ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Hassani   P. (1)
Seyedolhosseini   SM. (*1)
Sarvari   H. (1)
Hanaee   T. (1)






(1) Department of Urban Planning, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Correspondence

Address: No. 9, Shahid Payandeh 2, Razavi 22, Razavi Boulevard, Mashhad, Iran.
Phone: -
Fax: -
seyedolhosseini5930@mashdiau.ac

Article History

Received:  June  14, 2020
Accepted:  August 15, 2020
ePublished:  December 12, 2020

BRIEF TEXT


Religion has been one of the oldest incentives for traveling. The authorities and managers should understand visitors' behavioral patterns to increase social and economic benefits.

Aghajani et al. (2010) studied pilgrimage and tourism in Iran's development planning focusing on Imam Reza pilgrimage before and after the Islamic revolution. Tourism offered activities, as well as religious incentives, attract visitors [Bozic et al., 2016]. Recognition of the incentives can increase the visitors' ability and provides more incentives for them to be attracted and stay longer [Jang & Feng, 2007]. As religious tourism is in deep connection with cultural, social, and holiday group tourism, it is highly influenced by them. Then, the cultural domain of the destinations affects tourists' attraction [Shinde, 2012]. Satisfaction forms in two aspects: one before traveling and the other one after traveling and its real experience that satisfies the visitors [Sadeh et al., 2012]. Satisfaction from traveling increases visitors' loyalty, profitability, and market [Van Vuuren & Slabbert, 2011].

This study aimed to identify tourist's behavioral components and sort out their priorities in Mashhad to make them satisfied.

The current research is descriptive in terms of its nature and empirical in terms of its purpose.

The current research is carried out by handing questionnaires out to the visitors in Mashhad in the summer, 2019.

384 visitors were chosen to answer the questionnaires using simple randomized sampling.

The questionnaire, desk studies, and confirmatory factor analysis were used in the current research.

Men and women account for 46.1% and 53.9%, respectively. The statistical population includes people younger than 30 years old, with 13.5%, between 30 and 40 years old, with 41.4%, between 40 and 50 years old, with 26.8% and older than 50 years old, with 18.2%. People who stay for less than 3 days, 3days, between 3 days and one week, and more than one week account for 28.4%, 17.2%, 16.1%, and 38.3%, respectively. 89.8% of people start their travel from somewhere inside Iran, while 10.2% start their travel in foreign countries. Research variables can be classified into three categories, incentives, attitude, and satisfaction. The loyalty variable has the biggest average and cooperation has the smallest one. A correlation matrix of research variables was prepared for the assessment of the research inferential statistics. There is a positive correlation between all variables (Table 4). According to the fitted factor analysis model, all variables factor load is significant in the confidence level of 95% (Figure 1). CFA model fitness indices and their desirable value are shown in Figure 1.These indices show the great fitness of the models and the significance of factor loads of each variable. In Figure 1 incentive variables of Q3 and Q15 have the biggest factor load that shows that religious rituals are the main incentive for the visitors. Q20 is the biggest one in the variable of the attitude that is related to the positive effect of visitors' visualization and imagination of their destination on choosing the destination and their behavior. Q25 in satisfaction variable shows the visitors' satisfaction made by host community behavior towards the religious visitors.The most influential factor on visitors' behavior is the destination. Then, planning for the cities and designing the urban areas, managers and the decision-makers should take the religious visitors' needs into consideration (Table 5).Figure 2 shows the research model including t-value coefficients significance. This model tests all measuring equations (first and second factor loads). This test shows that the calculated average is more than the moderated level for all factors. T value, on the other hand, is bigger than the critical amount of 1.96.Evaluation of the visitors' behavioral components: according to the results from Table 4, the calculated t-value is significant at the level of 0.001 in the evaluation of the visitors' behavioral components. Then, incentive, attitude, and satisfaction are influential components in urban planning (Table 6).Religious visitors have a positive image of Mashhad and their emotional attitude toward this city attracts them (Table 7). According to the positive image of the visitors about Mashhad, the mean difference in loyalty component shows that visitors are almost satisfied by this city and will suggest it to others to visit. It would be of great importance for the urban authorities and decision-makers in religious cities. However, visitors' satisfaction should be gain in all behavioral fields to lead to loyalty and visitors' cooperation in urban activities. According to Table 8, participating in religious groups has a lower score of cooperation that should be taken into the managers' consideration. Setting priorities of visitors' behavioral components in urban planning: according to the findings of the current research, the Freidman test significance level for 384 questionnaires is 0.001 which is smaller than 0.05. Then, the null hypothesis is not confirmed. In other words, research variables do not have the same ranks and they can be prioritized. According to the results of the Freidman test, the loyalty component from the aspect of satisfaction has the highest mean with 4.80, which is followed by imagination from the aspect of attitude with the mean of 4.35. The last priorities are commitment and cooperation with 3.46 and 3.28, respectively.

According to the findings, there is a significant relationship between incentive and visitors' attitude and satisfaction by the destination that is consistent with the findings of Perthmaningsey et al. (2014). Amiri Aghdaei et al. (2016) people's imagination of the destination is very influential on religious tourism directly and indirectly. In both the current research and that of Amiri Aghdaei et al. visitors' satisfaction is of great importance. According to Bozic et al. (2016) tourists' activities in their destination, as well as the religious incentives, motivate the visitors.

There is no suggestion reported.

There is no limitation reported.

Religious visitors' satisfaction resulting in their cooperation, commitment and loyalty to their destination needs an accurate understanding of the visitors' needs that can be realized from their behavior.

The authors thank those people who helped them to carry out the current research.

None.

None.

This paper is extracted from Painaz Hasani's Ph.D. thesis "explaining strategic urban planning in religious cities to strike a balance between residents' and religious visitors' behavior (Case study: Mashhad).

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Ahmadi M, Mohammadi G (2014). Prioritize and determine the factors affecting the motivations and needs of sacred defense tourism. Basij Strategic Studies Quarterly. 17(65):115-140. [Persian]
[2]Aghajani H, Amirfakhriyan M, Biniaz MK (2012). Pilgrimage and tourism in the programs and major documents of the country's development with emphasis on the pilgrimage of Imam Reza (AS). Journal of Social Studies tourism. 1(1):63-75.
[3]Astuti Pratminingsih S, Lipuringtyas Rudatin Ch, Tetty R (2014). Roles of motivation and destination image in predicting tourist revisit intention: A case of Bandung – Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 5(1):19-24.
[4]Amiri Aghdaei F, Rezaei Dolatabadi H, Ansari A, Al-Ajaji H (2016). The mediating role of satisfaction in the effect of destination image on the development of religious tourism. Business Management Perspective. 27:107-124.
[5]Berger P (1967). A sociological view of the secularization of theology. New Jersey: Wiley Publishing. 6(1):3-16.
[6]Bideci M, Albayrak T (2016). Motivations of the Russian and German tourists visiting pilgrimage site of Saint Nicholas Church. Tourism Management Perspectives. 18:10–13.
[7]Bozic S, Spasojevic B, Vujicic MD, Stamenkovic I (2016). Exploring the motives of religious travel by applying the AHP method-The case study of Monastery Vujan (Serbia). International Journal Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage. 4(4):33-47.
[8]Buckley RC (2016). Qualitative analysis of emotions: Fear and thrill. Frontiers in Psychology. 7(1):1–13.
[9]Brennan Horley C (2012). Mental mapping the ‘creative city. Journal of Maps. 6(1):250-259.
[10]Chand M (2010). A cross-national study of motivational determinants among non-resident Indian visitors to religious centers in India. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration. 11(1):22-38.
[11]Collins Kreiner N (2020). A review of research into religion and tourism Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on religion and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 82:1-22.
[12]Collins Kreiner N, Shmueli DF, Gal M B (2015). Understanding conflicts at religious-tourism sites: The Baha'i World Center, Israel. Tourism Management Perspectives. 16:228-236.
[13]Carmona M, Heath T, Oc T, Tiesdell S (2003). Public places- urban spaces, The dimensions of urban design. 2nd ed. Jordan Hill, Oxford: Architectural Press.
[14]Edgell D.L, DelMastro Allen M, Smith G, Swanson JR (2008). Tourism policy and planning: Yesterday, today and tomorrow.1st ed. Jordan Hill, Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
[15]Galzacorta M, Guereño Omil B, Makua A, Iriberri JL, Santoma R (2016). Pilgrimage as tourism experience: The case of the Ignatian way. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage. 4(4):48-66.
[16]Hosseinipour SE, Rezaei Dolatabadi H, kazemi A (2016). Investigating the factors of traction and drift affecting the intention of religious tourism and how it affects them (Qom city). Tourism Management Studies. 11(36):109-124. [Persian]
[17]Hung K, Petrick JF (2011). Why do you cruise? Exploring the motivations for taking cruise holidays, and the construction of a cruising motivation scale. Tourism Management. 32:386-393.
[18]Hung K, Petrick JF (2011). Why do you cruise? Exploring the motivations for taking cruise holidays, and the construction of a cruising motivation scale. Tourism Management. 32(2):386-393.
[19]Imani Khoshkhoo MH, Bad M (2016). Typology of Karbala pilgrims based on the purpose and motivation of the trip case study: Arbaeen walk. Tourism and Development Quarterly. 5(3):155-137.
[20]Jang S, Feng R4 (2007). Temporal destination revisit intention: The effects of novelty seeking and satisfaction. Tourism Management. 28(2):580-590.
[21]Kujawa J (2017). Spiritual tourism as a quest. Tourism Management Perspectives. 24:193–200.
[22]Li X, Petrick JF (2010). Revisiting the commitment-loyalty distinction in a cruising context. Journal of Leisure Research. 42(1):67–90.
[23]Lo AS, Lee C (2011). Motivations and perceived value of volunteer tourists from Hong Kong. Tourism Management. 32(2):326-334.
[24]MacKay K, Fesenmaier D (1998). A process approach to segmenting the gateway travel market. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 7(3):1-18.
[25]McKercher B, Cros H (2003). Testing a cultural tourism typology. Tourism Research. 5(1):45-58.
[26]Moutinho L (1987). Consumer behavior in tourism. European Journal of Marketing. 21(10):1-44.
[27]Prayag G (2012). Senior travelers‟ motivations and future behavioral intentions: The case of nice. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 29(7):665-681.
[28]Pritchard MP, Havitz ME, Howard DR (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty link in service contexts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 27(3):333-348.
[29]Raj R, Morpeth N (2007). Religious tourism and pilgrimage festivals management an international. International Journal of Tourism Research. 10(3):290-291.
[30]Ragheb MG, Tate RL (1993). A behavioural model of leisure participation, based on leisure attitude, motivation and satisfaction. Leisure Stud. 12(1):61-70.
[31]Sadeh E, Asgari F, Mousavi L, Sadeh S (2012). Factors affecting tourist satisfaction and its consequences. Journal of Basic Appl Scientific Research. 2(2):1557-1560.
[32]Sangpikul A (2008). Travel motivations of Japanese senior travellers to Thailand. Tourism Research. 10(1):81-94.
[33]Shinde KA (2012). Place-making and environmental change in a Hindu pilgrimage site in India. Geoforum. 43(1):116-127.
[34]Smith V (1992). Introduction: The quest in guest. Annals of Tourism Research. 19(1):1-171.
[35]Toth G, David L (2010). Tourism and accessibility: An integrated approach. Applied Geography. 30(4):666-677.
[36]Turner V (1973). The centre out there: Pilgrim’s goal. History of Religions. 12(3):191-230.
[37]Veicy H (2017). Investigating the tourism industry policy in the upstream laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Studies in Public Policy. 7(25):93-112.
[38]VanVuuren C, Slabbert E (2011). Travel behaviour of tourists to a South African holiday resort. African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences. 17(4):694–707.
[39]Zamani Farahani H, Eid R (2016). Muslim world: A study of tourism & pilgrimage among OIC Member States. Tourism Management Perspectives. 19:144-149.
[40]Zhang H, Fu X, Cai LA, Lu L (2014). Destination image and tourist loyalty: A Meta analysis. Tourism Management. 40:213–223.