ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Ebrahimi   V. (1)
Vojoudi   E. (1 )
Fazel   A.R. (1 )
Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan   A.R. (*)






(*) Anatomy & Cell biology Department, Medicine Faculty, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
(1) Anatomy & Cell biology Department, Medicine Faculty, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Anatomy & Cell Biology Department, Medicine Faculty, Vakilabad Bolevard, Azadi Square, Mashhad, Iran. Postal Code: 91779-48564
Phone: +985118828572
Fax: +985118002484
ebrahimzadehba@mums.ac.ir

Article History

Received:  December  16, 2013
Accepted:  June 15, 2014
ePublished:  July 1, 2014

BRIEF TEXT


Cell reactions, leading to organ evolution during embryo evolution, play an important role in procedures relating to evolution, like cell differentiations, and they are effective on retina evolution as a specific nerve structure [1-7].

There are some researches on the effects of lectins on ganglionic cells in the vertebrates [7-10].

The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of glycoconjugates terminal sugars and their changes on ganglionic cells surface of rat’s retina using histochemichal lectin technique during eye morphogenesis.

Non-declared

Two-month female Wistar rats with male Wistar rats were obtained from Animal Home of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

20 female and 10 male rats were studied.

The rats were kept in standard conditions of Animal Home with free access to food and water, 12-hour light/dark cycle, appropriate wet, and 18-24℃. After adaptation in especial cages, the rats were brought into intercourse (one male by two females); and providing vaginal smear, zero day of pregnancy was determined. The pregnant rats were anesthetized with chloroform at every 14th to 16th days of gestation, successively. Branches of rat uterus were removed with cesarean section, and immediately, the embryos were separated from the membrane in physiology serum and fixed in formalin solution in room temperature [11]. Passaged via common methods of histology, the samples were molded in paraffin blocks, and 5μm-thickness sections from each sample were serially prepared with Rotary Microtome 1512 (Leit; Germany) in both sagittal and coronal directions. To stain with lectin histochemistry methods, and using desired lectins (Sigma, Aldrich; USA), the sections were prepared (Table 1). At first stage, the histological sections were hydrated via routine histological method. At second stage, according to histological hydration routine methods, the sections were made transparent with xylenol and then, they were stuck. At every stage, at least three samples were stained with each lectin as ‘experiment group’, with one section, exposed to HRP, DAB, and hydrogen peroxide (no lectin), as ‘control’. In addition, as positive control and alongside each lectin at every embryo stage, one combined sample was stained. The slides were checked out with an ordinary light microscope; and Likert scale was used to evaluate staining intensity. Intensity of different reactions to the lectins was scored and graded as follows [12]: Zero (-), no reaction or negative reaction 1 (+), mild or weak reaction 2(++), mean reaction 3(+++), severe reaction Based on observations done by 3 persons, staining intensity was determined in Blind manner; and based on the reaction intensity to each lectin at different embryo days (14th to 16th days), the samples were separately classified.

Since the retina and ganglionic cells were in different evolutionary stages at different embryo days and after, responds of the cells to the specific lectins showed a diverse spectrum of reaction intensity (Table 2). There was a mild reaction (+) in ganglionic cells of the retina in the stained tissue sections of 14th embryo day put by DBA lectin. However, there was no impressive reaction in the nerve fibers scattered throughout the retina (Fig. 1, A). No layer of the eyeball, especially from the retina, had reaction to DBA lectin, in the tissue sections obtained from 15th day embryo stained by DBA lectin (Fig. 1, B). There was no reaction to DBA lectin in 16th day embryo ganglionic cells (Table 2). The ganglionic cells of the retia in the tissue sections of 14th evolutionary day had mild reaction (+) to GSA1-B4 lectin. In addition, some connecting fibers of the ganglionic cells, expanded towards other retinal cells, responded to GSA1-B4 lectin; however, their reactions to cell body and combinations of the surfaces of the ganglionic cells were more severe (Fig. 1, C). 15th and 16th days embryo sections had no reaction to GSA1-B4 lectin (Table 2). 14th day, in contrast to 15th day, ganglionic cells of the retina put by MPA lectin had mild reaction (+), while the 15th day cells had the most severe reaction (+++). In addition, many nerve connecting branches of ganglionic cells had severe reaction to other retina layers with MPA (Fig. 1, A). 16th day ganglionic cells put by MPA lectin had mean intensity (++). Yet, there were severe scattered reactions among the nerve fibers in the retina cells (Fig. 2, A; Table 2). There was mild reaction (++) on the surface of ganglionic layer in 14th day tissue sections put by OFA lectin. In addition, nerve fibers out of ganglionic layer had mean reaction (Fig. 2, B). A comparison between 14th and 15th days tissue sections, put by OFA lectin, revealed an increase in the reaction intensity (+++) in ganglionic cells, as well as their nerve fibers, at 15th embryo day, than the used lectin did (Fig. 2, C). In 16th day ganglionic layer cells, there was mid reaction (+) to OFA lectin (Table 2).

… [13-16] The results confirmed many previous studies, showing the effect of sugar compounds on changes in the ganglionic cells of the retina during embryo evolution. In spite of the proved key roles of revealed sugars by the lectins [6, 17-19], they could not have any determined role in formation and differentiation of the desired cells at the said days. Maybe for the first time, the results show much more reaction intensity of the ganglionic cells to MPA lectin at 15th day, than similar samples at 14th and 16th days do.

Histochemical lectin studies can be the base of the researches on the retina diseases.

The lack of accurate determination of different embryo stages was one of the limitations for the present study.

In differentiations of the retina ganglionic cells during eye evolution, the expression different pattern of glycoconjugate terminal sugars is temporally fully set. In addition, including fucose, α-D-Gal, β-D-Gal, and N-acetylgalactoseamin terminal sugars, the glycoconjugates of cell surface play an important role in the evolution of the retina ganglionic cells.

The researchers feel grateful to Ms. Mojadded, who provided laboratory services.

Non-declared

The animals were kept according to National Institutions of Health (NIH) for human use of the laboratory animals.

The presented results here are of an MSc thesis approved as research project and numbered as 911216. Research Deputy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences founded the research.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Arab MR, Talaei Khouzani T, Fazel AR. Histochemistry and lectin histochemistry of the sclera and choroid in development of the eyes. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2002;12(34):1-8. [Persian]
[2]Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater. 2007;6(12):997-1003.
[3]Chung S, Sudo R, Vickerman V, Zervantonakis IK, Kamm RD. Microfluidic platforms for studies of angiogenesis, cell migration, and cell-cell interactions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(3):1164-77.
[4]Zagris N. Extracellular matrix in development of the early embryo. Micron. 2000;32(4):427-38.
[5]Blackshaw S, Harpavat S, Trimarchi J, Cai L, Huang H, Kuo WP, et al. Genomic analysis of mouse retinal development. PLOS Biol. 2004;2(9):247-68.
[6]Cho EYP, Choi HL, Chan FL. Expression pattern of glycoconjugates in rat retina as analysed by lectin histochemistry. Histochem J. 2002;34(11-12):589-600.
[7]Aly K, Salem-Bekhit MM. Histochemical mapping of glycoconjugates in the eyeball of the one humped Camel (Camelus dromedarius). J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2012;2(4):33- 46.
[8]Mubarak HJ, Mghamis MM. Comparative lectins histochemical study of vertebrates' retina. Kufa Med J. 2012;15(1):147-54.
[9]Gulati AK, Zalewski AA, Sharma KB, Ogrowsky D, Sohal GS. A Comparison of lectin binding in rat and human peripheral nerve. J Histochem Cytochem. 1986;34(11):1487-93.
[10]Sarthy PV, Curtis BM, Catterall WA. Retrograde labeling, enrichment, and characterization of retinal ganglion cells from the vertebrates. J Neurosci. 1983;3(12):2532-44.
[11]Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan A, Nikmard F, Mohammadzadeh E, Razavi H, Fazel A. Lectinhistochemistry study of Glycoconjugate terminal sugars during Rat kidney development. Horizon Med Sci. 2012;18(1):26-38. [Persian]
[12]Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan A, Hassanzadeh MM, Nikravesh MR, Fazel AR. Lectin histochemical study of vasculogenesis during rat pituitary morphogenesis. Iranian J Basic Med Sci. 2011;14(1):35-41.
[13]Alles AJ, AR Fazel, SS Spicer, Dom RM. Distribution of glycoconjugates in the optic vesicle and optic cup. Anat Embryol. 1990;182(6):611-6.
[14]White JM. ADAMs: Modulators of cell-cell and cellmatrix interactions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003;15(5):598- 606.
[15]Wu AM, Lisowska E, Duk M, Yang Z. Lectins as tools in glycoconjugate research. Glycoconjugate J. 2009;26(8):899-913.
[16]Mertz AF, Che Y, Banerjee S, Goldstein JM, Rosowski KA, Revilla SF, et al. Cadherin-based intercellular adhesions organize epithelial cell-matrix traction forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(3):842-7.
[17]Bee JA. Glycoconjugates of the avian eye: The development and maturation of the neural retina as visualized by lectin binding. Differentiation. 1982;23(2):128-40.
[18]Lee JH, Park HS, Shin JM, Chun MH, Oh SJ. Nestin expressing progenitor cells during establishment of the neural retina and its vasculature. Anat Cell Biol. 2012;45(1):38-46.
[19]Soderstrom KO. Lectin binding to the human retina. Anat Rec. 1998;220(2):219-23.