@2024 Afarand., IRAN
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2018;2(4):159-163
ISSN: 2251-8215 Sarem Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2018;2(4):159-163
Comparison of Serum Anti-Peroxiredoxin 3 and Anti-Peroxiredoxin 4 Auto Antibodies in the Patients with a History of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion and Healthy Women
ARTICLE INFO
Article Type
Original ResearchAuthors
Roumandeh N. (1)Saremi A.T. (2)
Pooladi A. (2)
Sanaye Naderi M. (3)
Younesi B. (3)
Arasteh J. (4)
Zare A. (*)
(*) “Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” , Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(1) Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC), Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(2) “Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” , Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(2) “Sarem Fertility & Infertility Research Center (SAFIR)” and “Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC)” , Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(3) Laboratory of Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran
(4) Biology Department, Basic Sciences Faculty, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
Article History
Received: April 13, 2017Accepted: September 20, 2017
ePublished: November 15, 2018
BRIEF TEXT
Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion (RSA) is one of the problems that results in the lack of maintenance of the fetus in mother and is characterized by three or more abortions before the 20th week of pregnancy [1].
... [2, 3]. Recent studies of repeated abortions with unspecified causes illustrate the imbalance in regulatory mechanisms and suggest significant changes in immune cell pattern in these patients compared to healthy women [4]. The study of Lee et al. on RSA patients has shown increase in pro-inflammatory response and auxiliary T cells (Th17) and decrease in regulatory responses of T cells [5]. In addition, several studies indicate the lack of pattern of cell and cytokine pattern of natural killer cells (NK), auxiliary T-1 (Th1) and T-2 (Th2) cells in RSA patients compared to healthy women with successful pregnancy history [4 , 6]. Therefore, many research and therapeutic centers, with the justification that alloimmunity may cause the disorder in balance and regulation of the immune system of RSA patients and, as a result, cause abortion in these patients, carry out immunological treatment such as lymphocyte therapy or IVG immunoglobulin injection (IVIG) to prevent the excretion of embryos by induction of immunological toleration [7-10]. ... [11].The findings show that 20% of RSA cases are due to autoimmune factors [12]. ... [13, 14]. The success of the pregnancy process is dependent on implantation and formation of placenta, and during the first trimester of pregnancy, the oxygen pressure in the placenta increases to provide the oxygen needed for the fetus, but this increase in pressure leads to an increase in the production of active oxygen intermediates (ROS), and place the placenta in the oxidative stress condition [15]. Numerous pairwise proteins, as the natural antioxidant, retain the placenta of destructive oxidative stress effects, including peroxiredoxin 3 (Prx3 or PRDX3) and peroxiredoxin 4 (Prx4 or PRDX4). These proteins are expressed by cytotrophoblast cells and play an important role in implantation and maintenance of the placenta in oxidative stress conditions [16]. In recent years, researchers have focused on placenta as a key member in the management of pregnancy and the maintenance of the fetus, and have studied the presence of antibodies against two placenta proteins, peroxiredoxin-3 and peroxiredoxin-4, and have introduced these two antibodies as autoimmune factors involved in RSA; However, these studies have been qualitative and the quantity and exact amount of these two antibodies in RSA patients and normal women have not been evaluated so far [17].
This is a case-control study.
This study was carried out on two groups of patients referred to Sarem Hospital in Tehran, one with at least 3 recurrent spontaneous abortions and another with no history of abortion and having at least two living children.
The case group included 100 patients with a history of at least 3 recurrent spontaneous abortions. The status of these patients was normal, in terms of karyotype, antiphospholipid antibodies, anticardillipin, ANA, antithyroid antibodies, microbial infections (TORCH, HBV, HIV, EBV and CMV), anatomical abnormalities, and normal hormone disorders. The control group consisted of 32 healthy women without a history of abortion and had at least two alive children.
Patients' consent was obtained before the sampling and the informed consent form approved by the morality committee of Sarem Hospital was completed by each of the volunteer patients. Then, 2 cc blood samples were taken from the participants and the serum sample was kept at -20 C of the freezer until complete collection of the samples. For quantitative measurement of anti-peroxiredoxin -3 and anti-peroxiredoxin -4 antibodies, their ELIZA kit was designed by coating the recombinant proteins of proxirdoxin-3 and proxirdoxin-4 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in two distinct ELIZA plates (MaxiSorp; Nunc Co., Denmark), and the amount of autoantibodies against these two placenta antigens were evaluated. As standard, certain amounts of commercial monoclonal antibodies against these two proteins (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were used and, quantitatively, the amount of these autoantibodies was determined. Data was analyzed by SPSS software. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normal distribution of data. Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine the significant difference between the groups. The results were reported as median and interquartile range.
The mean age of the control and case groups was 34.78 ± 1.13 and 31.61 ± 0.48 years, respectively. The anti-peroxiredoxin-3 autoantibody level in the case group was 62.98 (33.72-204.46) pg / ml and in the control group, it was 59.25 (45.02-97.77) pg / ml. The anti-peroxiredoxin-3 autoantibody level in these two groups did not show any significant difference (p = 0.51; Fig. 1). In contrast, the anti-peroxiredoxin-4 autoantibody level was 34.91(17.87-98.45) pg /ml in the case group and it was 8.32 (17.90-33.52) pg / ml (17.77 ± 4.59) in the control group, that there was a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.0004; Figure 1).The serum level of anti-oxidoxin-3 autoantibodies was 0.538, which was not significantly different from the reference line (which is equal to 0.50). The serum of antiperoxiredoxin-4 autoantibody level was 0.67, which had a relative separation value (Fig. 2).The surface area under the curve (AUC) is the result of the sensitivity and test characteristic. The borderline number of 124.8 was obtained from the analysis of the ROC curve of the anti-peroxiredoxin-4 serum autoantibody level above which was considered positive and the below of it was considered as negative. Based on the obtained borderline number, the odds ratio or OR calculated for PRDX4 was 12.66 (Figure 3).
... [18]. The most well-known autoantibodies involved in pregnancy and abortion problems are antiphospholipid antibodies [19]. ... [20]. Previous findings have reported the presence of multiple autoimmune antibodies in recurrent abortions [21], although the question that what antibodies can clearly predict pregnancy failure is still remained. The aPL antibody that is measurable in the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is considered as an autoimmune antibody associated with recurrent abortion, and according to recent reports and recent studies, about 10% of recurrent abortions occur due to APS, which accounts for a significant proportion. APS can be primary or secondary, be associated with lupus, and is associated with recurrent abortions [18]. Anti-oxidant V antibodies, antiprothrombin antibodies, anti-nuclease, anti-lamina, anti-gliadina, and anti-transglutaminase antibodies are other autoimmune antibodies that can have a deleterious effect on the placenta or embryo, and lead to abortion [2, 18]. For the first time in 2005, the presence of autoantibody against Prx1 was reported in autoimmune patients [22]. There is no other study on the role of peroxiredoxin anti-protein autoantibodies and their association with abortion. Regarding the importance of Prx3 and Prx4 proteins in preserving the placenta and the success of pregnancy, in this study, the serum of recurrent abortion patients was evaluated for the detection of anti-autoantibody against these two proteins, and the findings showed that there was no significant difference in the anti-peroxiredoxin-3 levels in RSA women compared with healthy women. However, the level of anti-peroxiredoxin-4 antibodies in RSA women is significantly higher than those of women in the control group. Therefore, anti-peroxiredoxin-4 antibodies are produced in RSA women, which can justify the association between autoimmunity and RSA, and the presence of these autoantibodies in the serum of these patients shows a new autoimmune theory. The important point in this study was that in the analysis of the ROC curve, the under curve for the Prx4 region was acceptable (close to 0.7), indicating a relatively good suitability and practicality of the test, and more importantly, the ratio of the obtained OR was high and It was noteworthy, which, of course, would require a further study with a larger sample size, since OR = 12.66, and if confirmed with a high sample size, it is clinically important. This odd ratio expresses that if people with Prx4 test are positive, the incidence of recurrent spontaneous abortion is 12 times more likely than those with negative tests.
Further study of these autoantibodies and its evaluation during pregnancy in RSA patients, as a supplementary study, can be used as an immunologic risk factor for embryo in these patients and its measurement can be used as a diagnostic test.
The serum levels of placenta anti-peroxiredoxin-3 autoantibody in patients with recurrent abortions and healthy women are not different, while serum levels of anti-peroxiredoxin-4 autoantibodies in patients with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions are higher than healthy women.
Patient satisfaction was obtained for participation in this study and the informed consent form approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Sarem Hospital was completed by each of the volunteer patients.
TABLES and CHARTS
Show attach fileCITIATION LINKS
[1]Pandey MK, Rani R, Agrawal S. An update in recurrent spontaneous abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(2):95-108.
[2]Garrido Gimenez C, Alijotas Reig J. Recurrent miscarriage: Causes, evaluation and management. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1073):151-62.
[3]Toth B, Jeschke U, Rogenhofer N, Scholz C, Wurfel W, Thaler CJ, et al. Recurrent miscarriage: Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. J Reprod Immunol. 2010;85(1):25-32.
[4]Saito S, Nakashima A, Shima T, Ito M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63(6):601-10.
[5]Lee SK, Kim JY, Hur SE, Kim CJ, Na BJ, Lee M, et al. An imbalance in interleukin-17-producing T and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(11):2964-71.
[6]Sharma S. Natural killer cells and regulatory T cells in early pregnancy loss. Int J Dev Biol. 2014;58(2-4):219-29.
[7]Chaichian S, Shoaee S, Saremi A, Pedar S, Firouzi F. Factors influencing success rate of leukocyte immunization and anti-paternal antibodies in spontaneous recurrent miscarriage. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007;57(3):169-76.
[8]Krechetova LV, Nikolaeva MA, Van'ko LV, Ziganshina MM, Golubeva EL, Stepanova EO, et al. Optimal detection of serum antipaternal antileukocytic antibodies after injection of allogenic lymphocytes in women with habitual abortions. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2012;153(5):726-9.
[9]Liang P, Mo M, Li GG, Yin B, Cai J, Wu T, et al. Comprehensive analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes in 76 women with recurrent miscarriage before and after lymphocyte immunotherapy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;68(2):164-74.
[10]Wilczynski JR, Radwan P, Tchorzewski H, Banasik M. Immunotherapy of patients with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage and idiopathic infertility: Does the immunization-dependent Th2 cytokine overbalance really matter?. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2012;60(2):151-60.
[11]Beaman KD, Ntrivalas E, Mallers TM, Jaiswal MK, Kwak Kim J, Gilman Sachs A. Immune etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss and its diagnosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(4):319-25.
[12]Ford HB, Schust DJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss: Etiology, diagnosis and therapy. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2(2):76-83.
[13]Perricone C, De Carolis C, Perricone R. Pregnancy and autoimmunity: A common problem. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(1):47-60.
[14]Christiansen OB. Reproductive immunology. Mol Immunol. 2013;55(1):8-15.
[15]Gupta S, Agarwal A, Banerjee J, Alvarez JG. The role of oxidative stress in spontaneous abortion and recurrent pregnancy loss: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(5):335-47.
[16]Nelson KJ, Knutson ST, Soito L, Klomsiri C, Poole LB, Fetrow JS. Analysis of the peroxiredoxin family: Using active-site structure and sequence information for global classification and residue analysis. Proteins. 2011;79(3):947-64.
[17]Gharesi Fard B, Jafarzadeh L, Ghaderi shabankareh F, Zolghadri J, Kamali Sarvestani E. Presence of autoantibody against two placental proteins, peroxiredoxin 3 and peroxiredoxin 4, in sera of recurrent pregnancy loss patients. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;69(3):248-55.
[18]Cervera R, Balasch J. Autoimmunity and recurrent pregnancy losses. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010;39(3):148-52.
[19]Kwak Kim J, Agcaoili MS, Aleta L, Liao A, Ota K, Dambaeva S, et al. Management of women with recurrent pregnancy losses and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;69(6):596-607.
[20]Kuon RJ, Strowitzki T, Sohn C, Daniel V, Toth B. Immune profiling in patients with recurrent miscarriage. J Reprod Immunol. 2015;108:136-41.
[21]Shoenfeld Y, Carp HJ, Molina V, Blank M, Cervera R, Balasch J, et al. Autoantibodies and prediction of reproductive failure. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2006;56(5-6):337-44.
[22]Karasawa R, Ozaki S, Nishioka K, Kato T. Autoantibodies to peroxiredoxin I and IV in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Microbiol Immunol. 2005;49(1):57-65.
[2]Garrido Gimenez C, Alijotas Reig J. Recurrent miscarriage: Causes, evaluation and management. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1073):151-62.
[3]Toth B, Jeschke U, Rogenhofer N, Scholz C, Wurfel W, Thaler CJ, et al. Recurrent miscarriage: Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. J Reprod Immunol. 2010;85(1):25-32.
[4]Saito S, Nakashima A, Shima T, Ito M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63(6):601-10.
[5]Lee SK, Kim JY, Hur SE, Kim CJ, Na BJ, Lee M, et al. An imbalance in interleukin-17-producing T and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(11):2964-71.
[6]Sharma S. Natural killer cells and regulatory T cells in early pregnancy loss. Int J Dev Biol. 2014;58(2-4):219-29.
[7]Chaichian S, Shoaee S, Saremi A, Pedar S, Firouzi F. Factors influencing success rate of leukocyte immunization and anti-paternal antibodies in spontaneous recurrent miscarriage. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007;57(3):169-76.
[8]Krechetova LV, Nikolaeva MA, Van'ko LV, Ziganshina MM, Golubeva EL, Stepanova EO, et al. Optimal detection of serum antipaternal antileukocytic antibodies after injection of allogenic lymphocytes in women with habitual abortions. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2012;153(5):726-9.
[9]Liang P, Mo M, Li GG, Yin B, Cai J, Wu T, et al. Comprehensive analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes in 76 women with recurrent miscarriage before and after lymphocyte immunotherapy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;68(2):164-74.
[10]Wilczynski JR, Radwan P, Tchorzewski H, Banasik M. Immunotherapy of patients with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage and idiopathic infertility: Does the immunization-dependent Th2 cytokine overbalance really matter?. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2012;60(2):151-60.
[11]Beaman KD, Ntrivalas E, Mallers TM, Jaiswal MK, Kwak Kim J, Gilman Sachs A. Immune etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss and its diagnosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(4):319-25.
[12]Ford HB, Schust DJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss: Etiology, diagnosis and therapy. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2(2):76-83.
[13]Perricone C, De Carolis C, Perricone R. Pregnancy and autoimmunity: A common problem. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(1):47-60.
[14]Christiansen OB. Reproductive immunology. Mol Immunol. 2013;55(1):8-15.
[15]Gupta S, Agarwal A, Banerjee J, Alvarez JG. The role of oxidative stress in spontaneous abortion and recurrent pregnancy loss: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(5):335-47.
[16]Nelson KJ, Knutson ST, Soito L, Klomsiri C, Poole LB, Fetrow JS. Analysis of the peroxiredoxin family: Using active-site structure and sequence information for global classification and residue analysis. Proteins. 2011;79(3):947-64.
[17]Gharesi Fard B, Jafarzadeh L, Ghaderi shabankareh F, Zolghadri J, Kamali Sarvestani E. Presence of autoantibody against two placental proteins, peroxiredoxin 3 and peroxiredoxin 4, in sera of recurrent pregnancy loss patients. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;69(3):248-55.
[18]Cervera R, Balasch J. Autoimmunity and recurrent pregnancy losses. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010;39(3):148-52.
[19]Kwak Kim J, Agcaoili MS, Aleta L, Liao A, Ota K, Dambaeva S, et al. Management of women with recurrent pregnancy losses and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;69(6):596-607.
[20]Kuon RJ, Strowitzki T, Sohn C, Daniel V, Toth B. Immune profiling in patients with recurrent miscarriage. J Reprod Immunol. 2015;108:136-41.
[21]Shoenfeld Y, Carp HJ, Molina V, Blank M, Cervera R, Balasch J, et al. Autoantibodies and prediction of reproductive failure. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2006;56(5-6):337-44.
[22]Karasawa R, Ozaki S, Nishioka K, Kato T. Autoantibodies to peroxiredoxin I and IV in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Microbiol Immunol. 2005;49(1):57-65.