ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Zakeri   S. (*)
Barqi   I. (1)






(*) Biomedical Engineering Department, Electrical Engineering Faculty, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
(1) Management Department, Educational Sciences Faculty, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

Correspondence


Article History

Received:  November  3, 2015
Accepted:  December 4, 2015
ePublished:  March 28, 2016

BRIEF TEXT


Creativity with its meta-cognition aspect relates to higher mental processes such as thinking, intelligence, imagination, and data processing [1]. … [2-10]

In order to consider creativity, 10-12Hz alpha-2 band changing in EEG [11], brain activities in response to divergent thinking [12], and 8-12Hz alpha band [13] have been studied.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of creative thinking on heart rate signal.

This is a semi-experimental study.

Medical engineering, electricity, and control students of Sahand Technology University were studied in 2012.

52 students were selected through available sampling method.

A Persian translation of Torrance creative thinking- B form (pictorial) [1] was used to assess the students’ creative thinking level. The test consists of three separate tasks which are picture making (1st activity), picture completeness (2nd activity), and parallel lines (3rd activity) each one lasting 10min and totally 30min [14]. During the test and 2min before, ECG signal of the students was recorded and then converted into HRV signal as hardware. All the participants were asked not to drink coffee before data recording and sleep fully. 50Hz notch filtering was done as hardware to remove urban electricity noise. 4-rank type II Chebychefv filtering with 0.3Hz disconnect frequency was used to remove external noise. 20-second blocks were used in signal windowing. Z transformation was done to normalize data. Scores over than 70 and lower than 30 scores were considered as high creativity and low creativity, respectively. Power linear characteristic was used to compare HRV signal changes between high and low creativities. Based on Cramer-von test, there was no normal data distribution. Wilcoxon non-parametric test was used to compare the variables between different groups based on gender, creativity level, and multi-language cases. … [15-17]

The number of female and male students was 26 persons per gender group. 25 and 27 students were bi-lingual and tri-lingual, respectively. There were different creativity test scores based on Torrance test, which led to heterogeneous distributions of scores more than 70 scores (high creative persons) and lower than 30 scores (low creative persons). Average HRV signal power values for relaxation time, 1st Torrance’s activity, 2nd Torrance’s activity, and 3rd Torrance’s activity were 0.035±0.001, 0.0475±0.0012, 0.0369±0.0008, and 0.0367±0.0001, respectively. Therefore, there was a considerable increase in average domain of signal power during creative thinking than relaxation time. There was a manifest decrease in HRV signal power, passing time and the last stages of creativity test being done. There was an increase in heart rate in persons with high creativity than persons with low creativity. Considering structure and scoring, the second activity showed a considerable difference between persons with high and low creativity than other activities (Table 1). Based on the scores, there was a higher creativity level in all four Torrance criteria in females than males. Based on a comparison between HRV changes in total time, there was a considerable increase in heart rate in females than males (p=0.0398). Based on the scores of Torrance test in bi-lingual and tri-lingual groups, there were better functions in the tri-lingual persons than bi-lingual persons. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in HRV signal between the groups (p>0.05; Table 2).

There was an increase in the heart rate in persons with high creativity than persons with low creativity. Female persons and tri-lingual persons were better than either male or bi-lingual persons. Based on the present results, creativity might be detected via heart signal, as well as brain signals. Concentration on the cognitive activities is going with a reduction in heart rate [18]. Participants in group plays are with higher creativity level than others [6]. Active frontal lobe in creative persons is manifestly distinguishable compared to persons with low creative level [19, 20]. Any stimulation of vagus nerve along with an increase in the heart rate leads to a disorder in test process, which results in a reduction in persons’ creativity level [16]. T gene plays an important role in creativity [19]. During 3 months, persons with RHO have shown a considerable reduction in creativity level [21]. … [22-24]

Usual tests might be useful to discover whether creativity is a specific domain of cognition or not. A greater sample size should be investigated. Spectrum analyses might be useful to determine creativity levels.

Since there was a small sample size, the present results could not be significant in all age groups. In addition, TTCT parameters evaluations were complex.

Creative thinking leads to an increase in the heart rate in persons with high creativity than persons with low creativity. Therefore, the creativity level might be detected via heart signal.

Computational Neurosciences Laboratory of Sahand Technology University is appreciated.

Non-declared

Non-declared

The paper was derived from an MS thesis done by the corresponding author in Sahand Technology University.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Pirkhaefi A, Borjali A, Delavar A, Eskandari H. Effect of the creative education on the creativity thinking students with metacognition’s parameters. J Educ Leadersh Adm. 2009;3(2):51-61. [Persian]
[2]Basadur M, Basadur T. Encyclopedia of Creativity. Runco M, Pritzker S, editors. 2nd edition. San Diego: Academic Press; 2011. pp. 85-95.
[3]Kaufman JC, Pumaccahua TT, Holt RE. Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors. J Personal Individ Differ. 2013;54(8):913-7.
[4]Kaufman G. What to measure? A new Look at the concept of creativity. Scand J Educ Res. 2003:47(3):235-51.
[5]Furnham A, Batey M, Booth TW, Patel V, Lozinskaya D. Individual difference predictors of creativity in art and science students. Think Sk Creat. 2011;6(2):114-21.
[6]Nusbaum EC, Silvia PJ. Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intell. 2011;39(1):36-45.
[7]Wang Y. On cognitive foundations of creativity and the cognitive process of creation. Int Cent Cogn Inform. 2008;3(4):104-13.
[8]Chung T. Table-top role playing game and creativity. Think Sk Creat. 2013;8:56-71.
[9]Krizman J, Skoe E, Marian V, Kraus N. Blingualism increases neural response consistency and attentional control: Evidence for sensory and cognitive coupling. Brain Lang. 2014;128(1):34-40.
[10]Simonov PV. Neurobiological basis of creativity. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 1997;27(4):585-91.
[11]Fink A, Schwab D, Papousek I. Sensitivity of EEG upper alpha activity to cognitive and affective creativity interventions. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011;82(3):233-9.
[12]Beeman MJ, Bowden EM, Haberman J, Frymiare JL, Liu SA, Greenblatt R, et al. Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(4):E97-111.
[13]Fink A, Neubauer AC. Eysenck meets Martindale: The relationship between extraversion and originality from the neuroscientific perspective. Personal Individ Differ. 2008;44(1):299-310.
[14]Rad IS, Karimi L, Ramezani V, Ahmadi M, Heshmatic R, Jafar E. Psychometric properties of Torrance test (Persian version) of creative thinking (A form). Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;5:1429-33.
[15]Srinivasan N. Cognitive neuroscience of creativity: EEG based approaches. J Meth. 2006;42:109–16.
[16]Ghacibeh GA, Shenker JI, Shenal B, Uthman BM, Heilman KM. Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on creativity and cognitive flexibility. Epilepsy Behav. 2006;8(4):720-5.
[17]Gruzelier JH, Thompson T, Redding E, Brand R, Steffert T. Application of alpha/theta neurofeedback and heart rate variability training to young contemporary dancers: State anxiety and creativity. Int J Psychophysiol, 2014;95(1):105-11.
[18]Bomrs KS, Kening KR. Heart-rate variability in creative functioning. Psychol Rep. 1971;29(1):160-2.
[19]Arden R, Chavez RS, Grazioplene R, Jung RE. Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behav Brain Res. 2010;214(2):143-56.
[20]Fink A, Grabner RH, Gebauer D, Reishofer G, Koschutnig K, Ebner F. Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2010;52(4):1687-95.
[21]Drago V, Foster PS, Skidmore FM, Heilman KM. Creativity in Parkinson's disease as a function of right versus left hemibody onset. J Neurol Sci. 2009;276(1-2):179-83.
[22]Lee H, Kim KH. Can speaking more languages enhance your creativity? Relationship between bilingualism and creative potential among Korean American students with multicultural link. Personal Individ Differ. 2011;50(8):1186-90.
[23]Black SR, McCown SM. Age-related changes in creative thinking. J Creat Behav. 2008;42(1):33-54.
[24]Belli S. A psychobiographical analysis of Brian Douglas Wilson: Creativity, drugs, and models of schizophrenic and affective disorders. Personal Individ Differ. 2009;46(8):809-19.