ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Bokaeian   M. (1)
Tahmasebi   H. (*)
Mohammadzadeh   A.R. (2)
Adabi   J. (1)
Sepehri Rad   N. (3)






(*) Microbiology Department, Medicine School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
(1) Microbiology Department, Medicine School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
(2) Microbiology Department, Medicine School, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
(3) Infectious Diseases & Tropical Medicine Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Microbiology Department, Medicine School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Dr. Hesabi Square, Zahedan, Iran. Postal Code: 98167-43463
Phone: +985433295744
Fax: +985433425732
h.tahmasebi87@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  November  22, 2015
Accepted:  April 16, 2016
ePublished:  June 30, 2016

BRIEF TEXT


Nosocomial pathogens are among the important factors that can interfere in the recovery of hospitalized patients [1].

... [2-9] improper treatment of infections caused by negative coagulase staphylococci and sometimes inappropriate or excessive use of a wide range of antibiotics have led to widespread resistances in this group including the resistance to methicillin in the bacteria [10]. ... [11-15]. PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) is one of the most sensitive and accurate molecular methods that can be used for tracing different genes in a DNA molecule [16, 17]. … [18-20]. By eliminating the DNA extraction phase, PCR implementation can get more quickly when studying a large number of samples [21].

The study aimed to compare two methods of PCR using extracted DNA with the extraction kit and direct PCR in determining the genes resistant to methicillin in negative coagulase staphylococci.

This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study.

This study was carried out in 2015 on 135 samples of Staphylococcus epidermidis and 88 samples of Staphylococcus saprophyticus.

Out of 839 samples, 135 samples of Staphylococcus epidermidis and 88 samples of Staphylococcus saprophyticus were taken from the blood, wounds, catheter and urine of patients hospitalized in Zahedan`s medical centers. The obtained samples were transferred to the microbiology laboratory of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences using BHI environment (Merck; Germany). To determine Streptococci species, samples were cultured on blood agar environment (Merck; Germany) with 5% of sheep blood and the species of negative coagulase staphylococci were identified using microbial detection methods such as Gram staining, biochemical tests such as catalase, coagulase, a survey of DNase production, cultivation on mannitol salt agar environment and examining the novobiocin sensitivity. According to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute), the strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis were differentiated from Staphylococcus saprophyticus using disks of 30-mg novobiocin, 10-mg bacitracin and 100-unit polymyxin B. In order to differentiate between Staphylococcus hominis and Staphylococcus epidermidis, fosfomycin and deferoksamine antibiotics were used, and the samples with diameters greater than 30 mm for fosfomycin antibiotic as well as the ones with diameters greater than 20 mm for deferoksamine, were considered Staphylococcus epidermidis.

After separation of bacteria species, the samples were stored at -20° C until DNA isolation. The standard strain of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC33591 was used as the positive control as was the standard strain of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 for the negative control. In order to extract the DNA, first, stored isolates were cultured at -20° C in blood agar environment and were incubated at 37 ° C for 24 hours. Then a colony of each cultured isolate was inoculated in 5 micro liters of Luria Brittany broth medium and incubated for 20 hours at 37 ° C. The tubes were then removed from the incubator and 1.5 micro liters of the medium was added to 1.5-mL micro-tubes. The stages of DNA extraction were done using the PR881614 extraction kit (Sinagene; Iran) according to the manufacturer's procedure. To examine the quality of extracted DNAs, first through dilution of the extracted DNAs, their OD (optical density) were studied and 5 micro liters of DNA was electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel (Figure 1). The resulted DNAs were stored at -20° C until PCR test. In the direct PCR method, instead of DNA extraction and performing its multiple stages, the new colony of bacteria was used as 24-hour cultures. Freshness of the colonies and not keeping them for doing PCR should be considered. Conducting PCR using extracted DNA and direct PCR: to identify mecA and 16srDNA genes, the primers of these genes were employed (Table 1). In order to carry out the PCR reaction, the final volume of 25 micro liters was used containing 1 microliter of template DNA, 1 microliter of each primer at 10 pico-molar concentration, 12.5 micro liters of the master mix (Ampliqon; Germany) and 10.5 micro liters of deionized distilled water. PCR mixture without the template DNA was deployed as the positive control [14]. Then the PCR reaction was performed for mecA gene using a thermocycler machine (BioRad; USA), including initial denaturation at 95 ° C for 5 minutes, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 ° C for 2 minutes, primer connection phase at 57 ° C for 2 minutes and replication of target segment at 72 ° C for one minute. The PCR program for 16srDNA gene was similar to mecA gene. PCR products were stored in a refrigerator at +4° C for electrophoresis. For conducting direct PCR reaction, instead of using template DNA and going through different stages of extraction, one of the newly-cultured bacterial colonies was taken with a microbiological loop and was inoculated in the prepared mixture. For better solution of the colony, the final mixture was vortexed for 10 seconds. To prepare the final mixture, the final volume was brought to 25 micro liters according to the first method, and instead of 1 micro liter of each primer, 3 micro liters of each primer were added and the reaction was done through the same temperature cycle. For the electrophoresis of PCR product, 8 micro liters of it were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gel and the final result was examined using the gel documentation system, the CCD-Tab1 model (Kiagene; Iran).

In both used methods, 16srDNA and mecA genes with a bond length of 420 and 310 were reproduced successfully relating to the gene of identifying Staphylococcus and methicillin-resistant gene, respectively. Besides, the quality of observed bonds was quite similar (Figures 2 and 3). Out of 135 samples of Staphylococcus epidermidis, 119 cases (88.1%) were extracted through PCR method using the DNA extracted by the kit and 117 cases (86.6%) had the mecA gene using direct PCR. Out of 88 samples of Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 71 cases (80.6%) were extracted by PCR using extracted DNA and 68 cases (77.2%) had the mecA gene through direct PCR.

... [22-31]. In a study on diphtheria toxins using direct PCR, Nakao et al. demonstrated that this method has acceptable sensitivity for diagnosing diphtheria toxin and clinical samples can be evaluated in terms of the presence of tox gene through this method [32]. In a study, Fod Vagan et al. used direct PCR method to evaluate Escherichia coli bacterium and the obtained results in this study indicate the accordance of this method with the DNA extraction-based method while the obtained bonds in both methods are almost equal and reliable [33]. Inglis et al. investigated the molecular tracing of Campylobacter species using direct PCR. [34]. ... [35-37].

Considering the lack of enough time to do further experiments, it seems that performing the direct PCR can be better and more tested through further studies.

Cross-sectional nature of this study, insufficient time to execute additional tests, and not doing this experiment with other bacterial species are the limitations of this study.

To save time and money, direct PCR can be used for detection of negative coagulase staphylococcus resistant to methicillin.

The authors of this article are grateful to the officials of the research center for infectious-tropical diseases of Zahedan Medical Sciences University and colleagues of microbiology laboratory in Zahedan Medical University for helping them accomplishing this research.

Non-declared

This study was approved by ethics and scientific research committees of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences in 2014.

This study was financially supported by the Research and Technology Deputy of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, using the funds of research projects.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Inweregbu K, Dave J, Pittard A, Nosocomial infections. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2005;5(1):14-7.
[2]Martin MA, Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia: Mortality and hospital stay. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110(1):9-16.
[3]Cheung GY, Otto M. Understanding the significance of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia in babies and children. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23(3):208-16.
[4]Schwalbe RS, Stapleton JT, Gilligan PH. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(5):927-31.
[5]Rupp ME, Archer GL. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: Pathogens associated with medical progress. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19(2):231-43.
[6]Huebner J, Goldmann DA. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: Role as pathogens. Ann Rev Med. 1999;50(1):223-36.
[7]Rupp ME, Archer GL. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: Pathogens associated with medical progress. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19(2):231-43.
[8]Makki AR, Sharma S, Duggirala A, Prashanth K, Garg P, Das T. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) other than Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from ocular infections. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):9018-22.
[9]Raei F, Eftekhar F. Studying the presence of blaZ gene and betalactamase production in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Iran J Med Microbiol. 2008;2(2):35-41.
[10]Maskell R. Importance of coagulase-negative staphylococci as pathogens in the urinary tract. Lancet. 1974;1(7867):1155-8.
[11]Uçkay I, Harbarth S, Ferry T, Lübbeke A, Emonet S, Hoffmeyer P, et al. Meticillin resistance in orthopaedic coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections. J Hosp Infect. 2011;79(3):248-53.
[12]Klingenberg C, Aarag E, Rønnestad A, Sollid JE, Abrahamsen TG, Kjeldsen G, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis in neonates. Association between antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and the host inflammatory response. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(9):817-22.
[13]Mombach Pinheiro Machado AB, Reiter KC, Paiva RM, Barth AL. Distribution of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types I, II, III and IV in coagulase-negative staphylococci from patients attending a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56(10):1328-33.
[14]Park JY, Fox LK, Seo KS, McGuire MA, Park YH, Rurangirwa FR, et al. Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from bovine intramammary infections. Vet Microbiol. 2011;147(2):142-8.
[15]Zadoks RN, Watts JL. Species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci: genotyping is superior to phenotyping. Vet Microbiol. 2009;134(1-2):20-8.
[16]Andreson R, Reppo E, Kaplinski L, Remm M. Genomemasker package for designing unique genomic PCR primers. Bio Med Clin Bioinform. 2006;7:172.
[17]Walley AJ. PCR protocols: current methods and applications. J Med Genet. 1994;31(1):87.
[18]Ottens R, Templeton J, Paradiso V, Taylor D, Abarno D, Linacre A. Application of direct PCR in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2013;4(1):e47-8.
[19]Rychlik W. Selection of primers for polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol Biol. 1993;15:31-40.
[20]Shahbazi B. Narenji H. Comparison of four methods of DNA extraction from gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Zanko J Med Sci. 2014;15(45):9-16.
[21]Chum PY, Haimes JD, André CP, Kuusisto PK, Kelley ML. Genotyping of plant and animal samples without prior DNA purification. J Vis Exp. 2012;10(67):3791-3844.
[22]Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, Jorgensen JH. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(10):4740-4.
[23]Capoluongo E, Giglio A A, Lavieri MM, Lesnoni-La Parola I, Ferraro C, Cristaudo A, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in subjects with atopic dermatitis. Higher prevalence of exfoliative B toxin production in lesional strains and correlation between the markers of disease intensity and colonization density. J Dermatol Sci. 2001;26(2):145-55.
[24]Raeymaekers L. Basic principles of quantitative PCR. Mol Biotechnol. 2000;15(2):115-22.
[25]Borst P. Genetic mechanisms of drug resistance: A review. Acta Oncol. 1991;30(1):87-105.
[26]Montazeri EA, Khosravi AD, Jolodar A, Ghaderpanah M, Azarpira S. Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from burn patients by multiplex PCR. Burns. 2015;41(3):590-4.
[27]Quirk M. First VRSA isolate identified in USA. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(9):510.
[28]Ahsani MR, Shamsaddini BM. Compare of two methods of direct PCR and PCR with DNA extraction in Clostridium Perfringens typing. Iran Vet J. 2012;8(4):5-12.
[29]Mousazade Moghadam M, Babavalian H, Mirnejad R , Shakeri F. Rapid DNA extraction of bacterial genome of Staphylococcus aureus using laundry detergents and assessment of the efficiency of DNA in downstream process using PCR. Med Lab J. 2012;6(1):35-42.
[30]Eickbush TH, Moudrianakis EN. The histone core complex: An octamer assembled by two sets of protein-protein interactions. Biochem. 1978;17(23):4955-64.
[31]Lichtensteiger CA, Steenbergen SM, Lee RM, Polson DD, Vimr ER. Direct PCR analysis for toxigenic Pasteurella multocida. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(12):3035-9.
[32]Nakao H, Popovic T. Development of a direct PCR assay for detection of the diphtheria toxin gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(7):1651-5.
[33]Fode-Vaughan KA, Maki JS, Benson JA, Collins ML. Direct PCR detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;37:239-43.
[34]Inglis GD, Kalischuk LD. Use of PCR for direct detection of Campylobacter species in bovine feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(6):3435-47.
[35]van Hal SJ, Stark D, Lockwood B, Marriott D, Harkness J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and chromagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(8):2486-90.
[36]Nishimura N, Nakayamaa H, Yoshizumib S, Miyoshib M, Tonoikea H, Shirasakia Y, et al. Detection of noroviruses in fecalspecimens by direct RT-PCR without RNA purification. J Virol Methods. 2010;163(2):282-6.
[37]Fazaeli A, Fuladi B, Hashemi Shahri M, Sharifi I. Evaluation of a direct PCR in comparison with routine microscopy and in vitro culture for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Iran J Public Health. 2007;36(Suppl 1):1-2.