@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2015;8(5):309-316
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2015;8(5):309-316
Matching Level between Professors’ Selected Media and Emotional-Perception Preferences of Students
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Descriptive & Survey StudyAuthors
Hedayati N. (1)Amini N. (*)
Zamani B.E. (2)
(*) Educational Sciences Department, Psychology & Educational Sciences Faculty, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
(1) Dentistry Department, Dentisry Faculty, Shahid Behshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(2) Educational Sciences Department, Educational Sciences & Psychology Faculty, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Correspondence
Address: Psychology & Educational Sciences Faculty, Darvazeye Shiraz, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, IranPhone: +983137932549
Fax:
narjesamini@yahoo.com
Article History
Received: March 15, 2015Accepted: September 9, 2015
ePublished: January 10, 2016
BRIEF TEXT
… [1-19] Academic achievement depends on the students’ learning styles and methods providing information for them [20-22]. Effective learning depends on the activity of the learner, and awareness of different learning styles and adaptation with them are requirements for the teachers to help the students’ effective learning [23]. … [24, 25]
A “deep” attitude to learning should be encouraged by the teachers [26]. Based on a conducted study, there is no correspondence between the used media by the teachers of humanities faculty and the students’ learning styles.
The aim of this study was to investigate correspondence between the students’ learning styles and educational media and technologies used by the teachers in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
This is a descriptive-cross sectional study.
The medical and dentistry students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences were studied in the academic year 2014-15.
The sample size formula was used to select the samples. 90 persons were randomly selected through stratified sampling.
Data was collected using Vark learning style questionnaire [12]. The 15- question closed-response questionnaire included 4-choice questions. The questions assessed some items; each one was related to a sensory preferred method. The items A, B, C, and D were visual, auditory, reading/writing style, and kinetic/motion sense items, respectively. Its reliability was 0.98 by Cronbach’s alpha [27]. A researcher-made questionnaire titled as “the rate of media utilization” included 22 questions scored based on the 5-point Likert scale. It consisted of visual technologies (6 items), auditory technologies (5 items), reading/writing technologies (3 items), and kinetic/motion technologies (8 items). Validity of the questionnaire was determined based on the viewpoints of the experts of educational technologies. Its reliability was computed 0.96 by Cronbach’s alpha. Data was analyzed by SPSS 22 software using descriptive and inferential statistics. Mean and standard deviation were used to show the items of central tendency and changeability. Hotelling T test was used to compare the dominant styles of the students. Considering the roles of the senses, different types of technologies and media used by the teachers of medical faculty were assessed by mean and standard deviation. To investigate the correspondence of the students’ learning style with the technologies and media used by the teachers, Samerz, Kendall, and Gamma correspondence coefficients were used.
The most preferred styles were visual style (mean scores 39.27±6.87) and composed style (mean scores 36.30±6.19), successively. The least preferred style was auditory (mean scores 30.28±7.56). The most prevalent styles in the female and male students were reading/writing (50.35±6.37) and auditory (40.81±12.93) styles, respectively (p=0.001; f=15.50; t₂=47.90). Compositions of technologies were used by the dentistry and medical teachers. The most utilized and the least utilized technologies used by the teachers were auditory (mean scores 3.88±0.93) and kinetic/motion (mean scores 2.30±0.44) technologies, respectively. There was no significant correspondence between the students’ reading/writing style and the reading/writing technologies selected by the teachers (p>0.05). Therefore, there was no correspondence between the medical students’ reading/writing styles and the reading/writing media used by the teachers. The media introduced by 80% of the teachers were book, notes, and internet papers while only 30% of the students preferred the reading/writing style. There was a significant correspondence between the students’ visual style and the visual technologies selected by the teachers (p<0.05). Therefore, there was a correspondence between the visual learning style of students of medicine faculty and the visual media used by the teachers. There was no significant correspondence and adaptation between the students’ kinetic/motion style and the kinetic/motion technologies selected by the teachers (p>0.05). Therefore, the selected technology was not consistent with the students’ needs. Experimental methods and experiences in the laboratories were preferred by 78% of the students compared to other methods, while the media was used in about 35% of the teaching time only, limited to practical courses and laboratory works. There was no significant adaptation between the students’ auditory styles and the auditory technologies selected by the teachers (p>0.05). Therefore, there was no consistency between the students’ auditory learning style and the auditory technologies used by the teachers. The level of the auditory style in 11.5% of the students was high. Intention to learn through auditory style was assessed by 88.5% of the students weak and moderate, while the auditory media, such as lecture presentation, were more used by the teachers in teaching (Table 1).
There was a positive and significant correlation between the students’ visual learning styles and the visual media used by the teachers. The result is consistent with other studies [7]. Probably, the learning styles and the media and technologies used by the teachers have mutual effects. Considering the content and educational conditions, the students use different styles or, in some cases, a composed style. In addition, the students’ learning styles are affected by the instructors’ teaching styles and learning methods. Nevertheless, the learning styles lead to specific interests in the teachers to utilize various media and technologies [27]. … [28-31] Educations in the learning-teaching courses leads to a high awareness of educational media and technologies in the teachers of nursing faculty [32]. … [33]
The teachers of the medicine faculty should utilize tools, media, and strategies consistent with the students’ learning styles. Qualitative studies should be done about the students’ preferences in the media used by the teachers.
No standard questionnaire and constrained results to the students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences were of the limitations for the present study.
There is correspondence between the technologies selected by the teachers of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and the students’ visual learning styles. Nevertheless, there is no correspondence between the technologies and reading/writing, auditory, and kinetic/motion styles.
All participants and the teachers of Medicine Faculty and Dentistry Faculty of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences are appreciated.
Non-declared
The participants were assured on the confidentiality of information. In addition, there was no constraint to participate. The participants were remain anonymous and proper time and place were provided for them.
Non-declared
TABLES and CHARTS
Show attach fileCITIATION LINKS
[1]Caillies S, Denhiere G, Kintsch W. The effect of prior knowledge on understanding from text: evidence from primed recognition. Euro J Cogn Psychol. 2002;14(2):267-86.
[2]Khandaghy MA, Rajayy M. Impact learning style on students' preferred style of teaching. J Educ Psychol. 2012;9(28):15-39. [Persian]
[3]Ismail A, Hussein R, Jamaluddina S. Assessment of students’ learning styles preferences in the faculty of science, Tishreen University, Syria. Proced Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):4087-91.
[4]Franzoni AL, Assar S. Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. Educ Technol Soc. 2009;12(4):15-29.
[5]Franzoni AL, Assar S. Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. Educ Technol Soc. 2009:12(4):15-29.
[6]Beacham NA, Elliott AC, Alty JL, Al-Sharrah A. Media combinations and learning styles: A dual coding approach. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecomunicaciones. Denver, Colorado; 2002.
[7]Bates OW, Poll G. Effective teaching with use technology in higher education. Zamani B, Azimi SA, translators. Tehran: Samt; 2010.
[8]Kloss RJ. A nudge is best: Helping students through the perry scheme of intellectual development. Coll Teach. 2010;42(4):151-8.
[9]Ford N, Chen S. Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. Br J Educ Tech. 2001;32(1):5-22.
[10]Javadinia AR, Sharifzadeh Gh, Abedini MR, Khalesi MM, Erfanian M. Learning Styles of Medical Students in Birjand University of Medical Sciences According to VARK Model. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(6):584-9. [Persian]
[11]Prince MJ, Felder RM, Brent R. Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? an analysis of existing and potential synergies. J Eng Educ. 2007;96(4):283-94.
[12]Hayes J, Allinson CW. The implications of learning styles for training and development: A discussion of the matching hypothesis. Br J Manag. 1996;7(1):63-73.
[13]Shuell TJ. Cognitive conceptions of learning. Rev Educ Res. 1986;56(4):411-36.
[14]Felder RM [Internet]. Index of learning styles [Retrieved 2009, 22 August; Cited 2015, 3 July]. Available from: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html
[15]Bertolami CN. Rationalizing the dental curriculum in light of current disease prevalence and patient demand for treatment: Form vs content. J Dent Educ. 2001;65(8):725-35.
[16]Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res. 1989;18(1):32-42.
[17]Banning M. Approaches to teaching: Current opinions and related research. Nurs Educ Today. 2009;25(7):502-8.
[18]Turki J. Thinking styles "in light of sternberg's theory" prevailing among the students of tafila technical university and its relationship with some variables. Am Int J Contemp Res. 2012;2(3):140-53.
[19]Chandler G. Succeeding in the first year of practice. J Nurs Staff Dev. 2012;28(3):103-7.
[20]Van Blerkom DL, Van Blerkom ML, Bertsch S. Study strategies and generative learning: What works?. J Coll Read Learn. 2006;37(1):7-18.
[21]Allen SJ. Adult learning theory & leadership development. Leadersh Rev. 2007;7:26-37.
[22]Norman G. When will learning style go out of style?. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(1):1-4.
[23]Isman CA, Gundogan NU. The influence of digit ratio on the gender difference in learning style preferences. Personal Individ Differ. 2009;46(4):424-7.
[24]Fleming N, Mills C. Not another Inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. Improv Acad. 1992;11:137-155.
[25]Fleming N [Internet]. VARK: A guide to learning styles. Available from: http://www.vark-learn.com/ documents/TheVARK Questionnaire.pdf. 2004.
[26]Duarte FP. Conceptions of good teaching by good teachers: Case studies from an Australian University. J Univ Teach Learn Pract. 2013;10(1):1-17.
[27]Rahmanpour M, Palizban F, Zamani BE. Survey and Comparison of the Students' learning Styles in Engineering and Human Science Faculty of ISfahan University According to Gender, Academic Level and Course. Eng Educ J. 209;11(41):47-67. [Persian]
[28]Khaghanyzadeh M. Use of media and educational assist tools in teaching. J Educ Strateg. 2009;2(3):127-30. [Persian]
[29]Anderson T, editor. Theory and practice of online learning. 2nd edition. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press; 2010.
[30]Adib Haj Baghery M. The experience nursing & midwifery about effective use of powerpoint in teaching. Iran J Med Educ. 2010;10(2):111-23. [Persian]
[31]Rasolinejad SA, Behnia H, Davoodabadi A, Rasoulinejad SV. Surveying the knowledge, attitude and practice of Kashan faculty member towards educational media. Feyz. 2004;7(4):78-83. [Persian]
[32]Malekshahi F, Sheikhian A, Ebrahim Zadeh F. The investigation Viewpoints of the Faculty of Medical Sciences in some educational indicators in lorestan University in 2007. Yafte. 2011;12(2):33-43. [Persian]
[33]Mousa Ramezany S. Effect multimedia education and lecture on study achievement of motivation and self-efficial students online. Educ Tech. 2011;1(6):45-58. [Persian]
[2]Khandaghy MA, Rajayy M. Impact learning style on students' preferred style of teaching. J Educ Psychol. 2012;9(28):15-39. [Persian]
[3]Ismail A, Hussein R, Jamaluddina S. Assessment of students’ learning styles preferences in the faculty of science, Tishreen University, Syria. Proced Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):4087-91.
[4]Franzoni AL, Assar S. Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. Educ Technol Soc. 2009;12(4):15-29.
[5]Franzoni AL, Assar S. Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. Educ Technol Soc. 2009:12(4):15-29.
[6]Beacham NA, Elliott AC, Alty JL, Al-Sharrah A. Media combinations and learning styles: A dual coding approach. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecomunicaciones. Denver, Colorado; 2002.
[7]Bates OW, Poll G. Effective teaching with use technology in higher education. Zamani B, Azimi SA, translators. Tehran: Samt; 2010.
[8]Kloss RJ. A nudge is best: Helping students through the perry scheme of intellectual development. Coll Teach. 2010;42(4):151-8.
[9]Ford N, Chen S. Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. Br J Educ Tech. 2001;32(1):5-22.
[10]Javadinia AR, Sharifzadeh Gh, Abedini MR, Khalesi MM, Erfanian M. Learning Styles of Medical Students in Birjand University of Medical Sciences According to VARK Model. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(6):584-9. [Persian]
[11]Prince MJ, Felder RM, Brent R. Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? an analysis of existing and potential synergies. J Eng Educ. 2007;96(4):283-94.
[12]Hayes J, Allinson CW. The implications of learning styles for training and development: A discussion of the matching hypothesis. Br J Manag. 1996;7(1):63-73.
[13]Shuell TJ. Cognitive conceptions of learning. Rev Educ Res. 1986;56(4):411-36.
[14]Felder RM [Internet]. Index of learning styles [Retrieved 2009, 22 August; Cited 2015, 3 July]. Available from: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html
[15]Bertolami CN. Rationalizing the dental curriculum in light of current disease prevalence and patient demand for treatment: Form vs content. J Dent Educ. 2001;65(8):725-35.
[16]Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res. 1989;18(1):32-42.
[17]Banning M. Approaches to teaching: Current opinions and related research. Nurs Educ Today. 2009;25(7):502-8.
[18]Turki J. Thinking styles "in light of sternberg's theory" prevailing among the students of tafila technical university and its relationship with some variables. Am Int J Contemp Res. 2012;2(3):140-53.
[19]Chandler G. Succeeding in the first year of practice. J Nurs Staff Dev. 2012;28(3):103-7.
[20]Van Blerkom DL, Van Blerkom ML, Bertsch S. Study strategies and generative learning: What works?. J Coll Read Learn. 2006;37(1):7-18.
[21]Allen SJ. Adult learning theory & leadership development. Leadersh Rev. 2007;7:26-37.
[22]Norman G. When will learning style go out of style?. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(1):1-4.
[23]Isman CA, Gundogan NU. The influence of digit ratio on the gender difference in learning style preferences. Personal Individ Differ. 2009;46(4):424-7.
[24]Fleming N, Mills C. Not another Inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. Improv Acad. 1992;11:137-155.
[25]Fleming N [Internet]. VARK: A guide to learning styles. Available from: http://www.vark-learn.com/ documents/TheVARK Questionnaire.pdf. 2004.
[26]Duarte FP. Conceptions of good teaching by good teachers: Case studies from an Australian University. J Univ Teach Learn Pract. 2013;10(1):1-17.
[27]Rahmanpour M, Palizban F, Zamani BE. Survey and Comparison of the Students' learning Styles in Engineering and Human Science Faculty of ISfahan University According to Gender, Academic Level and Course. Eng Educ J. 209;11(41):47-67. [Persian]
[28]Khaghanyzadeh M. Use of media and educational assist tools in teaching. J Educ Strateg. 2009;2(3):127-30. [Persian]
[29]Anderson T, editor. Theory and practice of online learning. 2nd edition. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press; 2010.
[30]Adib Haj Baghery M. The experience nursing & midwifery about effective use of powerpoint in teaching. Iran J Med Educ. 2010;10(2):111-23. [Persian]
[31]Rasolinejad SA, Behnia H, Davoodabadi A, Rasoulinejad SV. Surveying the knowledge, attitude and practice of Kashan faculty member towards educational media. Feyz. 2004;7(4):78-83. [Persian]
[32]Malekshahi F, Sheikhian A, Ebrahim Zadeh F. The investigation Viewpoints of the Faculty of Medical Sciences in some educational indicators in lorestan University in 2007. Yafte. 2011;12(2):33-43. [Persian]
[33]Mousa Ramezany S. Effect multimedia education and lecture on study achievement of motivation and self-efficial students online. Educ Tech. 2011;1(6):45-58. [Persian]