marrow cells, confirming the quality of the isolation of MSCs. By using the osteoblast differentiation medium, mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated into osteoblast cells, and morphological changes were noticeable on different days of microscopic observation (Fig. 2). Alizarin Red staining indicated calcium sedimentation in the culture medium, confirming the differentiation of osteoblasts. The color of Alizarin red showed calcium sedimentation and confirmed the differentiation of mesenchymal cells in to osteoblasts, which were not differentiated from mesenchymal stem cells and were considered as negative control after staining with Alizan Red (Fig.3). To confirm the differentiation of osteoblast cells, besides the staining of Alizarin Red, transcriptome markers were also used. For this purpose, the expression of alkaline phosphatase index from the early indices of osteoblast differentiation and osteocalcin markers from endpoint of osteoblast differentiation were studied. RT-PCR results of both markers showed that these indices were expressed in osteoblast cells, but not expressed in amniotic fluid stem cells, which confirmed the differentiation of osteoblast cells (Figs. 4 and 5).
In the studies, isolation of MSC from human amniotic fluid has been carried out in the second trimester of pregnancy as well as from the amniotic fluid of C57BL / 6 mice [14]. Osteoblasts differentiation is osteogenesis of a highly controlled evolutionary process that involves a large number of external factors, such as hormones, growth factors, messenger pathways, and transcription factors. Studies have shown that osteoblast cells derived from amniotic fluid cells are effective in bone regeneration of destructive injuries [15, 16]. Confirmation of differentiation using Alizarin red and RT-PCR staining in this study, using AR staining revealed that the cells used can produce calcium. This staining has been used as a standard marker for confirmation of distinction in previous studies [17, 18]. Of course, in some studies it is suggested that using AR staining, the use of expression of osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase genes can be very helpful [19]. Of course, many other markers, such as osteopontin, and sialoprotein, as well as transcription factors such as Ets1, Runx2 / Cbfa1, have been used to confirm the differentiation of osteoblast cells [20].
Amniotic fluid cells have the ability to differentiate into osteoblast cells using an osteoblast differentiation medium.
TABLES and CHARTS
Show attach fileCITIATION LINKS
[1]Prusa, AR, Hengstschlager M. Amniotic fluid cells and human stem cell research: A new connection. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8(11):RA253-7.
[2]Antonucci I, Iezzi I, Morizio E, Mastrangelo F, Pantalone A, Mattioli-Belmonte M, et al. Isolation of osteogenic progenitors from human amniotic fluid using a single step culture protocol. BMC Biotechnol, 2009;9:9.
[3]Cabral ACV, Ângelo PC, Leite HV, Pereira AK, Lopes APBM, Oliveira MB. Isolation, differentiation and biochemical aspects of amniotic fluid stem cell. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2008;54(6):489-93.
[4]Gekas J, Walther G, Skuk D, Bujold E, Harvey I, Bertrand OF. In vitro and in vivo study of human amniotic fluid-derived stem cell differentiation into myogenic lineage. Clin Exp Med. 10(1):1-6.
[5]Zhang X, Chen X, Wang H, Liu S. Development of amniotic fluid-derived stem cell. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008;22(7):864-8.
[6]Baksh D, Song L, Tuan RS. Adult mesenchymal stem cells: Characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. J Cell Mol Med. 2004;8(3):301-16.
[7]De Coppi P, Bartsch GJR, Siddiqui MM, Xu T, Santos CC, Perin L, et al. Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(1):100-6.
[8]Holden C. Versatile stem cells without the ethical baggage?. Science. 2007;315(5809):170.
[9]Kaviani A, Perry TE, Dzakovic A, Jennings RW, Ziegler MM, Fauza DO, Et al. The amniotic fluid as a source of cells for fetal tissue engineering. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(11):1662-5.
[10]Palumbo C, Ferretti M, Ardizzoni A, Zaffe D, Marotti G. Osteocyte-osteoclast morphological relationships and the putative role of osteocytes in bone remodeling. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2001;1(4):327-32.
[11]Zuk PA. Tissue engineering craniofacial defects with adult stem cells? Are we ready yet?. Pediatr Res. 2008;63(5):478-86.
[12]Hee HT, Ismail HD, Lim CT, Goh JC, Wong HK. Effects of implantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, disc distraction and combined therapy on reversing degeneration of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(5):726-36.
[13]Thomas D, Kansara M. Epigenetic modifications in osteogenic differentiation and transformation. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98(4):757-69.
[14]Beloti, MM. Rosa AL. Osteoblast differentiation of human bone marrow cells under continuous and discontinuous treatment with dexamethasone. Braz Dent J. 2005;16(2):156-61.
[15]Mao JJ, Giannobile WV, Helms JA, Hollister SJ, Krebsbach PH, Longaker MT, et al. Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells. J Dent Res. 2006;85(11):966-79.
[16]Kassem M, Kristiansen M, Abdallah BM. Mesenchymal stem cells: Cell biology and potential use in therapy. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2004;95(5):209-14.
[17]Salasznyk RM, Williams WA, Boskey A, Batorsky A, Plopper GE. Adhesion to vitronectin and collagen I promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2004;2004(1):24-34.
[18]Liu XJ, Ren GH, Liao H, Yu L, Yuan L. Induced differentiation of adult human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro toward osteoblasts. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2004;24(4):408-11, 418.
[19]Tsai MT, Li WJ, Tuan RS, Chang WH. Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(9):1169-74.
[20]Raouf A. Seth A. Discovery of osteoblast-associated genes using cDNA microarrays. Bone. 2002;30(3):463-71.
[2]Antonucci I, Iezzi I, Morizio E, Mastrangelo F, Pantalone A, Mattioli-Belmonte M, et al. Isolation of osteogenic progenitors from human amniotic fluid using a single step culture protocol. BMC Biotechnol, 2009;9:9.
[3]Cabral ACV, Ângelo PC, Leite HV, Pereira AK, Lopes APBM, Oliveira MB. Isolation, differentiation and biochemical aspects of amniotic fluid stem cell. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2008;54(6):489-93.
[4]Gekas J, Walther G, Skuk D, Bujold E, Harvey I, Bertrand OF. In vitro and in vivo study of human amniotic fluid-derived stem cell differentiation into myogenic lineage. Clin Exp Med. 10(1):1-6.
[5]Zhang X, Chen X, Wang H, Liu S. Development of amniotic fluid-derived stem cell. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008;22(7):864-8.
[6]Baksh D, Song L, Tuan RS. Adult mesenchymal stem cells: Characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. J Cell Mol Med. 2004;8(3):301-16.
[7]De Coppi P, Bartsch GJR, Siddiqui MM, Xu T, Santos CC, Perin L, et al. Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(1):100-6.
[8]Holden C. Versatile stem cells without the ethical baggage?. Science. 2007;315(5809):170.
[9]Kaviani A, Perry TE, Dzakovic A, Jennings RW, Ziegler MM, Fauza DO, Et al. The amniotic fluid as a source of cells for fetal tissue engineering. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(11):1662-5.
[10]Palumbo C, Ferretti M, Ardizzoni A, Zaffe D, Marotti G. Osteocyte-osteoclast morphological relationships and the putative role of osteocytes in bone remodeling. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2001;1(4):327-32.
[11]Zuk PA. Tissue engineering craniofacial defects with adult stem cells? Are we ready yet?. Pediatr Res. 2008;63(5):478-86.
[12]Hee HT, Ismail HD, Lim CT, Goh JC, Wong HK. Effects of implantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, disc distraction and combined therapy on reversing degeneration of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(5):726-36.
[13]Thomas D, Kansara M. Epigenetic modifications in osteogenic differentiation and transformation. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98(4):757-69.
[14]Beloti, MM. Rosa AL. Osteoblast differentiation of human bone marrow cells under continuous and discontinuous treatment with dexamethasone. Braz Dent J. 2005;16(2):156-61.
[15]Mao JJ, Giannobile WV, Helms JA, Hollister SJ, Krebsbach PH, Longaker MT, et al. Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells. J Dent Res. 2006;85(11):966-79.
[16]Kassem M, Kristiansen M, Abdallah BM. Mesenchymal stem cells: Cell biology and potential use in therapy. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2004;95(5):209-14.
[17]Salasznyk RM, Williams WA, Boskey A, Batorsky A, Plopper GE. Adhesion to vitronectin and collagen I promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2004;2004(1):24-34.
[18]Liu XJ, Ren GH, Liao H, Yu L, Yuan L. Induced differentiation of adult human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro toward osteoblasts. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2004;24(4):408-11, 418.
[19]Tsai MT, Li WJ, Tuan RS, Chang WH. Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(9):1169-74.
[20]Raouf A. Seth A. Discovery of osteoblast-associated genes using cDNA microarrays. Bone. 2002;30(3):463-71.