ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Saremi   A.T. (1)
Sanaye Naderi   M. (2)
Pooladi ‎   A. (1)
Younesi   B. (3)
Lashgari   P. (3)
Zare ‎   A. (*)






(*) ‎“Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” ‎, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(1) ‎“Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” ‎, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(2) Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)‎, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(3) ‎Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR), Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence


Article History

Received:  August  21, 2016
Accepted:  December 24, 2016
ePublished:  February 15, 2018

BRIEF TEXT


Abortion is one of the problems that leads to the lack of maintenance of embryo in a mother. Recursive ‎Spontaneous Abortion (RSA) is defined as three or more than three repeated abortions occurring before ‎the 20th week of pregnancy [1].‎

‎... [2, 3]. Previous studies have shown that during pregnancy, the mother's immune system usually ‎detects human leukocyte antigen (HLA) as a foreign agent and protects the surface of the embryo by ‎inducing alloantibodies that act as blocking antibodies, cover the surface of the fetus and protect it ‎from maternal immune responses [1, 4]. Some studies have pointed out that most women who have ‎spontaneous abortion due to alloimmune reasons have similar HLA with paternal HLA, that this ‎similarity may prevent proper immune response during pregnancy and the production of antibody-‎mediated antibodies such as anti-parietal cell antibodies (APCA), idiotypic antibodies (Ab2), and ‎mixed lymphocyte reaction blocking antibodies (MLR-Bf) antibodies, and the absence of these ‎antibodies is a major cause of abortion [1, 4-7]. ... [8-16].‎ One of the treatment options for recurrent spontaneous abortion in some European and Asian medical ‎centers, including in Iran, is lymphocyte therapy or immunotherapy using fetal lymphocytes that are ‎used to stimulate the mother's specific immune response to fetal alloantigens. Some research groups ‎reported increasing fertility following this treatment [6-8]. The effectiveness of this therapy has been ‎confirmed by some researchers, while others are doubtful [4-6, 17, 18]. In this therapeutic method, a ‎husband's lymphocyte or a third person donor is injected into a woman's immunization protocol and ‎stimulates her immune system to respond to fetal antigens, and examines the result of this ‎immunization with a leukocyte cross-match test.‎

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of leukocyte cross-match derived from lymphocyte ‎therapy in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.‎

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study.‎

This study was conducted in a population of women with a history of repeated abortions that had two ‎or more spontaneous abortions and referred to Sarem Specialized Hospital in Tehran between 2008 ‎and 2012.‎

Of the total number of 1,480 women referred to, 704 patients, after having been diagnosed as having ‎abortion, have no karyotype abnormalities, anatomical abnormalities in the uterus, uterine adhesions, ‎sexual and thyroid hormone disorders, infectious agents, and autoimmunity volunteered for treatment ‎of lymphocytic leukemia according to the specified protocol. Other patients or volunteers who were ‎not treated or did not continue treatment until the end, were excluded from the study.‎

Before lymphocytic therapy, a leukocyte cross-match test was performed using serum of patients and ‎leukocytes of their husbands, and lymphocytic treatment was proposed only for patients who were ‎negative for their test results (leukocyte cross-match<0.05). This treatment was carried out for the ‎patients with an explanation of its side effects to the patient and after signing the consent form ‎approved by the ethics committee of Sarem Hospital.‎ Lymphocyte treatment: After screening for spouse or third-person donors, in terms of transferrable ‎infectious factors including CMV, EBV, HBV, HCV, HIV, HTLV1 and Treponema pallidum. After ‎determining the blood group and Rh of patients, and their spouses or their donors, A blood sample was ‎taken from a spouse or a donor in two consecutive and three weeks intervals, 25 ml of heparin blood ‎was taken and by maintaining sterile conditions, their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) ‎were isolated using ficole. After 3 times that the cells were washed with ringer serum and their ‎counting was carried out using neobar slide at each turn, 80-100× 106 cells per ml of Ringer serum ‎were injected intra dermally at several points of the patient's arm. Two weeks after the last ‎immunotherapy, serum of patients and PBMCs were isolated, and an APCA examination of leukocyte ‎cross-match was performed [19-21]. These patients typically performed immunotherapy in two ‎rounds, and those who did not have positive result, continued the treatment 2 to 3 other times or by ‎using PBMCs of the third donor.‎ Determination of APCA percentage by leukocyte cross-match test: Husband`s or donor`s PBMCs ‎were removed from their blood using sterile flasks and sterilized under sterile conditions. After ‎washing with Hanks buffer, they were kept on ice and inside the refrigerator until the test was ‎performed. On the other hand, the serum of patient was isolated and 50 μl of dilution 1: 2, 1: 4 and 1: 8 ‎was poured into micro plate of 72 sample wells. Positive and negative control serum were also poured ‎into separate wells. In the wells for each patient, 500 cells of husband`s or donor`s PBMCs (in 50 ‎microliter volume) were added and then the plate was placed at room temperature for half an hour. In ‎the next step, 250 μl of rabbit complement was added to all wells and the plate was placed at 37 ° C for ‎‎1 hour and then 100 μl of eosin was added to all wells. After 5 minutes, the cells were fixed with 12% ‎formalin solution and the plate was examined by introspect microscope. Percentage of dead cells (cells ‎that penetrated the eosin color) was reported as a percentage of leukocyte cross-match [20-23]. In the ‎interpretation of the results, if the percentage of cross-match leukocyte was more than 35%, the result ‎of the test was positive and the lower values were reported as negative.‎

Cross-match leukocyte test was positive in 319 patients (45.31%) after two rounds of immunotherapy ‎with their spouse PBMCs. The remaining 385 patients (54.96%) who had a negative cross-matched test ‎in previous immunotherapy, continued treatment, and 168 other patients (23.86%) tested positive ‎after their immunotherapy with their husband`s PBMCs. A total of 704 patients who fully treated ‎lymphocytic treatment with their husband`s PBMC, 487 (69.16%) cases were positive in leukocyte ‎cross-match test. The remaining patients who, after several attempts of immunotherapy with their ‎husband's PBMC, were still negative, became volunteers of lymphocytic therapy using PBMC of the ‎third donor, which resulted in 51 (7.24%) cases of positive leukocyte cross-matched test. Of the total ‎number of patients, after this type of test, 538 (76.42%) of the patients had positive APCA after the ‎treatment (Fig. 1).‎

‎… [6, 24, 25]. Studies have shown that in patients with recurrent abortions, these immunologic ‎regulatory mechanisms are impaired, that despite the mention of some studies that the similarity of ‎paternal and maternal HLA antigens is still the main cause of this disorder, it is not well-known and is ‎still being studied by scientists [1, 5, and 6].‎ Experiences and studies from scientists and researchers in the field of infertility and repeated ‎abortions have shown that if women with a history of repeated abortion, are immunized with the ‎husband`s or the third donor white blood cells before the pregnancy, the outcome of the ‎immunological events that occurs after the treatment results in the increases of the chances of ‎maintaining a fetus. New studies explain the change in the regulatory mechanisms of the immune ‎system after the treatment [17, 20, and 26]. One of the methods for assessing the success of this ‎treatment in the development of APCA is to measure these antibodies using leukocyte cross-match test ‎‎(64.5% specificity) that physicians agree with this treatment as a criterion for increasing the chances ‎of success in pregnancy [1, 20, 21]. In this test, if the patient develops APCA, these antibodies react ‎with superficial antigens of the husband's leukocytes and, by adding the complement to the test ‎environment, the death of leukocytes happens, that the percentage of dead cells that absorbed eosin ‎color is considered as the result of test. ‎

The effectiveness and success of this treatment in pregnancy and protection against abortion requires ‎follow up of all patients.‎



Lymphocyte therapy is effective in increasing the amount of APCA. The consistency and continuation ‎of lymphocyte therapy can increase the chance of positive leukocyte cross-match in women with ‎spontaneous abortion.‎





This treatment was done for volunteers by explaining its side effects to the patient and after signing a ‎consent form approved by the morality committee of the Sarem Specialized Hospital.



TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Pandey MK, Rani R, Agrawal S. An update in recurrent spontaneous abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(2):95-108.
[2]Toth B, Jeschke U, Rogenhofer N, Scholz C, Wurfel W, Thaler CJ, et al. Recurrent miscarriage: Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. J Reprod Immunol. 2010;85(1):25-32.
[3]Saito S. The causes and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss. J Jpn Med Assoc.
[4]Ito K, Tanaka T, Tsutsumi N, Obata F, Kashiwagi N. Possible mechanisms of immunotherapy for maintaining pregnancy in recurrent spontaneous aborters: Analysis of anti-idiotypic antibodies directed against autologous T-cell receptors. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(3):650-5.
[5]Pandey MK, Agrawal S. Induction of MLR-Bf and protection of fetal loss: A current double blind randomized trial of paternal lymphocyte immunization for women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Int Immunopharmacol. 2004;4(2):289-98.
[6]Pandey MK, Thakur S, Agrawal S. Lymphocyte immunotherapy and its probable mechanism in the maintenance of pregnancy in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;269(3):161-72.
[7]Takeshita T. Diagnosis and treatment of recurrent miscarriage associated with immunologic disorders: Is paternal lymphocyte immunization a relic of the past?. J Nippon Med Sch. 2004;71(5):308-13.
[8]Khonina NA, Broitman EV, Shevela EY, Pasman NM, Chernykh ER. Mixed lymphocyte reaction blocking factors (MLR-Bf) as potential biomarker for indication and efficacy of paternal lymphocyte immunization in recurrent spontaneous abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(4):933-7.
[9]King K, Smith S, Chapman M, Sacks G. Detailed analysis of peripheral blood natural killer (NK) cells in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):52-8.
[10]Quenby S, Farquharson R. Uterine natural killer cells, implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(1):24-8.
[11]Saito S, Nakashima A, Shima T, Ito M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63(6):601-10.
[12]Tang AW, Alfirevic Z, Quenby S. Natural killer cells and pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent miscarriage and infertility: A systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(8):1971-80.
[13]Lee SK, Kim JY, Hur SE, Kim CJ, Na BJ, Lee M, et al. An imbalance in interleukin-17-producing T and Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells in women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(11):2964-71.
[14]Lee SK, Kim JY, Lee M, Gilman-Sachs A, Kwak-Kim J. Th17 and regulatory T cells in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(4):311-8.
[15]Lim KJ, Odukoya OA, Ajjan RA, Li TC, Weetman AP, Cooke ID. The role of T-helper cytokines in human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):136-42.
[16]Zenclussen AC, Fest S, Busse P, Joachim R, Klapp BF, Arck PC. Questioning the Th1/Th2 paradigm in reproduction: Peripheral levels of IL-12 are down-regulated in miscarriage patients. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002;48(4):245-51.
[17]Liang P, Mo M, Li GG, Yin B, Cai J, Wu T, et al. Comprehensive analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes in 76 women with recurrent miscarriage before and after lymphocyte immunotherapy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;68(2):164-74.
[18]Kling C, Steinmann J, Westphal E, Magez J, Kabelitz D. Adverse effects of intradermal allogeneic lymphocyte immunotherapy: Acute reactions and role of autoimmunity. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(2):429-35.
[19]Carp HJ, Toder V, Gazit E, Orgad S, Mashiach S, Nebel L, et al. Immunization by paternal leukocytes for prevention of primary habitual abortion: Results of a matched controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1990;29(1):16-21.
[20]Chaichian S, Shoaee S, Saremi A, Pedar S, Firouzi F. Factors influencing success rate of leukocyte immunization and anti-paternal antibodies in spontaneous recurrent miscarriage. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007;57(3):169-76.
[21]Umapathy S, Shankarkumar A, Ramrakhiyani V, Ghosh K. Role of anti-human lymphocyte culture cytotoxic antibodies in recurrent spontaneous pregnancy loss women. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011; 4(1): 17–19.
[22]Mittal KK, Mickey MR, Singal DP, Terasaki PI. Serotyping for homotransplantation. 18. Refinement of microdroplet lymphocyte cytotoxicity test. Transplantation. 1968;6(8):913-27.
[23]Terasaki PI, McClelland JD. Microdroplet assay of human serum cytotoxins. Nature. 1964;204:998-1000.
[24]Shreeve N, Sadek K. Intralipid therapy for recurrent implantation failure: New hope or false dawn?. J Reprod Immunol. 2012;93(1):38-40.
[25]Moraru M, Carbone J, Alecsandru D, Castillo-Rama M, Garcia-Segovia A, Gil J, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment increased live birth rate in a Spanish cohort of women with recurrent reproductive failure and expanded CD56(+) cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;68(1):75-84.
[26]Zare A, Saremi A, Hajhashemi M, Kardar GA, Moazzeni SM, Pourpak Z, et al. Correlation between serum zinc levels and successful immunotherapy in recurrent spontaneous abortion patients. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6(2): 147–51.