ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Haghi   Fahimeh (1)
Niknami   Shamsodin (*)
Sadat Tavafian   Sedigheh (1)






(*) Department of Health Education, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Department of Health Education, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
(1) Department of Health Education, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence


Article History

Received:  September  11, 2017
Accepted:  October 20, 2017
ePublished:  December 21, 2017

BRIEF TEXT


Preeclampsia (PE) is the most common complication of pregnancy and one of the top three causes of maternal death.

[1-9]. ... Several studies have focused on the role of diet in pregnancy and the incidence of PE [10-12]. [13-15]. ... Richardson's study also found that preeclampsia was lower in women who consumed two glasses of milk a day than other women [16]. … [17]. On the other hand, low levels of literacy are associated with less involvement in preventive behaviors, late diagnosis of diseases and disability in healthy lifestyle [18, 19].

This study was conducted to determine the effect of nutrition training program for the prevention of PE on the nutritional behaviors of pregnant women.

This research was a quasi-experimental study.

This study was carried out on 120 pregnant women in their third trimester of pregnancy referred to the healthcare centers of Pol-e dokhtar, Iran, in 2017.

The subjects were selected through cluster sampling method. For this purpose, 2 centers were selected randomly among 8 health centers in Pol-e dokhtar city. Then, randomly, 1 center was considered as the experimental group and the other center as control group. The sample size with a 95% confidence level and 80% power in each group was estimated 50 subjects; however regarding the 20% possibility of reduction, it increased to 60 in each group. The inclusion criteria included reading and writing literacy, active health records, third trimester of pregnancy regardless of the number of pregnancy and the willingness to attend the study.

The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire designed based on reference books and available resources [20-23]. It consisted of four sections of demographic information, questions of knowledge, attitudes and nutritional behaviors. The knowledge questions included ten questions with 3 scales (yes, no, and I do not know). Yes scored 2 and no scored zero score. Higher scores in this section indicate mothers' higher awareness of food and nutritional behaviors preventing PE. Attitudes toward preventive nutrition behaviors included 5 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranged very opposed (1) to so agree (5). Higher scores indicated positive attitude of mothers towards preventative nutritional behaviors of PE. PE preventive behaviors were also measured by 4 questions with 2-option scale, including yes (1) and no (zero). In addition, the content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts and by 10 gynecologists and health educators. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated in a preliminary study on 30 pregnant women using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The knowledge, attitude and behavior variables were 0.804, 0.701, and 0.855, respectively. The intervention program was designed using reference books and available resources [20-23] and also the opinion of the professors of midwifery and nutrition in three 2-hour training sessions and was held for the participants of the experimental group. In these sessions, PE and its symptoms and complications in mothers and fetus were presented followed by introducing the role of nutrition in prevention of PE. Then, using questions and answers, embarrassed and shy women were participated in the discussion, so that they could express their attitudes and, according to the topics provided by the teacher and the information obtained by other pregnant women, they identified their wrong attitudes and behaviors and made changes to solve them. Educational equipment, such as pamphlets and educational brochures were distributed among the participants in the experimental group. During this period, the control group received only routine education through health centers. Both experimental and control groups completed the questionnaires three months after the intervention. It should be noted that during this 3 month interval, no reminder messages were provided to the experimental group. Data was analyzed by SPSS 16 using Chi-square, Fisher's exact, independent t-test and paired T-test.

The mean age of the participants in the experimental and control groups was 31.17±4.98 and 31.08±5.14 years, respectively. Also, 35% of them had a below diploma degree, 40% diploma and 25% had university degree. In addition, 67.7% had medium household economic status followed by 16.7% good and 6.7% poor. Other demographic characteristics of the participants in the experimental and control group are presented in Table 1. According to the findings, there was no significant statistical difference between two groups in most demographic variables before the educational intervention (P>0.05); however, there were significant differences between two groups in the history of preterm delivery, abortion and history of high blood pressure plus seizure (P<0.05). The mean scores of knowledge, attitude and function of participants in both control and experimental groups before and after educational intervention are presented in Table 2. Based on the findings, the mean scores of knowledge, attitude and function of the two groups did not show a significant difference before and after the intervention (P> 0.05); however, 3 months after the intervention, the mean of these scores in two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). Intra-group comparison of scores also showed that the mean scores of knowledge, attitude and function of the intervention group before and 3 months after the intervention were statistically significant (P<0.001); however, the mean of these scores before and 3 months after the intervention in the control group did not show a significant difference (P>0.05).

… [24-26]. The results of studies by Anderson et al. in Scotland [27] and Boyd et al., in the USA [28] indicate the effect of an educational program on increasing and improving the nutritional awareness of pregnant women. Other research results in India also found that nutrition education and counseling led to an increase in the consumption of fruits, vegetables, milk and dairy products in pregnant women [29]. In the Widga & Lewis research, after training, there was a significant improvement in the consumption of fruits and vegetables, folate, energy, calcium and vitamins in pregnant women [30]. However, the findings of some studies indicate that education has no effect on the improvement of nutritional behaviors in pregnant women [31, 32]; as in Anderson et al. study no improvement in nutritional behaviors despite the increased awareness of pregnant women was observed [27]. … [33-38].

The use of educational reminder messages is recommended to avoid forgetting trainings and making a lasting change in people's behavior and performance.

Only the individual factors associated with preventative nutritional behaviors of PE have been investigated, which can be considered as one of the limitations of this research.

Educational intervention was effective in the prevention of PE in pregnant women through changing their nutritional behaviors. Therefore, it is suggested to educate pregnant women; moreover, further studies are recommended to confirm the results.

All participated pregnant women are appreciated.

-

The present research is approved by the ethics committee of Tarbiat Modarres University (ethics code: IR.TMU.REC.1395.473).

The present research is supported by the Tarbiat Modarres University as well as Lorestan University of Medical Sciences and Pol-e dokhtar Healthcare Network.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Allahyari E, Foroushani AR, Zeraati H, Mohammad K, Taghizadeh Z. A predictive model for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. J Reprod Infertil. 2010;10(4):261-7. [Persian]
[2]Amorim MM, Souza AS, Katz L. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe pre‐eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10:CD009430. PMID: 29058762 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009430.pub2
[3]Frampton GK, Jones J, Rose M, Payne L. Placental growth factor (alone or in combination with soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1) as an aid to the assessment of women with suspected pre-eclampsia: systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(87):1-160. PMID: 27918253 DOI: 10.3310/hta20870
[4]Churchill D, Duley L, Thornton JG, Jones L. Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre‐eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD003106. PMID: 23888485 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003106.pub2
[5]Henderson JT, Thompson JH, Burda BU, Cantor A. Preeclampsia screening: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2017;317(16):1668-83. PMID: 28444285 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.18315
[6]Heilmann L, Rath W, Pollow K. Hemorheological changes in women with severe preeclampsia. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2004;31(1):49-58. PMID: 15272153
[7]Moafi F, Dolatian M, Keshavarz Z, Alavi Majd H, Dejman M. Association between social support and maternal stress with preeclampsia. Soc Welfare Quart. 2013;13(48):151-70. [Persian]
[8]Kojouri M. Women's special care. Tehran: Bashra Publications; 2000. P. 120-2. [Persian]
[9]Moleeinejad M. Blood pressure in pregnancy and preeclampsia. Reproductive Health. Avalible at: URL: http://www.drmolaei.ir/index.php?ToDo=ShowArticles&AID=7091; 2010. [Persian]
[10]Sirohiwal D, Dahiya K, Khaneja N. Use of 24-hour urinary protein and calcium for prediction of preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;48(2):113-5. PMID: 19574169 DOI: 10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60268-0
[11]Morikawa H, Yoshida S. Toxemie of pregnancy and magnesium. Clin Calcium. 2005;15(2):213-9. PMID: 15692159 DOI: CliCa0502213219
[12]Kooshki A, Mortazavi F, Akbari A. The Relationship between Diet and Development of Gestational Hypertension. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 2009;16(2):100-7. [Persian].
[13]Khatouni A. Babysitters and mothers care and health. Tehran, Iran: Aftab Publication; 2002. P. 73-5. [Persian]
[14]Casey BM, Dashe JS, Wells CE, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG. Subclinical hyperthyroidism and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(2, Part 1):337-41. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000197991.64246.9a
[15]Rumbold A, Middleton P, Pan N, Crowther CA. Vitamin supplementation for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1:CD004073. PMID: 21249660 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004073.pub3
[16]Richardson BE, Baird DD. A study of milk and calcium supplement intake and subsequent preeclampsia in a cohort of pregnant women. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(7):667-73. PMID: 7702042
[17]Shieh C, Halstead JA. Understanding the impact of health literacy on women's health. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;38(5):601-12. PMID: 19883483 DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01059.x
[18]Lindau ST, Tomori C, Lyons T, Langseth L, Bennett CL, Garcia P. The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):938-43. PMID: 12015518
[19]Scott TL, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Baker DW. Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Med Care. 2002;40(5):395-404. PMID: 11961474
[20]Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Spong CY, Dashe J. Williams obstetrics. 24th ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill; 2014. P. 706-49.
[21]Saberi M, Khalilipour Ardestani M. Basic modern nutrition. 1st ed. Tehran: Royan Pajouh Publications; 2012. P. 539-40 .[Persian]
[22]Brantsæter AL, Haugen M, Samuelsen SO, Torjusen H, Trogstad L, Alexander J, et al. A dietary pattern characterized by high intake of vegetables, fruits, and vegetable oils is associated with reduced risk of preeclampsia in nulliparous pregnant Norwegian women. J Nutr. 2009;139(6):1162-8. PMID: 19369368 DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.104968
[23]Meher S, Duley L. Exercise or other physical activity for preventing pre‐eclampsia and its complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2:CD005942. PMID: 16625645 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005942.
[24]Esfahankalate S, Hasheminasab SM, Esfahankalate A. Effect of Lecture and Group Discussion on Improving the Nutritional knowledge of Pregnant Women in Gorgan. J Res Dev Nurs Midwifery. 2014;11(2):31-7. [Persian]
[25]Jahdi F, Montazeri A, Balouchi M, Behboodi MZ. The impact of group prenatal care on pregnant women empowerment. Payesh J. 2014;13(2):229-34. [Persian]
[26]Garg A, Kashyap S. Effect of counseling on nutritional status during pregnancy. Indian J Pediatr. 2006;73(8):687-92. PMID: 16936363
[27]Anderson AS, Campbell DM, Shepherd R. The influence of dietary advice on nutrient intake during pregnancy. Br J Nutr. 1995;73(2):163-77. PMID: 7718538
[28]Boyd NR, Windsor RA. A formative evaluation in maternal and child health practice: the partners for life nutrition education program for pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2003;7(2):137-43. PMID: 12870629
[29]Young MF, Nguyen PH, Addo OY, Hao W, Nguyen H, Pham H, et al. The relative influence of maternal nutritional status before and during pregnancy on birth outcomes in Vietnam. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;194:223-7. PMID: 26454228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.018
[30]Widga AC, Lewis NM. Defined, in-home, prenatal nutrition intervention for low-income women. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99(9):1058-62. PMID: 10491673 DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00251-5
[31]Burr ML, Trembeth J, Jones KB, Geen J, Lynch LA, Roberts ZE. The effects of dietary advice and vouchers on the intake of fruit and fruit juice by pregnant women in a deprived area: a controlled trial. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(6):559-65. PMID: 17381912 DOI: 10.1017/S1368980007249730
[32]Szwajcer EM, Hiddink GJ, Koelen MA, van Woerkum CM. Nutrition awareness and pregnancy: implication for the life course perspective. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(1): 58-64. PMID: 17178186 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.11.012
[33]Ostad RA, Safaeian AA, Modaresi ZH, Pourabdelahi P, Mahdavi R. Effect of nutrition education intervention on nutritional knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) among female employees of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2010;31(4):12-7. [Persian]
[34]Esfandyari Nejad P, Najar S, Afshari P, Yaralizadeh M, Nezamivand Chegini S. Evaluation of pregnant women's satisfaction of presented prenatal care at Ahvaz health care centers. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2016;19(31):13-22. [Persian]
[35]Jafari F, Eftekhar H, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A. Does group prenatal care affect satisfaction and prenatal care utilization in Iranian pregnant women? Iran J Public Health. 2010;39(2):52. [Persian]
[36]Vameghi R, Mohammad K, Karimloo M, Soleimani F, Sajedi F. The effects of health education through face to face teaching and educational movies, on suburban women in childbearing age. Iran J Public Health. 2010;39(2):77-88. PMID: 23113010
[37]Yeh MC, Ickes SB, Lowenstein LM, Shuval K, Ammerman AS, Farris R, et al. Understanding barriers and facilitators of fruit and vegetable consumption among a diverse multi-ethnic population in the USA. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(1):42-51. PMID: 18182418 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dam044
[38]Fathian Z, Sharifirad GR, Hasanzadeh A, Fathian Z. Study of the effects of Behavioral Intention Model education on reducing the cesarean rate among pregnant women of Khomeiny-Shahr, Isfahan, in 2006. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2007;9(2):123-31. [Persian]