@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2013;6(2):89-93
ISSN: 2228-5468 Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2013;6(2):89-93
Effective Factors on Electronic Learning
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Hadavand S. (*)Kashanchi A. R. (1)
(*) Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Sciences & Researches Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Address: Iran Electronic Institute, SaIran Company, Teymouri Al., End of Shahid Langeroudi St., Nobonyad Sq., Pasdaran Ave., Tehran, Iran.Phone: +982122562969
Fax: +982122988041
hadvand@sairan.ir
Article History
Received: September 9, 2012Accepted: March 16, 2013
ePublished: June 7, 2013
BRIEF TEXT
CITIATION LINKS
[1] Smrikarov A. A model of virtual university: Some problems during its development. Bulgaria; Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 2003.
[2] Kamaliyan A, Fazeli A. The examination of prerequisites and evaluation of facilities of electronic learning system. J Technol Educ. 2009;4(1):13. [Persian]
[3] Thomas P. Teaching over the internet: The future, computing and control. Eng J. 1997;8(3):8-10.
[4] Shih H. Using a cognitive motivation control view to assess the adoption intention for web based learning. Comput Educ. 2008;50(4):329-30.
[5] Yazdani F, Ebrahimzadeh I, Zandi B, Alipour A, Zare H. Recognizing of fundamental factors in effectiveness of elearning systems. J Inform Process Manag. 2012;27(2):390- 3. [Persian]
[6]Zhiting Z, Quing L, Hu H. Specification for service quality management system of e-learning. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci. 2009;3143:400-6.
[7] Gharemani M. Evaluation of effectiveness of the project management M.S courses and exploitation and operation management. Q J Manag Dev Process. 2001;11(9):55-6. [Persian]
[8] Unneberg L. Grand designer for e-learning: Can e-learning make the grade for our biggest corporate? J Ind Commer Training. 2007;39(4):204-11.
[9] Chahill R. What motivates faculty participation in elearning: A case study of complex factors [dissertation]. Minnesota: University of St. Thomas; 2008.
[10] Aydin CH, Tasci D. Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an emerging country. Educ Technol Soc. 2005;8(4):328-31.
[11]Berry W. Competency-based evaluation tools for integration industry training in family industry residency: A pilot study. Madrid; Education Conference in University of Madrid, 2007.
[12] Aghakasiri Z, Fazelian P. Evaluation of the virtual education plans in science faculty from the point of view of students and professions. Tehran; The 5th National Conference E-Learning and Education, 2010. [Persian]
[13] Seraji F, Attaran M. Methodology of research on elearning: A comparison between Iranian and foreign research. J Educ Innov. 2001;9(36):62-3. [Persian]
[14] Allen E, Seaman J. Making the grade online education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium; 2006.
[15] Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. The science of training: A decade of progress. Ann Rev Psychol. 2001;52(2):486-8.
[16] Ebili K, Sobhaninejad M, Youzbashi A. The examination of effective factors on promotion of educational courses effectiveness. Q J Hum Manag. 2010;3(9):62-3. [Persian]
[17] Winfred A, Winston B, Edens S. Effectiveness of training in organization: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(2):243-5.
[18] Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for customers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publisher; 2003.
[2] Kamaliyan A, Fazeli A. The examination of prerequisites and evaluation of facilities of electronic learning system. J Technol Educ. 2009;4(1):13. [Persian]
[3] Thomas P. Teaching over the internet: The future, computing and control. Eng J. 1997;8(3):8-10.
[4] Shih H. Using a cognitive motivation control view to assess the adoption intention for web based learning. Comput Educ. 2008;50(4):329-30.
[5] Yazdani F, Ebrahimzadeh I, Zandi B, Alipour A, Zare H. Recognizing of fundamental factors in effectiveness of elearning systems. J Inform Process Manag. 2012;27(2):390- 3. [Persian]
[6]Zhiting Z, Quing L, Hu H. Specification for service quality management system of e-learning. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci. 2009;3143:400-6.
[7] Gharemani M. Evaluation of effectiveness of the project management M.S courses and exploitation and operation management. Q J Manag Dev Process. 2001;11(9):55-6. [Persian]
[8] Unneberg L. Grand designer for e-learning: Can e-learning make the grade for our biggest corporate? J Ind Commer Training. 2007;39(4):204-11.
[9] Chahill R. What motivates faculty participation in elearning: A case study of complex factors [dissertation]. Minnesota: University of St. Thomas; 2008.
[10] Aydin CH, Tasci D. Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an emerging country. Educ Technol Soc. 2005;8(4):328-31.
[11]Berry W. Competency-based evaluation tools for integration industry training in family industry residency: A pilot study. Madrid; Education Conference in University of Madrid, 2007.
[12] Aghakasiri Z, Fazelian P. Evaluation of the virtual education plans in science faculty from the point of view of students and professions. Tehran; The 5th National Conference E-Learning and Education, 2010. [Persian]
[13] Seraji F, Attaran M. Methodology of research on elearning: A comparison between Iranian and foreign research. J Educ Innov. 2001;9(36):62-3. [Persian]
[14] Allen E, Seaman J. Making the grade online education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium; 2006.
[15] Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. The science of training: A decade of progress. Ann Rev Psychol. 2001;52(2):486-8.
[16] Ebili K, Sobhaninejad M, Youzbashi A. The examination of effective factors on promotion of educational courses effectiveness. Q J Hum Manag. 2010;3(9):62-3. [Persian]
[17] Winfred A, Winston B, Edens S. Effectiveness of training in organization: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(2):243-5.
[18] Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for customers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publisher; 2003.