ARTICLE INFO

Article Type

Original Research

Authors

Mirkarimi   S.K. (1)
Charkazi   A. (2)
Honarvar   M.R. (1)
Kabir   M.J. (1)
Berdi Ozouni-Davaji   R. (1)
Aryaie   M. (*)
Eri   M. (1)






(*) Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
(1) Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
(2) Public Health School, Public Health School, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Correspondence

Address: Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Hirkan Boulevard, Gorgan, Iran
Phone: +98 (17) 32424377
Fax: +98 (17) 32421657
aryaiem2009@yahoo.com

Article History

Received:  October  12, 2015
Accepted:  August 1, 2016
ePublished:  October 1, 2016

BRIEF TEXT


Fatness spread has increased over the world as a health problem and changed into an epidemic one in recent years [1].

[2-16]… Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) is a fear of evaluation model in order to predict and persuade people to do healthy behaviors. [17]… [18].

The aim of study was to check the effect of motivational interviewing on intention of doing physical activities in fat or overweight women by using PMT.

This study is a clinical trial.

The study conducted on fat or overweight women referring to health centers of Gorgan city in 2015.

In the first step, 60 fat or overweight women referring to health centers in Gorgan city were selected as non-probability and available sampling… [19]. Two centers were selected randomly among six health centers in Gorgan. Samples of control group and motivational interviewing group were selected from two other health centers and selected women were divided into two groups randomly according to BMI criteria. Based on the study conducted by Navidian et al. [20] and self-efficacy mean of 90.34±90.57 in motivational interviewing group and the mean of 44.06±8.68 in control group on confidence level of %95 and ability test of %95, 30 samples were considered for each group. The study entrance included the willingness of participation in the study and reading and writing literacy; and its exit criteria were the absence more than 1 session (in motivational interviewing sessions and physical activity’s instruction) and unwillingness of participation in the study.

Training sessions about physical activity (its advantages and effects on fatness and overweight) were represented by a health education and health promotion specialist to the two groups (control and motivational interviewing) during two weeks, two sessions in each (each session 45 minutes to an hour). Team motivational interviewing was also represented by a specialist in the field of consultation during 5 sessions (each session is one hour within two weeks) that there were 8-10 participants in each session. Designed leaflet based on PMT theory with content of advantages and effects of physical activity on fatness and overweight was used in both groups (control and motivational interviewing). Validity of the pamphlet was studied and confirmed by three health education and health promotion specialists and two physical education experts. The studied variables such as theoretical constructs, intention and attitude on physical activity and anthropometric status were measured before the intervention, 2 and 6 months after the intervention in both groups. There was an eight-part researcher-made questionnaire based on PMT theoretical constructs including demographic, anthropometric, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, self-efficacy, perceived response efficacy and intention and attitude on doing physical activity which was used to collect information. All questions regarding theoretical constructs based on 5-points Likert scale were graded from entirely agree (score 5) to entirely disagree (score 1). Face validity of the questionnaire was also studied and confirmed by 4 health education and health promotion specialists and 2 nutrition experts. Content validity of the questionnaire was also studied and confirmed by 5 health education and health promotion specialists and 2 nutrition experts and 7 women. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha and internal consistency methods. Its amounts for attitude questions on physical activity was 0.72 and perceived susceptibility 0.83, perceived severity 0.85, self-efficacy 0.87, perceived response efficacy 0.73 and for intention questions was 0.94. Weight was measured with light clothes and no shoes by weight scale model 803 (Seca; Germany) and with an accuracy of 0.1 Kg. Height was measured once at the beginning of the research by wall mounted stature meter (Seca; Germany) while standing next to the wall as back of the head, shoulders, hips and heels touch the wall with an accuracy of 0.1 Cm. all Anthropometric measurements were performed by one person. Distribution of collected data was normal according to the Shapiro-Wilk test. Quantitative variables at baseline (pre-intervention) were compared by independent T statistical test and qualitative variables were compared by chi-square statistical test. ANOVA with repeated measurements was used to study Anthropometric data (weight and BMI) and theoretical constructs two and six months after intervention. Also, LSD test was used to compare the time trend as two-by-two in groups. The linear regression method was used to evaluate the anticipation of constructs’ effects on their intention of doing physical activity, so that variables with the significance level of less than 0.05 in the univariate model entered into multivariate regression method and then their effects were evaluated (according backward method). All analysis was performed by SPSS statistical software version 18.

The mean age of women in control group was 38.72±9.53 years old and in motivational interviewing group was 37.20±8.08. The two groups in terms of demographic variables of age, education level, marital status and employment status had an insignificant difference (P>0.05; Table1). After motivational interviewing, scores of all PMT theoretical constructs in motivational interviewing group in comparison with control group increased significantly after two and six months after intervention (P<0.001) that the increase in perceived susceptibility was %35, perceived intensity %36, self-efficacy %24, perceived response efficacy %36, intention %39 and attitude %22. However, weight Anthropometric indexes and BMI were decreased in two and six months after, it was not statistically significant (P>0.05; Table2). Time trend had a significant effect on constructs of protection motivation theory and increased all constructs’ scores and caused the reduction of weight Anthropometric index and BMI in both groups which were not significance. Women’s intention of doing physical activity anticipated significantly two months after the intervention, the three constructs of perceived severity (β=0.22; P=0.014), perceived response efficacy (β=1.39; P=0.001) and perceived self- efficacy (β=0.73; P=0.043) and six months after the intervention, the two constructs of perceived severity (β=0.20; P=0.020) and attitude on doing physical activity (β=0.72; P=0.001).

The findings of current study indicate the long-term effect of motivational interviewing as a suitable technique to change intention behavior and its effectiveness has been proven in many studies [3, 17, 21-23]…. [22, 24-29].

It is recommended to increase follow-up duration till the effect of motivational interviewing on anthropometric index be confirmed.

Only women were studied. Therefore, the result of current study cannot be generalized.

Motivational interviewing increases all constructs’ scores of protection motivation theory and intention of doing physical activity in fat women or overweight subsequently.

We appreciate all women participated in the study, Vice-chancellor for Research & Technology of Golestan University of Medical Sciences due to financial support and the university ethics committee confirmation and Health Management and social development Research Center due to scientific support from plan.

Non-declared

The research has been approved by ethics committee of Golestan University of Medical Sciences (No. 10016393050560) and has been registered in Iran clinical trials center, registration code IRCT2015061517736N5.

The research has been supported financially by Vice-chancellor of Research & Technology of Golestan University of Medical Sciences.

TABLES and CHARTS

Show attach file


CITIATION LINKS

[1]Rerksuppaphol S, Rerksuppaphol L. Association of obesity with the prevalence of hypertension in school children from central thailand. J Res Health Sci. 2014;15(1):17-21.
[2]Lippa NC, Sanderson SC. Impact of information about obesity genomics on the stigmatization of overweight individuals: an experimental study. Obesity. 2012;20(12):2367-76.
[3]Mirkarimi K, Mostafavi F, Eshghinia S, Vakili MA, Ozouni-Davaji RB, Aryaie M. Effect of motivational interviewing on a weight loss program based on the protection motivation theory. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(6):e23492.
[4]Daniali SS, Azadbakht L, Mostafavi DF. The relationship between body image, self-efficacy and phisycal activity in female employees of Isfahan University of Medical Science and University of Isfahan, Iran. Health Sys Res. 2012;8(6):991-1001. [Persian]
[5]Bastos JP, Araújo CLP, Hallal PC. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity and associated factors in Brazilian adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(6):777-94.
[6]Sheikholeslam R, Mohamad A, Mohammad K, Vaseghi S. Non communicable disease risk factors in Iran. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004;13:S100. [Persian]
[7]Momenan A, Delshad M, Mirmiran P, Ghanbarian A, Safarkhani M, Azizi F. Physical inactivity and related factors in an adult Tehranian population (Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study). Iran J Endocrinol Metabol. 2012;13(5):493-503.
[8]Tucker JM, Tucker LA, LeCheminant J, Bailey B. Obesity increases risk of declining physical activity over time in women: A prospective cohort study. Obesity. 2013;21(12):E715-20.
[9]Berlin JA, Colditz GA. A meta-analysis of physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(4):612-28.
[10]Wadden TA, Foster GD. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Med Clin North Am. 2000;84(2):441-61.
[11]Haas WC, Moore JB, Kaplan M, Lazorick S. Outcomes from a medical weight loss program: primary care clinics versus weight loss clinics. Am J Med. 2012;125(6):e7-11.
[12]Martins RK, McNeil DW. Review of motivational interviewing in promoting health behaviors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(4):283-93.
[13]Navidian A, Abedi M, Baghban I, Fatehizadeh M, Poursharifi H. Effect of motivational interviewing on blood pressure of referents suffering from hypertension. Trauma Mon. 2010;15(2):115-21. [Persian]
[14]Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler CC, Aloia MS. Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change behavior. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;5(3):203.
[15]Westen D, Morrison K. A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: An empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies. J Consult Clin Pych. 2001;69(6):875-99.
[16]Dusek JA, Hibberd PL, Buczynski B, Chang B-H, Dusek KC, Johnston JM, et al. Stress management versus lifestyle modification on systolic hypertension and medication elimination: A randomized trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2008;14(2):129-38.
[17]Yoon E. Food defense management plan implementation intention: An application of protection motivation theory [Dissertation]. Manhattan: Kansas State University; 2007. p. 161.
[18]Redd BR. Using the protection motivation theory to examine the effects of obesity fear arousal on the physical activity of young adult female college students[Dissertation]. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University. 2012. p. 171.
[19]Lee SA, Wen W, Xu WH, Zheng W, Li H, Yang G, et al. Prevalence of obesity and correlations with lifestyle and dietary factors in Chinese men. Obesity. 2008;16(6):1440-7.
[20]Navidian A, Abedi M, Baghban I, Fatehizadeh M, Poursharifi H, Hashemi Dehkordi M. Effects of motivational interviewing on weight loss of individuals suffering. Iran J Nutr Sci Food Technol. 2010;5(2):45-52. [Persian]
[21]Mostafavi F, Mirkarimi SK, Berdi Ozouni-Davaji R, Vakili MA, Eshghinia S. Effect of motivational interviewing on weight loss. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2014;17(3):11-7. [Persian]
[22]Araújo-Soares V, McIntyre T, Sniehotta FF. Predicting changes in physical activity among adolescents: the role of self-efficacy, intention, action planning and coping planning. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(1):128-39.
[23]Zhang Y, Cooke R. Using a combined motivational and volitional intervention to promote exercise and healthy dietary behaviour among undergraduates. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;95(2):215-23.
[24]Park OH, Hoover L, Dodd T, Huffman L, Feng D. The use of the modified protection motivation theory to explore adult consumers’ functional foods consumption behavior. Graduate Student Research Conference in Hospitality and Tourism. Texas: Texas Tech University; 2011.
[25]Foley L, Prapavessis H, Maddison R, Burke S, McGowan E, Gillanders L. Predicting physical activity intention and behavior in school-age children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2008;20(3):342-56.
[26]Solimanina A, Niknami S, Hajizadeh I, Shojaeezadeh D, Tavousi M. Predictors of physical activity to prevent osteoporosis based on extended health belief model. Payesh. 2014;13(3):313-20. [Persian]
[27]Amireault S, Godin G, Vézina-Im L-A. Determinants of physical activity maintenance: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Health Psychol Rev. 2013;7(1):55-91.
[28]Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? a meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(2):249-68.
[29]Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S. Prediction and intervention in health‐related behavior: A meta‐analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30(1):106-43.