ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Khanemasjedi   Mashallah (1)
Araban   Marzieh (2)
Mohamadinia   Mehdi (3,*)






(1) Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
(2) Department of Health Education and Promotion, Scool of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
(3,*) Student Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Student Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Phone: -
Fax: -
mehdimohamadi7@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  June  22, 2017
Accepted:  April 22, 2018
ePublished:  June 1, 2018

BRIEF TEXT


Nowadays, with the importance of a patient-based approach in clinical decision-making, the quality of life associated with oral health in dentistry has been more considered.

... [1-7]. Along with the civilization of human life, dentoskeletal Malocclusion in Orthodontics known as malocclusion, like other disorders, such as high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease and diabetes has been increased. ... [8-15]. In recent years, several factors have been used to determine the need for orthodontic treatment. The need for orthodontic treatment factor is a malocclusion-based scoring system widely used in studies for the actual assessment and perceiving needs of orthodontic treatment [16]. In this regard, the Shaw et al. results suggested that the psychosocial complications of unacceptable appearance can be as much or even greater than biological ones [9]. However, in a study by Kragt et al., it was found that malocclusion had no significant effect on psychosocial complications. On the other hand, the effects of malocclusion vary in age and gender. In other words, it depends on age and sex [17]. ... [18-20].

The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between malocclusion and oral health-related quality of life among male high school students in Ahvaz, Iran.

This research is an analytical- descriptive (cross-sectional) study.

The study population was the male high school students (14-18 years) in academic year 2016-17.

The sample size was determined 200 subjects using a formula, of whom some students were excluded from the research and finally, 192 students were examined. The schools and students were selected by randomized cluster sampling among the schools of four districts of Ahwaz. A school was selected randomly from each district. The inclusion criteria included those who had not received any orthodontic treatment prior the study or were not under orthodontic treatment through the study as well as those with in permanent teeth stage. The subjects with physical or mental disability and those in mixed dentition stage were excluded from the study.

Examination was done using mirror, abaisse-langue, disposable gloves and metal chips to measure the sizes in millimeter. Data collection tools included demographic information scale (age, ethnicity, occupation and parents’ education, family status, general health status and oral health), Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire, and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). OIDP questionnaire: it is an 8-item scale that measures mental, physical and social dimensions of life [8, 9]. The items include the effect of oral health on eating, talking clearly, brushing teeth or dentures, Performing light physical activities, such as housekeeping, smiling and showing teeth without discomfort and embarrassment, sleeping and resting, enjoying communication, work-related activities and emotional situations, such as easily getting annoyed [20]. ... [21]. IOTN Index: This tool contains various criteria for the IOTN Index. The IOTN dental health component is composed of five scores that score 1 and 2 are no need or minimum need for treatment, grade 3 shows the borderline need, and scores 4 and 5 show a definite need for orthodontic treatment. Aesthetic component (AC) of IOTN consists of a scale of ten colour photographs, in which scores 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate no or minimum need for treatment, scores 5, 6 and 7 shows the borderline need and the scores 8, 9 and 10 represent the definite need for treatment [6]. The students were classified in the three groups of treatment based on the dental health component of the IOTN. Accordingly, the students who scored 1 or 2 had a minimum need for treatment; those who scored 3 had borderline need for treatment; and students who scored 4 or 5 had a definite need for orthodontic treatment. 10 color photographs of the AC of IOTN then were shown for the subjects and they were asked to choose the most similar photo to their dental system. The AC was determined and recorded according to the examiner opinion. The subjects were informed about the research objectives and the confidentiality of data and the voluntary participation in the study. The informed consent was signed by the participants’ parents and the samples were inspected in a room with adequate light. The examinations were done by a dentist in a room with adequate light and it was tried as much as possible to ensure for the same examination condition for all subjects. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the correlation coefficient of variables and one-way ANOVA was applied to compare the mean of quality of life scores in terms of malocclusion types. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22 software.

The demographic characteristics of the studied subjects are presented in Table 1. The total mean score of quality of life of participants was 6.48±19.47 and in general, oral health of 26.6% of the samples was effective in their quality of life. Oral health more affected smiling (15.6%) followed by emotional situations (9.9%) (Table 2). Occlusion status of the samples according to the IOTN scale showed that 51.1% of the participants had no or minimum need for orthodontic treatment based on dental health index. The relationship between quality of life and the occlusion status of the samples showed that the mean score of quality of life in students who according to the DHC component had definite need for orthodontic treatment was higher than other groups, which mean that they are less satisfied with life. This correlation was not statistically significant using one-way ANOVA (p=0.132; Table 3). According to the students, 90.1% of them had no or minimum need for orthodontic treatment. According to the students and the dentist, most of the students (94.3%) had no or minimum need for orthodontic treatment. On the other hand, the average score of quality of life in those who had borderline need for orthodontic treatment based on AC was higher than other groups. The results of one-way ANOVA showed a significant difference between the groups (p<0.05; Table 4).

Nagarajappa et al. found that 60% of 17-24-year old students in India over the past six months had at least one impact of oral health on their daily activities. In this study, the mean OIDP score was 2.49±3.92. In addition, the most affected activities were tooth brushing (24%) and eating (12%) [22]. ... [23]. In Miguel et al. study on 1182 twenty-year-old Brazilian children reported 26% need for orthodontic treatment based on IOTN [24]. ... [25-27]. Similar to the present study, Fayzbakhsh et al. in their study on the AC index, different values with DHC were obtained based on students view for their need for treatment. Accordingly, no or minimum need for treatment was 76.5%, borderline need was 15.2% and the definite need was obtained 8.3%, which means that in this study, the need for treatment based on the AC index was less than DHC [28]. ... [29-31]. The results of Yetkiner et al. showed that the need for orthodontic treatment has no significant effect on the oral health and self-esteem-based quality of life in primary school children in Turkey [32]. Moreover, in a study by Bianco et al., there was a significant relationship between the AC of IOTN index according to the dentist's opinion and the Child-OIDP index [33], which is consistent with the findings of this study. ... [34].

Prospective cohort studies are more suggested.

The study population was limited to the studied Ahwaz schools, so the results should be interpreted cautiously.

In 26.6% of the samples, the oral health is effective on the quality of life or at least one of their daily activities. In this regard, the most affected activity by oral health is smiling (15.6%) followed by emotional situations (9.9%).



None declared.

This research (Ethics code: IR.AJUMS.REC.1396.355) was approved by the Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

This study (study ID: GP95160) is extracted from a Ph.D. thesis in Dentistry and was supported by the Ahwaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Allen PF, McMillan AS, Locker D. An assessment of sensitivity to change of the oral health impact profile in a clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001;29(3):175-82. PMID: 11409676
[2]Mcgrath C, Bedi R, Gilthorpe MS. Oral health related quality of life–views of public in the United Kingdom. Community Dent Health. 2000;17(1):3-7. PMID: 11039623
[3]Haerian A, Sharifabadi M, Ali M, Amirian E. Relationship between oral health related quality of life and dental condition in patients referring to Yazd dental university and Yazd Khatamolanbia Clinic. J Community Health Res. 2015;4(2):105-13. [Persian]
[4]Jabarifar SE, Birjandi N, Khadem P, Farsam T, Falinezhad F, Javadi FM. Relationship between quality of life and oral health in 18-45 year-old subjects referring to Khorasgan School of Dentistry in 2010-2011. J Isfahan Dental Sch. 2012;8(1):68-74. [Persian]
[5]Danaie SM, Asadi Z. Distribution of malocclusion types, hereditary crowding and the need of 7 9 year old children to serial extraction in Shiraz, 2000-2001. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2003;4(2):44-51. [Persian]
[6]Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
[7]Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod. 1985;87(1):21-6. PMID: 3855347
[8]Khanehmasjedi M, Bassir L, Haghighizadeh M. Evaluation of relationship between orthodontic treatment need according dental aesthetic index (DAI) and Student’s Perception in 11-14 year old students in the city of Ahwaz in 2005. J Mashhad Dental Sch. 2007;31(Issue):37-46. [Persian]
[9]Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod. 1981;79(3):399-415. PMID: 6939333
[10]Corrucini RS, Pacciani E. Orthodontics and dental occlusion in Etruscans. Angle Orthod. 1989;59(1):61-4. PMID: 2646990 DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1989)059<0061:OADOIE>2.0.CO;2
[11]George JA. Bioarchaeology: interpreting behavior from the human skeleton. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
[12]Asgari I, Ebn Ahmady A, Khoshnevisan MH, Eslamipour F. Evaluation of the patient-based indices for orthodontic need assessment in the 13 to 18 year-old adolescents in Isfahan. J Dental Med. 2012;25(2):124-34. [Persian]
[13]Wędrychowska-Szulc B, Syryńska M. Patient and parent motivation for orthodontic treatment—a questionnaire study. Eur J Orthod. 2009;32(4):447-52. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp131
[14]Birkeland BO, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups. A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22(5):509-18. PMID: 11105407
[15]Riedmann T, Georg T, Berg R. Adult patients' view of orthodontic treatment outcome compared to professional assessments. J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60(5):308-20. PMID: 10546414
[16]Chen M, Feng ZC, Liu X, Li ZM, Cai B, Wang DW. Impact of malocclusion on oral health–related quality of life in young adults. Angle Orthod. 2014;85(6):986-91. DOI: 10.2319/101714-743.1
[17]Kragt L, Dhamo B, Wolvius EB, Ongkosuwito EM. The impact of malocclusions on oral health-related quality of life in children-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;20(8):1881-94. PMID: 26635095 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1681-3
[18]Naito M, Yuasa H, Nomura Y, Nakayama T, Hamajima N, Hanada N. Oral health status and health related quality of life: a systematic review. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(1):1-7. PMID: 16617194
[19]Khadem P, Maroofi V, Ghasemi D. The relationship between oral and dental health and quality of life based on DIDL index. Res Dent Sci. 2011;7(4):41-35. [Persian]
[20]Mohebbi S, Sheikhzadeh S, Bayanzadeh M, Batebizadeh A. Oral impact on daily performance (OIDP) index in patients attending patients clinic at dentistry school of Tehran university of medical sciences. J Dental Med. 2012; 25(2):135-41. [Persian]
[21]Dorri M, Sheiham A, Tsakos G. Validation of a Persian version of the OIDP index. BMC Oral Health. 2007;7(1):2. PMID: 17257407 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-7-2
[22]Nagarajappa R, Batra M, Sanadhya S, Daryani H, Ramesh G. Oral impacts on daily performance: Validity, reliability and prevalence estimates among Indian adolescents. Int J Dent Hyg. 2017;16(2):279-85. PMID: 28467033 DOI: 10.1111/idh.12284
[23]Razanamihaja N, Ranivoharilanto E. Assessing the validity and reliability of the Malagasy version of oral impacts on daily Performance (OIDP): a cross-sectional study. Biopsychosoc Med. 2017;11:2. PMID: 28184240 DOI: 10.1186/s13030-016-0087-z
[24]Miguel JA, Feu D, Bretas RM, Canavarro C, Almeida MA. Orthodontic treatment needs of Brazilian 12-year-old school children. World J Orthod. 2009;10(4):305-10. PMID: 20072747
[25]Ucuncu N, Erthgay E. The use of the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) in a school population and referred population. J Orthod. 2001;28(1):45-52. PMID: 11254803 DOI: 10.1093/ortho/28.1.45
[26]Safavi SM, Sefidroodi A, Nouri M, Eslamian L, Kheirieh S, Bagheban AA. Orthodontic treatment need in 14-16 year-old Tehran high school students. Aust Orthod J. 2009;25(1):8-11. PMID: 19634457
[27]Jamilian A, Toliat M, Etezad S. Prevalence of malocclusion and index of orthodontic treatment need in children in Tehran. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2010;8(4):339-43. PMID: 21180670
[28]Feyzbakhsh M, Khadem P, Sarandi S, Teimouri F, Aslani F, Dadgar S. Orthodontic treatment needs of 14-18 year-old male Students of Isfahan (Iran) in 2009-2010 using IOTN Index. J Mashhad Dent Sch. 2013;37(2):145-52. [Persian]
[29]Kolawole KA, Otuyemi OD, Jeboda SO, Umweni AA. Awareness of malocclusion and desire for orthodontic treatment in 11-14 year old Nigerian school children and their parents. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24(1):21-5. PMID: 18649560
[30]Abu Alhajia ES, Al-Nimri KS, Al-Khateeb SN. Self-perception of malocclusion among Jordanian school children. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(3):292-5. PMID: 15947230 DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjh094
[31]Mandall NA, McCord JF, Blinkhorn AS, Worthington HV, O'Brien KA. Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self- perception in 14-15 year old Asian and Caucasian children in Greater Manchester. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21(2):175-83. PMID: 10822891
[32]Yetkiner E, Vardar C, Ergin E, Yucel C. Orthodontic treatment need, self-esteem, and oral health-related quality of life assessment of primary schoolchildren: a cross-sectional pilot study. Turkish J Orthod Vol. 2014;26(4):182-9.
[33]Bianco A, Fortunato L, Nobile CG, Pavia M. Prevalence and determinants of oral impacts on daily performance: results from a survey among school children in Italy. Eur J Public Health. 2009;20(5):595-600. PMID: 19892850 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp179
[34]Heravi F, Farzanegan F, Tabatabaee M, Sadeghi M. Do malocclusions affect the oral health-related quality of life? Oral Health Prev Dent. 2010;9(3):229-33. PMID: 22068178