ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Basir Amir   SM. ()
Ghammari   H. (1)
Kiani   AR. (1)






() Educational Sciences & Psychology School, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran
(1) 1Educational Sciences & Psychology School, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran

Correspondence

Address: No. 21, Naser-Khosro 19.1, Mashhad, Iran. Postal Code: 91768-56611
Phone: +98 (51) 38424365
Fax: -
basir_amir3@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  January  28, 2019
Accepted:  June 2, 2019
ePublished:  June 15, 2019

BRIEF TEXT


... [1]. Substance abuse has always been associated with many problems in human life and is one of the most important social damages, that seriously threatens society [2].

... [3-8]. Studies have shown that a proper perception of social support or its lack has a significant impact on addiction [9]. Several studies show that the perception of social support is involved in prevention, treatment, and prevention of relapse. ... [12]. Social support includes support from "parents," friends, and "other important people of life" that an individual understands them with regard to his social and individual circumstances [13]. A number of studies have shown the relationship between the first component of social protection (parent) and addiction [14]. ... [15-18]. Some studies have shown that there are two other components of perceived social support (friends and other important people of life) and addiction [13]. Research results showed that the two components of social support perception by friends and other important people of life were able to predict drug relapse [19]. ... [20]. Over the past decade, a series of clinical trials have been conducted on the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on various drug-related disorders, including smoking, the use of several different substances, opiates [23], and Amphetamines [24]. ... [25-28].

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of ACT on the perception of social support from family, friends and other important people in addicted people's lives.

The present study is a semi-experimental research with with pretest-posttest design and control group.

This research was conducted on the addicts who were referred to the Hamyaran Addiction Recovery Center in Ardabil in 2018.

The samples were selected randomly, so that among those who were willing to participate in the study and had informed consent, 30 subjects who had inclusion criteria (ability to speak Persian, at least secondary school education, presence in a camp for at least one month, lack of simultaneous participation in other treatment programs, lack of individual counseling) were selected randomly and using lottery and were randomly assigned into two experimental and control groups.

Demographic indicators, including education, age, marital status and drug use were recorded for all samples according to the year. Social support perception questionnaire was used to collect data. It is a 12-item scale developed by Zimit et al. [29] and measures the level of perceived social protection of the individual by family, friends and other important individuals of the individual's life. It has 3 subscales of perceived social support by the family, social support received from friends and social support received by others. The internal reliability of this tool for subscales has been reported 0.86-0.90 using Cronbach's alpha and 0.86 for the whole questionnaire. In Iranian samples, Cronbach's alpha was reported to be 0.82 to 0.89 [30]. After obtaining the necessary permissions from the relevant authorities and approval of the research at the Ethics Committee of the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, the researchers visited the campus and settled there. After checking the conditions for entering the students to study and explain the goals and obtaining informed consent, the lottery was done and samples were selected. After the random allocation of the samples to the experimental and control groups, everyone completed the social support perception questionnaire. Then, the experimental group received ACT twice a week in 90 min through four weeks in the Hamyaran Addiction Recovery Center in Ardabil, whereas the control group did not receive any training. The protocol of the experimental group sessions was based on the ACT by Hees et al. book [31] (Table 1). After group counseling sessions, both groups were evaluated and compared to obtain post-test scores. During the implementation of the research, the following points were observed in order to respect the human rights of the subjects as well: - Obtaining consent from subjects about the purpose of research after making them informed. - informing all participants about the research objectives; - Providing the results of each subject if desired; - Observing the principle of trust and confidentiality of the results of the tests and performance of all subjects; - the fact that the subjects are free to leave the research or to stop the quizzes at each stage and conditions; - Providing a summary of the overall research outcomes to interested contributors. To analyze the data, multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) was used by SPSS 22 software. The assumptions of this test, namely, homogeneity of the matrix of the variance of the components of interpersonal needs (perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness) in the research groups assessed by the Box test, homogeneity of error variances in the studied groups was performed using F Levine's test and to determine the effect of the group on the components of interpersonal needs Wilk's Lambda was used.

20 subjects were married and 10 subjects were single. 15 subjects had secondary school education, 9 samples had diploma and 6 subjects had Bachelor degree. 7 samples were in the age group of 25-30 years, 4 samples in the age group of 31-35, 4 samples in the age group of 36-40, 7 samples in the age group of 41-45 and subjects were in the age group of 46-50 years old. 15 samples had a history of 10 to 5 years of drug use, 8 samples had a history of 11 to 15 years, 4 samples had a history of 16 to 20 years, and 3 samples had a history of 21-25 years of drug use. The difference in post-test scores between the experimental and control groups was significant in family social support perception (F = 7.782; p = 0.01) and social support perceived by friends (p <0.01, F = 34.276), however, there was no significant difference in the perceived social support from others (p = 0.327; F= 0.998; Table 2).

The first finding of the study was that ACT was effective in increasing the perceived social support of the addicted individuals’ families is consistent with the Shakernejad et al. [32] Samadi & Doostkam [33] and Younesi et al. [34] results. The second finding of the study was that ACT was effective in increasing social perception of addicts' friends, which is consistent with the findings of Noroozi et al. [35], Noori et al. [36] and Azade et al. [37]. ... [38]. The third finding of this research suggests that ACT was effective in increasing the perceived social support of others in addicts and after intervention, the experimental group did not have more social perceptions of others than the control group. No research was found on the effectiveness of ACT on the perception of social support by others in library and online investigations.

This research was done on male subjects, so it suggested that future studies be done on two sex groups and the results be compared.

This research was done on only male subjects, so the results can not be generalized.

ACT-based intervention increases the perceived social protection from the family and friends of addicts.

The authors are thankful to the officials of the Hamyaran Addiction Recovery Center in Ardabil amd all the addicts at the center who helped us with this research.

None declared.

This study was registered in the Ethics Committee of the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (Ethics Code: 145).

This research was entirely supported by the authors and no financial support was received.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Breslau J, Yu H, Han B, Pacula RL, Burns RM, Stein BD. Did the dependent coverage expansion increase risky substance use among young adults?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;178:556-61.
[2]Pour Rajabali Moafi M, Abdi R, Chelbianlou G. The Role of Abnormal Personality Dimensions in Prediction of Tendency to Substance Use in Tehran University Students in 2016: the Mediating Role Of Impulsivity. Q J Res Addict. 2018;12(46):235-54. [Persian]
[3]Pezeshkzad S, Esmaeili M, Farahbakhsh K, Falsafinexhad MR. Analysis of the causes of relapse in substance abusers based on semantic-value components of the language (case of discourse analysis). Q J Res Addict. 2018;12(46):55-74. [Persian]
[4]Nouri R, Mohammadkhani S, Movahedi M. Comparison of neuropsychological function between people with substance abuse and normal counterparts. Q J Res Addict. 2018;12(46):75-86. [Persian]
[5]Tremain D, Freund M, Wye P, Wolfenden L, Bowman J, Dunlop A, et al. Provision of chronic disease preventive care in community substance use services: Client and clinician report. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016;68:24-30.
[6]Agrawal A, Budney AJ, Lynskey MT. The co-occurring use and misuse of cannabis and tobacco: A review. Addiction. 2012;107(7):1221-33.
[7]Peiper NC, Ridenour TA, Hochwalt B, Coyne-Beasley T. Overview on prevalence and recent trends in adolescent substance use and abuse. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016;25(3):349-65.
[8]Klein JW. Pharmacotherapy for substance use disorders. Med Clin North Am. 2016;100(4):891-910.
[9]Ramos SD, Kelly M, Schepis T. Substance use in healthcare workers: Importance of stress perception, smoking temptation, social support, and humor. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(5):837-43.
[10]Cooper S, Campbell G, Larance B, Murnion B, Nielsen S. Perceived stigma and social support in treatment for pharmaceutical opioid dependence. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37(2):262-72.
[11]Smith JA, Franklin S, Asikis C, Knudsen S, Woodruff A, Kimball T. Social support and gender as correlates of relapse risk in collegiate recovery programs. J Alcohol Treat Q. 2018;36(3):354-65.
[12]Baqutayan S. Stress and social support. Indian J Psychol Med. 2011;33(1):29-34.
[13]Hatamian P, Karami J, Momeni K. Relationship Between Perceived Social Support (Family, Friends and Other Important People) With the Tendency of Using Psychotropic Substances Among the Nurses of Hospitals in Kermanshah City. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2017;5(4):367-73. [Persian]
[14]Lin C, Wu Z, Detels R. Family support, quality of life and concurrent substance use among methadone maintenance therapy clients in China. Public Health. 2011;125(5):269-74.
[15]Matthew KJ, Regmi B, Lama LD. Role of Family in Addictive Disorders. Int J Psychosocial Rehabil. 2018;22(1):65-75.
[16]Velleman RD, Templeton LJ, Copello AG. The role of the family in preventing and intervening with substance use and misuse: a comprehensive review of family interventions, with a focus on young people. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005;24(2):93-109.
[17]Flora K, Stalikas A. Factors affecting substance abuse treatment across different treatment phases. Int J Psychosocial Rehab. 2013;17(1):89-104.
[18]Flora K, Stalikas A. Factors affecting substance abuse treatment across different treatment phases. Int J Psychosocial Rehab. 2013;17(1):89-104.
[19]Işık I, Ergün G. Determining the relation between turkish middle-school students’ internet addiction and perceived social support from family. Addicta. 2018;5(3):1-6.
[20]Atadokht A, Hajloo N, Karimi M, Narimani M. The role of family expressed emotion and perceived social support in predicting addiction relapse. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4(1):e21250.
[21]Brooks AT, Lòpez MM, Ranucci A, Krumlauf M, Wallen GR. A qualitative exploration of social support during treatment for severe alcohol use disorder and recovery. Addict Behav Rep. 2017;6:76-82.
[22]Jones HA, Heffner JL, Mercer L, Wyszynski CM, Vilardaga R, Bricker JB. Web-based acceptance and commitment therapy smoking cessation treatment for smokers with depressive symptoms. J Dual Diagn. 2015;11(1):56-62.
[23]González-Menéndez A, Fernández P, Rodríguez F, Villagrá P. Long-term outcomes of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in drug-dependent female inmates: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2014;14(1):18-27.
[24]Stotts AL, Green C, Masuda A, Grabowski J, Wilson K, Northrup TF, et al. A stage I pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy for methadone detoxification. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;125(3):215-22.
[25]Smout MF, Longo M, Harrison S, Minniti R, Wickes W, White JM. Psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorders: A preliminary randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy. Subst Abus. 2010;31(2):98-107.
[26]Luoma JB, Kohlenberg BS, Hayes SC, Bunting K, Rye AK. Reducing self-stigma in substance abuse through acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, manual development, and pilot outcomes. Addict Res Theory. 2008;16(2):149-65.
[27]Dehghani A, Rezaei Dehnavi S. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on quality of life among patients under methadone maintenance treatment. Horizon Med Sci. 2018;24(3):246-52. [Persian]
[28]Rezaei Mirghaed M, Karimi R, Rahravi M, Mosaddegh K, Abipour J. Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on reducing co-morbid depression in drug-dependent individuals. Midd East J Disab Stud. 2016;6:265-9. [Persian]
[29]Amirian K, Mami Sh, Ahmadi V, Mohammadzadeh J. Comparison of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) on impulsivity in addicted people. Nurs Phys War. 2018;5(17):36-45. [Persian]
[30]Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30-41.
[31]Salimi AR, Joukar B, Nikpour R. Internet and communication: Perceived social support and loneliness as antecedent variables. Psychol Stud. 2009;5(3):81-102. [Persian]
[32]Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
[33]Shakernegad S, Moazen N, Hamidy M, hashemi R, Bazzazzadeh N. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on psychological distress, marital satisfaction and quality of life in women with multiple sclerosis. J Health Care. 2017;19(1):7-17. [Persian]
[34]Samadi H, Dostkam M. Investigating the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on marital compatibility in infertile women. Andishe va Raftar. 2017;11(43):67-76. [Persian]
[35]Younesi S, Abbasi Asl M, Khazan K, Kazemi J. The effectiveness of education acceptance-commitment theory (act) to reducing alexithymia of divorcing women. Q J Soc Work. 2016;5(3):5-13. [Persian]
[36]Norouzi M, Zargar F, Akbari H. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on reduction of interpersonal problems and experiential avoidance in university students. J Res Behav Sci. 2017;15(2):168-74. [Persian]
[37]Noori L, Moradi Shakib A, Azizi Bojnordi E, Adib F, Ashoori J. Effectiveness of group therapy based on acceptance and commitment on social and emotional adjustment of nursing students. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2018;25(5):172-9. [Persian]
[38]Azadeh SM, Kazemi-Zahrani H, Besharat MA. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on interpersonal problems and psychological flexibility in female high school students with social anxiety disorder. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8(3):131-8.
[39]Dekeyser M, Raes F, Leijssen M, Leysen S, Dewulf D. Mindfulness skills and interpersonal behaviour. Personal Individ Differ. 2008;44(5):1235-45.