ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Rabbani   G. (*1)






(*1) Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Research Center of Geography, Research Institute of Shakhes Pajouh, Isfahan, Iran

Correspondence

Address: No. 217, Azadi 51, Azadi Boulevard, Mashhad, Iran. Postal Code: 919793733.
Phone: +98 (51) 36053878
Fax: -
ghazaleh.rabbani@gmail.com

Article History

Received:  August  9, 2020
Accepted:  September 2, 2020
ePublished:  December 12, 2020

BRIEF TEXT


Understanding the impact of physical development on urban unstable weather is a challenging issue.

The rapid expansion of urbanization has led to the expansion of urban sprawling [Sudhira et al., 2004]. This type of urban expansion makes the authorities put more pressure on natural resources [Rafiee et al., 2009]. Land-use changes and dividing a large piece of land into some scattered small pieces have deteriorated the environment [Arsanjani et al., 2013], and have caused regional climate change [Emadodin et al., 2016]. Accordingly, the scientists showed that urbanization has caused weather chaos in recent decades [Bazkar et al., 2015]. The impact of urban physical expansion on thermal and dynamic changes of the global climate, thermal islands, greenhouse gases emission, and its impact on future climate is mentioned in various articles such as Fan & Sailor (2005), Alpert et al. (2011), Makar et al. (2006), Dodman (2009), Dulal et al. (2011), Daneshvar & Abadi (2017). According to the statistical analysis, the correlation between precipitation, relative humidity, and cloudiness degree and sprawling indicator varies from 0.63 to 0.93 [Rabbani et al., 2020].

This study aimed to analyze the daily changes of SWEAT indicators in four urban areas in Iran and Turkey to assess the impact of urban sprawling on making severe storms in urban areas.

This is an empirical study.

The current research is carried out using data from the upper-air level in the radiosonde stations of Tehran, Mashhad, Ankara, and Istanbul in 365 days of 2018 and their prediction for 2030.

There is no sampling method and number reported.

Used devices and materials are not reported.

Urban sprawling model analysis in 2018 and 2030 Urban development structures in the studied areas in 2018 in Tehran, Mashhad, Ankara, and Istanbul show that they are sprawled in zones with the areas of 1000, 500, 1400, and1300 〖km〗^2, respectively (Table 2). The studied areas' population is also of importance and Istanbul, for example, is much more populated than three other cities. It is predicted that the sprawling rate in 2030 in Mashhad and Tehran will be twice as much as their predicted population. It stresses the importance of the controlling physical expansion and striking a space balance in these cities (Table 3). Environmental changes indicator (∆Y) is an indicator based on urban sprawling level (∆X) in 2018 and its prediction in 2030. HBASE database based on LULC remote sensing data was used for this purpose. Assessments and space analysis of the studied database in GIS were used for the estimation of the indicator of (∆Y) (Table 4). The evaluation of environmental changes indicator as a result of sprawling According to the results of the current situation (2018), ∆Y is between 0.41 and 0.56 in the studied cities. These results will be practical when they are compared with the corresponding values in 2030. ∆Y is predicted to be between 0.61 and 1.98 in 2030. In other words, environmental changes caused by urban sprawling will increase. Tehran is predicted to have the most severe environmental changes. Other cities, on the other hand, are predicted to have ∆Y less than 1 despite their increase in the sprawling. ∆X turbulence analysis in 2018 and its prediction for 2030 shows that the highest level of turbulence caused by sprawling is predicted to occur in Mashhad and Tehran rising from 1.43 and 1.67 to 2.7 and 3.14. Increased ∆X in 2030 shows that all studied cities especially Tehran need to revise their urban sprawling control and prevention plans. Otherwise, urban land expansion demolishes the open space and green space in the future. It is suggested to make plans for an urban green belt in suburbs. Urban agriculture plan in the farms surronding the cities is another suggestion to determine urban sprawling borders. Severe weather threat index evaluation in 2018 SWEAT index is calculated for all four urban areas in 2018. Then, mentioned daily data were categorized into three classes of low, high, and severe instability (Table 5). According to the results, Istanbul is the only city in the severe weather instability class (SWEAT>300) in 2018. Annual SWEAT mean in Tehran, Mashhad, Ankara, and Istanbul is 83.7, 62.5, 110.3, and 128.5, respectively showing that stormy weather is more frequent in Istanbul and Ankara. Then these cities are in more severe weather instability in comparison to Mashhad and Tehran.

According to the results of the current research, there is a significant correlation between urban sprawling and regional climate changes that is approved by Rabbani et al. (2020) and Daneshvar et al. (2019).

There is no suggestion reported.

The most important limitation of the current research is due to the problems in collecting daily data from radiosonde stations that limit the feasibility of researching for consecutive years.

Urban growth has had a severe impact on regional weather in recent decades [Bazrkar et al., 2015]. SWEAT index is a forecasting index showing the stormy weather in urban areas. SWEAT index, in the current research, is studied in 4 urban areas in Turkey and Iran including Istanbul, Ankara, Tehran, and Mashhad and evaluated the relationship between urban sprawling, population growth, and environmental changes index caused by sprawling. According to the results, increased urban sprawling may cause an increase in urban air turbulence that may raise fuel and energy consumption for physical constructions and transportation. The correlation between the SWEAT index and the environmental changes index shows that urban sprawling has a significant impact on increasing the SWEAT index in all studied cities. The current article tends to bring future possible changes into consideration.

The author thanks the judges for evaluating her research.

None.

None.

This study is carried out at the author's personal expense.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Abshaev MT, Abshaev AM, Mikhailovskiy YP, Sinkevich AA, Popov VB, Adzhiev AK (2019). Characteristics of the supercell Cb thunderstorm and electrical discharges on 19 August 2015, North Caucasus: A case study. Preprints.
[2]Alpert P, Kishcha P, Kaufman YJ, Schwarzbard R (2005). Global dimming or local dimming?: effect of urbanization on sunlight availability. Geophysical Research Letters. 32(17):802.
[3]Arsanjani J, Helbich M, Vaz ED (2013). Spatiotemporal simulation of urban growth patterns using agent-based modeling: The case Tehran. Cities. 32:33-42.
[4]Baharvand S, Daneshvar MRM (2019). Impact assessment of treating wastewater on the physiochemical variables of environment: A case of Kermanshah wastewater treatment plant in Iran. Environmental Systems Research. 8:18.
[5]Baltaci H, Akkoyunlu BO, Tayanc M (2018). An extreme hailstorm on 27 July 2017 in Istanbul, Turkey: Synoptic scale circulation and thermodynamic evaluation. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 175:3727-3740.
[6]Bauman WH, Wheeler MM, Short DA (2005). Severe weather forecast decision aid. NASA Technical Reports Server. Washington, D.C: NASA Publictions.
[7]Bazrkar MH, Zamani N, Eslamian S, Eslamian A, Dehghan D (2015). Urbanization and climate change. In: Filho WL, editors. Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Berlin: Springer; pp. 619-655.
[8]Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF (2018). Present and future 374 Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data. 5:(1).
[9]Bhat PA, Shafiq M, Mir AA, Ahmed P (2017). Urban sprawl and its impact on landuse/land cover dynamicsof Dehradun City, India. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 6(2):513-521.
[10]Bhatta B (2009). Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Kolkata, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 30(18):4733-4746.
[11]Burdon FJ, Reyes M, Alder AC, Joss A, Ort C, Räsänen K, et al (2016). Environmental context and magnitude of disturbance influence trait-mediated community responses to wastewater in streams. Ecology and Evolution. 6(12):3923-3939.
[12]Das S (2017). Severe thunderstorm observation and modeling—a review. Vayu Mandal. 43(2):1-29.
[13]Daneshvar MRM, Abadi NH (2017). Spatial and temporal variation of nitrogen dioxide measurement in the Middle East within 2005-2014. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 3(1).
[14]Daneshvar MRM, Rabbani G, Shirvani S (2019). Assessment of urban sprawl effects on regional climate change using a hybrid model of factor analysis and analytical network process in the Mashhad city, Iran. Environmental Systems Research. 8:23.
[15]Derubertis D (2006). Recent trends in four common stability indices derived from U.S. radiosonde observations. Journal of Climate. 19(3):309-323.
[16]Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009). Land use and land cover change in greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Applied Geography. 29(3):390-401.
[17]Dodman D (2009). Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment and Urbanization. 21(1):185-201.
[18]Dulal HB, Brodnig G, Onoriose CG (2011). Climate change mitigation in thetransport sector through urban planning: A review. Habitat International. 35(3):494-500.
[19]Emadodin I, Taravat AR, Rajaei M (2016). Effects of urban sprawl on local climate: A case study, north central Iran. Urban Climate. 17:230-247.
[20]Epstein J, Payne K, Kramer E (2002). Techniques for mapping suburban sprawl. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 63(9):913-918.
[21]Fan H, Sailor DJ (2005). Modeling the impacts of anthropogenic heating on the urban climate of Philadelphia: A comparison of implementations in two PBL schemes. Atmospheric Environment. 39(1):73-84.
[22]GDEM (2018). Global digital elevation model archived by national aeronautics and space administration. United States: NASA.
[23]Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 25(15):1965-1978.
[24]Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D (2008). Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 10(1):26-43.
[25]Kardani-Yazd N, Kardani-Yazd N, Daneshvar MRM (2019). Strategic spatial analysis of urban greenbelt plans in Mashhad city, Iran. Environmental Systems Research. 8:30.
[26]Kaltenböck R, Diendorfer G, Dotzek N (2009). Evaluation of thunderstorm indices from ECMWF analyses, lightning data and severe storm reports. Atmospheric Research. 93(1): 381-396.
[27]Liu Y, Chen J, Cheng W, Sun C, Zhao S, Pu Y(2014). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the urban sprawl in a typical urban agglomeration: A case study on Southern Jiangsu, China (1983–2007). Frontiers of Earth Science. 8:490-504.
[28]Makar PA, Gravel S, Chirkov V, Strawbridge KB, Froude F, Arnold J, Brook J (2006). Heat flux, urban properties, and regional weather. Atmospheric Environment. 40(15): 2750-2766.
[29]Miller PW, Mote TL (2018). Characterizing severe weather potential in synoptically weakly forced thunderstorm environments. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science. 18(4):1261-1277.
[30]Mundia CN, Aniya M (2006). Dynamics of landuse/cover changes and degradation of Nairobi City Kenya. Land Degradation and Development. 17(1):97-108.
[31]Pham HM, Yamaguchi Y, Bui TQ (2011). A case study on the relation between city planning and urban growth using remote sensing and spatial metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning. 100(3): 223-230.
[32]Rabbani G, Kardani-Yazd N, Daneshvar MRM (2020). Factors affecting severe weather threat index in urban areas of Turkey and Iran. Environmental Systems Research. 9:9.
[33]Rabbani G, Shafaqi S, Rahnama MR (2017). Urban sprawl modeling using statistical approach in Mashhad, northeastern Iran. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 4:141-149.
[34]Rafiee R, Mahiny AS, Khorasani N, Darvishsefat AA, Danekar A (2009). Simulating urban growth in Mashad City, Iran through the SLEUTH model (UGM). Cities. 26(1):19-26.
[35]Rhodes CL, Senkbeil JC (2014). Factors contributing to tornadogenesis in landfalling Gulf of Mexico tropical cyclones. Meteorological Applications. 21:940-947.
[36]Siedlecki M (2009). Selected instability indices in Europe. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 96:85-94.
[37]Sioutas MV, Flocas HA (2003). Hailstorms in Northern Greece: Synoptic patterns and thermodynamic environment. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 75:189-202.
[38]Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Jagdish KS (2004). Urban sprawl: Metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 5(1) :29-39.
[39]Tewolde MG, Cabral P (2011). Urban sprawl analysis and modeling in Asmara, Eritrea. Remote Sensing. 3(10): 2148-2165.
[40]Tyrrell J (2007). Winter tornadoes in Ireland: The case of the Athlone tornado of 12 January 2004. Atmospheric Research. 83(2-4):242-253.
[41]Wang J, Sheng Z, Zhou B, Zhou S (2014). Lightning potential forecast over Nanjing with denoised sounding-derived indices based on SSA and CS-B Pneural network. Atmospheric Research. 137:245-256.
[42]World Urbanization Prospects [Internet]. Population division of the department of economic and social affairs of the United Nations. [Cited 2019, 01 Jun; Published 2019, 30 May]. Madrid: UN Publications. Available From: https://population.un.org
[43]Wyoming Weather Web [Internet]. Weather Information for Wyoming. [Cited 2019, 01 Jun; Published 2018, 25 February]. United States : University of Wyoming Publications. Available From: http://weather.uwyo.edu
[44]Yuan F, Sawaya KE, Loeffelholz BC, Bauer ME (2005). Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area by multitemporal landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment. 98(2-3):317-328.