@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2019;3(2):71-75
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2019;3(2):71-75
Properties and Maternal and Fetal Complications in Pre-eclampsia Patients, Case Study of Sarem Women’s Hospital
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Mosadegh H. (* )(* ) Sarem Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Address: Sarem Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Ekbatan Town, Tehran, IranPhone: -
Fax: -
dr.mosadegh.homeira@gmail.com
Article History
Received: December 9, 2017Accepted: April 6, 2018
ePublished: June 15, 2019
BRIEF TEXT
Preeclampsia and eclampsia are among the 5 leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity [1, 2].
… [3-15]. A systematic review in developing countries showed that maternal mortality was 4 times higher in preeclampsia patients. Also, in preeclamptic mothers, a higher rate of fetal death, hospitalization of the neonate in the intensive care unit (ICU), and preterm labor have been reported [16]. In the United States in 2012, the probability of preeclampsia mothers’ suffering from at least one maternal complication is 10.1% compared to 4.6% in non-preeclamptic mothers and the probability of infants’ suffering from at least one neonatal complication is 14.2% compared to 7.9%; in addition, it has reduced preeclampsia by 1.7 weeks [17].
This study was conducted with the aim of investigating properties and maternal and fetal complications in preeclampsia patients.
The present study is a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional.
The patients, who were referred to the Sarem Hospital diagnosed with preeclampsia from April 2010 to February 2015 and were hospitalized for termination of pregnancy
All 195 patients, were selected by the Census method.
Data collection was based on patient records, and pre-designed checklists were filled out on the documentation of the records. Preeclampsia is defined according to the 10th edition of Danforth's book [18]. The variables of the study included demographic characteristics of the patients, pregnancy and fertility status, maternal field diseases, history of preeclampsia, high levels of amniotic fluid (presence of polyhydramnios), systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured at the time of admission, symptoms of preeclampsia and eclampsia such as headache, nausea, vomiting, stomach pains (epigastric region), visual disorders and seizures, liver enzymes at the time of admission, platelets, creatinine, uric acid, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), presence or absence of maternal oliguria, protein excretion in 24-hour urine (in cases where the variable is measured), a review of maternal and fetal complications, length of hospital stay before the termination of pregnancy, method of termination of pregnancy, maternal postpartum hospital stay, neonate Apgar, gestational age at the time of termination of pregnancy, the presence or absence of HELLP syndrome, and fetal gender. The data were analyzed by SPSS 19 software, using Chi-square, Fisher exact, and T-paired tests.
51.8% of the neonates were male and 48.2% were female. The mean systolic blood pressure in the patients was 147.92±8.43 with a maximum of 180mmHg and minimum of 110mmHg and the mean diastolic blood pressure was 91.15±8.95 with a maximum of 115 and minimum of 60. The most common symptom of the patients was a headache observed in 28.7% of them. 8.7% of the patients had nausea, 3.1% had vomiting, 9.7% suffered from epigastric pain, 4.6% had visual disorders, and 0.5% (only 1 patient) had seizure and eclampsia. 63.9% of patients were asymptomatic. 14.1% of the patients had liver enzymes (SGOT and SGPT) disorder, 19.6% had less than 150,000 platelets, and 62.7% of them had abnormal Lactate dehydrogenase. In all patients, creatinine was in normal range, and none had oliguria. 64.6% of the patients had proteinuria +1, 21.5% had proteinuria +2, 13.3% had proteinuria +3, and 0.5% (1 patient) had +4 proteinuria. 24-hour proteinuria was not measured in all patients, but in the measured cases, the mean was 806.35mg. Maternal complications were reported in 8 patients as 4.1%. The most common complications were placental abruption and HELLP syndrome, each of which was observed in 2.1% (4 patients). One of the patients had intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). There were no cases of renal complications, fluid accumulation in the lung (pulmonary edema), and encephalopathy without structural causes. Fetal complications were present in 26.2% of the patients. The most common fetal complications were fetal distress and intrauterine growth restriction, that the frequency of both 12.3% (24 cases) was reported. 5.1% of neonates (10 neonates) were preterm labor, 3.6% had meconium excretion, and in 1 case, intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) was reported a 29-week-old fetus diagnosed with placental abruption and her mother had HELLP syndrome. The mean maternal hospitalization was 0.63 days before the termination of pregnancy and 2.5 days after delivery. The mean 1-minute Apgar score was 8.37 (±1.32) and the mean 5-minute Apgar score was 9.48 (±1.19). Among all patients, one case with vaginal delivery and the rest with cesarean section terminated the pregnancy. Among the field diseases, patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome were associated with increased maternal complications as 3.1% of them had complications, while complications were observed in 1% of the patients without this syndrome, but there was no significant relationship between this syndrome in mother and fetal complications (p=0.1). In this study, there was no significant relationship between diabetes, critical high blood pressure, and a history of preeclampsia and maternal and fetal complications (p>0.05). Of 8 cases of maternal complications, 6 cases were in the symptomatic mothers' group and 2 cases were in the asymptomatic group. Symptomatic mothers had maternal and fetal complications more than asymptomatic mothers, but this relationship was not significant (p>0.05). The low gestational age had a significant relationship with the increase in fetal complications so that the gestational age was 35.6% for complicated fetuses and 37.2% for uncomplicated fetuses (p=0.001). Among laboratory indices, Lactate dehydrogenase was associated with a significant increase in maternal (p=0.001) and fetal (p=0.004) complications, so that the mean of this index was 2235.38 in complicated mothers and 384.61in uncomplicated mothers, while in fetal complications, these numbers were reported 385.35 and 375.02, respectively. The mean liver enzymes was higher in patients with maternal complications, so that the mean serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) was 49.5 in patients with maternal complications and 26.94 in patients without maternal complications (p=0.043), and the mean serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) was 60.13% in complicated mothers and 23.87 in uncomplicated mothers, and this relationship was statistically significant (p=0.001). There was no significant relationship between platelet count and maternal and fetal complications (p>0.05).
According to the World Health Organization report, the mortality and morbidity rate of mothers with preeclampsia was 0.43% and 36.6% for fetal mortality in developing countries [16]. The rate of fetal mortality was about 12-times lower (0.5%) in Sarem Hospital. This was lower compared to a study conducted in California between 2008 to 2011, and a study presented in 2012 that reporting fetal mortality due to preeclampsia as 1.8% [17]. In this study, the most common fetal complications were fetal distress and intrauterine growth restriction with 12.3% frequency, and, totally, 26.2% of them were complicated. In a study conducted by Stevens et al. the fetal distress was 2.6% [17].
It is suggested to investigate some maternal complications such as postpartum hemorrhage in future studies. In addition, other fetal complications such as sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, and other fetal complications in preeclampsia mothers should also be considered.
One of the limitations of this study is the defect of some records, which made it impossible to evaluate some variables, such as the level of uric acid with regard to the lost data.
The levels of liver enzymes and the presence of antiphospholipid syndrome are considered as predictors of maternal complications, while Lactate dehydrogenase and symptomaticity of the mother are predictors of maternal and fetal complications.
None declared by the authors.
None declared by the authors.
None declared by the authors.
None declared by the authors.
CITIATION LINKS
[1] World Health Organization. Maternal mortality [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2016 May 01]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
[2]Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323-33.
[3] Osungbade KO, Ige OK. Public health perspectives of preeclampsia in developing countries: Implication for health system strengthening. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011.
[4]Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130-7.
[5] Dolea C, AbouZahr C. Global burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the year 2000. World Health Organization:Geneva;2003.
[6] Kharaghani R, Esfahani BO, Cheraghi Z, Mohammadian Z, Nooreldinc RS. Prevalence of preeclampsia and eclampsia in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2016;19(1):64-71.
[7]Roberts JM, Gammill HS. Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2005;46(6):1243-9.
[8]Steegers EAP, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376(9741):631-44.
[9]English FA, Kenny LC, McCarthy FP. Risk factors and effective management of preeclampsia. Integr Blood Press Control. 2015;8:7-12.
[10] Jeyabalan A. Epidemiology of preeclampsia: impact of obesity. Nutr Rev. 2013;71(suppl_1):S18-25.
[11]Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early-versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet.Gynecol. 2013;209(6):544.e1-12.
[12]Paré E, Parry S, McElrath TF, Pucci D, Newton A, Lim KH. Clinical risk factors for preeclampsia in the 21st century. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):763-70.
[13]Wikström AK, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S. Tobacco use during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk. Hypertension. 2010;55(5):1254-9.
[14]Ota E, Ganchimeg T, Mori R, Souza JP. Risk factors of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its adverse outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: a WHO secondary analysis. PloS one. 2014;9(3):e91198.
[15] Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753.
[16]Abalos E, Cuesta C, Carroli G, Qureshi Z, Widmer M, Vogel JP, et al. Pre‐eclampsia, eclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: A secondary analysis of the world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;121(s1):14-24.
[17] Stevens W, Shih T, Incerti D, Ton TG, Lee HC, Peneva D, et al. Short-term costs of preeclampsia to the United States health care system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):237-48.
[18]Gibbs RS, Karlyn BY, Haney AF, Nygaard I. Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology. 10th Edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP); 2012.
[19]Harmon QE, Huang L, Umbach DM, Klungsøyr K, Engel SM, Magnus P, et al. Risk of fetal death with preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):628-35.
[20]Saadat M, Nejad SM, Habibi G, Sheikhvatan M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;46(3):255-9.
[21] Aali BS, Ghafoorian J, Mohamad-Alizadeh S. Severe preeclampsia and eclampsia in Kerman, Iran: Complications and outcomes. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10(4):CR163-7.
[22] Priso EB, Njamen TN, Tchente CN, Kana AJ, Landry T, Tchawa UF, et al. Trend in admissions, clinical features and outcome of preeclampsia and eclampsia as seen from the intensive care unit of the Douala General Hospital, Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;21(1):103-7.
[23] von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, Pipkin FB, Côté AM, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: Development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):219-27.
[24] Kozic JR, Benton SJ, Hutcheon JA, Payne BA, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P. Abnormal liver function tests as predictors of adverse maternal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(10):995-1004.
[25]Umasatyasri Y, Van I, Shamita P. Role of LDH (Lactate dehydrogenase) in preeclampsia eclampsia as a prognostic marker: An observational study. Int Arch Integr Med. 2015;2(9):88-93.
[26]Thangaratinam S, Koopmans CM, Iyengar S, Zamora J, Ismail KM, Mol BW, et al. Accuracy of liver function tests for predicting adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in women with preeclampsia: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(6):574-85.
[2]Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323-33.
[3] Osungbade KO, Ige OK. Public health perspectives of preeclampsia in developing countries: Implication for health system strengthening. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011.
[4]Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130-7.
[5] Dolea C, AbouZahr C. Global burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the year 2000. World Health Organization:Geneva;2003.
[6] Kharaghani R, Esfahani BO, Cheraghi Z, Mohammadian Z, Nooreldinc RS. Prevalence of preeclampsia and eclampsia in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2016;19(1):64-71.
[7]Roberts JM, Gammill HS. Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2005;46(6):1243-9.
[8]Steegers EAP, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376(9741):631-44.
[9]English FA, Kenny LC, McCarthy FP. Risk factors and effective management of preeclampsia. Integr Blood Press Control. 2015;8:7-12.
[10] Jeyabalan A. Epidemiology of preeclampsia: impact of obesity. Nutr Rev. 2013;71(suppl_1):S18-25.
[11]Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early-versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet.Gynecol. 2013;209(6):544.e1-12.
[12]Paré E, Parry S, McElrath TF, Pucci D, Newton A, Lim KH. Clinical risk factors for preeclampsia in the 21st century. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):763-70.
[13]Wikström AK, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S. Tobacco use during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk. Hypertension. 2010;55(5):1254-9.
[14]Ota E, Ganchimeg T, Mori R, Souza JP. Risk factors of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its adverse outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: a WHO secondary analysis. PloS one. 2014;9(3):e91198.
[15] Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753.
[16]Abalos E, Cuesta C, Carroli G, Qureshi Z, Widmer M, Vogel JP, et al. Pre‐eclampsia, eclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: A secondary analysis of the world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;121(s1):14-24.
[17] Stevens W, Shih T, Incerti D, Ton TG, Lee HC, Peneva D, et al. Short-term costs of preeclampsia to the United States health care system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):237-48.
[18]Gibbs RS, Karlyn BY, Haney AF, Nygaard I. Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology. 10th Edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP); 2012.
[19]Harmon QE, Huang L, Umbach DM, Klungsøyr K, Engel SM, Magnus P, et al. Risk of fetal death with preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):628-35.
[20]Saadat M, Nejad SM, Habibi G, Sheikhvatan M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;46(3):255-9.
[21] Aali BS, Ghafoorian J, Mohamad-Alizadeh S. Severe preeclampsia and eclampsia in Kerman, Iran: Complications and outcomes. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10(4):CR163-7.
[22] Priso EB, Njamen TN, Tchente CN, Kana AJ, Landry T, Tchawa UF, et al. Trend in admissions, clinical features and outcome of preeclampsia and eclampsia as seen from the intensive care unit of the Douala General Hospital, Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;21(1):103-7.
[23] von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, Pipkin FB, Côté AM, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: Development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):219-27.
[24] Kozic JR, Benton SJ, Hutcheon JA, Payne BA, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P. Abnormal liver function tests as predictors of adverse maternal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(10):995-1004.
[25]Umasatyasri Y, Van I, Shamita P. Role of LDH (Lactate dehydrogenase) in preeclampsia eclampsia as a prognostic marker: An observational study. Int Arch Integr Med. 2015;2(9):88-93.
[26]Thangaratinam S, Koopmans CM, Iyengar S, Zamora J, Ismail KM, Mol BW, et al. Accuracy of liver function tests for predicting adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in women with preeclampsia: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(6):574-85.