ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Zaker Bostanabad   S. (*)
Rahimi   M.K. (1)
Mahdavi   M. (2)
Pourazar‎   Sh. (3)






(*) Biological Sciences Faculty, Parand Branch, Isalmic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
(1) ‎Medicine Faculty, Tehran Medical Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
(2) ‎Molecular Department‎, Khatam Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(3) ‎Molecular Department‎, ‎“Masoud Lab” and “Sarem Women’s Hospital”‎, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence


Article History

Received:  February  20, 2014
Accepted:  May 19, 2016
ePublished:  June 15, 2017

BRIEF TEXT


Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a member of the herpesviridae family, is a commonly found congenital viral ‎infection in many population groups that occurs in all age groups and at all levels of the community [1, ‎‎2].‎

Cytomegalovirus infection is usually asymptomatic, but sometimes it occurs in some patients with ‎serious and deadly infection. The cytomegalovirus remains in the latent form after a period of active ‎infection. The virus can be reactivated at an appropriate time, such as pregnancy, and the fetus also ‎receives cytomegalovirus infection through the mother. ‎ ‎… [3-7].From primary infection and recurrent cytomegalovirus infection, the highest rates of ‎congenital infection is related to mothers who have been infected initially. In cases where the first ‎infection occurs in the last trimester of pregnancy, it is more likely that it will be transmitted to the ‎fetus. However, if the primary infection occurs in the first trimester or early in the second trimester, ‎the chances of transmission is lower, and if transmitted, causes more severe damage to the fetus [3, 5, ‎‎8, and 9]. ‎ Anti-cytomegalovirus antibodies cannot completely protect the mother and the fetus against infection, ‎infection return, and infection transmission [9-12]. The presence of IgM is also not valid reason for the ‎presence of primary cytomegalovirus infection, since in the case of an infectious disease, there is also ‎an antibody of IgM class, and an antibody titer is beneficial in these cases [2, 5, 13, and ‎‎14].cytomegalovirus is now a major contributor to congenital malformation, mental retardation, ‎abortion and infections in neonates and infants. Cytomegalovirus infections have numerous economic, ‎social, and psychological losses [15, 7-17]. In Iran, there is no definite figure for the incidence of ‎congenital cytomegalovirus infection and congenital cytomegalovirus diseases have large side effects ‎and costs. In these cases, the definitive diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection is based on the ‎isolation of the virus. However, in many cases, especially in screening tests, there is no possibility of ‎the cultivation of the virus (due to its expensiveness and time-consuming nature) [3, 18-22].‎

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the molecular method in diagnosis of the disease ‎with other conducted methods and the importance of the molecular method for rapid and correct ‎testing.‎

This research is descriptive-analytic.‎

In this study, women who were referred to Javaheri, Bouali, and Amiralmomenin hospitals (affiliated ‎to the Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch) in different weeks of pregnancy and women ‎who had normal delivery were examined in the years 2010-2011. ‎

‎60 women who had referred for abortion in different weeks of pregnancy and 60 women with normal ‎delivery were examined. ‎

Before the study, consent was taken from all the patients and a questionnaire including age, ‎occupation, history of previous illness, number of pregnancy and previous delivery, abortion time, and ‎number of abortions was designed and the patient`s information revealed from interview was entered ‎into it. ‎ Under the class II hood, amniotic fluid was taken from mothers. The samples were first numbered and ‎the same numbers were written in separate tubes, and then 200 μl of each sample was poured into the ‎corresponding tubes. The samples were stored in a freezer. The samples were concentrated and then ‎the DNA was extracted. ‎ Amniotic fluid samples were prepared for the extraction of the nucleic acid and the ROCHE kit was ‎used according to the kit method to isolate the DNA. The buffer gene code 280 was amplified using the ‎primers PCR and using primers F GTAGCTGGCATTGCGATTGGT and R TCCAACACCCACAGTACCCGT. ‎PCA was performed in 50 μl tube containing 2 μl KCL, 2 μl Tris (pH 8), 5 μl dNTP, 1.5 μl MgCl2, 1UTaq ‎polymerase, 2727 μl water (molecular DDW grade), 20 Pico mole from each primer and 6-10 μl of ‎isolated DNA. ‎ ‎ Initial denaturation at 94 ° C for 90 seconds, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 ° C for 50 seconds, ‎initially annealed at 64 ° C for 50 seconds, a format at 72 ° C for 50 seconds, and a 72 ° C cyclic cycle ‎for 10 minutes were applied, and the product obtained by agarose gel 1.5% along with ethidium ‎bromide was evaluated and identified.‎ Data were analyzed by chi-square test using SPSS 13 software and the results were compared in two ‎groups of abortion (case group) and normal delivery group. ‎

The age range of the case and control group was 25-30 and 30-35 respectively. The mean age of women ‎in the case and control group was 28.50±6.68 and 29.00±5.87 years, respectively. In the women of the ‎case group, the results of PCR was positive for 7(18.9%), 5(27.8%), and 4(80.0%) samples who had no ‎history of abortion (zero abortion), one abortion and two abortions respectively. In the control group, ‎the results of PCR was negative. In the control group, 85.0% of the cases had no history of abortion, ‎and 15.0% had one abortion. In addition, in the control group, 5% of the cases had abortion in less than ‎‎20 weeks of pregnancy and 8.3% had preterm delivery or intrauterine death. There was significant ‎relationship between the incidence of CMV and the number of abortions in the mothers of the case ‎group (p<0.05; Table 1).‎

‎… [23-26].A study by Ryan et al. in 2005 it was found that cytomegalovirus infection has contaminated ‎about 50-80% of the adult population. This statistic is based on antibody measurements in the ‎population. In addition, it has been shown that cytomegalovirus is the most commonly transmitted ‎mother to fetus virus before the birth. In the low socio-economic conditions in the third world ‎countries, this virus is the most responsible virus in the herpes family for the embryo and neonatal ‎disorders [4, 9, and 14]. In a study by Boeckh et al. in 2004, cytomegalovirus was the most important ‎congenital infections in humans and the second cause of mental retardation (after Down syndrome). ‎The virus is one of the factors among the infections of Torch syndrome that causes congenital ‎anomalies and disorders. In the United States, the prevalence of primary infections of cytomegalovirus ‎in pregnant women was reported to be about 1-3%. Pregnant women do not show any signs. However, ‎in some cases they are seen as having a mononucleosis-like condition and their fetus is at the risk for ‎congenital cytomegalovirus. Now, cytomegalovirus remains the leading cause of congenital viral ‎infection in the United States [10].‎ In 2003, a study was conducted by Sukhikh, in which serological methods such as IgM and IgG ‎antibody specific kits were used. In this study, PCR was also used to confirm the presence of ‎cytomegalovirus infection in urine specimen, saliva, and amniotic fluid, and the value of the vaccine in ‎preventing infection [8]. ‎ In the study of Griffith et al., the prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection with rubella virus in pregnant ‎women was investigated. In 15% of women with primary cytomegalovirus infection, fetal loss was ‎seen and this rate was 7 times higher than control samples. The transmission of the virus in the first ‎trimester, second trimester and the third trimester was 20%, 0% and 40% respectively [21].‎

It is suggested that more studies be done to evaluate molecular methods and compare the sensitivity ‎and the specificity of it with other methods in the larger population, taking into account geographical ‎condition.‎



Considering the importance of quick and correct detection of the disease agent before its ‎complications, the molecular method can help to this end even in cases of low pathogenicity. ‎









TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Summers PR. Microbiology relevant to recurrent miscarriage. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37(3):722-9.‎
[2]Rappaport F, Rabinovitz M, Toaff R, Krochik N. Genital listeriosis as a cause of repeated abortion. Lancet. ‎‎1960;1(7137):1273-5.‎
[3]Rad cliffe JJ, Hart CA, Francis WJ, Johnson PM. Immunity to cytomegaloviruses in women with unexplained ‎recurrent spontanous abortion. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 1986;12(4):103-5. ‎
[4]Sifakis S, Ergazaki M, Sourvinos G, Koffa M, Koumantakis E, Spandidos DA. Evaluation of Parvo B19, CMV and ‎HPV viruses in human aborted materialusing the polymerase chain reaction technique. Eur J Obstet Gynecol ‎Reprod Biol. 1998;76(2):169-73.‎
[5]Gartner L, Kunkel M, Oberender H. Persistence of IgM antibodies to CMV-induced late antigen in pregnancy ‎andpostpartum. Acta Virol. 1983;27(1):86-8.‎
[6]Luerti M, Santini A, Bernini O, Castiglioni M, Ragni MC. ELISA antibodies to cytomegalovirus in pregnant ‎patients prevalence in andcorrelation with spontaneous abortion. Biol Res Pregnancy Prinatal. ‎‎1983;4(4):181-3.‎
[7]Szkaradkiewicz A, Pieta P, Tułecka T, Breborowicz G, Słomko Z, Strzyzowski P. The diagnostic value of anti-‎CMV HPV-B19 antiviral antibodiesin studies on causes of recurrent aboirtions. Ginekol Pol. 1997;68(4):181-‎‎6. [Polish]‎
[8]Sukhikh GT, Dadal'ian LG, Van'ko LV, Kalafati TI, Sidel'nikova VM. Diagnostic and prognostic value of specific ‎immune response to Cytomegaloviruses inpregnant women with a history of habitual abortion. Akush ‎Ginekol (Mosk). 1992;(3-7):30-3. [Russian]‎
[9]Kost BP, Mylonas I, Kästner R, Rack B, Gingelmaier A, Friese K. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in ‎pregnancy: A case report of fetal death in a CMV-infected woman. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(3): 265-8.‎
[10]Rajaii, M, Pourhassan A. Evaluation of immunity against CMV in Azarbaijan female population. Iran J Clin ‎Infect Dis. 2008;3(3):143-8.‎
[11]Ergun UG, Bakaris S, Ucmak H, Ozbek A. Fatal congenital cytomegalovirus infection following recurrent ‎aternal infection after a 7-year interval. Saudi Med J. 2007;28(2):264-7.‎
[12]Zalel Y, Gilboa Y, Berkenshtat M, Yoeli R, Auslander R, Achiron R, et al. Secondary cytomegalovirus infection ‎can cause severe fetal sequelae despit maternal preconceptional immunity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. ‎‎2008;31(4):417-20.‎
[13]Satilmiş A, Güra A, Ongun H, Mendilcioğlu I, Colak D, Oygür N. CMV seroconversion in pregnants and the ‎incidence of congenital CMV infection. Turk J Pediatr. 2007;49(1):30-6.‎
[14]Ione R, Fomda BA, Thokar M, Wani T, Kakru D, Shaheen R, et al. Seroprevalence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in ‎Kashmir valley-a preliminary study. JK-Practitioner. 2004;11(4):261-2.‎
[15]Goering R, Dockrell, Zuckerman M, Roitt I, chiodini P. Medical Microbiology. 3rd Edition. Edinburgh: Mosby; ‎‎2004.‎
[16]Gomez E, Loures A, Smelon J, Baltar. Late CMV disease and/or pecursence in renal transplant recipients with ‎pronged oral garciclovirprophylanis. Transplantation smedzin, 2003.‎
[17]Vanson WJ, The TH. Cytomegalovirus infection after organ transplantation: An update ith special emphasis ‎on renal transplantation. Transpl Int. 1989;2(3):147-64.‎
[18]The TH, Van Der Bij W, Van Den Berg Ap, Van Der Gissen M, Sprenger Hg, Van son WJ. Cytomegalovirus ‎antigenemia. Rev inf Dis. 1990;12:737-44.‎
[19]Boeckh M, Bowden RA, Goodrich JM, Pettinger M, Meyerst J. Cytomegalovirus antigen detection in peripheral ‎blood leukocytes after allogeneic narrow transplantation. Blood. 1992;80:1358-64.‎
[20]Van Der Bij W, Schirm J, Torensma R, Van Son WJ, Tegzess AM, The TH. Comparison between viremia and ‎ntigenemia for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(12):2531-5.‎
[21]Grefte JM, Van Der Gun BT, Sehmolke S, Van Der Giessen M, Van Son WJ, Plachter B, et al. The lower matrix ‎protein pp65 is the principal viral antigen present in peripheral blood leukocytes during an active ‎cytomegalovirus infection. J Gen Virol. 1992;73:2923-32.‎
[22]Gema G, Revello MG, Percivalle E, Zavattoni M, Parea M, Battaglia M. Quantification of human cytomegalovirus ‎viremia by using monoclonal antibodies to different viral proteins. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28(12):2681-8.‎
[23]Nelson CT, Demmler GJ. Cytomegalovirus infection in the pregnant mother, fetus, and newborn infant. Clin ‎Perinatol. 1997;24(1):151-60.‎
[24]Piper JM, Wen TS. Perinatal cytomegalovirus and toxoplasmosis: Challenges of antepartum therapy. Clin ‎Obstet Gynecol. 1999;42(1):81-96.‎
[25]Huang JC, Naylor B. Cytomegalovirus infection of the cervix detected by cytology and histology: A report of ‎five cases. Cytopathology. 1993;4(4):237-41.‎
[26]Friedmann W, Schäfer A, Kretschmer R, Lobeck H. Disseminated cytomegalovirus infection of the female ‎genital tract. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;31(1):56-7.‎