@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2018;2(4):153-157
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2018;2(4):153-157
Reproductive Outcomes of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) in PCO Compare to non-PCO Patients
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Saremi A.T. (1)MehdiZadeh Shahi A. (*)
Pooladi A. (1)
Shami M. (2)
Safavi M. (2)
(*) Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(1) “Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” , Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(1) “Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” , Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(2) Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Article History
Received: April 24, 2017Accepted: October 16, 2017
ePublished: November 15, 2018
BRIEF TEXT
One of the most important causes of infertility in people with PCOS is ovulation disorders or lack of it. When these people enter the ART procedure for a therapeutic intervention, according to existing protocols, one should receive a series of ovarian stimulants, one of the side effects of which is the possibility of Ovarian Hyper Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS).
Symptoms of polycystic ovary, which are characterized by ultrasound, have characteristics that include an increase of 2 to 8 mm cysts of 10 or more in one surface and an increase in stroma density [1]. This mark is one of the most important foundations for diagnosis in polycystic ovary syndrome, which, when combined with other symptoms including oligomenorrhoea (prolonged menstruation periods), increases blood androgens, insulin, thickening of the body hair, abdominal obesity, and ovulation failure, is defined as a polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOS) [1-3]. The PCO ultrasound sign also exist in polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD). Since this mark is one of the most important and pivotal symptoms, and considering that serious discussions are now underway to accurately define PCOS and PCOD and need to be reviewed, in this study, it has been tried to compare the presence or absence of ultrasound sign of polycystic ovaries, while seeing this mark is the most important predictor of the incidence of OHSS. Polycystic ovary is a complex heterogeneous and genetic complicated multifactorial disorder that causes metabolic and endocrine abnormalities in the body. Because of the obesity in this disease, normal ovulation faces with disorder [3, 4]. Based on previous studies, PCOS is a systemic disease that can affect both the quality of the oocytes and endometrial admission [5].
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of mild to moderate OHSS on PCO patients compared with non-PCO patients.
This study is a cross-sectional and retrospective study.
In this study, infertile patients are candidate to do an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with a mild to moderate degree of OHSS was investigated through examination of files in Sarem Specialized Hospital in Tehran for 2 years.
321 patients who were classified according to the criteria of Abolqhar et al. were classified as mild to moderate OHSS classes [6]. Patients with insulin resistance syndrome were not included in the study. Finding PCO symptoms, especially in ultrasound, was a prerequisite for separation of patients in both PCO and non PCO-dependent groups. The reason why patients were nominated for ICSI and ovulation stimulation was not only the observation of PCO symptoms.
All patients were diagnosed with OHSS with ultrasound, and their OHSS severity was mild to moderate in their records, due to follicular numbers or symptoms such as sickness, nausea, vomiting and abdominal distension. All patients with OHSS in this study treated with 20% mannitol as a treatment for Sarem Specialized Hospital [7-9]. Most patients received this drug while they were hospitalized. All of these patients were treated with ovulation stimulant drugs, including Nostymone, Gonal F, HMG, or a combination of these. Patients' data included age, weight, body mass index (BMI), number of follicles, number of oocytes, number of embryos, number of transferred embryos, number of injection, duration of treatment with gonadotropins, number of hospitalization days and day of injection of HCG (quantitative parameters) and severity of OHSS, etiology and type of infertility, type of drugs, clinical pregnancy outcomes (based on observation of embryo sac gestational age and embryonic heart) were collected, and compared between the two groups with and without PCO. Data were analyzed using SPSS 13 software using Fischer T-test and Fisher exact tests.
102 (31.8%) patients had PCO conditions and symptoms, either PCOS or PCOD. The number of people who were only ICSI candidates due to PCO and ovarian factors was 40 (39.2%), and the reason for being candidate was 62 (60.8%) of the remaining patient was the combination of other infertility factors (6 with combination of female factors and 56 with male and female factor combination). In the non-PCO-induced group the cause of the ICSI and stimulation of ovulation, in 141(64.4%), 23(10.5%), 12(5.5%) and 45(19.65) was male factor, female tube factor, unknown, or combination of male and female factors respectively. The severity of OHSS in the two PCO and Non-PCO groups was significantly different (p=0.0001) and patients in PCO group, generally, had higher grade of OHSS (Table 1). Mean age was not significantly different between PCO and non PCO groups (p = 0.341). There was no significant relationship between age and severity of OHSS (p = 0.136). There was no significant correlation between age and outcome of pregnancy (based on clinical pregnancy confirmation) due to limited age range of patients (p = 0.992). There was not a significant relationship between the number of follicles, number of oocytes, number of embryos, number of transmitted fetuses, duration of treatment, and duration of hospitalization in patients with age (p> 0.05). Concerning the type of infertility, 259 (80.7%) patients had primary infertility and 62 (19.3%) had secondary infertility. In terms of type of infertility, there was no difference between PCO and non PCO groups (p = 0.762). The type of infertility (primary or secondary) was not significantly correlated with severity of OHSS (p = 0.13). There was no significant difference between weight and BMI in PCO group (p> 0.05) compared to non-PCO subjects. No significant correlation was found between the dose of injected HCG and OHSS severity (p = 0.384), so that the dose of injected HCG in patients with mild OHSS was relatively moderate compared to OHSS, however, patients had varying degrees of OHSS severity (Table 2). The embryo transfer was postponed to next cycle in 23 (11.9%) patients with mild OHSS and in 18 (14.1%) patients with moderate OHSS, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.610). Embryo transfer was postponed to the next cycle in 17 (16.7%) patients in the PCO group and 24 (11%) in the non-PCO group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.156). There was a significant difference between the mean number of transferred embryos in the non-PCO group compared to the PCO group (p = 0.015). The severity of OHSS was also significantly associated with the number of transmitted fetuses (p = 0.03), so that in mild OHSS and moderate OHSS, 3.86 ± 1.2 and 3.16 ± 1.01 embryos had been transferred respectively (Table 2). Overall, 13.4% of patients had successful pregnancies in form of clinical pregnancy (gestational sac and embryo heart). There was no significant relationship between the success rate of pregnancy and the PCO domain (p = 0.602), so that in the PCO group, the success rate was 11.8% and in the non-PCO group it was 14.2%. There was no significant difference in success rate in pregnancy in terms of severity of OHSS (p = 0.741), so that success rate in mild OHSS and moderate OHSS, based on the transferred embryo in the same cycle, was 14% and 12.5% respectively.
The severity of OHSS in both PCO and non-PCO groups was significantly different, so that the number of patients with moderate OHSS in the PCO group was more than the non-PCO group, which was consistent with the findings of Tomon et al. [10]. ... [11-16]. There was a significant difference between the mean numbers of transferred embryos in the non-PCO group compared to PCO group. McCormick et al. have shown that the increase in androgen in PCO individuals affects the quality of the fetus and may also impair the implantation. On the other hand, in PCO individuals in that study, the lower quality of the embryo was lower than that of the control group, which increased the number of transmitted embryos to achieve more fertility [17]. These findings are consistent with the results of our studies. There was a significant difference in the number of transmitted embryos in relation to the severity of OHSS. Women with OHSS should be more likely to produce ovules and increase oocytes compared to other women, and therefore it is unreasonable that they are more likely to have fertility and pregnancy. Depending on the severity of OHSS and oocyte stimulation, since the number of oocytes is more and results in a greater number of embryos [18], it is expected that in the mild OHSS, more embryos be transferred compared to the moderate OHSS, so that the success rate increases.
It is suggested that a cohort study be designed in the future to make a more accurate and reliable conclusion.
A retrospective and cross-sectional design of this research was one of the limitations of this study.
The success rate of ICSI / IVF fertility in people with OHSS is lower than usual, and necessarily the presence of PCO in individuals with OHSS, although it can somewhat reduce the outcomes and success of pregnancy, is not a decisive factor in the success rate of pregnancy. With the longer duration of OHSS treatment and the number of more embryos transmitted (on average, one more fetus), almost the same success rate can be achieved in individuals with a PCO background
TABLES and CHARTS
Show attach fileCITIATION LINKS
[1]Kazemi A, Hasanzahraee R. The effect of polycystic ovary syndrome on outcome of assisted reproductive technology in Isfahan Infertility Center in 2003. Iranian J Nursing Midwif Research. 2006;11(1).
[2]Richardson MR. Current perspectives in polycystic ovary syndrome. Am fam physician. 2003;68(4):697-704.
[3]Mohiti-Ardekani J, Taarof N. Comparison of leptin blood levels and correlation of leptin with LH and FSH in PCOS patients and normal individuals. SSU J. 2010;17(5):353-7.
[4]Williams T, Mortada R, Porter S. Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Am fam physician. 2016;94(2):106-13.
[5]Nabiuni M, Parivar K, Zeynali B, Karimzadeh L, Sheikholeslami A. Changes in the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in polycystic ovary syndrome in wistar rats. Tehran Univ Med J. 2011;69(9):537-46.
[6]Saremi A. Textbook of Reproductive Medicine. Sarem Journal of Medicine. 2016;5(17):63-4.
[7]Saremi A, Mehdizadeh SA, Shami M, Safavi M. Effect of mannitol therapy protocol on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome management, comparisonbetween PCO and non-PCO patient's outcome. International J fertil sterlity. 2013;7(1):117.
[8]Saremi A, Namdar khanzadeh M, Shami M, Alaiha F, Pooladi A. The Efficacy of Mannitol Therapy in the Management of Moderate and Severe Forms of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A New Application. Sarem Journal of Medicine. 2012;1(3):9-19.
[9]Saremi AT, Shami M, MohammadAliha F, Pooladi A. Use of Mannitol therapy for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (ohss) management. Med J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;5(1).
[10]Tummon I, Gavrilova Jordan L, Allemand MC, Session D. Polycystic ovaries and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic review. Acta obstet gynecol Scand. 2005;84(7):611-6.
[11]Fiedler K, Ezcurra D. Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10(1):32.
[12]Onofriescu A, Luca A, Bors A, Holicov M, Onofriescu M, Vulpoi C. Principles of diagnosis and management in the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Curr Health Sci J. 2013;39(3):187-92.
[13]Delvigne A. Epidemiology of OHSS. Reprod biomedic online. 2009;19(1):8-13.
[14]Delvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod update. 2002;8(6):559-77.
[15]Mokhtar S, Hassan HA, Mahdy N, Elkhwsky F, Shehata G. Risk factors for primary and secondary female infertility in Alexandria: A hospital based case control study. J Med Res Institute. 2006;27(4):255-61
[16]Nastri CO, Ferriani RA, Rocha IA, Martins WP. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology and prevention. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(2-3):121-8.
[17]McCormick B, Thomas M, Maxwell R, Williams D, Aubuchon M. Effects of polycystic ovarian syndrome on in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer outcomes are influenced by body mass index. Fertil steril. 2008;90(6):2304-9.
[18]Fitzmaurice GJ, Boylan C, McClure N. Are pregnancy rates compromised following embryo freezing to prevent OHSS?. Ulster Med J. 2008;77(3):164-7.
[2]Richardson MR. Current perspectives in polycystic ovary syndrome. Am fam physician. 2003;68(4):697-704.
[3]Mohiti-Ardekani J, Taarof N. Comparison of leptin blood levels and correlation of leptin with LH and FSH in PCOS patients and normal individuals. SSU J. 2010;17(5):353-7.
[4]Williams T, Mortada R, Porter S. Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Am fam physician. 2016;94(2):106-13.
[5]Nabiuni M, Parivar K, Zeynali B, Karimzadeh L, Sheikholeslami A. Changes in the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in polycystic ovary syndrome in wistar rats. Tehran Univ Med J. 2011;69(9):537-46.
[6]Saremi A. Textbook of Reproductive Medicine. Sarem Journal of Medicine. 2016;5(17):63-4.
[7]Saremi A, Mehdizadeh SA, Shami M, Safavi M. Effect of mannitol therapy protocol on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome management, comparisonbetween PCO and non-PCO patient's outcome. International J fertil sterlity. 2013;7(1):117.
[8]Saremi A, Namdar khanzadeh M, Shami M, Alaiha F, Pooladi A. The Efficacy of Mannitol Therapy in the Management of Moderate and Severe Forms of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A New Application. Sarem Journal of Medicine. 2012;1(3):9-19.
[9]Saremi AT, Shami M, MohammadAliha F, Pooladi A. Use of Mannitol therapy for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (ohss) management. Med J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;5(1).
[10]Tummon I, Gavrilova Jordan L, Allemand MC, Session D. Polycystic ovaries and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic review. Acta obstet gynecol Scand. 2005;84(7):611-6.
[11]Fiedler K, Ezcurra D. Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10(1):32.
[12]Onofriescu A, Luca A, Bors A, Holicov M, Onofriescu M, Vulpoi C. Principles of diagnosis and management in the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Curr Health Sci J. 2013;39(3):187-92.
[13]Delvigne A. Epidemiology of OHSS. Reprod biomedic online. 2009;19(1):8-13.
[14]Delvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod update. 2002;8(6):559-77.
[15]Mokhtar S, Hassan HA, Mahdy N, Elkhwsky F, Shehata G. Risk factors for primary and secondary female infertility in Alexandria: A hospital based case control study. J Med Res Institute. 2006;27(4):255-61
[16]Nastri CO, Ferriani RA, Rocha IA, Martins WP. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology and prevention. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(2-3):121-8.
[17]McCormick B, Thomas M, Maxwell R, Williams D, Aubuchon M. Effects of polycystic ovarian syndrome on in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer outcomes are influenced by body mass index. Fertil steril. 2008;90(6):2304-9.
[18]Fitzmaurice GJ, Boylan C, McClure N. Are pregnancy rates compromised following embryo freezing to prevent OHSS?. Ulster Med J. 2008;77(3):164-7.