ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Khani Jeihooni   A. (1)
Razavi   M. (1)
Kashfi   S.M. (2)
Ansari   M. (1)
Gholami   T. (*1)






(*1) Public Health Department, School of Health, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
(1) Public Health Department, School of Health, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, , Fasa, Iran
(1) Public Health Department, School of Health, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
(1) Public Health Department, School of Health, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa , Iran
(2) Public Health Department, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Ibn-e Sina Square, Fasa, Fars Province, Iran
Phone: +98 (71) 53350994
Fax: +98 (71) 53357091
gholamitahereh@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  July  8, 2019
Accepted:  September 18, 2019
ePublished:  March 18, 2020

BRIEF TEXT


… [1]. Hookah is a traditional type of smoking and one of the major public health challenges and one of the leading causes of death in most countries [2, 3].

... [4-19]. It has shown that the pattern of tobacco use is associated with complex socio-structural processes, including low socioeconomic status, peer pressure, attitudes, abstract norms, intention, and self-efficacy as the most important predictors of smoking in adolescents. These factors are the components of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and according to the global studies, among available theories, TPB is the most useful theory to better understanding the predictors of tobacco use [20]. ... [21]. Many studies have used TPB for tobacco use, including Fathi et al. [22], Jovini et al. [23], Jahanpour et al. [24], and Mohammadi Zeidi et al. [25].

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of an educational intervention based on TPB on the prevention of hookah smoking among high school students.

The present research was a quasi-experimental study

This study was performed on high school male students (second and third grade) in Fasa city in 2018-19.

A study by Alzio et al. [12] found that 5.3% of adolescents were hookah users. Thus, at least 200 individuals in each group are needed to make a significant difference of 0.63% between the two groups with 95% accuracy and 80% power based on the sample size determination formula in clinical trials. Samples were randomly divided into the control (n = 200) and experimental (n = 200) groups.

The data collection tool was a self-reported questionnaire consisting of demographic information and TPB parts. The questionnaire was completed by the experimental and control groups before and three months after the intervention. The educational intervention consisted of seven 50-55-min training sessions and one session per week for the experimental group in high school classroom. Life skill training was used in the TPB-based intervention. The sessions were held in groups of 20 subjects in the classrooms focusing on group discussion techniques, role playing, and brainstorming and the role of friends and their support, as well as the ability to say no and avoidance of friendships with hookah users were pointed. A summary of the discussed subjects was given to the students the end of each session (abstract norms and behavior). At the end of the training sessions, educational booklets were given to the subjects. To follow-up the activities, a training session was monthly held for the students and a WhatsApp group was formed to exchange information with the parents of the students Data were collected before and 3 months after the intervention and were analyzed by SPSS 22 software using paired t-test, independent T-test, and chi-square test.

The mean age in the experimental and control groups were 16.±1 1.68 and 16.54 ± 1.33 years, respectively. Also, the number of family members in the experimental and control groups were3.88 ± 2.58 and3.64 ± 2.72, respectively, which there was no significant difference between the two groups (p> 0.05). There was no significant difference between the students of the experimental and control groups in terms of other demographic variables, including educational level, household monthly income, parents 'educational level, parents' occupation, and smoking hookah, cigarettes or drugs in parents (p> 0.05; Table 2).Before the educational intervention, there was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in awareness, attitude, abstract norms, perceived behavioral control, intention and preventive behaviors of hookah smoking (p> 0.05); however, three months after the intervention, the experimental group showed a significant increase in each of these variables (p = 0.001), while in the control group there was no significant difference (p> 0.05; Table 3).

... [26-30]. Mackundy et al. examined factors related to hookah smoking on 5 students based on the TPB and showed that positive attitude and perceived behavioral control were the strongest predictors of hookah consumption [27]. ... [31, 32]. In the study by Arab et al., smoking friends, smoking parents, and smoking siblings were associated with tobacco use. In this study, among the constructs of TPB, abstract norms construct was the most important preventers of tobacco use among students [33]. Khani Jeyhouni et al. also cited the lack of contact with hookah friends as one of the most important reasons for non-smoking hookah [30]. In other studies consistent with the results of this study, educational intervention increased the mean score of abstract norms [15, 34]. ... [35]. In a study by Alamy et al., perceived behavioral control was a strong predictor of intention to prevent tobacco use in college students [36]. In studies conducted by Makvandi et al. [27], Karimi et al. [35], Tahmasebi et al. [37] and Alanazi et al. [38], perceived behavioral control and attitude were the strongest predictors of hookah and cigarettes. The findings of other studies indicated an increase in the perceived behavioral control score after the intervention [41-41] .... [42-44].

It is recommended that the institution officials by cultivating via effective methods educate students and their families, develop daring skills, and plan for reducing smoking.

One of the limitations of this study was self-reported data collection.

The TPB-based educational intervention is effective in preventing hookah smoking in high school students.

The authors are thankful to all those who contributed to this research.

None.

The study was approved by the Research Council of Fasa University of Medical Sciences (Ethics code: IR.FUMS.REC.1396.305).

This study was sponsored by the Vice chancellor for research of Fasa University of Medical Sciences (Grant No.: 96218).

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1] Rao S, Aslam SK, Zaheer S, Shafique K. Anti-smoking initiatives and current smoking among 19,643 adolescents in South Asia: findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Harm Reduct J. 2014;11(1):8.
[2]Maziak W. The global epidemic of waterpipe smoking. Addict Behav. 2011;36(1-2):1-5.
[3] Waziry R, Jawad M, Ballout RA, Al Akel M, Akl EA. The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):32-43.
[4] Hassounah S, Rawaf D, Khoja T, Rawaf S, Hussein M, Qidwai W, et al. Tobacco control efforts in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: achievements and challenges. East Mediterr Health J. 2014;20(8):508-13.
[5] Meysamie A, Ghaletaki R, Haghazali M, Asgari F, Rashidi A, Khalilzadeh O, et al. Pattern of tobacco use among the Iranian adult population: results of the national Survey of Risk Factors of Non-Communicable Diseases (SuRFNCD-2007). Tob Control. 2010;19(2):125-8.
[6]Roskin J, Aveyard P. Canadian and English students' beliefs about waterpipe smoking: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):10.
[7]Beaglehole R, Bonita R. Global public health: a scorecard. Lancet. 2008;372(9654):1988-96.
[8]Noonan D, Kulbok PA. New tobacco trends: waterpipe (hookah) smoking and implications for healthcare providers J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009;21(5):258-60.
[9] Ghasemi A, Siadmoradi L, Momenan AA, Zahedi Asl S. Association between tobacco smoke and serum nitric oxide metabolites concentration. Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;12(4):336-41. [Persian]
[10] Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86(9):1119-27.
[11] Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3(11):e442.
[12] Alzyoud S, Haddad L, El Shahawy O, Ghadban R, Kheirallah K, Alhawamdeh KA, et al. Patterns of waterpipe use among Arab immigrants in the USA: a pilot study. Br J Med Med Res. 20144(3):816-27.
[13]Arnett JJ. The developmental context of substance use in emerging adulthood. J Drug Issues. 2005;35(2):235-54.
[14]Joe S, Canetto SS, Romer D. Advancing prevention research on the role of culture in suicide prevention. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2008;38(3):354-62.
[15] Momenabadi V, Kaveh MH, Hashemi SY. Effect of educational intervention on intention of university students’ disuse of hookah smoking: BASNEF model. J Subst Use. 2018;23(3):262-7.
[16] Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9064):1498-504.
[17]Salameh P, Waked M, Aoun Z. Waterpipe smoking: construction and validation of the Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale (LWDS-11). Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(1):149-58.
[18] Khor PY, Harun NB, Ishak FB, Anuar NAIM, Karim NA, Azman A, et al. Contributory factors to the smoking of shisha among teenagers in the Perak City of Ipoh: A preliminary qualitative survey. Int J Public Health Res. 2012;2(1):80-4.
[19]Vanderhoek AJ, Hammal F, Chappell A, Wild TC, Raupach T, Finegan BA. Future physicians and tobacco: an online survey of the habits, beliefs and knowledge base of medical students at a Canadian University. Tob Induc Dis. 2013;11(1):9.
[20] Aljarrah K, Ababneh ZQ, Al-Delaimy WK. Perceptions of hookah smoking harmfulness: predictors and characteristics among current hookah users. Tob Induc Dis. 2009;5(1):16.
[21]Sharma M. Theoretical foundations of health education and health promotion. Burligton: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2016.
[22]Fathi Y, Moeini B, Bazvand A, Barati M, Roshanaei G. The Effectiveness of Educational Program Based on Theory of Planned Behavior on Preventing and Decreasing Tobacco Smoking Among Post-secondary Students. J Educ Community Health. 2016;3(2):54-61. [Persian]
[23]Joveyni H, Dehdari T, Gohari M. Waterpipe smoking in the male college students: an education intervention using theory of planned behavior. J Res Health. 2013;3(4):497-503.
[24]Jahanpour F, Vahedparast H, Ravanipour M, Azodi P. The trend of hookah use among adolescents and youth: a qualitative study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2015;3(4):340-8. [Persian]
[25] Mohammadizeidi E, Pakpour A. Effectiveness of an educational intervention based on theory of planned behavior to reduce intentions to smoke among secondary school students. J Res Health. 2013;3(4):504-13.
[26]Saeed Firoozabadi M, Tahmasebi R, Noroozi A. Predicting factors on continued intention of waterpipe smoking among women in Bushehr using the theory of planned behavior. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2015;2(4):260-9. [Persian]
[27]Makvandi Z, Sharifi M, Barati M. Assessment of factors associated with hookah consumption among college students of asad abad city base on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in 2015-2016. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2017;5(4):270-9. [Persian]
[28] Al-Naggar RA, Saghir F. Water pipe (shisha) smoking and associated factors among Malaysian university students. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(11):3041-7.
[29] Martinasek MP, McDermott RJ, Martini L. Waterpipe (hookah) tobacco smoking among youth. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2011;41(2):34-57.
[30]Khani Jeihooni A, Khiyali Z, Kashfi SM, Kashfi SH, Zakeri M, Amirkhani M. Knowledge and attitudes of university students towards hookah smoking in Fasa, Iran. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2018;12(1):e11676.
[31]Chabrol H, Mabila JD, Chauchard E, Mantoulan R, Rousseau A. Contributions of parental and social influences to cannabis use in a non-clinical sample of adolescents. Encephale. 2008;34(1):8-16. [French]
[32]Voisin DR, Salazar LF, Crosby R, Diclemente RJ, Yarber WL, Staples-Horne M. Teacher connectedness and health-related outcomes among detained adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(4):337.
[33]Araban M, Karimi M, Taher M, Bayati S, Bakhtiari A, Abrehdari H, et al. Predictors of tobacco use among medical students of ahvaz university: A study based on theory of planned behavior. J Educ Community Health. 2015;2(1):10-8. [Persian]
[34] Ezati Rad R, Hassani L, Aghamolaei T, Ghanbarnejad A. Effect of educational intervention based on theory of planned behavior and reduced water pipe smoking among women above 15 (yrs.) in Bandar Abbas. Tech J Eng Appl Sci. 2015;5(3):181-7.
[35]Karimi M, Niknami S, Heidarnia AR, Hajizadeh I. Measuring constructs of Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) regarding cigarette use among adolescents. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2013;16(8):e77273.
[36]Alami A, Rezaeian Kochi MH, Moshki M. Application of Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Intention and Action of Preventing Tobacco Use among Students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2016;3(4):340-8. [Persian]
[37]Tahmasebi R, Saeed Firoozabadi M, Noroozi A. Assessment of the extended theory of planned behavior for nicotine dependence prediction: An application of path analysis. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2017;19(9):1-7.
[38]Alanazi NH, Lee JW, Dos Santos H, Job JS, Bahjri K. The use of planned behavior theory in predicting cigarette smoking among Waterpipe smokers. Tob Induc Dis. 2017;15(1):29.
[39] Bashirian S, Heidarnia A, Allahverdipour H, Hajizadeh E. The theory-based substance abuse prevention program for adolescents. Health Educ Health Promot. 2013;1(1):3-12.
[40] Jafari M, Shahidi S, Abedin A. Comparing the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Stages of Change Model on improving abstinence self-efficacy in Iranian substance dependent adolescents. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2012;6(2):7-15.
[41] Mohammadi Zeydi I, Pakpour-Hajiagha A. Application of the theory of planned behavior for the prevention of substance abuse among male adolescents. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2016;3(4):298-310. [Persian]
[42] Peters GJY, Kok G, Abraham C. Social cognitive determinants of ecstasy use to target in evidence‐based interventions: a meta‐analytical review. Addiction. 2008;103(1):109-18.
[43] Renuka P, Pushpanjali K. Effectiveness of health belief model in motivating for tobacco cessation and to improving knowledge, attitude and behavior of tobacco users. Cancer Oncol Res. 2014;2(4):43-50.
[44]Huang CM, Chien LY, Cheng CF, Guo JL. Integrating Life Skills Into a Theory‐Based Drug‐Use Prevention Program: Effectiveness Among Junior High Students in Taiwan. J Sch Health. 2012;82(7):328-35.