ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Descriptive & Survey Study

Authors

Sedghi Goyaghaj   N. (*)
Monjamed   Z. (1)
Ghorbani   Sh. (1)
Akbarnrjhad   N. (1)
Khosrozadeh   M. (2)






(*) Shefa Neurosciences Research Center, Khatamol Anbia Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(1) Shefa Neurosciences Research Center, Khatamol Anbia Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(2) Nursing Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences University, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Khatam Ol Anbia Hospital, Shefa Neurosciences Research Center, Rashid Yasemi Street, Vali-ye-Asr Street, Tehran, Iran
Phone: +982122180036
Fax: +982122180036
n.sedghi@uswr.ac.ir

Article History

Received:  January  29, 2016
Accepted:  June 6, 2016
ePublished:  June 18, 2016

BRIEF TEXT


Spinal cord injury is a severe accident that has unpredictable consequences for suffered individual, family, friends and society [1].

… [1-4]. Suffering from spinal cord injury creates a lot of complications, but pain is being raised as one of the worst and most debilitating problems in these patients [5]. … [6-10]. People with spinal cord injuries may experience one or more types of pain at the same time that sometimes it reaches to the extent of seven different types of pains [11, 12]. … [13-17].

The aim of conducting this study was investigating the prevalence and severity of different kinds of pains in patients with spinal cord injury who visited Khatam Alanbiya's hospital in Tehran.

This study is sectional descriptive-analytic.

This study was conducted on all the patients with spinal cord injury who visited Khatam Alanbiya's hospital in Tehran.

With using the Cochran formula and sampling based on the aim, 248 patients entered the study who had visited the spinal cord section of the hospital in the first 6 months of the year 2015 and were willing to participate in the study.

To gather data, the demographic properties questionnaire (that had questions about age, marital status, educational level, infection reason, and injury type, the date of beginning of the pain and body mass index) and international questionnaire of basic pains in patients with spinal cords were used. The international questionnaire of basic pains of patients with spinal cords injuries was designed by a group of specialists in spinal cords pain, psychiatrist, psychologist and epidemiologists and a representative from international community of spinal cord injuries under the supervision of four valid organizations including international community of spinal cord, the American community of spinal cord injury, American community of pain and international community of pain studies. The first version of it was designed in 2006 in Copenhagen in Denmark and then in 2010 it was changed to self-reported method by Johnson. The questionnaire has 15 questions and four parts that specifies pain types, pain location, pain effects and severity and time pattern of the pain. 13 of these questions is being repeated for each pain with special feature [18]. The different kinds of pain part has 3 questions that one of this questions examines having and not having the pain and is being answered with yes and no. the other question specifies one type of the pain with special features to five types and more and one important question choses between one of the unknown non-nerve and nerve pains. The pain location part with one question shows the existence of the pain in different parts of the body. The severity and time pattern of pain with 4 questions specifies the pain severity (zero to 10), the severity pain in week days, the pain duration and the time of the climax of the pain. The pain effects part includes 6 seven-choice questions about the sleeping quality, life enjoyment, satisfaction, recreation, the ability of doing life daily activities and doing the job and from zero to 6 shows the pain effects on patient's life and one question specifies using and not using the treatment to reduce the pain[19]. The validity and reliabiltiy of international questionnaire of basic pains of spinal cords injuries was examined by Johnson et al. in 2010 on 184 patients suffering from spinal cords injuries and its Cronbach's alpha coefficient was reported 0.94 and inward class correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.91[20] . Its content and face validity were examined and confirmed by Sedghgoy Aghaj et al on 25 persons including 10 specialists and 15 patients of spinal cords injury. Also, its reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and inner correlation (IC) 0.93 in upper level [19] . The data after gathering were entered in SPSS 19 software and were analyzed with using the descriptive statistics (calculation of the frequency, the percentage of the frequency, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics. At first, the normality of data distribution was examined by using the Cologrof-Smirnof statistical test that the results showed the normality of the data. Then the independent T-test was used to compare the variables between two genders, the Pearson correlation test was used for specifying the relationship between age and the severity of different kinds of pain and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the intensity of different types of pain based on demographic variables.

The participating patients were 248 persons who mostly were men, married and they had diploma. The mean age of patients was 42.00± 11.3 years and their mean body mass scale was 32.4± 4.52 Kilograms per square meter. The reason for spinal cord injury in these patients in order of frequency was war, car accident, falling from height and spinal cord tumors. 60.08% of patients were injured in thoracic vertebra (C1-C12) and most of them (70.1%) stated that their pain was started immediately after the spinal cord injury (Table 1). Only 6 persons (2.41%) of patients stated that they did not have pain and 242 persons (97.59%) mentioned one or more pains. The neuropathic pain was the most prevailing pain among these people and musculoskeletal and visceral pains were in next ranks in terms of prevalence. The most severe pain in patients respectively was neuropathic, musculoskeletal and visceral pains (Table 2). People who had neuropathic pain, almost all parts of body was in pain and generally, most organs, which were in pain, were the neck and shoulder (Table 3). Neuropathic pain in 81.85% and musculoskeletal pain in 73.24% of cases were in the level of the injury and lower. In terms of the neuropathic pain, 74.19% of patients stated that they had pain during the last 7 days and 66.53% had the pain continuously and permanently in terms of pain duration that the pain intensity became more at nights (from 24 to 6 in the morning) for most of the patients (53.22%) and in 28.22% of cases there was no special time function during the day. About musculoskeletal pain, 45.96% stated that during last week, they have had pain for 4 days and 56.04% mentioned the pain duration between 1-24 hours that there was no time function of the pain intensifying for most patients (39.91%). About visceral pain, 41.53% of patients had pain in all the 7 days of the week and 73.38% said the pain duration was between 1-60 minutes. Also in this case, there was no time function for these patients (87.9%) for pain intensifying. The mean score of the effect on people's lives in people with neuropathic pain was 3.79± 0.60, in people with musculoskeletal pain 3.21±0.68 and in people with visceral pain 1.21±0.39. Also, 74.19% of patients were using medical and nonmedical treatment for their pain that the used treatment was medical treatment (Gabapentin, Pregabalin, and Baclofen) mostly. There was a meaningful relationship only between gender and pain severity and the mean musculoskeletal pain severity in women (7.12±2.80) was meaningfully more than men (5.93±0.72) (P=0.018). There was no meaningful relationship (p>0.05) between pain severity and other demography patient's properties.

The findings shows the high prevalence of different kinds of pains after suffering from spinal cords injury that its prevalence is higher in different studies (between 11% and 96%) [6, 11, 21]. … [22]. In terms of pain severity, the current study results indicates the severity of these pains specially neuropathic pain and is aligned with the order of pain severity in other studies [23-26]…[27-31].

Non-declared

Of limitations of this study the low number of participating women can be mentioned. Also, mental perception of the pain that is different between different people can affect the gain results.

The pain in spinal cords injury patients is prevalent and mostly severe. Neuropathic pain is the most common and severe pain of its kind and musculoskeletal and visceral pains are in next levels.

We show our extreme thanks to the respectful research management and adjutancy of Khatam Alanbiya hospital of Tehran and the friendly cooperation of the respectful nursery manager and patients.

Non-declared

In order to comply with ethics in the study, an informed consent was taken from all the patients and it was explained to them that there was no need to mention the first and last name. Participating in the study was completely optional and had no effect on their treatment procedure.

This study is part of a researching project with approved number 94-14 at 5/6/2015 in Shafa nerve science research center of Khatam Alanbiya hospital of Tehran.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Mosavi S, Kooshki M, Mehrabi Kooshki A. Physical and mental illness in capable in compare to disable veterans with spinal cord injury. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2011;29(145):831-9. [Persian]
[2]Shojaei H, Jafari A, Valaei S. Frequency of phantom pain among patients with spinal cord injury. Iran J War Public Health. 2009;1(3):88-96. [Persian]
[3]Fatehi F, Kamli M. Perceived experiences of unemployed people with spinal cord injury in the process of returning to work. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2011;8(2):256-62. [Persian]
[4]Moghaddam M, Davatgaran K, Nazmdeh K. Comprehensive rihabilitation in spinal cord injury. Department of Rehabilitation: Office for Disability Rehabilitation Physical, Motor, and Sensory; 2007. [Persian]
[5]Nakipoglu-Yuzer GF, Atci N, Ozgirgin N. Neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Pain Physician. 2013;16(3):259-64.
[6]Calmels P, Mick G, Perrouin-Verbe B, Ventura M. Neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: Identification, classification, evaluation. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;52(2):83-102.
[7]Jensen MP, Hoffman AJ, Cardenas DD. Chronic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury: A survey and longitudinal study. Spinal cord. 2005;43(12):704-12.
[8]Mehta S, Orenczuk K, McIntyre A, Willems G, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JT, et al. Neuropathic pain post spinal cord injury part 2: Systematic review of dorsal root entry zone procedure. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013;19(1):78-6.
[9]Giannoccaro MP, Moghadam KK, Pizza F, Boriani S, Maraldi NM, Avoni P, et al. Sleep disorders in patients with spinal cord injury. Sleep Med Rev. 2013;17(6):399-409.
[10]Norrbrink Budh C, Kowalski J, Lundeberg T. A comprehensive pain management programme comprising educational, cognitive and behavioural interventions for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(3):172-80.
[11]Finnerup NB, Baastrup C. Spinal cord injury pain: Mechanisms and management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16(3):207-16.
[12]Votrubec M, Thong I. Neuropathic pain: A management update. Aust Fam Physician. 2013;42(3):92-7.
[13]Celik C, Boyaci S, Ucan H. Pain in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2013;21(1):53-7.
[14]Michailidou C, Marston L, De Souza LH, Sutherland I. A systematic review of the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain, back and low back pain in people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(9):705-15.
[15]Spinal cord injuries Center. What a spinal cord injury patient should know. Tehran: Veterans Medical Sciences and Engineering Research; 2009. [Persian]
[16]Smeal WL, Yezierski RP, Wrigley PJ, Siddall PJ, Jensen MP, Ehde DM. Spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2006;7(12):871-7.
[17]van Gorp S, Kessels AG, Joosten EA, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Pain prevalence and its determinants after spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2015;19(1):5-14.
[18]Widerström-Noga E, Biering-Sørensen F, Bryce T, Cardenas DD, Finnerup NB, Jensen MP, et al. The international spinal cord injury pain basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(12):818-23.
[19]Sedghi Goyaghaj N, Fallahi Khoshknab M, Khankeh H, Hosseini MA, Rezasoltani P. Effect the exercise program on neuropathic pain intensity in patients with paraplegia spinal cord injury. Med Surg Nurs J. 2015;4(3):52-9. [Persian]
[20]Jensen MP, Widerström-Noga E, Richards JS, Finnerup NB, Biering-Sørensen F, Cardenas DD. Reliability and validity of the international spinal cord injury basic pain data set items as self-report measures. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(3):230-8.
[21]Siddall PJ, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2003;103(3):249-57.
[22]Andresen SR, Biering-Sørensen F, Hagen EM, Nielsen JF, Bach FW, Finnerup NB. Pain, spasticity and quality of life in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury in Denmark. Spinal cord. 2016. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.46.
[23]Bryce TN, Gomez J. Management of pain after spinal cord injury. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2015;3(3):189-96.
[24]Norrbrink C, Lindberg T, Wahman K, Bjerkefors A. Effects of an exercise programme on musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury-results from a seated double-poling ergometer study. Spinal cord. 2012;50(6):457-61.
[25]Widerström-Noga E, Pattany PM, Cruz-Almeida Y, Felix ER, Perez S, Cardenas DD, et al. Metabolite concentrations in the anterior cingulate cortex predict high neuropathic pain impact after spinal cord injury. Pain. 2013;154(2):204-12.
[26]Dworkin RH, O’connor AB, Backonja M, Farrar JT, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: Evidence-based recommendations. Pain. 2007;132(3):237-51.
[27]Cardenas DD, Nieshoff EC, Suda K, Goto S-i, Sanin L, Kaneko T, et al. A randomized trial of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury. Neurol. 2013;80(6):533-9.
[28]Middleton JW, Siddall PJ. Assessing and managing pain after spinal cord injury. Pain Manag Today. 2015;2(1):26-8.
[29]Widerström-Noga EG, Turk DC. Types and effectiveness of treatments used by people with chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: influence of pain and psychosocial characteristics. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(11):600-9.
[30]Norrbrink Budh C, Lundeberg T. Non-pharmacological pain-relieving therapies in individuals with spinal cord injury: A patient perspective. Complement Ther Med. 2004;12(4):189-97.
[31]Saeidian SR, Alizadeh K. Complications of Immobilization in spinal cord injury veterans in Khuzestan. J Mil Med. 2003;5(1):1-5. [Persian]